Analysing The Macro Brewing Industrial Environment Commerce Essay

The macro-environment of the UK brewing industry are the major external and unmanageable factors that influence its operating organisations determination devising, every bit good as its public presentation and schemes. To place and measure its cardinal factors, utilizing the PESTLE model will supply a comprehensive list of influences and cardinal drivers in six chief classs, which are: political, economic, societal, technological, legal, and environmental. This method allows concerns to see and research how their external environment might alter so that they are prepared if things should alter.

PESTLE analysis of the UK Brewing Industry

Political

We will write a custom essay sample on
Analysing The Macro Brewing Industrial Environment Commerce Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

The authorities plays a cardinal function in how the brewing industry operates. The turning bad promotion refering the so called ‘binge drink civilization ‘ in the UK, has forced the authorities to take action against societal behavior. Current UK authorities proposals are seeking to undertake intoxicant abuse, by implementing extra ordinance and farther punitory revenue enhancements. This has resulted in an increased cost load on both the sector and its clients ( Beer and Pub Association 2008 ) . In the 2008 budget the responsibility of beer was increased to 9 % , and through a revenue enhancement escalator the exchequer has mapped out a two per cent above rising prices addition over the following four old ages.

The increasing handiness of low cost intoxicant in the UK has been closely examined by the authorities and local governments. Scotland is close to implementing a minimal monetary value on intoxicant, which is merely likely to impact the off-trade, while local governments in Manchester are look intoing the possibility of presenting a similar strategy ( Keynote 2011[ two ]) . These policies could assist local beer makers to vie with larger supermarkets who are able to sell beer at lower monetary values.

A recent canvass shows that the populace are against the authoritiess ‘ current policy docket on undertaking intoxicant abuse through increased revenue enhancements. 61 % of the populace said they would non be willing to pay more revenue enhancement on intoxicant to forestall others from imbibing. 82 % said that higher revenue enhancements below the belt penalise reasonable drinkers. While 86 % say increased revenue enhancements will non significantly cut down orgy imbibing. Taking this into history this would impact the brewing industry because if these revenue enhancements were farther implemented the buying of beer will drop. ( Beer and Pub Association 2008 )

Inflation is presently estimated at 4 % , due to the addition in value-added-tax ( VAT ) , which was introduced in January 2011. Harmonizing to keynote ( 2011 ) this, coupled with “ the likeliness of farther revenue enhancements on intoxicant to be announced in 2011 will intend that beer monetary values may witness important additions over the following twosome of old ages ” .

Economic

It can be argued that economic factors are possibly the most of import to the brewing industry. In the current economic clime, it has become progressively difficult for the beer and saloon sectors to see growing and strive. The downswing is impacting both concerns and families throughout the UK. The on-going recognition crunch and go oning rising prices additions is adding more and more force per unit area on persons, households and concerns. Persons by and large have less disposable income and this in bend has meant that overall gross revenues of intoxicant in the UK have declined, in 2008. Expensive planetary trade goods and lifting energy monetary values are besides holding a terrible consequence, peculiarly in relation to input cost ( Beer and Pub Association 2008 ) .

Pubs rise about twice every bit much revenue enhancement with every pint sold compared to a pint sold in a supermarket. Beer gross revenues in saloon and nines create 18 occupations for every 3 occupations created by gross revenues in supermarkets and package stores. However, there were still a sum of 44,000 occupations lost between 2000 and 2005. It is predicted a farther 43,000 occupations will be lost over the following 5 old ages ; this has a major consequence on the local and rural economic system because 85 % of the merchandises and stuffs used in brewing are produced in the UK ( Beer and Pub Association 2008 ) .

Social

There is increasing concern about the development of a ‘binge civilization ‘ in the UK. In recent clip ‘s society as a whole has found it acceptable for persons to imbibe big measure of intoxicant on a day-to-day footing. More and more persons are on a regular basis traveling out to societal events with the purpose of devouring as much intoxicant as possible acquiring rummy and misbehaving ( Beer and Pub Association 2008 ) . This has highlighted the demand for dramatic alterations to the manner intoxicant is advertised and distributed to the populace.

Scots and Newcastle Plc states that cut monetary value offers of intoxicant in supermarkets are “ out of sync with the responsible imbibing message ” ( Daily Mail 2006[ three ]) . The ability for elephantine supermarkets to sell below-cost intoxicant has a damaging consequence on saloons because they are basically unable to vie on monetary value. The smoke prohibition besides means that there is more likely to an addition imbibing in the place ( Daily Mail 2006[ four ]) and off from saloons and bars.

Large ingestions of intoxicant has caused many societal jobs in Britain and it is argued by Keynote ( 2011 ) that “ A big figure of people blame intoxicant, in some manner, for street force, matrimonial jobs, deficiency of productiveness at work and hapless public presentation at school. ” This has resulted in 78 % of the UK population being in favor of presenting “ cigarette-style packaging warnings for pregnant ladies and drivers ” ( Keynote 2011 ) . These extra instructions could be damaging to the brewing industry if implemented by the authorities because it deters clients from purchasing their merchandises.

Technological

New advanced engineering available this has significantly changed the procedures within the industry. With developments in engineering and equipment such as infrigidation and motorised conveyance allowed for the consolidation of the brewing industries around the universe ( Reader 2010 ) [ ehowfoods ] . It has besides allowed brewing companies to experiment with utilizing different spirits and textures to assist them appeal to new clients for illustration the new spirits of cyder that are widely available across the UK.

Progresss in engineering have besides meant that breweries can go more efficient, cut downing production costs. For illustration Adnams was able to salvage 30 % off their energy costs by presenting new energy reclamation engineering ( Adnams 2010 ) . This resulted in increased net income borders.

Breweries were traditionally attached to public houses and supplied beer to their local country nevertheless betterments in distribution channels have meant that they can now provide their merchandises globally. This has caused rapid enlargement of brewing companies around the universe. The usage of Global Positioning systems ( GPS ) , Electronic financess transfer ( EFT ) and portable informations aggregation terminuss at nowadays is used by the bulk of beer distributers to help the distribution procedure ( NWBA 2006 ) .

Legal

UK statute law presently states that the legal bound of intoxicant ingestion before drive is 80 milligram of intoxicant per hundred milliliters of blood ( Redchair, 2010 ) . This will impact the brewing industry because gross revenues in saloon, nines and other locales that sell intoxicant may endure from a decrease of gross revenues, since clients are now limited to no more than two pints of beer this means clients may non be able to devour as much beer if they are driving. The programs to cut down it to 50 milligrams would do waiter lessenings in gross revenues which could so take to orders from beer makers worsening because that would be tantamount to one drink to make that bound.

The smoke prohibition has affected saloons across the UK, this prohibition has caused them to lose a big sum of trade ( Telegraph, 2008 ) . The smoke prohibition can hold a direct consequence on beer gross revenues because 60 % of beer gross revenues are sold in saloon, nines and bars ( Wake up for Westminster instance survey ) . 365 licensees were surveyed by The Scottish Trade Association and the consequences revealed that since the smoke prohibition was introduced in March 2006 intoxicant gross revenues have fallen by more than 10 % . Further studies carried out by the Trade Association showed that 46 % of pubs visits by habitues had dropped since the prohibition was put into consequence and 51 % of those habitues were passing less money than usual ( BBC News, 2006 ) .

Environmental

The brewing sector has reduced CO2 emanations by twice the sum since the 90s and is on path to do its mark in the following few old ages. Emissions per hectoliter of beer produced have lowered by 49 % since 1990 with the entire emanations falling by 52 % , shown in the graph below ( The British Brewing Industry, 1976-2006 ) .

Figure 1: United kingdom, Industry and Brewing Sector Emissions

( Beginning: The British Brewing Industry, 1976-2006 ) .

UK brewing companies approximately spend about ?4 million per annum to run into the footings with current packaging waste duties and purpose to run into the recovery and recycle marks. An issue for vertically incorporate beer makers is that costs are predicted to drastically lift due to increased clip taken to cipher obligated tunnages. Even though casks and kegs are included in the Packaging Waste Regulations the association sustain that they are indispensable parts of a wider beer dispense system, and at the terminal of their usage period the metal will be recycled into new kegs which means they ne’er enter the UK waste system ( The British Brewing Industry, 1976-2006[ V ]) .

The Changing Nature of the Competitive Environment

The brewery industry is extremely competitory and extremely concentrated concern. There are a figure of forces at work here all of which can supply an penetration into how appealing the brewery industry is, in footings of whether it is the type of industry to come in or go forth ; if there is room to exercise any type of influence and how the rivals within this industry impact its public presentation ( Johnson, 2009 ) . To assist supply an analysis of the brewery industry and develop a concern scheme, utilizing Michael E. Porters Five Forces Model will find its competitory strength or attraction of a market.

Porter ‘s Five Forces Analysis for the UK Brewery Industry

POTENTIAL ENTRANTS ( MEDIUM RISK )

Barriers to entry

Scale & A ; Experience

Entree to supply/distribution channels

Legislation/ Government action

Differential ( Flavoured to avoid competition

Industry is concentrated/low growing

BREWERS ( HIGH )

Increased competition

Merchandises are standardised

Competing on price/packaging

BUYERS ( HIGH )

Concentrated purchasers

( 20 % supermarkets: supermarkets can backward incorporate if they can do their ain beer/ viing once more beer makers )

Low shift costs

Buyer competition menaces

Suppliers ( HIGH RISK )

Competition menaces

High shift costs

Concentrated provider ( high )

SUSTITUES ( VERY HIGH RISK )

Alco-pops

Wine

Price/Performance ratio

Excess Industry effects

The menace of the entry of new rivals:

Gross saless In the brewing industry have decreased by 5.6 % since 2006 which has resulted in its overall market worth being estimated at over ?17 billion. A prospective company planning to come ining the brewery industry needs to take into history that it is a really expensive venture, as the monetary value of general trade goods and natural stuffs are continuously increasing and can be regarded as a capital intensive market as it can take a figure of old ages to come in due to licencing demands and initial production clip that beer takes.

A strong cognition base is required in apprehension of the complexnesss of the industry, holding some sort of experience is indispensable. Most of the taking industries have been established for a long clip such as the brewery Anheuser-Busch InBev which was founded in 1316 ; and is presently the taking manufacturer of larger in the UK.

Legislation is besides another barrier to entry, as revenue enhancement on beer becomes increasing expensive. However facts shows there are now more than 700 breweries in Britain, the largest figure since the Second World War and more per caput of the population than anyplace else in the universe.

The drift behind the recent rise in beer makers was the debut in 2002 by Gordon Brown of the ‘small breweries ‘ alleviation ‘ strategy, besides known as Progressive Beer Duty ( PBD ) . Breweries that produce fewer than 60,000 hectoliters of beer a twelvemonth, about ten million pints, measure up for a price reduction on the sum of responsibility they pay. Those bring forthing fewer than 5,000hl ( 880,000 pints ) qualify for the maximal 50 per cent price reduction[ six ].

Enhancing your marketing/brand image, using patents, and making confederations with associated merchandises can minimise the menace of new entrants.

The strength of competitory competition:

There seems to be an addition in competition in the brewery industry as houses combating to accomplish market leader position. Anheuser-Busch InBev Uk, Heineken Uk, Molson Coors are the three top trade names in the brewery industry.

Table 4.1: Market Share of the UK Beer and Brewery Industry byA CompanyA byA ValueA ( % ) , A 2010

Company

Market Share ( % )

Anheuser-Busch InBev UK

29.0

Heineken UK

27.0

Molson Coors Brewing Company

18.0

Carlsberg UK

11.0

Others

15.0

Entire

100.0

( Keynote 2011 )

Since 2009 InBev has been steadily roll uping their portion in the beer and brewery market and now has the largest market portion. This is chiefly due to the increasing popularity of sub-premium laagers, such as the AB InBev brands Becks Vier and Stella Artois. They reported an addition in gross revenues of 12.6 % signifier ?1.31bn to ?1.48bn despite enduring a pre revenue enhancement loss of ?246.1m.

Stella Artois is a trade name that has retained its place as the best-selling laager in the UK, despite increased competition from sub-premium trade names and has besides observed outstanding gross revenues since its launch. The other three dominant brewing companies as indicated in table 4.1, have witnessed diminutions in their portion of the UK market, Carlsberg ‘s portion fell by 4 % , Heineken ‘s by 3 % and Molson Coors ‘ by 2 % . The portion of the market accounted for by smaller UK brewing companies ( included under the ‘others ‘ header ) remained inactive on 2009 degrees. ( Keynote 2011 ) .

Within the beer industry there are low exchanging costs as the merchandise itself is standardised intending consumer are free to buy whichever beer they favours, nevertheless, consumers are really much trade name loyal. Beer companies spend 1000000s of dollars yearly on advertisement. The advertisement is non needfully created to increase demand, nevertheless create trade name consciousness. A new concern will hold to be prepared to put to a great extent in advertisement if there are to vie in the market Threats of challengers can be reduced by using a assortment of tactics. To minimise monetary value competition, separate your merchandise from your rivals ‘ by introducing or bettering characteristics besides seeking to organize stronger relationships and construct client trueness[ seven ].

The menace of replacement merchandises:

Substitutes in the brewery industry are thing such as vinos, sprites and alco-pops. In the banking industry, high shift costs are in topographic point to forestall clients exchanging to replacements. However due to the low cost nature of beer it is non applicable here therefore clients have no duty of trueness. Although there are a figure of replacement ‘s beer remains the most popular alcoholic drink within the male population in Britain, accounting for 60 % of the market. The bulk of people tend to devour beer on societal rudimentss so other signifiers of societal assemblage can be described as non direct replacement ‘s thing such

In order to diminish the menace of replacements in the market and encourage clients, directors of new concern in the brewery industry must carefully see these options and strategically turn to all the other options confronting a prospective purchaser. The dainty of replacement in the brewery industry is medium as although there seems to be a batch of other alternate which consumers can travel for the bulk still buy beer as their preferred pick of drink[ eight ].

The bargaining power of purchasers:

The brewery industry have three chief types of buyers-direct consumers, wholesalers/ retail merchants, and pubs /bars. Apart from the saloon and restaurant the chief purchaser of the brewery industry are the big supermarket Tesco, Sainsbury, ASDA, Morrison etc. Gross saless of beer have switched popularity from on-trade to off-trader significance jobbers and supermarkets have gain more bargained bargaining power.

It can be argued the industry overall has low purchaser power as it consist of big companies providing to a figure of different purchasers 85 % of the market is shared between the four top companies and a big figure of jobbers. Regional purchasers experience low power where as national purchasers experience high bargaining power.

Beer is a standardized merchandise which can be purchased from a figure of other providers giving purchasers a grade of power. Buyers besides experience power in an industry when the merchandises represent a comparatively big disbursal for your clients ; because beer is comparatively low priced purchasers will seldom experience the demand to compare monetary values giving the purchaser less power.

The brewery industry seems to hold high/ medium purchasers power due to the fact that direct consumers have multiple options for amusement, and jobbers and retail mercantile establishments have 1000s of beer trade names to take from. Therefore, a new concern proprietor must be originative in traffics with consumers, normally by offering trueness plans and increasing perceived value[ nine ].

The bargaining power of Suppliers:

The bargaining power of providers in the brewery industry can be preserved as low due to the fact there are a figure of providers available to a brewery. The chief supply determinations lies with the cardinal merchandise ingredients, hops, amylum beginnings, Yeast and Clarifying agent besides the packaging stuff the aluminum glass etc.

There are a figure of husbandmans which can supply a new concern with the natural stuff which it needs, go forthing providers with less power. The providers can non sell straight to clients, as a consequence they need the partnership with the breweries in order to last and go on trading. This will give a new concern more bargaining power with their providers.

However when the resources required are alone it becomes dearly-won to exchange providers. In the fabrication of beer certain specialist ingredient such as enzymes are used in the fabrication procedure, altering to another provider may necessitate a concern to alter their full fabrication procedure. This may be really dearly-won and will cut down monetary value dialogue taking to cut down dickering power.

The addition in planetary demand for bio-fuels can be described as a job for brewing industry. Bio-fuel IS produced by the use of amylum ( corn/maize ) and yeast agitation to bring forth ethyl intoxicant. This could give the amylum and barm harvest providers powerful influence over the monetary values beef uping their bargaining power.

Contracts and positive relationships with providers and manufacturers are another manner new concern can pull off the uncertainness and power of providers[ x ].

The Strategic Directions of Adnams

Adnams is a British brewery founded in 1890 in Southwold, Suffolk[ xi ]. Adnams journey of patterned advance in malice of diminutions in the brewery industry started in October 2004, when the authorities called on the intoxicant industry to halt encouraging orgy imbibing as it related to jobs were bing the UK ?200bn a twelvemonth. During this clip Adnams placed themselves as being a supplier of intoxicant that their clients drink as a beginning of enjoyment, relaxation and a cardinal characteristic of societal life for many. As a consequence of the economic downswing Adnams reported at 64 % lessening in operations net incomes and a 0.6 % lessening in sale in 2008, as a consequence of alterations in client disbursement wonts due to the recession, many people started to imbibe within their places. ( Data proctor 2009 )

To get the better of the alterations Adnams was confronting, determinations were made to:

Minimise their environmental impact

Maximise their operational efficiency and,

Achieve and keep a superior return on investing[ xii ]

The purpose of Adnams short term scheme was to assist retrieve from the low net incomes made in 2008. To accomplish this Adnams decided to stop dead the beer monetary values at the degree it was during 2008, till the terminal of 2009, which made them standout from their rivals, which turned out to be really successful because Adnams reported addition in their net income in 2009 of “ ?922,000 compared to ?142,000 for the same period in 2008 ” ( Data proctor 2009 ) .

The disadvantage this posed on Adnams was for them to now stay a low-price bargainer. Adnams Southwold chief long term strategic programs are to hold minimum environmental impact, focal point on swerving merchandises, maximal operational efficiency and superior returns on investing ( Green Suffolk 2011 ) .

Minimize Environmental Impact

Adnams began to do alterations in how the brewery procedure operates to cut down its impact on the environment. In October 2006 Adnams built their environmentally friendly distribution Centre, which has the biggest green roof in the UK, with solar panels supplying 80 % of its hot H2O and reed beds purify the waste H2O ( bbc.co.uk ) . All the walls are built from blocks made of calcium hydroxide, quarry waste, and hemp.

The impact of the eco-friendly warehouse has been really good on the environment. Suffolk Country Council reported that due to the renewable environmentally friendly stuffs used to construct the warehouse, there has been a CO2 emanations salvaging of over 450 metric tons ( Green Suffolk 2011 ) . Not merely has the hemp and calcium hydroxide rock prevented a high CO2 emanation in the ambiance, it besides acts as an effectual sound dielectric, which means that the noise pollution has been cut down. The sustainability scheme which Adnams has undertaken has given the administration a positive image and besides adds value to their merchandises.

Maximize operational efficiency

Adnams vowed to keep its monetary value freezing for an extra 6 months, and in order to continue this promise they have adopted a monetary value decrease scheme through increased efficiency.

As brewing involves utilizing a batch of boiling H2O, alternatively of Adnams leting the steam produced to vanish into the ambiance it is captured by its new engineering and used to do the undermentioned brew, which cuts down on the sum of gas used by 30 % ; and the sum of H2O used to do one pint of beer from 6 pints of H2O to 3.5 pints and are happening ways to cut down this farther ( Annual study 2009 ) . And with the partnership with British gas, Adnams started a undertaking to turn brewery waste into green gas that can be for the national grid in February 2010 and really started being pumped into the national grid in August 2010 heating 235 places ( bbc.co.uk )

Tax returns on Investings

The increased efficiency has meant that net income borders have remained high in malice of the economic downswing ; this leads to their 3rd strategic program of accomplishing superior returns on investings. In 2009 Adnams had a net income border of 6.06 % compared to its rivals Heineken UK with -11.93 % and Molson Coors UK with 2.13 % . Since 2002 Adnams has ever maintained a positive net income border farther guaranting a greater return on capital employed.

While Adnams rivals have a negative ROCE, Adnams have managed to keep their return on capital employed and stockholders ‘ financess[ xiii ].

Ansoff ‘s matrix identifies four different schemes that concerns could run to take maximal advantage of market and merchandise chances which will be used to assist foreground the schemes Adnams undertook. Adnams adopted a merchandise development attack as they developed new merchandises in the bing market by “ working new engineering in order to stay competitory ” ( Lynch 2006 ) . Adnams has besides been able to make a diverse merchandise portfolio, including seasonal and standard beers covering all four countries of the Boston matrix ( see appendices ) .

The strategic waies that Adnams have undertaken that have attributed to their patterned advance are in market development, merchandise development, and market incursion consolidation.

Beginning: thestudentroom.co.uk ( 2010 ) available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php? t=455066

Adnams identified that in 2008 “ the market for green, ethical and fair-trade goods is valued at ?15bn and turning 9 % per twelvemonth ” ( Turney 2008[ xiv ]) , and identified the alterations in consumer gustatory sensations and adapted to run into their demands, so in 2008 the new C impersonal beer was introduced, which focused on utilizing their resources and nucleus competencies to retain competitory advantage. This attack ties into the neo-classical economic theory that takes a resourced based position of scheme where “ one house outperforms another if it has superior ability to develop, usage and protect nucleus competencies and resources, which are the foundations for making the hereafter ” ( Stacy 2007 ) .

Decision

Table OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1

Boston Matrix

Appendix 2

Meeting Logs

Appendix 1: Boston Matrix

Appendix 2: Meeting Logs

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

22nd February 2011

Time:

12:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( Library Resource Centre )

Meeting No.

1

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

Familiarize ourselves with one another and exchange contact inside informations

Ensure everyone has a transcript of the instance survey

Skim over the instance survey and insight possible paths for inquiries 1, 2 and 3

Following meeting day of the month: 1st March 2011

By the following meeting everyone should hold read and understood the instance survey to the full, and made slug points for each inquiry.

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

1st March 2011

Time:

12:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( Library Resource Centre )

Meeting No.

2

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

Gather all the notes made for each inquiry

Decide who will make which inquiry

Following meeting day of the month: 8th March 2011

By the following meeting everyone should hold made a start on their assigned inquiry so that everyone can read over it and offer suggestions

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

17th March 2011

Time:

14:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( Mid Level )

Meeting No.

3

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

Combined the work that everyone has done so far separately for each inquiry

Whatever is left to make everyone should make, and we will convey it together for the following meeting

Following meeting day of the month: 22nd March 2011

By the following meeting all the inquiries will be answered by everyone and set together jointly and everyone will read the assignment and take notes on which subdivisions they feel are irrelevant so that it will be cut down to do relevant together so that everyone is happy with its content

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

22nd March 2011

Time:

11:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( LRC Second Floor )

Meeting No.

4

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

To set everyone ‘s part to the assignment together

To read and discourse why subdivisions of the assignment are irrelevant

Following meeting day of the month: 24th March 2011

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

24nd March 2011

Time:

13:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( LRC Level 2 )

Meeting No.

5

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

To take out subdivisions that everyone agrees are irrelevant

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

25th March 2011

Time:

15:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( LRC Level 2 )

Meeting No.

6

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

To take out subdivisions that everyone agrees are irrelevant and add finishing touches

Meeting Title:

Strategic Management Assignment

Date:

26th March 2011

Time:

13:00

Location:

Kingston Hill Campus ( )

Meeting No.

Attendants:

Alfred Okanlawon, Andrina Beau-Pierre, Damian Brooks, Rosetta Azah-Thomas, Jermaine Randolph

Subjects:

Read over the amended assignment and compose up the debut and decision

×

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out