Compare and contrast aphra Bhen's Oroonoko Essay

Though little is really known about Ben’s early years, evidence suggests that she may have had a Catholic upbringing; (1) however, In considering the text for analysis, Ben’s position on religion shows that she found religion very constrictive to society, which I will discuss in detail later. Francis-Marie Route who is also known by his mom De plume Voltaire, was famous for his wit and for his advocacy of civil liberties, including freedom of religion, freedom of expression, free trade and separation of church and state.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Compare and contrast aphra Bhen's Oroonoko Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

He was a French Enlightenment writer, historian and philosopher, and his Book ‘_Candied or Optimism’ _ Is a satirical philosophical tale which I will also discuss in detail later. The first text to be analyses Is found on page 11 of ‘_ironwork_’. The text depicts the “Indian” natives of Saurian, how they appear to the narrator, how they show love to each other and how they Interact with the English governor. The text begins with a vivid description of the natives. ‘they are extreme modest bashful, very shy and nice of being touched… ‘ ‘… ND though they are all thus eked if one lives forever among them, there is not seen an indecent action or glance. ‘ This is a vivid description of innocence, and leads to the use of poetic language when discussing erotic love: egg :-eh pursues her with eyes and sighs were all his language’ while she: ‘… Looked down with all blushing modesty. ‘. This is also a clever use of the narrative structure known as facilitation, and gives a powerful impression of how the natives feel for each other. However the tone she uses In the text Is also hyperbolic, In as much as she romanticists the natives she describes.

Also by doing this the natives are shown as passive. Ratter of the narrative she states ‘… So like our parents before the fall… ‘ which she also connects with: ‘… And these people represented to me an absolute idea of the first state of innocence, before man knew how to sin… ‘ By placing these comments in this conjunction, together with the innocence she creates, she thus connects both the native man and the woman to Adam and Eve within their setting:- the Jungle of Saurian, which thus creates an impression of the Garden of Eden as described in the Bible, in Genesis 3.

This is something that her audience, having known the Biblical ext accurately, would have been able to understand and thus take into consideration, when thinking about a man and a woman from a country a long way away. The narrator considers this noble; when she sees their culture free from the social parameters of religion and informs the reader thus: ‘Nature is the most harmless, inoffensive, and virtuous mistress, it is she alone, if she were permitted, that better instructs the world than the inventions of man; religion would here destroy that tranquility that they possess by ignorance. But she also sates in the first quarter of the text . ‘It seems as if they had no wishes, ND nothing to heighten their curiosity’; and later adds: ‘where there is no novelty there is no curiosity. ‘ when this is considered with the biblical connections, there is the possible implication of rank detachment thus separating the natives from the Christian-European culture which she and her readers are a part of. At the end of the text, she separates the natives even further from the colonists, when she describes a meeting with the Governor.

When the Governor cannot make the trip to see them, the natives conclude that he must be dead. When this it is seen that this is not the case, the natives call the Governor ‘a liar and guilty of that infamy’. On one level, this could be seen as ‘native justice’ as she calls it. However, it also implies that the natives are limited in their understanding, and possibly suggesting that colonization is acceptable, moreover necessary for their development. The second texts is seen on Pages 40 to 42 of Voltaire ‘Candied or Optimism’ and are contained in chapter 16 of the main text.

The scene depicts Candied and Combat entering the Jungle of Rolling, Their entrapment by the Orwellian’; Combat’s discourse with the Orwellian, who then release Candied and Combat from vapidity, and ends with Candid’s exclamation as to how nice the Orwellian are. ‘It’s a Jesuit it’s a Jesuit we will be avenged! And we’ll eat the Jesuit! ‘ say the Orwellian after capturing Candied. Here Voltaire is seeing the native as very savage. But he is also viscously satirical and ironic, as Voltaire himself was taught by the Jesuit order.

The omniscient narrator here gives us insight into what the natives are saying, and this adds to the viscous humor and the irony. Continuing theme within the text ‘All is for the best, no doubt, but I must say that it’s cruel thing to have lost Mademoiselle CUNY©Gonne and be roasted on a spit by the Rollins. ‘ Combat comes to the rescue by reasoning with the natives. Here Voltaire does not see a race that is inferior to the culture in Europe, but simply another form human being that can be reasoned with. As Combat states: that: ‘natural law teaches us to kill our neighbor all the world over’. The Orwellian might be cannibals’ but as he says We Europeans have other means of eating well’ thus suggesting that there is little that separates modern society from the native, other than money. The Orwellian are convinced by Combat’s reasoned speech and not only do they let them go, they give them women and are treated with “every civility” again underlining the ‘civility’ of the native population and thus informing the reader of the day that the natives are civilized in their behavior, despite where they live and what they wear and try to do.

As the piece end’s, Candied is overcome both by his deliverance but also by the natives themselves “what men! What customs! ” he says, going back to the theory of Optimism and the issues that relate to cause and effect: ‘ if I had not run my sword eight through CUNY©gonad’s brother, I would have been eaten alive without fail. ‘ ‘It seems to me that nature is a good thing, since these people, instead of eating me, showed me a thousand civilities Just as soon as they know I was not a Jesuit. In its tone style and genre ‘_Candied or Optimism’_ is a sharply satirical, philosophical tale that stands against the Leibniz argument for philosophical optimism which is summed up in the words of Alexander pope: ‘whatever IS, IS RIGHT’. (2) In its tone style and genre ‘Ironwork’ is a classical tragedy where the hero is brought low by arsenal character flaws or outside circumstances.

In comparing and contrasting the texts, both consider colonization and exploration: In considering the concept of exploration within ‘_ironwork_’ Been paints a vivid picture of the passivity and the beauty of the natural order, and how this Justifies hierarchal society, Whereas, in ‘_Candied_’ Voltaire paints a very different picture, where humanity as a whole is struggling with its very nature, and only reason and enlightenment can help humanity progress. In considering colonization, Been supports the idea of colonization as a means of uncial gain for the homeland.

Therefore the natives are shown as a species on their own but a secondary species, next to the European colonists which thus supports the idea of slavery, as a means to an end, despite the suffering that slavery incurs. This is seen in how she considers the natives in the text, who are considered, on the whole as naive. Cultures that simply do not interact well. Suggesting that colonization is an imposition of one culture upon another for the sake of greed. This too is seen in the way he portrays the natives in the text, and though both consider religion to be a an-made construct that is difficult and dangerous to impose upon another culture.

It is Ben’s perspective of the natives that is demeaning, whereas Voltaire position is one of equality where we are all the same ‘the world over’. ‘_ironwork_’ by Para Been and ‘_Candied_’ by Voltaire, Both have varied and complex arguments relating to slavery and the plight of humanity. Both are very different and tell two very different stories of life in other lands. The fact that they are still in print now, is a reflection of their importance in understanding the attitudes ND cultural aspects of the time that they were written.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out