Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of the Roles of Education in Society Sample Essay

Marxists take a critical position of the function of instruction. Capitalist society is basically a two-class system. with a governing category working the working category. Marxist see instruction as being run in the involvements if the opinion category. For illustration. Althusser argues that instruction is an of import ideological province setup that helps to command people’s thoughts and beliefs. He suggests instruction has to intents. It reproduces category inequalities through the coevalss by guaranting that most propertyless students experience instruction failure. Education besides legitimates this inequality. carrying the working category to accept educational and societal inequalities. Other Marxists have besides pointed to the being of a concealed course of study in schools.

The Marxists helped lend to our apprehension of the function of instruction in society in many ways. They went against the functionalists and even opposed one of the functionalist’s theories.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of the Roles of Education in Society Sample Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Marxists take a category struggle attack they see instruction as functioning the demands of capitalist economy. They therfore don’t agree with the functionalist’s position of consensus and theory of meritocracy. Meritocracy is an educational or societal theory believing that everyone has an equal chance to make good and to win. Meaning that your single attempts are what make you achieve wagess and position. instead than ascribed by their upbringing. background. ethnicity. category or gender. This means that everyone gets the same instruction and it’s up to them how good they do at school. Marxists believe that this isn’t true and meritocracy is a myth.

Whilst Marxists believe it is partly true. it is up to the pupil to make good and seek nevertheless they can merely make every bit good as the capitalist society allows them to. Willis is a Marxists sociologist and a interactionist. he besides shows this by stating kids put themselves into societal groups and take non to seek and stop up non acquiring the classs down to their ain behavior. However Bowles and Gintis. two other Marxists believe this is achieved through the correspondence rule and the myth of meritocracy they say non everyone gets an equal right to instruction as there are private schools that ever get the same classs as arguably they are acquiring a better instruction. In general different schools have different instruction manners and different degrees of public presentation so depending what school you go to can hold a large impact on your instruction ; for illustration if the same individual went to private school and so a province school they could stop up with better classs from traveling to the private school and bad classs from the province school nevertheless if they go to a private school and don’t attempt but went to a province school and tried truly difficult this may non true.

Marxists besides say that schools teach students to accept hierarchy and those they reproduce the following obedient work force that will accept inequality as inevitable. Bowles and Gintis decided to make a survey on 237 pupils from New York. They found that the school rewarded the sort of personality traits that made for a submissive compliant worker. They besides found that pupils that showed independency and creativeness tended to derive lower classs than those who showed features linked with obeisance and subject for illustration promptness. They besides talk about the concealed course of study and how schools are learning pupils things they don’t know they are larning. They teach you things you know you shouldn’t make and they teach you to accept hierarchy as you know if you go against the instructor you will be punished in some manner. Schools Teach pupils how to move in the workplace as they obey the instructor in the workplace you have to obey your employer. They besides talk about working category people stating “I’m hapless because I’m dumb” they believe this as they feel they didn’t work hard at school and were non really clever so they didn’t acquire good classs hence didn’t acquire a good occupation and so now don’t have much money. Bowles and Gintis say this is unjust they have been taught to fault themselves alternatively of faulting the capitalists.

Althusser is another Marxist sociologist ; he looks at ideological province setup. He believes that instruction merely reproduce category inequality by conveying it from coevals to coevals they do this by neglecting each consecutive coevals of working category students in bend. This legitimates category inequality by bring forthing political orientations that disguise its true cause. The map of political orientation is to carry the working category to accept inequality as inevitable and hence reduces the menace of them disputing or endangering capitalist economy.

This is all what we are taught by the Marxists about instruction. It is based on stating that school is misdirecting pupils into being the following obedient work force and whilst each sociologist’s sentiment somewhat differs they all say that it is a negative experience which teaches us to demur Capitalism.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out