Comparison of academic papers on subject of management accounting Essay

In this paper, we will compare and contrast two academic documents presented on the classs, they are Task uncertainness and its interaction with budgetary engagement and budget accent: some methodological issues and empirical probe ” ( hereinafter referred to as Paper 3 ) and “ Activity-Based Costing and Central Overhead Cost Allocation in Universities: A instance survey ” ( hereinafter referred to as Paper 6 ) . We will chiefly concentrate on capable affair, function of theory, methodological analysis, paradigm and methods utilizing in two academic documents. Furthermore, we will knock the strengths of decisions, the strengths and failings of attack and give the decision.

First of wholly, the capable affair in two academic documents is both on the scope of direction accounting. Paper 3 re-examines Brownell and Hirst ( Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn 1986 ) that is when task uncertainness is low, low budget engagement should be accompanies by low budget accent for effectual managerial public presentation. However, the consequences are non expected to keep when task uncertainness is high. The paper aimed to happen a strong support for the hypothesis by utilizing fluctuations in measuring and trying methods and managerial public presentation. On the other manus, Paper 6 examines the development of ABC in the university accounting system and evaluates the part to work out the jobs associated with cardinal overhead cost allotment systems. A dramatis personae survey utilizing ABC methodological analysis was developed and applied in the library of the University of Southampton. The consequences showed the differences by utilizing ABC theoretical account to apportion overhead costs between academic modules compared to the bing system.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Comparison of academic papers on subject of management accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Second, the function of theory in Paper 3 is Contingent Theory whereas Activity-Based Costing Theory is used in Paper 6. The basic theoretical account of Contingent theory of direction accounting involves the contingent variables and organisational construction to specify accounting proficient behaviour in different environment and engineering. Therefore, the managerial effectivity will be greatly improved. In this paper, the writer examines whether there is a connexion between variables such as undertaking uncertainness, budget engagement and budget accent to back up the hypothesis. However, Paper 6 uses the ABC theory to develop a theoretical account in the library services of University of Southampton. The ABC theory place the activities in all academic sections associated with cardinal overhead cost and specify the cost driver of each activity. Based on each cost driver, the cardinal operating expense costs are divided into a big measures of parts allocated to each section. Compared to bing system, the theoretical account based on the ABC theory is more advanced and makes overhead cost allotments more accurate as existent.

Third, the methodological analysiss used in Paper 3 are non merely the measuring of undertaking uncertainness but besides trying processs as an empirical. First of wholly, the hypothesis predicts that there is a correlativity between budgetary engagement, budget accent and undertaking uncertainness with managerial public presentation. Then, harmonizing to the anterior theory, undertaking uncertainness is divided into two dimensions of undertaking trouble and undertaking variableness to measure. Second, it used the sampling procedures taking more than 100 people from two different countries in fabrication to be investigated. Furthermore, the ABC methodological analysis in Paper 6 is used in the library service to apportion cardinal operating expense to all section modules. The ABC theoretical account identified each activity in the academic sections and allocated the cardinal operating expense cost to those activities by cost drivers.

Fourthly, the Paper 3 utilizations functionalist paradigm whereas the Paper 6 uses the interpretative paradigm. In the functionalist research, it started with the theory such as definitions and set of premises. Then it deduced the hypothesis and used the quantitative method to roll up informations beginning. Finally verification leads to back up for theory. However, theory ne’er be proved perfectly. In the Paper 6, the paradigm conforms to interpretive. The instance survey aimed to make research in one existent organisation and research worker writes in an informal manner and uses the personal voice whilst the procedure is inductive and theories are developed for apprehension.

Fifthly, the methods in the Paper 3 included sampling processs and variable measuring. First of all, they choose the sample of 120 directors ‘ engagements in the 61 houses. The responses to questionnaires are from most of houses and directors, which satisfies the distribution and age and section covered. Then, variable measuring is based prior theory related to task uncertainness and utilize the statistics to prove and verify the correlativity of each variable and task uncertainness. In this paper, research workers are utilizing the tripartite interaction including the undertaking trouble and undertaking variableness alternatively of two-way and the consequence confirmed the outlook. Otherwise, the method in the Paper 6 is chiefly associated with developing an ABC theoretical account in the library service. At the beginning, informations aggregation is involved with activity informations, cost informations and other information related to staff statistics. The method of apportioning costs utilizing activities was in two phases. The first phase is analysing the staff activities within each of library ‘s divisions. The 2nd phase is to associate these service suppliers ‘ activities to place service users activities based on modules and sections. From the informations, a better apprehension of chief activities within the library was obtained and identified the most appropriate cost drivers afterwards.


In the Paper 3, the consequences of this survey support the outlook that Brownell ‘s ( 1982 ) happening holds merely under conditions of low undertaking uncertainness. However, when undertaking uncertainness is high, engagement is holding a positive function across all degrees of budget accent. The deductions of the consequences of the survey are peculiarly utile in modern-day fabrication scenes where alterations in engineering are taking topographic point. In add-on, the measuring of budget accent in public presentation rating is far from settled. So the suggestion is that the consequence can exercise considerable influence on the appropriate mix of accounting and non-accounting controls. More research can concentrate on this facet of undertaking engineering.

In the Paper 6, the advantage for utilizing ABC is outlined that cost is allocated to be verified and refuted. It could better organisational efficiency and chance cost and would be charged for existent ingestion that seemed more just. Meanwhile, the failings are obvious such as adverse on the long-run executive and expensive cost associated with development and care this system. It besides involved the subjective and interpretive position in the development of ABC theoretical account. However, it is ineluctable that ABC is a discovery and did better the efficiency of allotment associating to traditional attacks. More pertinence of system in pattern should be taken into consideration.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out