Digital Library is the library which is practical and it is besides an electronic library which it use the engineering to develop the library and the aggregations can be accessed by anyone, anytime and anyplace. Digital libraries is of import to humanists because it can do the work easier. In the yesteryear, library provides entree to original plants and there are many physical libraries that people can travel and seek for their beginnings. When the engineering are widely developed, the libraries besides need to maintain up-to-date and align with the engineering so that they can supply entree to beginnings in individual topographic points or depository to users for illustration Online Archive of California hypertext transfer protocol: //www.oac.cdlib.org. Besides, digital libraries non simply provide entree to original plants but they besides provides other services such as MyManuskrip, Past Year Exam Paper, Thesis Collection and others which besides known as the Digital Library Initiatives. Furthermore, this can rush up the entree to the aggregations. Therefore, collaborative digitisation is of import because it non that easy to develop the practical libraries together with library enterprises. They need a related system and more resources to do it a success. By collaborative with other libraries or parties, it can assist the work to succes.
Harmonizing to Longman Dictionary, coaction refers to a occupation or piece of work that involves two or more people working together to accomplish something. While digitize agencies to set information into a digital signifier. Collaborative digitisation is a pool of libraries, universities, and archives working together to set up best patterns for change overing stuffs such as sound, image, etc. to digital format ( IGI Global,2014 ) . Collaborative digitisation is the new ways of change overing the resources in the library in digital signifiers. This attempts makes new chances to the library. In the past few old ages, most libraries assume that clients would come to the physical library but in this epoch of engineering, most establishments are looking for other options to be more relevant to their communities and their customers’ day-to-day lives.
The focal point is now on the experience, both existent and practical of the establishment itself nd besides the institution’s aggregations ( Yarrow & A ; Clubb, 2008 ) . Via coaction, this can better the institution’s services and plans. Harmonizing to Yarrow and Clubb ( 2008 ) , partnerships of assorted sorts can assist the establishments to carry through their ends and serve the community to the best of their corporate abilities. Therefore, to join forces with other establishment, the establishment should first place possible collaborative chances and so developing partnership to construct stronger aggregations of digital resources has advantages to for all the spouses, and benefits the clintele of all the establishments involved in the coaction ( Straw,2009 ) . Harmonizing to Straw ( 2009 ) , to accomplish the advantages though, issues such as ownership, right of first publication, stigmatization, entree, costs, and others must be addressed. Written aggrements that outline those issues, every bit good as the ends and each partner’s duties, are indispensable to successful coactions. Institutions and persons can carry on successful undertakings entirely on their ain. Smaller establishments may non be able to make every bit much as larger 1s, but they may afford a scanner and to set a few images from their aggregation on the Internet. Therefore, if a library wants to join forces with others, the should hold the proper program in implementing the ends, possible investing of clip, the expertness and besides the resources they need in certain collaborative activities with an mentality to general schemes of an administration.
BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE DIGITIZATION COMPARED TO INDIVIDU
Working together with other establishment might gives immense positive impact to the libraries than working separately. There a several benefits that a library can acquire from this collaborative digitisation or besides known as partnership. The first advantage from this collaborative digitisation is thebroader scope of stuffs that can be made available for users or broad application of consequences. The users can entree to over 100 from three or four depositories, and from a more varied aggregation of experiences alternatively of 20 Civil War letters from one depository. Besides, a research worker can analyze images of life and civilization in towns, metropoliss, and rural countries throughout a part because the research experience is expanded expotentially by the increased figure of digital resources that can be made available through effectual coaction. In easy word, partnership provides entree to a greater web which it offers multilingual content for their aggregations. Besides, the aggregation can be accessed by greater geographics part which everyone can entree to the library aggregations in anyplace and at anytime with the connexions of the cyberspace. Furthermore, with the greater entree web, the richer the aggregations that users can acquire and it has a greater value which more users can entree to it. As if single establishment ot state, they would non be able to make the work entirely because in digitize aggregations, they would necessitate more resources and web. With the broad application of consequence, the establishment can develop the criterion methods for informations assemblage. Besides, it can better ordinances for digitisation production, distribution and usage of the aggregations. Furthermore, it besides can increased see in resource allotment.
Second, thecollaborative digitisation can increase the entree. A good illustration of collaborative digitisation is the coaction between a county historical society and a larger establishment such as a college or university. The county historical society operates on a limited budget, is run purely by voluntaries, and is merely unfastened for a few hours each hebdomad. By partnering with the larger establishment to supply entree to digital transcripts of its geneology stuffs, the historical society is able to hold a global user base through the Internet who might be unable to go to see and utilize the stuffs during the limited clip the society is unfastened for concern. Geneologists everyplace will be able to see those household letters on their ain clip agenda. The county historical society benefits from increased visibleness and usage. The college or university benefits from the availibility of more resources for their pupils and module. Therefore, in this state of affairs everyone wins
Besides, the 3rd benefit is thatall the resources can be shared via coactionas the budgets fall and costs rise. The spouses can portion equipment and staff. A smaller establishment may simply be able to afford a less expensive scanner that allows staff to digitise standard exposure merely, while the larger institutional spouse can supply equipment for scanning big format points, sound, or picture. Equipment can be purchased via a grant and shared with all spouses. Pooling resources makes a successful undertaking possible that may non been financially or practically by any of the spouses on their ain. A merchandises can be reused and repositioned if possible. Besides, via sharing resources, the aggregations are linked which the value added is additions. Not simply that, spouses can besides negociate the debt for production and right of first publication.
The really of import component in the development of successful digital aggregations is the digital content direction system. The digital content direction system provides for control, standardisation, searchability, compatibility, and sustainability. Large and effectual digital content direction system can be really expensive. Therefore, by join forcesing with an establishment that has a digital direction system in topographic point can cut the cost and besides save clip in developing the system. For little establishment, it can be the difference between holding a digital presence and non.
Besides of the usage of digital direction system, there is other proficient considerations that can be addressed in a positive manner via partnerships. Through coaction agreement, the issues of sever infinite can be resolved. The expertness that a library needed could be available from one of the spouses. Metadata creative activity requires professional preparation that may be present at merely one of the spouses. Conformity with criterions besides can be achieved through working together. when the resources are pooled together, it can gives richer consequences than single attempts.
Fourth, a important positive result of coaction can be success ingeting support for digital undertakings. The cost of a digital undertaking can be important therefore, sharing cost can be good for everyone. Beyond cost sharing is the increasing demand for external support, peculiarly via grants. As Deanna Marcum writes, “Partnership has become the needed watchword for acquiring any attending from an external support agency.” She points out the that grants suppliers see “the power of digital engineering for supplying entree to information resources, and they know that, through partnerships, even little undertakings easy can be amplified to convey benefits to many new and frequently unforeseen audiences.” Digital partnerships are evidently an avenue for obtaining external support in today’s competitory fiscal environment.
Harmonizing to Lim ( 2014 ) , some libraries are researching the potency of dig tization partnerships to better instruction and acquisition and are supplying digital imagination centres and digital media services for module. The digitisation partnerships with module are the chances to better the library engagement and visibleness. The libraries that are merely started to digitise their aggregations can look to the experience and expertness of a turning figure of establishments and libraries that are developing digital depositories of instructional, cultural, and scholarly stuffs for educational intents.
Last but non least, the benefits of collaborative digitisation is that the delivering of a better services. The entree and the usage of aggregations are improved which it can be entree across the universe, by anyone and besides users can entree to the broad scope of aggregations. Besides, the aggregations of the library can be entree via laptops, tablet, and even via smart phones. It makes the user’s life much easier.
TYPES OF COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS
Harmonizing to ( Harun, n.d. ) , coaction is of import because the libraries need more cardinal digital library to do easiness of user’s plants. In collaborative digitisation, there are different attacks to collaborative webs and their types. However, all coaction signifiers can be categorized into the undermentioned types which involved partnership between archives, libraries, and museums, joint attempts with public and commercial spouses, and outsourcing digitization services ( ManA?uch, 2011 ) .
For partnership between archives, libraries, and museums, The coaction between those three establishments have existed a long clip before digitization. Memory establishments have on a regular basis been join forcesing in different Fieldss for illustration, educational programmes, cultural events, common publication undertakings etc ( ManA?uch, 2011 ) . Collaboration between establishments possessing valuable aggregations became of import to present a good quality of service to users and supply entree to inter-related aggregations held in diverse establishments.
Meanwhile for joint attempts between public and commercial spouses cover coaction aimed at sharing resources to bring forth a better service to users, cut down the cost load, and guarantee sustainability of digitised aggregations in the long-run. ManA?uch, ( 2011 ) cited Hughes, ( 2004 ) statement that the treatments about coaction with public and commercial spouses stemmed from acknowledgment of the necessity for significant insistent attempt and investing to digitize and prolong digitised aggregations. Digitizers normally collaborate with three types of establishments which include administrations that have similar aims or related aggregations, governmental and other administrations that are uninterrupted givers or participants in digitization enterprises, and commercial endeavors back uping digitization for economic benefits.
Outsourcing digitization services is the purchase of digitization work/services from other administrations ( which may be either commercial or non-commercial ) . This type of coaction is aimed at obtaining resources non present in memory establishments. In a wide sense outsourcing is widely discussed as a world of modern-day archives, libraries and museums due to their budget restraints, turning demands for proviso of quality services, demand for new competences and other grounds ( Ball and Earl, 2002 ) . These
COLLABORATIVE AMONG COUNTRY
Since the early 1970s, Malayan libraries and information centres have been collaborating officially ( Kaur, and Singh n.d. ) . When MALMARC ( Malayan Machine Readable Catalogue ) was started in 1977, the coaction and resource sharing among academic libraries in Malaysia besides started. MALMARC was a brotherhood catalogue consisting about 480,000 bibliographic records of the National Library of Malaysia ( NLM ) and all academic libraries in Malaysia. This undertaking was coordinated by the Science University of Malaysia ( Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM ) and with a fiscal grant from UNESCO. Unfortunately, the advancement of the undertaking was non truly successful because of the deficiency of financess and alterations in library scene.
Since the 1970s, assorted mechanisms have evolved to organize coaction among academic libraries. A Standing Committee of National and University Libraries in Malaysia ( Persidangan Perpustakaan Universiti dan Perpustakaan Negara, PERPUN ) consisting of the National Library of Malaysia and academic libraries was formed to look into the affairs of coaction and resource sharing. Loan from inter library and papers supply were the chief concern of resource sharing at that clip. The petition for Interlibrary Loans ( ILL ) and Document Delivery Services ( DDS ) were done manually and the points were picked up and sent by selected PERPUN member’s vehicle, which was scheduled on a rotary motion footing.
In 1988, a papers bringing pool among libraries was formed, initiated by the National Library of Malaysia, with the aims of promoting local bringing services and enable easy entree of information at local and international degrees. The papers bringing system was portion of the National Availability of Publication, which in bend was portion of the Universal Availability of Publications ( UAP ) plan initiated by IFLA and supported by UNESCO ( Raja Abdullah, 1999 ) . The ILL/DDS maps with the co-operation of establishments from Brunei, Singapore, Australia and the British Library. The Numberss and classs of libraries involved in this enterprise are listed in Table
Table 1: Members of the Inter Library Lending System, Malaysia Type of Library
Public Academic and university libraries Private Academic and university libraries Government Departments Commercial Agencies NGOs Total
Number 45 43 6
138 110 9
The University of Maryland ( UM ) Libraries established the Office of Digital Collections and Research ( DCR ) in December 2004, to organize and be after for digital enterprises, and to develop and pull off a cardinal digital depository by utilizing the Fedora architecture to put digitized objects from across the UM Libraries ‘ sections ( Guehuen & A ; Hanlon, 2009 ) . They stated that the depository would restrict the re-scanning of on a regular basis requested stuff and at the same clip repurpose those scans for on-line digital aggregations. The depository was to be filled with stuffs created from frequenter petitions, peculiarly those generated by the Department of Archives and Manuscripts, along with any stuffs digitized as portion of other digitisation undertakings.
Besides University of Maryland, Houston Public Library in Texas US besides did a positive alteration which they collaborate with museums ( Yarrow and Clubb, 2008 ) . One partnership with the Houston Museum of Natural Science involves the museum back uping library narrative hours and other activities by supplying educational stuffs and objects available via Discovery Kits. The library besides collaborates with the Houston Museum of Fine Arts to convey exhibits to library subdivisions. The library so hosts programming related to the exhibits, including narrative hours, talks and besides workshops.
Following coaction occur in Medical Libraries which is collaborative digitisation of Medical Libraries ( CDML ) . the CDML undertaking is a 2 twelvemonth undertaking was launched in 2005. Cairo, Alexandria, Zagazig, Suez Canal, Minia, Beni Sweif and Menia are the pool of 7 Egyptian medical modules which is formed and digitise their thesis from 2000 until 2006. IBM company and UpToDate joined the undertaking as spouses. The medical libraries collaborates with IBM and UpToDate to digitise their theses aggregations. 7 universities will hold to pooled their resources for on-line entree to finish the undertaking. Full text service can be obtained from the campus from take parting modules or use for an history from the disposal of the undertaking.
As decision, collaborative in digitisation is of import to each state because it can assist the development of the digital library success. A digital library is of import in educational and research procedure. Furthermore, it can supply entree to many of the cognition web across the universe which it can gives see to a research worker. Harmonizing to ( Norasiah Haji Harun, n.d. ) , Malaysia’s library needs a batch more support to be the same as other state in developing good digital libraries. Malaysia already developed PERDANA undertaking as the National Digital Library Program and have been accepted but they need more from the National Library to supply more clear leading and playing a immense function in originating Digital Libraries locally and besides internationally. Actually, Malayan academic libraries are really cognizant of the support and they are strongly back up the sharing enterprises. The work together with continuesly commited to back up the National Library, lending to the bibliographic national database, developing brotherhood list of resources, reacting to the demand for electronic bringing of paperss, and a realisation that resource-sharing is a shared duty among libraries, are the factors Malayan academic libraries need to succees in the hereafter.
Deyrup, M. M. ( 2009 ) . Digital scholarship. New York: Routledge.
What is Collaborative Digitization Program ( CDP ) . ( n.d. ) . IGI Global: International Publisher of Progressive Academic Research Books and Journals. Retrieved May 23, 2014, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.igi-global.com/dictionary/collaborative-digitization-program-cdp/4356
Collaboration in resource sharing among Malaysian academic libraries in a digital environment. ( n.d. ) , 1–14.
Harun, N. H. ( n.d. ) . Digital Libraries in Malaysiaaˆ? : Problems Faced and Factors for Future Growth, ( July 2010 ) .
ManA?uch, Z. ( 2011 ) . Collaborative webs of memory establishments in digitization enterprises.The Electronic Library,29( 3 ) , 320–343. doi:10.1108/02640471111141070
Yarrow, A. , & A ; Clubb, B. ( 2008 ) .Public Libraries, Archives and Museumsaˆ? : Tendencies in Collaboration and Cooperation.
Koelen, M. ( n.d. ) ( 2009 ) . The Importance of Digital Libraries in Joint Educational Programmes: A Case Study of a Maestro of Science Programme Involving Organizations in Ghana and the Netherlands. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dlib.org/dlib/november09/koele
Kaur, Harvinder. , Kaur, Kiran. , & A ; Singh, Diljit ( n.d. ) . Collaboration in resource sharing among Malaysian academic libraries in a digital environment, 1–14.