Corporate Governance Is Related To Creating Wealth For Shareholders Accounting Essay

Corporate administration is related to making wealth for stockholders in both the close and long term. It requires a complex system of cheques and balances. There are three cardinal histrions in the screen of corporate administration: stockholders, direction, and the board of managers. The purpose of corporate administration is to guarantee corporations follow the jurisprudence and ordinances. In add-on, there is a public dealingss benefit to being a good corporate citizen. At a more micro degree, administration is all about doing certain the organisation delivers on its promises to both employees and clients and that both groups end up satisfied.

What follows is a wide overview of administration issues. It ‘s non meant to be comprehensive, nor provide legal counsel. Laws vary from legal power to legal power.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Corporate Governance Is Related To Creating Wealth For Shareholders Accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

The Corporation and Its Control

A corporation is formal legal entity that is publically registered for making concern. The privileges and liabilities of a corporation are separate from those of its members. There are many signifiers of corporations and most of them are used to make concern. They are governed by corporate jurisprudence, which is designed to protect the involvements of direction, employees, and stockholders.

Under the jurisprudence, corporations are afforded limited liability. In the instance of bankruptcy, for illustration, stockholders may lose their investings and employees may lose their occupations. But neither will be personally apt to company creditors except in rare instances. Like human existences, corporations have rights and duties under the legal system. They can be booked for condemnable discourtesies like fraud. Corporate portions are besides are freely movable.

Corporations besides have centralized direction under a board of managers. Such characteristics make corporations a really attractive concern entity. A corporation can be beyond the life-time of its investor and stockholders, for illustration. This characteristic provides corporations much required stableness, every bit good as the capableness of roll uping wealth and making mega undertakings.

A corporation can hold vote and nonvoting members. The company is normally controlled by a board of managers elected by the stockholders. The CEO, President, CFO and other top officers are normally appointed by the board of managers to pull off the strategic and operational personal businesss of the corporation. While stockholders of course have some influence-some say non plenty in publically held companies-big creditors like Bankss and other fiscal establishments can besides hold a control over the personal businesss of corporations. In some instances, these creditors may hold one or more members on the board, which can act upon the determination devising. When the board makes a determination to neutralize or fade out a for-profit corporation, stockholders get whatever is left over after paying off creditors and others with involvements in the corporation.

In the instance of liability, stockholders benefit by the limited liability commissariats of the jurisprudence. Publicly traded corporations are required to print the one-year study and other fiscal informations for the protection of investors and creditors. In many instances of hapless corporate administration, the published one-year studies and fiscal informations were earnestly flawed. There are many criterions, like GAAP ( Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ) in the United States, that have stringent guidelines for accounting every bit good as printing one-year fiscal statements and other informations.

The construction of the corporation is continuously germinating in response to new authorities ordinances and market conditions. In the instance of abnormalities, repairing the duty of stockholders or direction becomes a large challenge. Different legal powers vary significantly on this subject.

Board of Directors

The members of the board are elected or appointed by the stockholders. They oversee the activities of a corporation. They appoint members of the executive direction ; they make and O.K. strategic determinations. The powers, responsibilities, and duties of the board are determined by the company bylaws. The bylaws besides state how many managers there should be on the board, election processs, and frequence of their meetings.

The board of managers is the highest direction decision-making organic structure in a corporation. It is accountable to stockholders for the public presentation of the corporation. Directors set up high-ranking policies and way for the organisation, and they guarantee equal fiscal resources for operations. The board approves the one-year budget for a corporation. As board members they besides have some legal duties. They appoint the members of executive direction like the CEO and CFO. The whole of executive direction is answerable to the board of managers. The Board takes more of a supervisory function and daily direction is left to identify executive squad members.

In theory, the control of the company is divided between the board of governors or managers and the stockholders in the General Body Meeting ( GM ) . ( In the U.S. , it ‘s the one-year meeting. ) In pattern, control varies from company to company. Another characteristic of boards of managers in big public corporations is that it tends to hold more de facto power. The board can embrace a vote confederation that is hard to get the better of. One ground is that some institutional stockholders such as pension financess and Bankss grant their vote rights ( placeholders ) to the board at general organic structure meetings.

Members of the board may come both from inside the company and from outside. Insiders are normally senior members of the executive direction squad like senior frailty presidents of big concern sections. Board members, who are insiders from the executive direction squad, are by and large non paid anything excess for functioning on the board. External members may be high concern and societal personalities, who receive compensation for functioning on the board. Company Torahs require that a certain per centum of board members are external. Directors who are non proprietors or directors are frequently called outside managers, disinterested managers, independent managers, or non-executive managers. External board members may, and frequently do, function on the board of several companies at the same time as long there are no struggles of involvements. A board member is expected to be ethical plenty and honour the Torahs and patterns with regard to struggle of involvement, corporate belongings, chance, and or information. He or she is expected non to work under force per unit area and all the clip ballot merely for what aligns to conscience, cognition, and belief.

Powers and Obligations of Board of Directors

The board of managers is given the power to guarantee the company is managed decently. Most of the clip, the board exercises its power in meetings. Legally sufficient notice must be given to the board members for these meetings. Meetings without sufficient notice may still be valid provided all the members attend. The board of managers, in most instances, has power when it acts as a whole and non in single capacities. There can be exclusions to this regulation, though. The board of managers can name any of the managers or any other employee as its representative and depute any or all power to him/her to be exercised jointly or singly. The board besides has the power to name the pull offing manager ( CEO ) and other executive members of direction.

Directors exercise full control over the direction policies of the company, but the companies are run for the benefit of its stockholders. Laws hence impose rigorous controls over the board in relation to exerting its powers. Directors at all times must move candidly and in good religion. All their powers must be exercised for proper intents and may non be misused. While taking other places, managers ca n’t put themselves where their responsibilities and involvements conflict with their current place. If a manager enters into a dealing with another company, where his ain involvements conflict with company, he needs to guarantee the company gets the upper limit out of that dealing and that his ain involvements are non given penchant. A manager ca n’t utilize the company belongings, chance, and information for his addition without the written consent of the company. A manager may non function on the board of other, straight competitory companies. A manager must unwrap his shareholdings and advise the stock exchange of this information. Directors ca n’t adhere themselves ( fetter ) with respect to exerting their powers in a peculiar manner at future board meetings. Directors may be held apt if an act of carelessness is proved on their portion.

The powers and liabilities of the board of managers vary in every legal power, but general commissariats to safeguard the involvements of stockholders and clients remain the same.

Powers and Duties of Stockholders

By registering a company as a corporation, one must accept certain legal duties that are imposed by the implicit in Torahs. These Torahs operate to protect the involvements of company every bit good as stockholders, society, and creditors. If a company fails, stockholder liability is limited to the sums they have invested in the company. If managers and officers of a company provide personal loan warrants, they may, nevertheless, lose personal assets in the instance of a loan default. Shareholder powers include altering stockholder rights, hiring and disregarding members of the board, amalgamations and acquisitions, major fiscal minutess and determinations related to settlement of the company. A company can, farther, follow a fundamental law for corporate administration.

As mentioned, a company may go on to be even if its stockholders, functionaries, and managers die, leave, or sell their portions. A company ‘s assets belong to the company as a separate legal entity. At the same clip, it is stockholders that own the company. They can go through ordinary or particular declarations that can impact the company. These declarations must be in conformity with the company fundamental law. Particular declarations can impact the company as a whole, or the involvements of some or all of its investors. Appointing and taking Directors is by and large done by an ordinary declaration that is nil but a bulk ballot. A particular declaration may necessitate a 75 % bulk or higher. Stockholders are most active at one-year meetings that are conducted to follow fiscal studies, appoint of hearers, chosen of managers, and other concern that requires such general organic structure declarations. Particular general organic structure meetings can be called anytime on an as-need footing.

Stockholders are required to inform the company if their shareholding form exceeds a certain per centum of company ‘s portion capital. In some instance, for illustration, if the shareholding exceeds 2 % of the company ‘s portion capital, the stockholder must inform the company within 15 yearss.

Why Corporate Administration?

Governance ever relates to an country of duty. Effective direction, processes, policies, and determinations are required to oversee outlooks, power, and public presentation in the country of duty. At the section degree, administration might affect implementing these policies. At the corporate degree, administration might take the signifier of developing policies on investing, usage of information, staffing, and so on. Administration is fundamentally a procedure of determination devising and a procedure by which the determinations are implemented in an country of duty.

Administration can be defined at different degrees, like corporate administration, undertaking administration, and information engineering administration and so on. For now, we will be chiefly concerned with the corporate administration.

At its nucleus, good administration is all approximately good corporate leading. To assist in accomplishing its end, every organisation makes strategic and operational programs that are in line with the vision set at the top degree. Good administration continuously steers the organisation towards the set vision through strategic and operational programs. It makes certain the daily operations are ever aligned with the vision, therefore making a strong hereafter for the organisation.

The board of managers and the members of executive direction have the chief duty for driving good administration patterns across the ranks. An effectual board will do certain stockholder assets and financess are used sagely and suitably to maximise wealth and net incomes while keeping all the societal duties for the organisation. Good administration will cut down the hazards of fiscal failure and greatly cut down the legal fusss while maneuvering the organisation towards a entire all-around success.

There is increasing grounds that companies with good corporate administration patterns have higher market ratings. Improved corporate administration constructions and superior concern procedures help guarantee choice decision-making and smooth and effectual sequence planning. They besides contribute positively to the long-run success of companies-irrespective of the industry section and its beginnings of finance.

Corporate Governance Codes

Corporate administration is a precedence for many corporations because it gives them a manner to pull off their hazards and add value to stockholders and clients. Improved corporate administration gives corporations a manner to cut down their ain internal organisational hazards and, as a consequence, better their ability to run in bad concern environments. It ‘s a general concusion that the being of good administration patterns could hold avoided the worst portion of many recent fiscal failures.

Poor criterions of corporate administration, peculiarly in the country of transparence and revelation, have hampered the growing of many companies and even made them unstable. Poor corporate administration patterns have contributed to the spread of corruptness and fraud in the ranks that led to the dramatic failure of many corporations in the United States, Western Europe, and India ( like Enron and Satyam Computers for illustration ) . In many instances, investor force per unit areas for public presentation are ferocious, and direction sometimes takes undue hazards or violates conformity regulations, acts that are merely non in the long-run involvement of the organisation. Governance still looks voluntary in pattern, even if it ‘s purely enforced by the jurisprudence. The duty of managers is about limitless compared to the clip they can pass in supervising concern. In many instances, the quality and asperity of internal audits may be questionable as internal hearers are non independent and they report to the same concern directors that are being reviewed. There is besides excessively much dependance on external audits, which may be a cause of concern sometimes, as the sum of clip external hearers spend in scrutinizing a corporation may non warrant the mammoth size and volume of the job being audited. In any instance, the board is mostly dependent upon the executive direction to make the right thing. Board members have to trust upon the informations and information that is supplied to them. In this respect boards must be given entire control to supervise and implement the codification of corporate administration.

For information intents I am naming the demands of some major corporate administration codifications ( delight refer to the mention [ 1 ] for this chapter in Appendix C ) . There are multiple codifications provided by European and U.S. bureaus. Below are the some of import points culled from assorted beginnings merely to give you a spirit of the nature of corporate administration in assorted states and industries. Not all use in all state of affairss, nor do all transport the force of jurisprudence. Readers are encouraged to mention to the mention on this chapter if they are interested in more inside informations.

Codes suggest either a bulk of non-executive managers in the board or a balance of non-executive and executive managers.

Codes suggest non-executive managers run into entirely on occasion without the presence of executive managers.

Codes insist on a crystalline procedure of assignment of managers that is non under the exclusive control of executive direction.

Codes suggest a compensation or wage commission to make up one’s mind on the wages of board members, including executive members and other members of executive direction.

Codes require an audit commission.

Codes require corporations to carry on one-year internal audits overseen by the audit commission.

All codifications envisage the demand for carry oning public presentation audits of single board members, the board itself, and its commissions.

Codes suggest the board needs to O.K. the equity compensation programs of the managers and executive members of the direction.

Codes say corporations must develop and print an appropriate codification of concern moralss and behavior. The board must attest that the codification is being followed.

Codes suggest that the functions of president and CEO must be separated. It ‘s the president who will supply the managers with necessary pieces of information about the personal businesss of the company that may be required for their effectual operation.

In European codifications, the managers are capable to periodic elections and required to describe certain things, like the purchasing and merchandising of stock, to the markets.

Codes frequently besides discuss the function of institutional investors and how they can assist keep good corporate administration in corporations

A Gallic codification requires that the managers represent all the investors instead than little involvement groups. Independent managers are to carry through that function.

It ‘s the occupation of CEO and senior direction to measure and pull off the hazard exposure of the organisation. An audit commission will merely see the guidelines and procedures that are used to manage the hazards.

Every company must be equipped with dependable processs to measure the organisation ‘s hazards and committednesss, including off-balance sheet hazards.

The board should keep and reexamine a sound system of internal controls to safeguard stockholders involvements. Risk direction and internal control are treated as two separate watercourses. Risk direction related to fiscal coverage procedures is farther differentiated from the above two.

Common observations sing hazard include:

Hazards are often non linked to scheme

Hazard definitions are frequently ill expressed

The organisation must develop intelligent responses to hazards

Hazard analysis must take into history stakeholders

How to Implement Corporate Governance

Effective corporate administration demands proper internal controls. Internal controls are policies and processs, put in topographic point by direction to guarantee of import ends and aims will be met while following the rules of good corporate administration. Internal controls promote operational efficiencies and effectivity while guaranting attachment to order policies and other ordinances. They besides help supply dependable fiscal information and protect relevant records and assets. In the chapter on Service Delivery Management, besides we discussed how overall IT administration helps in accomplishing the coveted service degrees. It ‘s the effectivity of internal controls implemented within the overall administration model that determines the degrees of operational efficiency. It ‘s direction, and non the hearers, who set and exercising internal controls. Internal controls should supply an confidence that fiscal studies and informations are dependable and accurate plenty for concern and regulative demands. Internal controls are applicable to manual every bit good as computerized systems. Internal controls must guarantee the seasonableness and cogency of minutess. All minutess must be decently recorded, authorized, valued, classified and reconciled to relevant subordinate records.

Any internal control system is a complex environment. At the top degree, it starts with the basic direction doctrine and runing manner of an organisation. Then there are direction constructions like separation of responsibilities and lines of coverage. It ‘s really of import that everyone in the hierarchy understands his or her authorization and duty. Forces need to be trained with latest updates in trade, ordinances, and organisational policies and processs. Communication and information systems play an of import function in implementing internal audit controls. They need to be unfailing and comply with the control demands. A competent internal audit map is of import as good.

For the effectual design of an internal control system, the first measure is to make a comprehensive hazard appraisal. It may cover mission, minutess, conformity, and assets. Risk direction and controls must be in line with organisational aims and schemes. An internal control system is designed to pull off the hazards that may affect the schemes for hazard turning away, hazard transportation, hazard extenuation, and hazard credence. All the control points are identified, and possible exposures are analyzed. Technology, processes, and organisation construction must be linked in order to plan effectual internal controls. Internal controls start by deploying the proper forces, policies, and processs to pull off the identified hazards. Independent cheques are maintained along with strict records and certification. Physical controls are placed over assets and records. Policies and processs are relevant, complete, and good documented at any given point in clip. Guaranting consistence in policy conformity is every bit of import. Good controls guarantee a smooth flow of fiscal information and overall coordination in a decentralised environment. Proper escalation and job declaration procedures are set in topographic point. Puting up of answerabilities may be the individual most of import component in any internal control system. Whistle blowers, monitoring, and early warning systems play an of import function in effectual operation internal controls.

Internal audits are of import tools to guarantee, consult, and implement corporate administration. They is a systematic and disciplined attack to measure and better the effectivity of administration procedures, hazard direction, and internal controls. Company insiders act as internal hearers, who are given proper power and authorization to transport out their work independently. The range of internal audits may cover operations, finance, fraud analysis, sensing and bar, plus direction, and conformity with Torahs and ordinances. Internal scrutinizing involves mensurating conformity with company ‘s policies and processs, and hearers may rede executive direction and the board of managers on better put to deathing their duties. But the audit does n’t cover executing of the organisation ‘s activities. Publicly held companies by and large have an internal audit section led by a main audit executive who reports to the Audit Committee of the board of managers. The Chief executive officer may be the administrative head of the internal audits section.

Besides carry oning audits, internal hearers besides have a function in hazard direction and implementing corporate administration. In internal audits, the charter is to mensurate efficaciousness of operations, dependability of fiscal studies, and conformity with professional criterions and Torahs of the land. In the hazard direction procedure, internal audits need to chart how the organisation identifies, analyzes, and responds to hazards. They need to guarantee the effectivity of the overall hazard direction procedure. Internal hearers are frequently quoted as being the 4th pillar of corporate administration. ( The other three being direction, external hearers, and the board of managers. ) Internal hearers help the audit commission of the board of managers perform its responsibilities efficaciously. Internal hearers inform the board ‘s audit commission on the effectivity of internal controls, set the docket for meetings, place capablenesss of cardinal directors, and guarantee the audit commission receives dependable information. Internal hearers besides coordinate the external audits.

Consulting hearers, who are seasoned corporate professionals, can besides assist direction implement corporate administration. Their degree of independency is in between internal and external hearers. Consulting hearers are used in some countries where the company lacks sufficient expertness for scrutinizing certain countries, or they are besides sometimes used to augment the bing internal auditing staff. Consulting hearers can work independently or they can team with internal hearers for their work.

External Hearers are besides used to independently measure the effectivity of corporate administration within a company.

External Audited accounts

An external hearer ‘s study is considered an of import good fiscal papers for any concern. Hearers certify the information in fiscal statements that can be used to pull investors and obtain fiscal loans. So it ‘s in the involvement of the concern to acquire a clean audit study from external hearers. The hearer ‘s study is merely an sentiment ( and non an rating ) on whether the information presented is right and free from material misstatements. Everything else is left for users to make up one’s mind. Actual journal entries may non be evaluated by the hearers.

Unqualified audit studies are issued by hearers when they think the entries are free from any material misstatements and entries are prepared reasonably in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ( GAAP ) . To a user this would intend company ‘s fiscal place and the province of concern personal businesss are represented reasonably in the study. This is the best study a concern can acquire from an hearer. A qualified study is issued when a twosome of state of affairss in fiscal statements do n’t follow with GAAP but mostly follow the principals of GAAP. A disclaimer is issued when the hearers are unable to organize any sentiment on the fiscal statements and as a consequence garbage to publish any sentiment. This may be a state of affairs in which hearers start the audit work on an entity but could n’t finish it due to assorted grounds. Hearers can besides notice on the province of internal controls for a public company. These types of sentiments ( COSO- Committee of Sponsoring Organizations Opinions ) are now required along with the sentiment on fiscal statements.

Sarbanes-Oxley ( SOX )

Sarbanes-Oxley is a US jurisprudence passed in 2002 to reenforce the patterns of corporate administration and recover investor assurance that had been shaken due to a figure of major corporate and accounting dirts reported in the US. SOX was sponsored by US Senator Paul Sarbanes and US Representative Michael Oxley. SOX statute law has broad deductions and it establishes new or enhanced criterions for all United States publically listed company boards, executive direction, and public accounting houses. It contains 11 rubrics, or subdivisions, that legislate extra duties for corporate boards and mandate condemnable punishments for certain misdemeanors. The jurisprudence requires the Security and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) to implement the opinions so that companies comply with the demands of the new statute law.

SOX loosely covers the undermentioned subjects:

Defines new criterions and guidelines for corporate boards and audit commissions.

Provides new guidelines for answerability criterions and besides fixes condemnable punishments for the misdirection of corporations.

Defines new independent criterions and guidelines for external hearers.

Introduces a new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ( PCAOB ) to work under the SEC. The PCAOB will supervise public accounting houses and besides work on accounting criterions.

By and large Accepted Accounting Principles ( GAAP )

Here ‘s what Investopedia says about GAAP:

The common set of accounting rules, criterions and processs that companies use to roll up their fiscal statements. GAAP are a combination of important criterions ( set by policy boards ) and merely the normally recognized ways of recording and describing accounting information. GAAP are imposed on companies so that investors have a minimal degree of consistence in the fiscal statements they use when analysing companies for investing intents.

The US has its ain version of GAAP that is called American GAAP. Either manner, GAAP is a standard and guidelines that companies are expected to follow while roll uping their fiscal statements. Still, there is a batch of chance for those who want to play with informations for ain advantage. So even if histories are maintained as per GAAP, hearers ca n’t presume anything. Even fiscal statements prepared as per GAAP may necessitate a close examination and professional judgement by the hearers. Please refer to the mention [ 2 ] for this chapter in Appendix C.

More late, GAAP is easy acquiring phased out and giving manner to the International Accounting Standards ( more exactly – International Financial Reporting Standards [ IFRS ] as planetary concern becomes more widespread. IFRS is established and maintained by the International Accounting Standards Board. In some parts of the universe, local accounting criterions are applied for little companies, but all publically listed or big corporations must follow with the more comprehensive IFRS. This manner, statutory fiscal coverage is compatible internationally, across legal powers.

Information Technology Governance

IT administration focuses on hazard direction and public presentations of IT systems. It ‘s needed for greater answerability in determination devising utilizing IT systems in the best involvement of stockholders. Investings in IT systems are increasing twenty-four hours by twenty-four hours, something that has long-run deductions for investors. IT administration forms a system in which all relevant stakeholders, including the board members, senior directors, clients, and employees are responsible ( for their parts ) for determination devising that affects IT. This makes determination doing sing IT issues more responsible as each determination is judged on its alliance with organisation ‘s strategic aims. While pull offing hazard and guaranting the right conformity degrees are necessities of good administration, it is sometimes more of import to acquire our focal point on presenting value and mensurating public presentation.

There are many back uping mentions for the execution of IT administration. Some of them are:

AS8015-2005 Australian Standard for Corporate Governance of Information and Communication Technology. AS8015 was adopted as ISO/IEC 38500 in May 2008

ISO/IEC 38500:2008 Corporate administration of information engineering, ( really closely based on AS8015-2005 )

Control Objectives for Information and related Technology ( COBIT ) is regarded as the universe ‘s taking IT administration and control model.

The IT Infrastructure Library ( ITIL )

ISO27001 – it focuses on IT security

CMM – The Capability Maturity Model – focal point on package technology ( Software Engineering Institute )

TickIT is a quality-management enfranchisement plan for package development

Corporate Governance V. IT Governance

Corporate administration is a manner to command and pull off a corporate entity. It consists of a set of policies, procedures, imposts and traditions, Torahs, concern patterns, and institutional patterns that are applicable or adopted by the entity. Corporate administration helps an organisation to run into it ‘s ends in the most effectual and efficient mode possible. It ‘s a scheme that allows a corporate entity to pull off all facets of its concern so that it can run into its ends while following with all applicable Torahs and codification of concern moralss.

IT administration is a subset subject of corporate administration that trades with hazard direction and public presentations of IT systems. The purpose of IT administration is to guarantee that the investings in IT organisation are in line with concern schemes and generate desired concern value while maintaining associated hazards under control. This is done by implementing a chiseled IT organisation construction that assigns clearly the functions and duties that are related to information systems, informations, concern procedures, and associated IT substructure.


Corporate administration can be defined many ways. One such definition, which we used in the old subdivisions is this: “ Administration is fundamentally a procedure of determination devising and procedure by which the determinations are implemented in an country of duty. ” It is a procedure that revolves around determination devising and its execution by the direction and staff of an organisation. We can hold 100s of cheques and balances in topographic point as a portion of internal control systems. But after all, it is worlds who must mean to follow them. Controls can be bypassed or overruled, as typically happens in high growing stages of the concern. Corporate administration can be implemented merely by taking through illustration. When the top direction is really serious about it and patterns administration to the nucleus, merely so can the staff be expected to follow.

Society at big has a really large function in doing corporations follow the rules of corporate administration. Internal hearers are the paid employees of any corporation. So there is a bound to how much they can travel against the will of executive direction in implementing corporate administration. In an ill-famed instance from India that made the headlines the universe over in 2008, external hearers signed inflated and overstated histories for uninterrupted seven old ages in a row. Fake certification of bank sedimentations were used by top direction that showed a hard currency modesty of over one billion dollars. Actually it was merely a few million. This was in malice of a fully fledged internal audit section and moderately good information systems. The computing machine systems were tampered at the point where the concluding fiscal statements are taken out for the reappraisal of hearers. So it ‘s the purpose to implement corporate administration that comes foremost to any system of internal or external controls. Corporations are a subdivision of society and in instance after instance we see that it is the single lesson and the ethical criterions of society at big that will do any system of corporate administration work in the true sense.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out