A detailed comparison of different accounting standards Essay

The construct of comparison is one of the implicit in constructs brought Forth under IFRS. Single twelvemonth fiscal statements are non permitted ( the merely exclusion being for first twelvemonth companies ) yet they are allowed under GAAP.


We will write a custom essay sample on
A detailed comparison of different accounting standards Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Under IFRS, subordinates must follow all the accounting policies of the parent company in consolidation. Before the acceptance of the parent ‘s accounting policies, it must be determined whether or non a specific entity is considered a related party required to consolidate. Such a finding of a consolidation under GAAP is based off of the Variable Interest Entity ( VIE ) theoretical account under FIN 46. Under FIN 46, consolidation determinations are based on finding who has the right to incur the income and losingss of a related entity. Determinations are made calling the primary donee of the related entity and measuring the relationship. IFRS focuses on the impression of control in finding whether a parent-subsidiary relationship exists. Control is defined as the ability to govern over the operating assets of an entity in order to obtain the benefits.


Compensation of cardinal direction is a needed revelation under IFRS, where as under GAAP it is non.

Accrued Expenses

IFRS requires a elaborate revelation of the nature of each accrued disbursal and the nature of the alterations to those accrued disbursals. Under GAAP, accrued disbursals are non required to be separately disclosed in the fiscal statements – increasing the transparence of fiscal statements.


The last-in-first-out ( LIFO ) bing methodological analysis for stock list is prohibited under IFRS. The alteration to IFRS would coerce a company to follow the first-in-first-out ( FIFO ) methodological analysis or leaden mean cost method. The acceptance of a new costing method could significantly impact the operating consequences of an entity.

Damage of Long-lived Assetss

There are differences in the testing for the damage of durable assets held for usage. These differences could potentially take to earlier impairment acknowledgment under IFRS. GAAP uses the undiscounted cash-flow method in finding the recoverability of an plus, where as IFRS requires the usage of an entity-specific discounted hard currency flow or just value measuring. By holding different testing demands the finding of whether an plus is impaired or non could differ from one set of criterions to the following ( impacting the antecedently recognized loss ) .

Transporting Value of Assetss

Under GAAP, assets are by and large carried at historical cost ( with a few exclusions for certain fiscal instruments ) , whereas under IFRS historical cost is the primary footing of accounting, nevertheless the ability to appreciate assets ( to fair market value ) is allowed. By appreciating assets, there may be important differences in the transporting value of these assets versus GAAP.


IFRS requires that separate, important constituents of an point of belongings, works and equipment be recorded and depreciated individually. If an plus has multiple facets each with different lives, the plus must be depreciated in sections, instead than as a whole. IFRS yearly evaluates the residuary value of an plus at the balance sheet day of the month.


Under GAAP, there is specific counsel in doing the finding as to whether a rental is considered runing or capital. The four specific standards environment:

Ownership reassigning to the leaseholder,

a deal purchase option,

lease term in relation to the economic utile life – 75 % , and

the present value of minimal rental payments in relation to fair value of the leased plus – 90 % .

IFRS focuses on the overall substance of the dealing and substantialness all of the hazards or wagess of ownership are transferred to the leaseholder. IFRS measures all of the standards GAAP uses, yet it does non put a specific threshold on the sum. This is a authoritative illustration of how GAAP follows a rigorous set of regulations while IFRS necessitates judgment-based determinations.

Income Taxes

There are several differences between IFRS and GAAP associating to accounting for and coverage of income revenue enhancements:

The revenue enhancement rate used for mensurating deferred revenue enhancements under GAAP is the enacted revenue enhancement rate in topographic point when the timing difference is expected to change by reversal, whereas under IFRS, the well enacted revenue enhancement rate is used.

Under GAAP, the categorization of the deferred revenue enhancement plus or liability is either short-run or long-run depending on the underlying relationship of the timing difference. Under IFRS, deferred revenue enhancement assets and liabilities are ever recorded as long-run.

Under GAAP ( for non-public companies ) , a rapprochement of the expected revenue enhancement disbursal to existent is non required in item and merely a revelation of the nature of the accommodating points is required. IFRS requires the complete rapprochement, including the nature and sums.

Construction Contracts

Under GAAP, while the per centum of completion method is preferred, the completed contract method is acceptable in certain state of affairss. GAAP does let for the completed contract method in certain state of affairss where a dependable estimation can non be made and there is non an expected loss to be incurred on the undertaking. IFRS specifically prohibits the usage of the completed contract method, and alternatively recommends the usage of the cost recovery method when per centum complete can non be faithfully estimated.

Uniting and sectioning contracts is allowed, but non required under GAAP, nevertheless when certain standards are met under IFRS, it is a demand. The impact can well alter a company ‘s gross contingent upon the fortunes within each contract ( for illustration, the bulk of costs incurred are on the section of a undertaking transporting lower borders than the remainder of the undertaking. In this instance under IFRS, less income would be recognized if the occupation was broken out into sections ) .


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out