Critically discuss earnings management Essay

GainingsManagement, in exchange listed companies, is non fraud but a instance of caution buyer for investors.


We will write a custom essay sample on
Critically discuss earnings management Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Net incomes direction is controversial issues [ A1 ] among investors and company’s direction [ A2 ] , Nowadays, listed company’s [ A3 ] directions [ A4 ] face a batch of force per unit area to force the firm’s stock monetary values every bit high as possible, maximising the shareholder’s wealth every bit good as guaranting their ain benefits. Hence, the [ A5 ] net incomes direction has been used to run into this accomplishment. However, some said [ A6 ] the net incomes direction is a fraud, and it is criticized for misleading, and lead oning the reliable company’s information to the stakeholders, as many recent instances, like Enron and WorldCom, were collapsed [ A7 ] accused of the utilizations of the net incomes direction.

Definition of Earning Management

Net incomes direction is defined as the direction of a steadfast uses its ain acumens to make up one’s mind the most good accounting interventions applied to the house [ A8 ] ( Healy and [ A9 ] Wahlen, 1999, cited by Dechow & A ; Skinner, 2000 ) . Indeed, net incomes direction extremely corresponds with accumulations accounting footing [ A10 ] . It offers direction a window to postpone or change the stuff minutess in order to avoid the unexpected impacts to stock value ( Dechow et al, 2000 ) . There are plentifulness of attacks can [ A11 ] be used by direction to extenuate the negative effects to [ A12 ] the company’s market value. For case, booking [ A13 ] the net incomes of following twelvemonth in progress, extinguishing the operation cost through capitalisation, and postponing outgos to following period, in order to camouflage the company’s true public presentation of current twelvemonth ( Dharan, 2003 ) . However, to what extent that the net incomes direction would go inappropriate? [ A14 ] It is explicitly by the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) that the net incomes direction is merely acceptable when it is within the guidelines puting down by General Accepted Accounting Principles ( GAAP ) , and anything beyond the range of GAAP would be in instance of duplicity. Harmonizing to SEC, deceitful accounting incurred is ever pertinent to direction utilizing over-aggressive net incomes direction ways to cover with the firm’s accounting minutess ( Dechow et al, 2000 ) . Additionally, William & A ; [ A15 ] Gerry ( 2003 ) believe that deceitful net incomes direction is to falsify the sensitive information, covering the mastermind fiscal place of the company by the ways of utilizing different inappropriate accounting attacks. Therefore, non all the instances are constituted the [ A16 ] fraud, but when the directions exploit the over-aggressive and improperly [ A17 ] methods to undertake with the fiscal minutess.

Reasons & A ; Problems of utilizing Earning Management

The net incomes direction is said to be the attacks that steadies the firm’s stock monetary values without fluctuations, since fluctuated stock monetary value may hold an inauspicious consequence to the company’s operation hard currency influx ( Boissay, Frank & A ; Gropp, 2008 ) , and the possible chances to pull new capital. Furthermore, stock monetary values are determined by assorted factors, but a huge bulk of determiners are subjected by the market. Dechow et Al ( 2000 ) stated that a firm’s stock monetary value will be fallen unevenly and well, if the firm’s public presentation does non aline with the market’s expectancy. It can be seen that directions have strong grounds to work the net incomes direction to run into the market outlook. Furthermore, the company’s incentive strategy was held to be the one of the chief force that managers exploit the net incomes direction. Nowadays, many companies link its market public presentations with the fillip of the directions, ensuing directions mistreating of the net incomes direction in order to maximise their personal’s wealth by keeping the company’s stocks or portion options as portion of their compensation ( Gaver, Gaver & A ; Austin, 1995 ) . It is seemed that utilizing the net incomes direction may profit all the parties. However, the company’s directions would alter sporadically, and the company’s growing is merely shifted from the hereafter. When the market realizes the true fiscal place of the company, it is possible that its stock monetary value would be dropped well, and the stockholders would be the major victim finally.

Argument of utilizing Earning Management from the position of Caveat Emptor

Some statements of net incomes direction revolves the Caveat Emptor, which refers to a purchaser has duty and responsibility to size up all possible jobs of the merchandise before buying, and therefore, they have no rights to claim amendss from Sellerss afterwards. However, it is debatable that the net incomes direction is hard to detect as company’s directions would seek to stamp down the negative information to populace ( Lo, 2007 ) . Since the asymmetric information existed between the directions and investors, hence, fiscal studies of listed companies are required to be audited before presenting in many states, determining the information provided is complied [ A18 ] with the relevant accounting criterions. Nowadays, investors evaluated [ A19 ] the company’s consequences are to a great extent rely on the audited studies as it is impossible for investors to supervise the daily operation of a company. However, In the instance of Enron prostration, the hearer, Arthur Andersen, was failure to carry through their duties to protect the benefits of the stakeholders. There was an obvious struggle of involvement between the Andersen and Enron. On the one manus, Enron paid Andersen for scrutinizing its fiscal studies. On the other manus, Enron besides paid a immense sum of adviser fee to Andersen, in returning of their sentiments to besiege the loopholes of the accounting criterions in order to accomplish the enigma growing [ A20 ] ( Arnold & A ; De Lange, 2004 ) . Furthermore, the recognition evaluation bureaus and the company’s directions themselves have the strong motives to worsen the head covering between the investors and the house. In order to prolong the stock monetary values, companies would pay to recognition evaluation bureaus to rank their company as the best quality investings ( Frost, 2007, cited by Demirtas & A ; Cornaggia, 2013 ) . Undoubtedly, this pattern would entice people and even the elephantine fund houses to purchase those highest evaluation securities, plus the company’s managers compensations are related with the company’s public presentations. All cumulative, it can be found that the natural job of Caveat Emptor [ A21 ] is the struggle of involvement. The good parties would seek to conceal the unfavorable information circulating to investors. As a consequence, people are improbable to entree the possible jobs of their investings, and non able to do a sensible determination.

Regulation and Prevention of Earnings Management in the U.K. and U.S.

Accounting criterions and Auditing are the prevalent and stating to be the efficient ways to forestall the making accounting. However, the effects of these two methods for forestalling from frauds are seemed to be inefficient. Accounting criterions are the set of regulations that provides a frame to a company when they are fixing the fiscal statements, and therefore, investors can consist the different companies under the same frame. Every listed company in the U.K. and the U.S. is required to show their fiscal studies harmonizing with the UK General Accepted Accounting Practice and US General Accepted Accounting Principles severally ( Pricewaterhousecoopers, 2010 ) . It seems to be the best manner to forestall accounting fraud incurred, if company followed all the guidelines set. However, the line between appropriate utilizing net incomes direction and excessively aggressive manner is hard to specify ( William et al, 2003 ) , since many future benefits influx are strictly decided by the opinion of the managers. The U.K. GAAP emphasises on the construct of “True and just view” [ A22 ] presented into the fiscal study, while the U.S GAAP do non necessitate. However, this term is arguable as it is excessively subjective, since different individual have dissimilar accounts and perceptual experiences of this term ( Amat, Blake & A ; Oliveras, n.d. ) , and hence, it can be seen that U.K. would hold more flexibleness for direction utilizing net incomes direction instead than U.S. Other than the accounting criterions, hearers play a important function of bar the fraud of utilizing net incomes direction. The absence of the auditor’s diligence to carry through their professional responsibilities may be responsible the deceitful net incomes direction occurred. In reacting to the fiscal dirts in the really beginning of 21stcentury, the US authoritiess [ A23 ] enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act taking to heighten quality of the fiscal statements ( Coglianese, Healey, Keaing & A ; Micheal, 2004 ) , re-building the market’s assurance towards the audit houses. However, the result of the Act was defeated [ A24 ] . Harmonizing to Mckenna ( 2012 ) , hearers refuse the incriminations of the frauds which they were non able to observe by stating that they were guiltless and deceived by the directions every bit good as investors. Furthermore, hearers were rarely to give negative sentiments to the debatable companies as those hearers are paid tremendous fees for scrutinizing and confer withing. Furthermore, the history criterions are greatly influenced by the major good party audit houses ( Healy & A ; Palepu, 2003 ) . Therefore, a batch of rules and regulations set to modulate the management’s behaviours towards net incomes directions may be undermined every bit good as the independency of the hearers themselves.


In the [ A25 ] decision, net incomes direction can non be said to be radically frauds [ A26 ] to some extent as it can be found that its have positive and negative effects towards stakeholders. On the bright side [ A27 ] , stockholders and directions are both deriving the grasp of the stock monetary value lifting. On the down side, the struggle of involvements between directions and stakeholders may take the directions exploit the net incomes direction for personal gaining and being reckless of the effects. Since the asymmetric information involved, Caveat buyer may non be held for directions to switch the unfavorable judgment to stockholders as they do non detect company’s fiscal provinces decently before investing.


Amat, O. , Blake, J. , & A ; Oliveras, E. ( N.d. ) . The fighting Against Creating Accounting: Is “True and Fair View” Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution? . Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // doi= & A ; rep=rep1 & A ; type=pdf

Arnold, B. , & A ; De Lange, P. ( 2004 ) . Enron: an scrutiny of bureau jobs.Critical Positions on Accounting,15 ( 6 ) , 751-765. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // _tid=8250dd34-74c1-11e3-abc9-00000aacb360 & A ; acdnat=1388786201_b5e1c0048fdfd3581b6c7dced8b94af1

Boissay, F. , Frank, M. Z. , & A ; Gropp, R. E. ( 2008 ) . The Consequence of Stock Market Fluctuations on Corporate Cash Flows. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Coglianese, C. , Healey, T. J. , Keating, E.K. , & A ; Micheal, M. L. ( 2004 ) . The Role of Government in Corporate Governance. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Demirtas, K. O. , & A ; Cornaggia, K. R. ( 2013 ) . Initial recognition evaluations and net incomes direction.Review of Financial Economics. 22 ( 2013 ) , 135-145, Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // _tid=48e1bebc-74c4-11e3-99be-00000aacb360 & A ; acdnat=1388787393_da96ffa93e52cc8f03490522b69576c5

Dechow, P. M. , & A ; Skinner, D. J. ( 2000 ) . Earnings direction: Accommodating the positions of accounting faculty members, practicians, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14 ( 2 ) , 235-250. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Dharan, B. G. ( 2003 ) .Net incomes Management with Accumulations and Financial Engineering. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Gaver, J. J. , Gaver, K. M. , & A ; Austin, J. R. ( 1995 ) . Extra grounds on fillip programs and income direction.Journal of Accounting and Economicss, 19 ( 1 ) , 3-28. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // _tid=4d552270-74c1-11e3-8c53-00000aacb360 & A ; acdnat=1388786112_e0a519cae32b892dc37de7dcbdfad7af

Healy, P.M. & A ; Palepu, K.G. ( 2003 ) . The Fall of Enorn,Journal of Economic Perspective, 17 ( 2 ) , 3-26.

Lo, K. ( 2007 ) . Earningss direction and net income quality.Journal of Accounting & A ; Economicss, 45 ( 2-3 ) , 350-357. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // _tid=0b2f72e8-73ee-11e3-ac81-00000aab0f01 & A ; acdnat=1388695377_5917b7c6d39ed6e5d20f7028a7416b5c

Mckenna, F. ( 2012 ) .Ten old ages after Sarbox, clip for an audit of the hearers. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // # axzz2pUhUheS5

Pricewaterhousecoopers. ( 2000 ) .International Accounting Standards – Similarities and Differences – IAS, US GAAP and UK GAAP. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //

William, R. O. , & A ; Gerry, H. G. ( 2003 ) . Maynard Fabrication: an analysis of GAAP-based and operational net incomes direction techniques.Strategic Finance, 85 ( 1 ) , 50. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out