Ethical Position: The Role of Social Media in Recruitment and Selection “A” is a Bangladeshi keeping company that conducts its concern all over the universe. The company aims to be recognized as a planetary trade name and is presently in the procedure of spread outing its operation. To accomplish its end of planetary enlargement. “A” is looking to engage new executives who are immature. energetic and surpassing. The executives should hold good communicating accomplishment as they will hold to match with possible clients from all over the universe.
They should besides possess a sympathetic personality as their work will be people-oriented. The executives should be technologically competent as they may hold to pass on online. Mr. Rahim is a senior director who wants to utilize societal media as a tool to roll up more information about the possible recruits. He argues that. as the campaigners themselves shared the information on populace. it will be wholly legal and ethical to utilize that information in their enlisting and choice procedure.
As the campaigners themselves shared their personal information on a public web site. it would non be a breach of privateness to utilize that information either. He besides argues that. when people are asked to portion information in a occupation interview. they are more like to merely portion the information that make them look good and hide the information that make them look bad. Therefore. the information collected from their personal Facebook. LinkedIn and Twitter histories should assist the company justice the campaigner from an indifferent point of position. Mr. Karim. another senior director. is nevertheless against the usage of societal media to roll up personal information. From his point of position. it will be an invasion of privateness to roll up information from their societal media histories as the campaigners intended their histories for personal usage. He besides believes that the company should merely utilize the information provided by the campaigners themselves in the enlisting and choice procedure. He thinks that the informations collected from societal media sites are more likely to be biased as the campaigners may non hold been serious when posting them.
He argues that although the possible recruits shared their personal information on a public web site. they did non give them the permission to utilize it as a standard to measure their occupation effectivity. If this information relates to some facet of a candidate’s background that could non be requested in an interview. such as age. cultural background. sexual orientation. etc. they could be conflicting favoritism jurisprudence. As the occupation requires good communicative accomplishments. Mr. Rahim believes that the company should look into the societal media presence of their possible recruits. He argues. that if person doesn’t have a societal media account in this age. they are most likely to be backdated and rather incapable of working in a planetary company. Besides. people who have more friends or followings in facebook and chirrup are more likely to be surpassing. As the company is looking for surpassing people to fall in the organisation. it should be a valid and dependable choice tool.
Mr. Karim is strongly against this position. He argues that a person’s personality can non be judged by looking at their societal media profile. Just because person has more friends or followings on societal media sites. it can non be said for certain that individual has a more sympathetic personality. It will be unethical and prejudiced to except quality campaigners merely because they are non active on societal media sites.
Mr. Rahim believes that people who post male chauvinist. racialist. homophobic comments on facebook may damage the concern repute of “A” . Some international concern spouses of “A” may even halt making concern with them. So. “A” has every right to know apart against employees who post controversial content on their societal media histories. Peoples. who identify with radical spiritual or political groups on societal media sites. should non be selected as employees.
Mr. Karim argues people’s behaviour on societal media may non be a true contemplation of their positions. Just because person appears sexist. racialist or homophobic on societal media. that doesn’t mean that that’s how they are in existent life. Besides. a person’s spiritual and political positions are wholly his ain. It is surely non ethical to judge a campaigner merely based on what they do in their ain clip off from work. “A” can non know apart against possible campaigners merely because they shared their positions strongly on societal media sites.
