In current scenario, the survey of fractional order PID accountant tuning regulations of robust control system for first order plus clip hold systems have been developed. In this paper, on the footing of computational strategy, a accountant is designed to fulfill the hardiness belongings with regard to derive fluctuation and coveted stage border standards. In this survey, numerical calculation of tuning expression and relationship between design specification and design parametric quantity are both discussed by taking an illustration of ceramic infrared warming system.
In the design specification, the accountant parametric quantities and the works conditions, a just comparing with an optimum design whole number order PID ( IOPID ) accountant done via simulation and experimental trials to demo the accountants dynamic public presentation, stableness and hardiness when the parametric quantity alteration.
Introduction:
In, the recent twelvemonth the applications of fractional concretion have been pulling more and more research workers in the field of technology and scientific discipline. The orders of fractional concretion are existent figure. Today, many research workers have focused on fractional order PID accountants and have obtained some utile consequences. The fractional order PID accountant ( ) was proposed in as a generalisation of PID accountant, where spread outing of the derivative and integrals to fractional orders which are adjusted to frequency response of the control system straight and continuously. This paper presents a mathematical computational tuning strategy of FOC for certain temperature system used in industry.
The chief part of this paper include
Fractional order PID accountant with and as integrity is proposed ( IOPID ) with mathematical calculation for first order plus clip hold system is presented.
Fractional order PID accountant is proposed with mathematical calculation for first order plus clip hold system is presented.
Harmonizing to the systematic design and simulation, a just comparing of control public presentation with IOPID accountant.
From the simulation consequences, it can be seen that FOPID accountant outperforms the IOPID accountant.
Design Specification of Control works and accountants
Control Plant
Because of little hold clip in big figure of temperature system works, so a typical first order plus clip hold works discussed in this paper is
Which can be a about theoretical account of a big figure of industrial workss. For the ceramic infrared warming system transportation map with the value of addition ( K ) fluctuation of 3.96 to 4.2, clip invariable of 140 sec and lag clip of 7 sec. So, the typical FOPLT works for ceramic infrared warmer taken as
Accountants
The fractional order relative built-in derivative accountant ( FOPID ) has the undermentioned signifier
Where, and
Clearly, this is a specific signifier of the most common accountant which includes an planimeter of order and a discriminator of order.
By sing the value of and, the accountant signifier become the IOPID in the undermentioned look as
Where Kp, Ki and Kd represent relative, built-in and derivative addition severally.
Design Consideration:
By sing, the tuning method present by Monje, Vinagre and their co-worker used in the paper. Monje and Vinagre et. Al, see the five design standards algorithm for design specification. These design standards obtain by acquiring the value of needed stage border, critical frequence point on the Nyquist curve of works at which
and derive border as
By acquiring the stage border ( ) and critical frequence ( ) , five design standards of Monje – Vinagre et. Al method are given as follow.
Phase Margin and Gain Crossover Frequency
The two frequence sphere specifications are used to mensurate the hardiness i.e addition border and stage border. The stage border is related to the damping of the system, therefore the undermentioned equation should be satisfied
and
Where is a addition crossing over frequence.
Robustness due to fluctuation in the addition of Plant
The stage is forced to be level at and the stage secret plan is about changeless within the interval around to fulfill the undermentioned restraint
As, per the stage secret plan around the specified frequence is locally level, which implies that the system will be more robust to fluctuation of addition and measure response is about changeless within the interval with changeless wave-offs.
High Frequency Noise Rejection
The undermentioned status must be satisfy to the hardiness due to high frequence noise
Where A is the coveted value of the noise fading for frequence is rad/sec.
The undermentioned restraint must be satisfied to guarantee a good end product perturbation rejection.
Where B is the desirable value of sensitiveness map for which the frequence is rad/sec.
Design of IOPID accountant
By sing the FOPLD system for ceramic infrared warmer, whose unfastened cringle transportation map is
The frequence response for ceramic IR warmer system as
Where K=3.96 to 4.2, T=140 sec, L=7 sec
The addition and stage of the works are as follow
Controller Design:
As per the FOPID accountant, the value of planimeter order ( ) and discriminator order ( ) are taken as integrity severally so IOPID accountant obtain as
In this survey, a method has been proposed to obtain the relative addition changeless ( ) , the invariable of built-in addition ( ) and the invariable of derivative addition ( ) .Let the be the needed stage border and be the frequence of the critical point on the Nyquist curve of works at which and specify addition border as
Then, in order to do the stage border of the system equal to and, the undermentioned equation must fulfill.
Harmonizing to IOPID accountant transportation map [ ] , we can acquire the frequence response as
The addition and stage of accountant are as follow,
The unfastened cringle frequence response given as
The addition and stage of the unfastened cringle frequence response as follows
Harmonizing to the design specification ( I ) and ( two ) , the hardiness to derive fluctuation in the works, we can set up an equation about as
Where
From, the Nyquist curve, we set the addition border and stage border as follow by taking Nyquist and bode secret plan of system
rad/sec, =600
By work outing the equation ( a ) , ( B ) and ( degree Celsius ) , we get, and straight
=2.825, =0.0855, =9.074
The IOPID accountant obtained as
Output response with measure input
Design of Controller
This subdivision represents the development of a tuning method of accountant for first order plus clip hold system with addition parameter uncertainness construction. All parametric quantities of the accountant are calculated to fulfill the public presentation of the works. Five unknown parametric quantities of the accountant are estimated work outing five non-linear equations that satisfy five design standards.
Bode secret plan of FOPTD systems with gain parameter uncertainness construction are successfully combined with five design standards to obtain the accountant.
The stage and amplitude of the works in frequence sphere can be drive from equation ( ) by,
FOPID Controller design
From fractional order PID accountant transportation map ( ) , we can acquire its frequence response as follows,
Harmonizing to specification ( 1 ) , the stage value
Harmonizing to specification ( 2 ) we get the magnitude of as
Harmonizing to specification ( 3 ) we get
As
Where
As per the specification ( 3 ) we get the high frequence noise rejection as
Where
As per the specification ( 4 ) we get Good perturbation rejection as
Where
Steady province addition K does non hold any consequence on stage secret plan of the works. In order to plan robust accountant should be satisfied with transportation map of FOPID, viz. must be taken at the point ‘x ‘ . The restraint of stage border and derive border should be satisfied at point ‘y ‘ shows the minimal stage border.
Equation ( ) Five unknown parametric quantity can be solved by utilizing FMINCON optimisation tool chest of MatLab. Equation ( ) is considered as a chief equation and other equation are taken as non-linear restraints for optimisation. Value of the all five unknown parametric quantity get calculated to obtain the accountant to command the ceramic IR warmer as
Step response of C ( s ) G ( s ) are obtained by utilizing the ‘nintblocks ‘ of MatLab shown in fig.
The measure response of the system shows that the system is more robust to derive alteration and wave-off of the measure responses is about changeless. Bode secret plan, Magnitude secret plans of T ( s ) and S ( s ) of the system obtained in MatLab. It shows that stage of the system are about level and about changeless within an interval around with specified restraints.
From the figure of bode secret plan, T ( s ) and S ( s ) , one can reason that the accountant satisfies the robust public presentation of the system.
Decision:
In this paper, two methods for tuning of accountant have been proposed. The first method is based on the thought of utilizing unity power for the planimeter and derivative map of. By work outing the equation obtained by taking consideration of the restraint, we get the value of the different three parametric quantities optimized to accomplish better measure response.
The proposed robust tuning method for a accountant to command first order plus clip hold with parameter uncertainness construction designed. The five design restraints benefits of the Monje-Vinagre et. al.method were used to deduce five non-linear equations. Value of unknown parametric quantity of stage extreme point of bode envelopes of the works is used to fulfill robust public presentation of the system.
The simulation consequences show that the proposed method of accountant has better measure response than IOPID accountant for ceramic IR warmer.
REFRENCES
Podlubny, L. Dorcak, and I. Kostial, “ On fractional derived functions, fractional-order dynamic system and PII»DI? -controllers ” , Proc. of the 36th IEEE CDC, San Diego, 1999.
K. J. Astrom and T. Hagglund, PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, Research Triangle Park, Instrument Society of America, 1995.
Podlubny, “ Fractional-order Systems and Fractional-order Controllers ” , The Academy of Sciences Institute of Experimental Physics, UEF-03-94, Kosice, Slovak Republic, 1994.
Podlubny, “ Fractional-order systems and PII»DI? -controllers, ” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 44, pp. 208-214, 1999.
C.A. Monje, B.M. Vinagre, Y.Q. Chen, V. Feliu, P. Lanusse and J.Sabatier, “ Proposals for Fractional PII»DI? Tuning ” , The First IFAC Symposium on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications 2004, Bordeaux, France, July 19-20, 2004.
D.Xue and C.Zhao. Fractional order PID accountant design for fractional order systems [ J ] . Control Theory and Applications, Vol.24, No.5: 771-776, 2007. ( in Chinese )
S. E. Hamamci, “ An algorithm for stabilisation of fractional-order clip hold systems utilizing fractional- order PID accountants, ” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, Vol. 52, pp. 1964-1969, 2007.
N. Tan, O.F. Ozguven and M.M. Ozyetkin, ” Robust stableness analysis of fractional order interval multinomials, ” ISA Transactions, vol. 48, pp. : 166-172, 2009.
C. A. Monje, Design methods of fractional order accountants for industrial applications. Ph.D. thesis, University of Extremadura, Spain,2006.
D. Valerio, “ Ninteger v. 2.3. fractional control tool chest for matlab, ” 2005.
Valerio, D. ( 2001 ) . Non-integer order robust control: an application. In: Student Forum, Porto, 25-28.
Valerio, D. and Sa da Costa, J. ( 2002 ) . Time domain executions of non-integer order accountants. In: Controlo, Aveiro, 353-358.
Valerio, D. and Sa da Costa, J. ( 2003a ) . Optimization of non-integer order control parametric quantities for a robotic arm. In: International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Coimbra.
YangQuan Chen and Ivo PetraA? and DingyuXue, “ Fractional order control – a Tutorial, ” Proceedings of the 2009 American Control Conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2009.
K. Bettou, A. Charef, F. Mesquine, “ A new design method for fractional PI I» DI? accountant ” , IJ-STA, vol. 2, pp.414-429, 2008
C. Yeroglu, N. Tan, “ Development of a Toolbox for Frequency Response Analysis of Fractional Order Control Systems ” , 19th European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design, Antalya, August 2009.
Tan, N. , OA? zguA?ven, OA? .F. , OA? zyetkin, M.M. : ‘Robust stableness analysis of fractional order interval multinomials ‘ , ISA Trans. , 2009, 48, pp. 166-172
Hwang, C. , Cheng, Y.C. : ‘A numerical algorithm for stableness testing of fractional hold systems ‘ , Automatica, 2006, 42, pp. 825-831
Xue, D. , Chen, Y.Q. : ‘A comparative debut of four fractional order accountants ‘ . Proc. Fourth World Congress, Intelligent Control and Auto, 2002, vol. 4, pp. 3228-3235
Yeroglu, C. , Onat, C. , Tan, N. : ‘A new tuning method for PI I» DI? accountant ‘ . ELECO 2009 Sixth Int. Conf. Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bursa, Turkey, 2009
Tan, N. , Yeroglu, C. : ” Note on fractional-order proportional-integral-differential accountant design ” IET Control Theory Appl. , 2011, Vol. 5, Issue. 17, pp. 1978-1989
