Can We Actually Achieve Professional Skepticism Accounting Essay

Professional Skepticism as per International Auditing Standards issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board refers to – An attitude that includes a inquiring head, being watchful to conditions which may bespeak possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical appraisal of audit grounds. ( IFAC ) ( KOJUTSUKAN )

Professional agnosticism is an attitude adopted by the hearer when carry oning the audit. It means that the hearer remains independent of the entity, its direction and its staff when finishing the audit work. In a practical sense, it means that the hearer maintains a inquiring head and exhaustively look intoing all grounds provided by the client. The hearer must seek independent grounds to confirm information provided by their client ; they must be leery when grounds contradicts paperss held by their client or questions made of client forces. ( Moroney, Campbell & A ; Hamilton, 2011, p 23 )

We will write a custom essay sample on
Can We Actually Achieve Professional Skepticism Accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

What it requires

The function of the hearer is to function as an independent mention point for the stakeholders to be able to mention to in order to trust on the information provided by the direction of the personal businesss of their Company. This raises the saloon of duty upon the hearers and accordingly their cardinal responsibility is to be able to use an questioning head to every critical countries of judgement and every facet of their work that has an built-in hazard of misstatement.

Bing skeptic is an art of stepping back and looking at the premises employed by the direction from a wholly independent point of position whereby the hearer can dispute the point of position of the direction to the extent to which it does non do sense in footings of the substance of the minutess and the concern of the client in the context of the economic and industry specific environment.

Modern Challenges

As the universe faces economic downswing and fiscal crises, the hearers are pushed more and more towards keeping their independency and raising the bars of professional incredulity to the degrees of flawlessness. At the same clip the clients are being faced by increasing force per unit areas from the increasing outlooks of interest holders at one manus and increasing fright of failure of concern and loss of wealth attach toing the predominating fiscal crises.

All in all auditing within the guidelines of moralss and professionalism is going more and more hard to continue. The increasing degree of competition among the audit houses is yet once more playing a portion in doing life hard for the single audit houses.

This state of affairs is coercing the audit houses to increase the quality of certification involved so that the work performed should non divert from the demands of international auditing criterions.

An increased demand for certification and increased hazards of divergences from keeping the quality of the work performed has left the profession confronting the undermentioned major hazards:

Concentrating on back uping the direction premises through audit grounds alternatively of disputing the premises.

Concentrating on the information available and non on the information that might be but is non available.

Approach being shifted from finalising the audits harmonizing to established timelines alternatively of reevaluating the timelines in visible radiation of new audit grounds.

Collateral audit grounds non being sought to the extent to which current audit grounds serves the certification demands.

Inability to dispute work performed in old old ages

Constructing sense and using logics to clients premises to avoid excess work required in instance of disputing the same

Overlooking the substance of the dealing

What should be done to accomplish professional incredulity in the current scenario?

To be able to populate the auditing criterions instead than merely make fulling up the audit files, the hearers need to be more focussed on the application of the hazard based attack from the beginning of the audit and the audit spouses and directors should be able to construct the same in the behaviour of the audit squad and do them recognize that audit is more than merely a occupation, its more about transporting the duty of trust held by the stakeholders and non working under the acquaintance footings of the direction that is more frequently a practical concern on battles where audit squads are repeated more than one time.

Professional incredulity can be achieved if the audit is conducted purely in the flow required by the auditing criterions, which can be summarized as under:

Identify hazard countries and pass on the same to the audit squad efficaciously and do certain they understand the importance of disputing premises and direction representations.

Expression for collateral audit grounds to back up an grounds which appears to be thin and corroborate direction representations by other audit grounds.

More frequently than non the audit squad does non prove the informations provided by the direction although the auditing criterions require us to prove the truth of informations provided by the direction. There is an increased hazard that the informations can be manipulated.

Incorporate necessary audiences in critical and combative countries and involve expert services where applicable to look into the work performed by direction expert

The audit battles should be efficaciously planned and adequately supervised and reviewed at regular intervals to do certain that any countries which require particular focal point are non missed out.

Effective communicating demand to be held amongst the audit squad and issues should be highlighted without clip holds.

The audit squad should pass on with all degrees of client staff specially the below direction staff and the internal audit section to acquire an indicant of a possible direction prejudice.

The battles should affect a reappraisal by an independent spouse of the house and he/she should be a involved in the battle from origin to the terminal.

The battle directors and the staff planning squad should maintain a closer oculus on the acquaintance menace that may be in instance where an battle squad or the senior members thereof are being repeated over a figure of old ages and accordingly the members of the squad develop a degree of acquaintance which may endanger their ability to dispute the audit grounds, information and premises available.

The house should hold an independent hazard direction squad that should critically measure the degree of fees charged to the peculiar client and the grade to which the same may ensue in self-interest menace to the audit house or the engagement spouse, such menaces may be reduced by using necessary precautions.

All in all, professional incredulity is about covering with the audit in a mode that challenges the direction point of position and critically measuring the information at manus. This in the true sense is what an audit is all about. Checking the information from an questioning and skeptic position is chiefly a behavioural concern and can be achieved if the audit battle is trained and developed in a mode that instills such behaviour in their positions of looking at things.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out