Discus How Humans Have Changed The Atmosphere Geography Essay

To near this inquiry to the full, it is of import to specify the key footings and the parametric quantities that the inquiry sets. The first cardinal term that requires specifying is ‘atmosphere ‘ ; atmosphere is “A gaseous envelope gravitationally bound to a heavenly body” ( Mayhew, 2009, p. 31 ) on Earth the ambiance can be split up into beds, the furthest bed is the thermosphere, here temperatures are hot and atoms are extremely spread out. The following bed is the mesosphere, here temperatures are really cold and this is the bed in which incoming organic structures are disintegrated. The bed below this is the stratosphere, where the composing of the ambiance alterations and gases become more abundant, including O which is responsible for absorbing harmful extremist violet radiation ( Smithson, Addison, & A ; Atkinson, 2008 ) . Below the stratosphere is the concluding closest bed the troposphere ; the troposphere is the bed that contains the bulk ( 80 % ) of the affair in the ambiance and is about 8-16 kilometers deep ( The Encylopedia of Earth, 2010 ) , together they comprise what is referred to as the ambiance ( Smithson, Addison, & A ; Atkinson, 2008, p. 45 ) . The 2nd cardinal term is ‘physical effects ‘ . ‘Physical effects ‘ refers to the material effects of worlds altering the ambiance, so for illustration the make-up of the ambiance or alterations in morphological landscape, or any other touchable consequence. The parametric quantities set by this inquiry are that it asks for how worlds have affected the ambiance ( of Earth ) , in other words the anthropogenetic alterations of the ambiance on our planet. In add-on physical effects lineations that effects to worlds do non necessitate to be delved into at length.

Global heating is one issue built-in to this inquiry. The International Panel on Climate Change 2007 Report stated planetary heating can at least partially be attributed to greenhouse gases ( GHGs ) : “Greenhouse gas forcing has really likely caused most of the ascertained planetary heating over the last 50 years.” ( Solomon, 2007, p. 665 ) Where “very likely” is determined as “ & gt ; 90 % ” ( Solomon, 2007, p. 121 ) . The alterations made to atmospheric composing have arisen from anthropogenetic beginnings. Greenhouse gases produce a nursery consequence by which nursery gases trap surpassing longwave radiation inside the Earth ‘s ambiance ( Smithson, Addison, & A ; Atkinson, 2008, p. 49 ) so the more nursery gases you have the larger the sum of heat being trapped, therefore planetary temperatures addition. The chief green house gases are Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous and Chlorofluorocarbons and Ozone ( Pidwirny, 2009 ) ( Elsom, 1993, p. 152 ) . In add-on H2O vapor besides plays a major function as a nursery gas but is considered a feedback mechanism and non a forcing ( Schmidt, 2005 ) .

We will write a custom essay sample on
Discus How Humans Have Changed The Atmosphere Geography Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Carbon dioxide has increased as a consequence of human activity ( “atmospheric blending ratio of CO2 has increased globally by about 100ppm ( 36 % ) over the last 250 years” ( Solomon, 2007, p. 137 ) ) where the chief beginnings are burning of fossil fuels ( coal, natural gas, crude oil ) for things like power Stationss, transit, industrial use etc. CO2 is major a subscriber in the nursery consequence and “very likely” histories for ? of current radiative forcing. ( Solomon, 2007, p. 131 )

However other gasses play functions in the green house consequence, methane has a planetary heating factor higher than that of CO2 and has been on the addition since 1800s and have gone from 0.8ppm to 1.7ppm by 1990 ( Hester & A ; Harrison, 2002, p. 152 ) . Human actions have increased production of methane ; fuel combustion, additions in cattle herding, rice agriculture, gas release from land fill to call a few beginnings ( Hester & A ; Harrison, 2002, p. 151 ) . Azotic Oxide is another GHG ; nevertheless it does non present a big a menace as the others because of its low addition in ppm ( 16 % since 1750 ) and subsequent little consequence on radiative forcing ( Solomon, 2007, p. 212 ) .

The concluding common GHG are the Chlorofluorocarbons ( CFCs ) , which are have 12’000-16’000x better soaking up of infrared than CO2, although it is found in drastically smaller measures compared to CO2 ( Elsom, 1993, p. 152 ) . Chlorofluorocarbons are besides responsible for depletion to the ozone bed within the stratosphere, particularly in polar parts ( Newman, 2009 ) . Ozone ( O3 ) is in a changeless balance of being created and destroyed, as O2 is turned into two O molecules and the remarkable O ‘s react with O2 signifier Ozone ( O3 ) . Chlorine from Chlorofluorocarbons is broken free by radiation and reacts with ozone, intending there is less Ozone in the stratosphere to protect against biologically harmful UV radiation. ( Newman, 2009 )

So what does holes in the ozone bed mean for the Earth? Increased UV radiation will hold legion effects, the most prolifically talked about being harm to clamber and eyesight. But what are the other effects? Harmonizing to a study by the United Nations Environmental Programme there are legion tellurian and aquatic ecosystems that are light-sensitive, and alterations in UV radiation could be fatal, which in clip would be extremely damaging to nutrient webs and alimentary cycling, ensuing in unanticipated effects ( feedback cringles etc ) . Additionally “assuming other factors remain changeless, extra UV-B will increase the rate at which primary pollutants are removed from the troposphere” ( United Nations Environmental Programme, 1998, p. 15 ) was one of the more interesting points raised in there executive sum-up, alongside the indicant that UV radiation is damaging to man-made stuffs and biopolymers such as paper, wood and wool.

Now that the effects of Chlorofluorocarbons have been discussed we can come back to the thought of the effects of GHGs and planetary heating. “The additive warming tendency over the last 50 old ages ( 0.13°C [ 0.10°C to 0.16°C ] per decennary ) is about twice that for the last 100 old ages. The entire temperature addition from 1850-1899 to 2001-2005 is 0.76°C [ 0.57°C to 0.95°C ] .” ( Solomon, IPCC 2007: Drumhead for Policy Makers, 2007, p. 5 ) Increases in planetary temperatures are expected but are non wholly predictable due to theoretical accounts non being wholly accurate, nevertheless anticipations by the IPCC scope from 1.8oC ( B1 Scenario ) to 4.0oC ( A1FI Scenario ) . Increased temperatures will ensue in ice sheets runing and increased sea degree ( 0.18m-0.38m lowest scenario 0.26m-0.59m highest scenario ) . For the following two decennaries a heating of about 0.2°C per decennary is projected ; hotter yearss will be more common, and colder yearss less frequent and less terrible and heat moving ridges and heat enchantments will be higher. Besides it is predicted there will be more drouths, and increased opportunities of utmost conditions events ( tropical cyclones ) . ( Solomon, 2007 ) . Ice caps runing besides consequence in reduced temperature and salt of the H2O, which could interrupt the thermohaline circulation belt ( which is responsible partially for warming Northern Europe ) as the belt is driven by differences in H2O denseness,

In decision, worlds have polluted the ambiance with GHGs and CFCs which have could hold permanent reverberations on the maps and procedures of are universe and clime. Although Chlorofluorocarbons are no about complete out of usage due to the confirmation of the Montreal protocol, we still continue to pump CO2 and other GHGs into the ambiance, the effects of this are still non complete known due to pattern uncertainnesss and unanticipated feedbacks, but it is certain that the Earth is warming, and that we will hold to cover with the jobs that occur.

Bibliography

Colls, J. ( 1997 ) .Air Pollution.London: E & A ; FN SPON.

Elsom, D. M. ( 1993 ) .Atmospheric Pollution.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Hester, R. E. , & A ; Harrison, R. M. ( 2002 ) .Global Envrionmental Change.Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Mayhew, S. ( 2009 ) .Oxford Dictionary of Geography.New York: Oxford University Press.

Newman, P. A. ( 2009, November 18th ) .Ozone Facts: What is Ozone?Retrieved April 24th, 2010, from NASA – Ozone Hole Watch: hypertext transfer protocol: //ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/ozone.html

Pidwirny, D. M. ( 2009, July 7th ) .Chapter 7: Introduction to the Atmosphere – ( H ) . The Greenhouse Effect. Retrieved April 24th, 2010, from PhysicalGeography.net: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7h.html

Schmidt, G. A. ( 2005, April 6th ) .Water vapor: feedback or forcing?Retrieved April 24th, 2010, from RealClimate.org: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/

Smithson, P. , Addison, K. , & A ; Atkinson, K. ( 2008 ) .Fundamentalss of the Physical Environment.New York: Routledge.

Solomon, S. D. ( 2007 ) .IPCC 2007: Drumhead for Policy Makers.New York: Cambridge University Press.

Solomon, S. D. ( 2007 ) .IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Encylopedia of Earth. ( 2010, January 4 ) .Atmosphere Layers. Retrieved April 22, 2010, from The Encylopedia of Earth: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.eoearth.org/article/Atmosphere_layers

Tickle, A. , Fergusson, M. , & A ; Graham, D. ( 1995 ) .Acid rain and nature preservation in Europe.Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature ( WWF ) .

United Nations Environmental Programme. ( 1998 ) .Environmental effects of ozone depletion: 1998 Assessment.Capital of kenya: Secretariat for The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer United Nations Environment Programme ( UNEP ) .

×

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out