Exploring the Allegorical Nature of the Faerie Queen Essay

An fable – a signifier of drawn-out metaphor in which objects. individuals and actions in a narrative. in this instance. The Faerie Queen. are equated with significances lying outside the narrative itself – represent an abstraction in the pretense of a concrete image. with characters frequently bodying abstract qualities. One manner of looking at The Faerie Queen is that it is allegorical in a complex mode.

As a manner of composing in a still mostly spiritual society ( fifteenth century England ) . sing The Faerie Queen as an fable allows the reader to perceive nature and history as in ownership of concealed Godhead significances capable of being revealed to the diligent. worthy searcher. Similar to the construct of a “sugar-coated pill” The Faerie Queen’s allegorical nature allows the writer ( Edmund Spenser ) to hide ( mostly moral ) thoughts from his readers and uncover them merely to a meriting few who are able to travel beyond visual aspects and acknowledge the truth for what it is.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Exploring the Allegorical Nature of the Faerie Queen Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

One needs to work hard in unlocking the concealed significances for comprehension brought about by diligence would be valued more by the human head than one that is easy understood. i. e. Una had veiled herself until the Red Cross Knight had proven himself worthy of seeing her face at their engagement. In the instance of Duessa. the name itself seems to stand for dichotomy. fraudulence in contrast to the 1 ( Una ) truth. as her function varies from one book to another.

In Book I she embodies spiritual falsity while in Book V it is political falsity. looking in the pretense of just animals until the facts of her foulness are exposed much like literature’s Circe the enchantress and her cup of toxicant capable of changing her form in her purpose to lure and incarcerate her lovers. Spenser’s Duessa is clearly English as she appears to be the merger of the temptress Circe with the scriptural Whore of Babylon. i. vitamin E.

Catholicity in the eyes of Protestant ( Elizabethan ) England. Her function is mostly limited to lead oning visual aspects and scoring the Red Cross Knight. purportedly stand foring the “false” faith of the Roman Catholic Church. As for Una. her individuality is clarified with frailties parodying “true” faith as she appears to stand for the 1. baronial truth among the wilderness. a ‘woman clothed with the sun’ and whose beauty is a manifestation of Christ’s tempting grace.

As the personification of the “true” Church ( the Church of England ) . she travels with the Red Cross Knight ( purportedly stand foring England as its frequenter Saint George was said to hold been a firedrake killer ) in order to salvage her parents from a firedrake. In maintaining with the work’s spiritual tone. Una’s rovings in the wilderness could be viewed in the scriptural tradition as the Church flying the Antichrist. Upon run intoing her. the character of Abessa flees in panic of Una and her king of beasts. which likely represents the justness wielded by Christ through the earthly executors of His will.

Una plays the function of the romantic heroine in demand of a brave knight to deliver her from a moral and volatile luck. She is the “truth” to the Red Cross Knight’s “nobility” yet they are separated. until such a clip when they overcome their several obstructions and prove themselves worthy of a blessed brotherhood. Her character is made to roll. and in Cantos 3 and 6 it is made clear that her advancement through the natural universe is upward. Her brush with Arthur helps her better understand her predicament and what needs to be done for her to be able to exceed her agony and wretchedness.

In a manner. one could reason that Arthur represents godly intercession or merely providence imparting a manus to beef up our moral resoluteness at the clip of darkest human infirmity. Whereas Una represents the one truth. Duessa is the life. take a breathing fraudulence in Faerie Queen. The Red Cross Knight as he descends the universe of society ( Cantos 4 and 5 ) in the company of Duessa is capable of seeing merely surfaces. She is delusory. but does that do her needfully evil?

There is no uncertainty that Una personifies the good yet though Duessa might be her antithesis. it is harder to determine whether she is out justly evil or simply ambidextrous. After all. human existences surely err from clip to clip. we are both deceived and cheats in our ain manner. yet we are non condemned so easy as evil personified or offspring of Satan. But since we are speaking of fables in The Faerie Queen written to laud the reign of Elizabeth I of England. one has to observe the looking demand to revile Catholicism. symbolized by Duessa. as the delusory enemy to England’s Anglican Church symbolized by Una.

Representing truth. Una remains veiled for most of the verse form. bring outing herself merely when the Red Cross Knight is eventually betrothed to her ( Canto 12 ) and when she is all by herself ‘farre from all work forces sight’ ( 3:4 ) . In the same manner as that of the House of Holiness. her ‘gates’ remain closed for fright of being raped for her beauty. The principle for this is that truth as a award of great worth remains vulnerable to development. epitomized in the image of Una’s virginity. ‘that obstinate forte’ ( 6:3 ) which needs to be safeguarded until such clip when she is ready to release it to person worthy of her.

When she is eventually unveiled. her beauty is described as blinding – ‘The blazing brightness of her beauties beame’ ( 12:23 ) – to impart acceptance that truth is non for the fainthearted. and in the juncture that it appears to the common people is needs to have on a head covering as truth can non be conveyed straight for it tends to blind its audience. Finally. for all its power truth is clothed in simpleness and naturalness. In contrast to Duessa’s attire of garments ‘gilt and gorgeous gold arayd’ ( 5: 26 ) . Una enters ‘under a vele. that wimpled was full low.

’ Duplicity is fond of shows and of exhibiting itself – Duessa is set upon a seven-headed animal – yet truth does non necessitate fancy outer garments to hide its natural luster. She is able to chasten the king of beasts. which recognizes Una’s beauty and goodness and responds to her overtures consequently. while it seems to be able to spot Duessa’s true nature despite her lovely visual aspect. fifteenth century Elizabethan England placed great value on a woman’s virtuousnesss. e. g. celibacy. fidelity. etc.

and this is suitably manifested by Una who firm safeguards her virginity. in contrast to Duessa who takes great pleasance in scoring work forces with her feminine trickeries. Una represents chaste love which waits for the right clip. that is. in the context of matrimony. before prosecuting in sexual affairs. Duessa is an wholly different affair – she takes pleasance in her power over work forces through her gender. Of class for the conservative sexual mores of the clip this was ugly in a adult female – she would easy be labeled as a prostitute.

A adult female during those times was viewed somewhat better than belongings. foremost as belonging to her male parent. so to her hubby. and her worth in the matrimony market was frequently viewed in relation to her girlhood. aside from the size of her dowery. Nowadays though. society has a more broad position on the functions of adult females. their maps in society and how they are expected to move. and it would be harder to flatly generalise adult females as merely being the nubile sort or those whom work forces should merely dally with.

Besides. the influence of faith has significantly waned – it no longer dramas such a cardinal function in the lives of most people. Therefore. contemporary readings of The Faerie Queen would non needfully take a sort position of Spencer’s illustration of adult females. peculiarly if one utilizes the feminist position in critically analysing the said work. Work Cited: Spencer. Edmund. The Faerie Queen. London: Penguin Classicss. 1979.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out