Comparative essay of property ownership Property ownership is described to be the solid exemplification of dominance, for a lack of better word, an individual imprint to whatever the object the owner may possess. “My Wood” written by E. M. Forester and “Who Owns the Mountains” written by Henry Van Dyke, both deals with complex idea within the context of property ownership. The idea of responsibility is definitely present in the writing discussed by Forester.
For Henry Van Dyke, he pertains to the idea that acquiring an ownership to an object is not fully worth the commitment if one does not recognize and appreciate he beauty and the reasons for its existence. Furthermore, although E. M. Forester and Henry Van Dyke display a unique and different approach to the fundamental ideas behind the property ownership, the two writers’ intention is nearly identical. Whatever one has ownership to, it is going to have an effect on us one way or another. Of all the things that exist in our world, will we truly be able to obtain a “true” ownership to any of them?
In “My Wood”, Forester implies that with property ownership, there comes a great burden of responsibility, or referred to as a “heavy’ eeling. Because of this burden that might arouse an issue, he suggests that we should think twice before committing to an ownership to a certain item. “If you have a lot of things you cannot move about a lot, that furniture requires dusting, dusters require servants, servants require insurance stamps, and the whole tangle makes you think twice before you accept an invitation to dinner or go for a bathe in the Jordan. Forester utilizes Biblical allusions to reveal his attitude of owning a land. Something that might seem simple in this case, contain numerous chain of events. However, his example imposes some problems involving fallacies, in this case known as a slippery slope. He is assuming that one decision to own an item will lead to inconclusive cause and effects. Forester states that even the smallest considerations to own an item “spring from a foolish desire to express.. from an inability to enjoy what [is available]. Aside from the elaborations on his “heavy’ feeling and unsatisfied attitude toward “human mind”, what Forester tends to do in his writing that is different from “Who Owns the Mountains” is that he generalizes material-rich society with a ubiquitous-like statements. Creation, property, enjoyment form a sinister trinity in the human mind. Creation and enjoyment are both very, very good, yet they are often unattainable without a material basis. ” Perhaps finding the true ownership to any item may be one of the most difficult task that a human mind can perform.
In “Who Owns the Mountains”, Henry Van Dyke presents more direct and profound perception of what ownership of a property really is. He states that ownership that we can “make our own forever by understanding and admiration and sympathy and love” is the only kind of possession that really matters in our lives. Van Dyke comes to use a definite example to get his statement across to the readers. For example, he presents a situation where a rich individual, Midas Bond, adds a new exquisite art to his exclusive collection; furthermore, Midas is satisfied how much value is stored within the item.
However, Van Dyke goes on to say that Midas is only which is “closed and barred to him. ” The author also displays an appeal to pity to get his points across, and says that “poor art student who wanders through his gallery, lingering with awe and love before the masterpieces owns them far more truly than Midas does. Although his examples seem convincing, this is certainly a logical fallacy. In this case, Van Dyke is generalizing wealthy individual as boasting incoherent beings.
Ultimately, Forester’s and Van Dyke’s thesis boils down to an identical perspective with a little tweak in what they seek. Forester’s main principle in property ownership concerns with the idea that people are affected in some way from owning an item, and his idea tends to lean towards the negative side in which he states that ownership “forms sinister.. in human mind. ” For Van Dyke, he believes “real property’ is the one in which people can cherish and treasure for life. He who loves most has most. Although these two writers are taking a different approach to the same idea, their primary concern for what is truly sensible in owning a property is indifferent. Citation Forster, E. M. “”My Wood” by E. M. Forster (Page 2) – Forster’s Essay – 60 Essays. ” Grammar and Composition – Homepage of About Grammar and Composition. Abinger Harvest, 1996. web. 23 sept. 2010.. Dyke, Henry Van. “Who Owns the Mountains? by Henry Van Dyke – Classic British and American Essays and Speeches. ” Grammar and Composition – Homepage of About Grammar and Composition. Fisherman’s Luck and Other Uncertain Things. Web. 24 sept. 2010..