The celebrated, Andy Warhol and Robert Indiana are considered to be two of the most influential creative persons of the Pop Art period. Though their plants are different representationally, they are able to amend the class of their common beginning of inspiration- American Popular culture- through the similarities and differences that they exhibit in their plants. Warhol ‘s Elvis I and II, and Indiana ‘s The Demuth American Dream No.5 are addressed as two illustrations in this instance. While Warhol takes a broad stance towards his work in adding new dimensions to Pop Art, Indiana sets the roots of his work in the earlier Precisionist painters, such as Charles Demuth.
Andy Warhol and Robert Indiana have been credited with ridiculing and observing American in-between category values. Their plants get rid of the differentiation between popular and high art through their transient and probationary nature, and hence by encompassing these qualities they mirrored American society. Andy Warhol and Robert Indiana achieve the facets of depersonalisation, humdrum repeat of images in their plants, through incorporating popular civilization ethos of mass production and commercialisation.
Warhol nominates the Pop icon, Elvis Presley, as the focal point of change for aesthetic elements in his work Elvis I and II. The famous person is used by Warhol as a motive in the form of a celebrated adult male that is repeated four times horizontally across his work. The figures possess variant visible radiation and dark facets as portion of their overall form and composing which is due to effects caused by silk showing. Through the use of the efficient technique, Andy Warhol reduces the personal touch that was a pattern associated with predecessors of Pop Art- Abstract Expressionists. This act enabled the creative person to incorporate repeat and to add a commercial expression and feel to the work. Warhol had an array of helpers who produced his silk screen multiples, following his waies to do different versions and fluctuations. This exercising which had its roots in the Dada motion brought new dimensions to Pop art. The four Elvis figures have similarities and differences due to the changeless supplanting of the squeegee across the work, which in bend brought a different tone, chromaticity of shading, and variant texture across the work. Warhol wanted to name these disparities the “ errors, ” that he liked to maintain in the picture to make an unbalanced aesthetic characteristic. The usage of a bright background, which lacks any sort of position or deepness, gives it a sense of continuum and eternity. The homogeneousness facet of the two backgrounds in the work, in footings of coloring material and composing, brings a great trade of attending to the focal point of the picture, viz. the Elvis figures ; this addresses Warhol ‘s political orientation about a good picture which is “ one that ‘s in focal point and of a celebrated individual. “ The canvas on the right has a matte and semi-glossy coating, which is the consequence of the intermixing of two techniques. These techniques are spray picture and silk showing, each giving the work a level, yet unsmooth and slightly brooding texture. The chromatics of the work is inspired from Warhol ‘s engagement with the movies he created at the time.Thus, through the amusements with mass production and silk showing, Andy Warhol gives new significances to the aesthetic elements – coloring material, texture and visible radiation – which enable Warhol to accomplish his end of humdrum repeat, in his Acid I and II.
Indiana treats the overall aesthetic elements of the work every bit such as coloring material, texture, and composing. He approaches his work in a more defined and elemental mode compared to Warhol ‘s. Though Indiana and Warhol both use bold, brassy, and likewise looking colorss, Indiana, nevertheless, integrates them otherwise. Indiana ‘s composing and usage of coloring material is good defined and bold, but Warhol ‘s colors merge into the shading created by the silk screen. Indiana uses different tones of colorss to make assorted sorts of infinite for different intents, although this does non impact the matte and two dimensional aesthetic facets of the composing he presents in the picture. He presents the picture with a tenseness between the chromatics, where he allocates the Centre and focal point of the five canvases to the figures, with the usage of bright colorss he grabs the attending of the witness and, in contrast to this impression, he budgets the remainder of the infinite in the picture to make an illusional and bogus position through the usage of different chromaticities of Grey. The defined lines and bold colorss have been achieved by the stenciling technique. Indiana employs legion symmetrical and insistent forms, like the reoccurring motive of the figure five, circles, Pentagons, trigons, stars, and etc, to convey life to the aesthetic qualities of the work. These everyday composings presented across the painting tend to either conveying attending to or run out the celebrity out of the Demuth ‘s I Saw the Figure 5 In Gold ; this in bend has brought Indiana ‘s work a quality similar to the 1 in Warhol ‘s in accomplishing his end of humdrum characteristics.
Through the observation of Warhol ‘s work, one can happen many facets of the painting keeping a deep significance, typifying Elvis ‘s life. Meaning to his work can be credited to the “ errors ” that he kept instead than fixed. One of the facets the spectator can rapidly place in the work is the gradual attenuation of Elvis from left to compensate. Created by the silk showing technique, this progressive discoloring of the iconic figure may touch to his decease and to the run outing out of his popularity, and the backgrounds of the two canvases seem to typify life and decease. The colorful canvas on the left symbolizes life because the colorss used are bright and bold, similar to the life style of Elvis himself who was submerged in his ain wealth and celebrity. In contrast, the canvas on the right which has been spray painted to look monochrome in coloring material, symbolizes his decease. The gray affair goes manus in manus with the melting out of Elvis. Furthermore, the repeat of the four figures of Elvis mimicked the consequence of media impregnation. The usage of silk screen to make repeats has itself become portion of the significance of the image because it had been created by the usage of mass produced stuffs. The 2nd facet is the manner the background of the picture looks as if it is ne’er stoping, giving it a sense and feel of continuum and eternity. Last, the background looks as if it ‘s uninterrupted due to the deficiency of a actual background. Further, continuum is achieved through the deficiency of edge- tenseness. The top border of the canvas cuts the caput and the underside cuts the pess of this exaggerated famous person. This cutting off consequence on the figure which looks as if it has been cut and pasted onto the canvas, gives the painting a collage- similar visual aspect. By cutting and gluing the image onto the canvas, one can see that Warhol looked for the fasted and the most efficient manner to make a sequence of Elvis.
Similar to Warhol ‘s work, when looking at Indiana ‘s The Demuth American Dream No.5, one knows that there has to be a significance behind the manner it was created or the manner it has been laid out. The most of import facet of this work is that he took the work of Demuth ‘s well known I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold, and included it in his ain vocabulary. By utilizing an already established work – similar to how Warhol used an established famous person – repetitively, he either attempted to run out its popularity and reinstate a disregarded work. By utilizing a preexisting work, Indiana attempts the “ transcript and pasting ” method of Warhol to expeditiously make five indistinguishable plants. By making indistinguishable canvases, Indiana saved clip from holding to give the work an individualism. As situated in the rubrics themselves, the figure five is of great importance in the work, this is shown by its serialisation and that there are five canvases that create this chef-d’oeuvre. Furthermore, the picture illustrates the multidimensional belongingss of Numberss in an aesthetic context. With its ocular reverberations of the figure five- a series of “ fives ” invariable in design, yet decreasing in size as they recede inward, and enlarging outward about past the image plane- the picture seems to perforate mathematical infinite. Indiana ‘s figure five strains and pulls, withdrawing and projecting itself once more onto the canvas, its original motion in clip transformed into ocular tensenesss, caught within the warring force per unit area lines of darkness and lamplight, a aureate object held suspended on the ruddy fires of sound.The ocular power of Demuth ‘s ‘ original image and Indiana ‘s heterotaxy of it into what might be called its “ native ” ocular medium is so so strong that it still has the force to animate creative persons of an full new generation.Moreover, there are besides spiritual symbols that go manus in manus with the importance of the figure five. Hoosier state was closely affiliated with faith, and he tried to integrate this facet into his plants. The five panels signifier into the form of a Grecian cross. [ 5 ] The four panels which have the words “ err ” , “ dice ” , “ eat ” , and “ clinch, ” are placed environing the nucleus, which is the 5th panel. The cross symbolizes the four elements of the universe – Fire, Water, Earth, and Wind. These four elements can take the signifier of the four outer panels of Indiana ‘s layout. Further, the four words he uses on each panel – err, dice, eat and embrace – semen to do up one signifier – the signifier of the American Dream. The usage of words and letters in his picture had been inspired by stencils, because he was amused with how it makes the image appear as if it had been printed. Therefore, through the enthusiasm created by the effects of the stencil which was used as an efficient agencies of production, Indiana expeditiously creates a sequenced chef-d’oeuvre.
For many old ages Andy Warhol and Robert Indiana pushed frontward the boundries of Pop art to hammer a extremely individualistic manner to refer to the technological promotions of the clip. They both engage themselves with the revolution of the techiniques that they were presented with through the influeneces of mass production and commercialisation. The context of both plants revolves around the, so Popular, civilization of America which was extensively entertained with mass media and iconic figures in their society. Therefore, the two Pop creative persons incoporated facets of humdrum and repeat in their plants, puting new land regulations for the art hierarchy in America by wipe outing the contrast between high and low art.
Andy Warhol, Elvis I and II, 1964
Silkscreen print, spray pigment on Ag canvas, silkscreen print, acrylic on canvas
164 ten 82 inches
Robert Indiana, The Demuth American Dream No.5,1963
Oil on canvas
365.7 ten 365.7 centimeter ( Each of 5 panels )
- “ Glossary of Medieval Architecture: Grecian Cross. ” University of Pittsburgh. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.pitt.edu/~medart/menuglossary/GREEKCR.HTM ( accessed November 14, 2009 ) .
- “ The Figure 5 in Gold: Charles Demuth ‘s Art & A ; William Carlos Williams ‘ Poem. ” WisdomPortal.com. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wisdomportal.com/Christmas/Figure5InGold.html ( accessed November 14, 2009 ) .
- Wilson, William. “ Pop Art Masters “ PRINCE OF BOREDOM ” THE REPETITIONS AND PASSIVITIES OF ANDY WARHOL. ” Popular Paintings, Artwork and Pop Art Gallery. hypertext transfer protocol: //popartmachine.com/masters/THE_REPETITIONS_AND_PASSIVITIES_OF_ANDY_WARHOL.htm ( accessed November 14, 2009 ) .