1. Explain the job of ‘democratic deficit’ and suggest possible solutions to the issue.
The democratic shortage. in general footings. is a job related with the incapacity of the EU establishments to stand for and back up most of the European population. as it is supposed to make. This job is besides related with the “level of ain control” that the member provinces have if different facets that are considered to be decided in EU establishment degrees. From my point of position. a good thought to diminish the existing degree of democratic shortage would be to increase the strength of the national parliaments in the legislative procedure of the EU every bit good as giving them back the ability of control some Fieldss that possibly should non be controlled by the EU.
2. Discourse the importance of democracy within the European integrating procedure.
In order to concentrate in the importance of the democracy in the European integrating procedure. I can state that the democracy is the base of the EU. From the beginning. if there had non been democracy likely the EU would non be as we now it today. The EU footing talk about no dictatorial regimens. peaceable declaration of struggles. active political engagement of the European citizens… If we take a expression of these points. we find that they are the same as the basic rules of democracy. Sing the European integrating procedure. I think it is adequate to advert that one of the entree standard points in order to come in into the EU for other states is holding a democracy. Knowing this. we can think about the importance of this construct in the whole European integrating procedure.
3. Is the formation of touchable European consciousness necessary for the publicity of European democracy?
In my sentiment it is true that a European consciousness is needed in order to advance a European democracy. The ground why I think like this is so simple: “if something is wanted is because person wants it” . What I mean with that phrase is that even before start seting a European democracy. it has to be the purpose of that. In this instance. it is needed that the citizens of the European Union have the though that they belong or that they form portion of something. and that is why they want that European democracy to be developed.
4. Make you believe that the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice made valid parts to the democratisation of the EU?
Nowadays there is merely one sentiment about the parts of the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties to the European democracy: they have been missed chances. This is thought due to the undermentioned grounds: * Amsterdam Treaty: It is said that the Amsterdam Treaty supposed a measure back in the democratic vision for the EU?s hereafter. This treaty could be described easy as “maintaining national control trend” . The biggest error of this procedure was prioritising specific politic footings alternatively of other inquiries related with the EU democracy as a whole. * Treaty of Nice: Although the Charter of Fundamental Rights was signed in Nice. it was non included in this treaty. This is one of the grounds because people think that the Nice procedure. as the Amsterdam 1. was a lost chance for EU democracy. Apart from this. there are two chief points in which this Treaty represents a deficiency of vision for the EU democracy: non being of any understanding about European integrating and ignore of the importance of the ability of the states to command the alterations of the pacts.
5. Make you believe that the failed Constitutional Treaty would hold strengthened European democracy. and if so. how?
In my sentiment. the nidation of the Constitutional Treaty could hold been a measure frontward in footings of the European democracy. My point of position is based in some surveies which point out that the points included in the CT could hold alter the signifier of determination devising in the EU to a new manner much more functional. equilibrated and utile.