Arthur Andersen accounting firms was the auditor to Enron Essay

Secondary, the Enron`s direction failed in their duties. During the Enron`s portion monetary value autumn, the Enron`s executives required their employees bought the stock, and at the same clip, the executives were selling the stocks in order in turned their dorsum on their employees. Finally, the employees lost their retirement support, payroll checks and other compensation program. in position of the fact that a direction must be trusty and have unity, in this instance Enron had deceived the employees faith and trust to the company. Therefore, the Enron`s direction is one of the grounds lead to crisis of assurance.

External parties would be the Arthur Andersen scrutinizing term and scrutinizing commitment term. Arthur Andersen accounting houses was the hearer to Enron. Unlike Enron`s scrutinizing term, the external term scrutinizing term should be independent signifier Enron Company with indifferent attitude. This was clearly non the instance, Arthur Andersen comptrollers knew long beforehand about `s turning loses, at the same clip ; Enron paid an tremendous consulting fee to Andersen for bring oning the action of utilizing SPE `s to conceal loss. Consequently, the hurt of repute led to the death of Andersen audit house.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Arthur Andersen accounting firms was the auditor to Enron Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

The three types of confer withing services I would wish to present would be Financial Advising, Operation and Human Capital. Firstly, Financial Advising is one of the chief types of consulting services. Auditing houses would back up CFOs to voyage the complexness of their function, arrange the construction of their map and to heighten their part to the concern. As being a CFO, it has to take the determination support information in the appropriate clip and transform the finance map from a ‘supporting ‘ map to a ‘business spouse ‘ alternatively of merely cut downing the costs of finance function.. For illustration, Deloitte provide a specific CFO Service consist of finance transmutation, integrated public presentation direction, shared services design & A ; execution and outsourcing advisory. However, the CFOs may take to struggles of involvement between scrutinizing houses and CFO. Once the auditing houses are taking parts of the aggressive accounting and fiscal coverage interventions, the function for them being independency would be agitating. Since the CFOs may wish to pay a higher consulting fees to the auditing houses for Windowss dress the fiscal statement. A good fiscal statement can please the stockholders and pull more investors in the hereafter. Therefore, scrutinizing houses would assist their clients to conceal their loss by their auditing cognition if they want to have higher gross. For illustration, during the early months of 2002, Enron had paid an tremendous consulting fee to Andersen for the SPE-related Transaction, this cause critics charges that the above action impaired Andersen `s independency.

Second type of confer withing service I would wish to present is Operation. By PwC, the operation could include separate into borderless procurance, gross growing, shared services and outsourcing and sustainability. The above action all used to better the direction and procedure by increased the effectual of their operating procedures and supply concatenation. For illustration, in some instances, scrutinizing houses may propose their clients make the service transmutation such as traveling from traditional, merchandise oriented organisation to service oriented companies, which can clearly sort the difference between normal runing concern and service concern. However, it is impossible to guarantee the operation reding would be successful. Once the company follow their auditing firm`s suggestion but acquire a loss. This will severely impact the auditing house ‘s feeling as loss of possible clients. as a consequence, the auditing houses would wish to conceal their client`s loss in order to maintain their ain repute. This would be placing as opportunism which is a menaces to independence.

The last but non least, 3rd consulting service would be Human Capital. Every organisation gets human resources issues, these issues arise every bit good as the concern start to turn with more concern scheme. Therefore, scrutinizing houses try to supply advanced, integrated and practical solutions to aline the organization`s people and concern schemes by back uping human capital consulting services. It aims to maximise the potency of the client`s worker in order to better the concern public presentation. The menaces for this confer withing service is similar to operation confer withing service, the auditing houses may do a incorrect suggestion which transform the workers in to inappropriate place, it will take to de-motivated the client`s worker and cause bad public presentation. Seriously, the staff may go forth the concern so organisation demand to engage or develop another worker which increase the cost of human resources. Sometimes, the scrutinizing would wish to conceal their error by assisting window dress their client`s fiscal statement or debts off the balance sheet.


The followers are five recommendations that have been made late to beef up and the independent audit map. Sarbanes -Oxley Act ( SOX ) would be the first I want to explicate.

SOX is a united states federal jurisprudence enacted on July 30, 2002 which set new or encourage quality for all U.S public company boards, direction and public accounting houses. This act turn to a host of recommendation for strengthens the independent audit map. SOX subdivision 204 dressed ore on hearer studies to scrutinize commissions, it outline that each registered public accounting house should describe any issues to the audit commission of the issuer seasonably. The above subdivision is utile for maintain the hearer independency as it required some indispensable elements. First, it is said that all critical accounting policies and patterns would be used. Secondary, the issuer would discourse all alternate intervention of fiscal information within lawful accounting rules.

In response to SOX`s action, the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) exchanges proposed new regulation and ordinance to beef up audit commissions. One of the action that SEC pattern is concluding regulation which related to non-audit service, as auditing houses provide non-audit service to their client such as confer withing service would impair the accounting firm`s independency. Consequently, the concluding regulation includes forestalling certain spouses taking portion of the scrutinizing service. Furthermore, concluding regulation address an comptroller would non be independent from scrutinizing firm`s client if the auditing houses received any payment other than audit, reappraisal and attest services. I would back up the above recommendation since it divide the non-audit service and audit service by different parties in order to maintain the audit service independency as the hearer can non work in the function of direction. SOX 201 outline the services outside the range of pattern of hearers, under 201, it identify the non-audit service including

Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or fiscal statements of the audit client

Fiscal information systems design and execution

Appraisal or rating services, fairness sentiments, or contribution-in-kind studies

Actuarial services

Internet audit outsourcing services

Management maps or human resources

Broker or trader, investing advisor, or investing banking services

Legal services and adept services unrelated to the audit

Any other service that the board determines, by ordinance, is impermissible.

By ‘Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ‘

In SEC concluding regulation, it besides enhanced the alone ability and duty of the audit commission which used for prevent the hearer form the force per unit areas that caused by their clients CEOs, CFOs, internal scrutinizing term and direction. This would be utile for keeping independency but it hard to pattern, since the lone manner to promote the hearer ability would be instruction or professional preparation. However, it can`t guarantee the auditing term wouldn`t be induce by the big sum of fees that their clients paid particularly

Another action return by SEC would be the rectification to concluding ordinances. This regulations relate to demands towards hearer independency and minimise the misstatements of fiscal statement, it enhanced revelation of fees paid to hearers.

Beside SEC and SOX, in Government Auditing Standards 2010 Exposure Draft besides outline a conceptual model for independency. it used to supply a clear agency for hearers to sort hearer independency and the model are based on facts and fortunes that are frequently alone peculiar audit concern. However, these auditing criterions are merely a bill of exchange so it hard to guarantee the information is truth or would non be right in the hereafter.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out