Accounting Fraud Of Enron Corporation Accounting Essay

One of the grounds for the current economic crisis was the use of accounting sheets and traveling about slackly declared criterions. This allowed a batch of worsening companies continue without investors – the market – recognizing how bad these companies were making. One of the early illustrations of accounting fraud is Enron Corporation. Enron was demoing 1000000s of dollars of net income, but in world it was losing.

We shall see on the following stuff how accounting criterions have emerged and why. The concluding behind the demand of accounting criterions will be clearly identified. It is of import to acknowledge what accounting is and why it is of import to a concern in order to acquire a clearer image of the demand of a proper base by which its rules and criterions are dependent on.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Accounting Fraud Of Enron Corporation Accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Accounting is the agencies by which information about an endeavor is communicated, therefore it is sometimes called the linguistic communication of concern. Many different users have need for accounting information in order to do of import determinations. These users include investors, creditors, direction, governmental bureaus, labour brotherhoods, and other.

Accounting can be used at two degrees ; for single and for the endeavor. Persons can utilize accounting information to assist command the degree of outgo, to help in be aftering future degrees of outgo, to assist raise extra finance and to make up one’s mind the best manner to pass their money.

At the degree of endeavor, it is used to command the activities of the organisation, to be after future activities, to help in raising finance, to describe upon the activities and success of endeavor to interested parties.

Accounting Standards

Earlier in history, text books show several illustrations of how accounting was accused of being inappropriate to cover with fiscal coverage. It seems that there were non adequate criterions that would let proper rating of institutes. In the late sixtiess, a company was bought for several 1000000s, nevertheless in the undermentioned twelvemonth it showed a loss of 9.5million lbs compared to the expected ten million!

The direct consequence was an increasing tendency of losing assurance towards the finance profession. Accounting was accused to function best those who are involved in the accounting institutes.

As a consequence several accounting organic structures emerged to seek and hold on several general acceptable criterions that would minimise the ability of institutes to fraud utilizing accounting. The Financial Reporting Council ( FRC ) was responsible of overlooking the whole plan of originating solid accounting criterions. The Accounting Standard Board ( ASB ) was the organic structure responsible in making the needed criterions. The Financial Reporting Review Panel ( FRRP ) was responsible about implementing the application of the criterions. Any institute non following with the criterions might be asked to stand upon the panel for probe.

Although the accounting criterions are based on “ true and just ” coverage, this is a bit equivocal. As being true and just merely requires the comptroller to follow the accounting rules that best suits his demand, which may non give an accurate image of the institute. “ Creative Accounting ” is a nomenclature used to depict those accounting patterns that look for cringles in the accounting criterions and utilize them to show whatever they want to show no affair how far or shut it is from the world.

Accounting Principles

The development of a “ conceptual model ” did take several professional organic structures several old ages of devoted work to develop. “ A conceptual model is a statement of by and large accepted theoretical rules that form the frame of mention for a peculiar field of question ” ( Ciancanelli et al, 2009 ) .

This frame of mention, or rules, attempts to reply several inquiries such as what needs to be accounted for, how should they be measured, and how should they be communicated to users. Equally simple as these inquiries may look, they really were a topic of a batch of treatment and dissension. Puting criterions without establishing these criterions on solid rules was like seeking to construct a house without a construction.

One illustration of the jobs that incurred in history when a simple inquiry such as: what events should be accounted for, was when companies during the 1980s were integrating “ trade name names ” and valuing them in the balance sheet. This resulted in increasing the plus value of companies without them accruing existent plus!

In December 1999 the ASB published a “ Statement of Principles ” ( Ciancanelli et al, 2009 ) . This statement of rules comprised of eight chapters each depicting clearly a set of rules by which accounted criterions can be based on. A good illustration is the 4th chapter: elements of fiscal statement. Assetss, for illustration, were defined as “ are rights or other entree to future economic benefits controlled by an entity as a consequence of past minutess or events ‘ , ( Statement of Principles for Financial Accounting, p.51 ) .

These set of rules allowed a more accurate rating and description of accounting criterions. It was fundamentally the frame work for the comptrollers to really hold on a set of criterions that would reflect a better image of the fiscal place of different establishments.


Accounting statements are one of the most of import tools that investors rely on to measure the place of a company it might be interested in pumping 1000000s of dollars to put in. They are besides really of import for directors to recognize the fiscal place of their company. They are of import to employees who might be straight affected by a bad fiscal place of the company they work for.

Accounting statements must hence be dependable ; dependable in the sense of being a proper contemplation of what the company ‘s fiscal place is. Historically we saw how loose criterions allowed for large corporations to demo a false fiscal place for old ages without being noticed. The consequence was a catastrophe on all stakeholders every bit good as the economic system.

For accounting statements to be dependable they need to be based on solid criterions. And for criterions to be proper they need to be based on clearly stated rules. These rules allowed for a more incorporate understanding on the criterions and therefore an acceptable model for all accounting organic structures to trust on. This, as a consequence, led to more public assurance to accounting statements which was on the brink at a certain point of clip.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out