Kalifomatos Consultants is a Measure Surveying house with a broad scope of services provided for the possible Client. One of the Fieldss KCQS specializes in is Project Management. Project Management aims to present any given Project guaranting the desired balance between Time, Cost and Quality.
Feasibility studies, harmonizing to Douglas ( 1999 ) , test whether the demands ab initio set out can be really met or non. Boyle ( 2003 ) suggests that feasibleness studies can take different signifiers. Functional feasibleness amongst others refers to physical demands every bit good as dirt conditions. Technical feasibleness refers to the statutory consents every bit good as the clip restraints whereas fiscal feasibleness trades with the costs of the development and in kernel creates a budget for the Client to make up one’s mind on whether he can follow it or non. In add-on to the above, concern feasibleness trades with the strategic brief analysis bespeaking if the qualitative facets of the development fit the concern theoretical account of the Client.
In this phase, the initial statement of demands is developed into the design brief on behalf of the Client corroborating the key demands and restraints for the development, following the feasibleness analysis taken earlier. The following measure that follows is the designation of which procurance method is better for usage which sufficiently meets the Clients demands ; the Project Manager could make this. The last measure of the Design brief is to piece the people that need to be involved in the development procedure which comprise of Architects, Quantity Surveyors etc. ( Boyle 2003 )
Harmonizing to the information our house has been provided with, the borehole records the Client is said to hold in his ownership are of a adjacent site to the proposed 1. The fact that a adjacent site has antecedently undergone a site probe does non vouch that for illustration the dirt conditions for the proposed one will be the same. The strata could change every bit good as the deepness of the H2O tabular array ; possibly a new site probe for the proposed site reveals that the site has been bombed during the war, ensuing to a deformation of dirt conditions in the site. This could be seen as a possible constrain which would hold been identified if a site probe had been undertaken.
Another activity that has been undertaken was the geting of the site. Following the old point, every bit good as the fact that our company has non been presented with an existent probe for the proposed site, the site could be rendered as wholly useless for the intents its needed. Taking into consideration the fact that the Client ‘s managers have old development experience for some old ages, the geting of the site with no site probe undergone could be seen as a really naive move.
Harmonizing to Hacket ( 2007 ) , Management Contracting and Construction Management are really similar in many facets, however, there is one indispensable separating characteristic which is cardinal to the apprehension of the two systems ; the contractual agreements between the parties involved. In Management Contracting, the subcontractors are in contact with the Management Contractor whereas in Construction Management they are in direct contact with the employer ; none of the subcontracts are entered into by the Construction Manager. The difference is illustrated by comparing the two diagrams provided.
The most of import demand the Client has set out was that the quality degree is to be prestige. The best quality is offered from traditional procurance method. Another demand set out by the client is the flexibleness of the design ; besides traditional procurance is the best suited for this but Design and Manage offers a high public-service corporation for this subdivision every bit good. However, when it comes to high complexness of the design, Traditional procurance does non outdo suit the description whereas all the other methods do. The following demand set out is asap completion ; Traditional Procurement does non offer that whereas once more, all the other methods do. Furthermore, Design and Manage offers the individual point duty the Client is looking for every bit good as Design and Build. This characteristic would non be available with Traditional Procurement method nor with the Design and Build or the Management Contracting as illustrated in the old schematics. Furthermore, two of HRD2010 ‘s managers have old development experience, so the fact that in order to utilize Design and Manage one needs old experience is seen as a disadvantage, is easy one to get the better of here. The chief ground Construction Management has been rejected even though it is really similar to Design and Manage, was the individual point of duty required by the Client ; therefore entire public-service corporation offered in the chart is 450. And last but non least, the Client welcomes the sharing of hazards ; Design and Manage can besides fulfill that demand.
Based on the RIBA undertaking allotment, the Client has non performed decently the Preparation phase. Critical points have been left out which could hold major impacts on the undertaking ‘s development. KCQS has provided the Client with some recommendations for the successful patterned advance of the development. These would be the immediate conductivity of a site probe for the proposed development ‘s site in order to be able to continue consequently. The Client has failed to supply a proper feasibleness study ( recommended ) which is critical in measuring the quality of the proposed development, its costs every bit good as the demand to run into statutory consents. Following the above, the Client should be able to turn to to possible restraints with respects to the development and get the better of them in due clip. It is besides recommended that the people that are to be involved in the development procedure are to be identified.