Euthanasia: Is It Humane? Essay

Euthanasia: Is It Humane? BY valena1005 Introduction Is mercy killing humane? Do we have the right to assess whether a life is worth living? Euthanasia also known as mercy killing is a way of painlessly terminating one’s life with the “humane” motive of ending his suffering. Albania, Belgium, Netherlands, Oregon, Switzerland and Luxembourg are some places where euthanasia or assisted suicide has been legalized. Should Euthanasia be legalized in Russia or not? Let’s have a look at the arguments that will help us understand the reasoning for / against mercy killing. Resolution analysis

Euthanasia- Euthanasia is the termination of a very sick person’s life in order to relieve them of their suffering. Futile treatment-Treatment that the health care team think will be completely ineffective. Indirect euthanasia-This means providing treatment (usually to reduce pain) that has the foreseeable side effect of causing the patient to die sooner. Involuntary euthanasia-This occurs when the person who dies wants to live but is killed anyway. It is usually the same thing as murder. Living will-A document prepared by an individual in which they state what they want in regard to edical treatment and euthanasia.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Euthanasia: Is It Humane? Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Non-voluntary euthanasia-This is where the person is unable to ask for euthanasia (perhaps they are unconscious or otherwise unable to communicate), or to make a meaningful choice between living and dying and an appropriate person takes the decision on their behalf, perhaps in accordance with their living will, or previously expressed wishes. Palliative care-Medical, emotional, psychosocial, or spiritual care given to a person who is terminally ill and which is aimed at reducing suffering rather than curing. Voluntary euthanasia-This is here euthanasia is carried out at the request of the person who dies.

Hedonism (al- Greek.. ‘H?¶ov?©l – ?«en]oyment”, “fun”) – an ethical doctrine that pleasure is the highest good and purpose of life. Value Morality, the value of life. Criterion 1. Legalize euthanasia In this situation should make decisions by brains, not by feelings. According to the hedonism*, person should not suffer at all. 2. Euthanasia should be carried out only at the request of the patient. Death is the point in a person’s life, Plato said, everyone has the right to put it when he wants Contentions pro

Can quickly and humanely end a patient’s suffering, allowing them to die with dignity. Legalizing euthanasia would help alleviate suffering of terminally ill patients. It would be inhuman and unfair to make them endure the unbearable pain. ln case of individuals suffering from incurable diseases or in conditions where effective treatment wouldn’t affect their quality of life; they should be given the liberty to choose induced death. Also, the motive of euthanasia is to “aid-in-dying” painlessly and thus should be considered and accepted by law.

Although killing in an attempt o defend oneself is far different from mercy killing, law does find it worth approving. ln an attempt to provide palliative care* , a doctor does and should prescrlDe mealclnes(lnalrect eutnanasla”) tnat wlll relleve nls suTTerlng even IT medications cause gross side effects. This means that dealing with agony and distress should be the priority even if it affects the life expectancy. Euthanasia follows the same theory of dealing with torment in a way to help one die peacefully out of the compromising situation.

In this case it is necessary to conclude an living ill*, then you subscribe to your death. Even there are examples of euthanasia in the Bible – in 2 Samuel 1:9-10 “Then he begged me, ‘Come over here and put me out of my misery, for I am in terrible pain and want to die. ‘ So I killed him. ” Everyone has the right to decide how they should die. Deciding if you want to be alive or not is a personal decision. Neither the doctors nor the government has the power to decide if you should live or not. Since it is not their life and they are not in your situation, they cannot make that kind of decision for you.

They give us the liberty to decide our Job, our family, our religion. Why should they not give us the right to decide if we want to live or not? That should be the first right before all the ones I have mentioned. It is not logical that we can choose in all those other decisions if we cannot first choose to live or die. Euthanasia should be a natural extension of patient’s rights allowing him to decide the value of life and death for him. Maintaining life support systems against the patient’s wish is considered unethical by law as well as medical philosophy.

If the patient has the right to discontinue treatment why would he not have the right to shorten his lifetime to escape the intolerable anguish? Isn’t the pain of waiting for death frightening and traumatic? Voluntary euthanasia* should be legalize. Keeping people alive costs a lot of money, which could be used to save other people’s lives In a way, we are Just wasting time and money on a situation that won’t get better. If the patient wants euthanasia, why not do it if we cannot end the huge amount of money wasted on a treatment that won’t help.

Moreover person spends ot Just his money, government pays for his life too. In most countries there is a shortage of health resources. As a result, some people who are ill and could be cured are not able to get speedy access to the facilities they need for futile treatment* At the same time health resources are being used on people who cannot be cured, and who, for their own reasons, would prefer not to continue living. Allowing such people to commit euthanasia would not only let them have what they want, it would free valuable resources to treat people who want to live.

Con Against the will of God Religious people don’t argue that we can’t kill ourselves, or get others to do it. They know that we can do it because God has given us free will. Their argument is that it would be wrong for us to do so. They believe that every human being is the creation of God, and that this imposes certain limits on us. Our lives are not only our lives for us to do with as we see fit. To kill oneself, or to get someone else to do it for us, is to deny God, and to deny God’s rights over our lives and his right to choose the length f our lives and the way our lives end.

Violates accepted codes of medical ethics: the Hippocratic Oath, the World Medical Association in its1992 Statement of Marbella, more recently the NZ Medical Association, condemned euthanasia as unethical. The doctor is a man too he can make mistakes as others . The diagnosis may be incorrect. So assigning a fatal diagnosis and the euthanasia doctor will kill healthy person. Conclusion The discussion over human euthanasia evokes strong emotions on both sides of the debate. Convincing Justifications are found for both viewpoints.

Doubtless, at times a need exists for euthanasia, be that in active, passive, involuntary, or voluntary form, and some forms of euthanasia do exist; however, society must ask what the cost of life and death is: financially, physically, emotionally, and mentally. One person or group should not determine how, when, and if another person should die. Ending an individual’s life, because someone decided that person’s life provides no value to the individual or to society is not ethical and never will be. Pakhomenko Valeria,16 years old Russia


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out