Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 are two different books with a batch of similarities and although written old ages ago. can still be applicable to the universe today. Several conflicting frames of head have played specifying functions in determining humanity throughout the 20th century. Visions of a bright hereafter held by humanity were taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through the forfeit of individualism to the province. The hocus-pocus and the perfidy by both governing authorities shows their similarities in their oppressive control and this is really apparent in both novels. The novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury established the ambiance of the authorities control over everything the citizens do—even in what they think. Fear of the effects of moving in the non-prescribed manner is shown through the supporters. who were the few people in each novel to finally happen the visible radiation and what constitutes as a good life. merely for it to be their biggest defect. A individual character is alienated because of his inability to conform and accept the Torahs of society.
The similar fright of the maltreatment of power and engineering of the province at the disbursal of human individualism. nucleus values etc. present within these novels speaks to the relevancy of these novels within their historical context and their utility for rousing people to the awful effects of their ignorance. Warnings of what society could perchance devolve to are presented in 1984 by George Orwell and in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. Both novels contain graphic dystopian universes from which we can see strong resemblances to our present societies and that is the dangers of a controlled authorities and how seeable this control is in both novels.
The authoritiess in novels Big Brother and The Party in 1984 and The Firemen in Fahrenheit 451 have dominant control over their citizens and they have a batch of similarities in their ways of commanding. Their privation for more and more power is a graphic illustration of control in the novels. In 1984. this can be seen throughout the novel as the authorities tries to extinguish everything pleasurable. Harmonizing to the governing party. they try to make a dystopian society where even sex is merely a formality and non for pleasance. But in the hereafter there will be no married womans and no friends. Children will be taken from their female parents at birth. as one takes eggs from a biddy. The sex inherent aptitude will be eradicated. Reproduction will be an one-year formality like the reclamation of a ration card. We shall get rid of the climax. Our brain doctors are flat work upon it now. ( Orwell 267 )
In the fresh Fahrenheit 451 the chief battle for power trades with the authorities. This excessively oppressive. about Orwellian manner bureaucratism tries to do certain there is no interaction with books at all. They believe that books permeate their society and pervert the heads of the people. Unannounced hunts of belongings by “Firemen” are non at all uncommon. At the slightest intimation of this futuristic contraband. these firemen will rummage through all of one’s belongings. at times. destructing everything in their way. On the opposite side of that spectrum. there is a battle for power by the people as good. There is the adult female who hid several thousand volumes of books in her house. She loves these books so much that when the firemen ransacked her house. she went down with the books without vacillation. She did non care what they were traveling to make to her.
Another illustration of the similarities is the elements used for control in both novels. In 1984. there were a batch of elements used. Telescreens for illustration was a really of import component in the drama. There was a telescreen in every house and the ‘proles’ could non set it off. It could see everyone and everything and it was put at that place merely to watch the people and besides reprimand or in ‘Newspeak’ zap them of any bad actions towards the authorities. “Winston kept his dorsum to the telescreen. It was safer ; but as he knew. even a dorsum can be revealing” ( Orwell 3 ) . This remark merely goes every bit far to state the audience the extent to which fright was inputted into everyone in the drama merely in an effort to keep their control in this ‘dystopian’ society. In Fahrenheit 451. they are fire combatants but alternatively. they set fire on books and houses that have books. Component of control can clearly be seen at that place as they do non desire people reading books as they believe it merely corrupts the head and harmonizing to Beatty the caput of the fire section. it ever angers some people. “While the book went sparkling commotions and blew off on a air current turned dark with burning” ( Bradbury 3-4 ) .
Control is one of the major subjects in the novels 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 and it is largely showcased on the authorities. The citizen’s ignorance in both novels and how the authoritiess cultivates that by doing them experience everything was all right and thereby lead oning them into confronting world. In Fahrenheit 451. everything that the authorities encourages the people to make while at work are merely Acts of the Apostless of deflecting people. They prefer people watching telecasting and driving recklessly on the route to them reading books. “How did you acquire so empty? He wondered. Who takes it out of you? ” ( Bradbury 44 ) In this conversation. Guy Montag tries to speak to his married woman but all she cares about are the telecasting characters than she does to him. She even goes every bit far as to name them her household.
In 1984. this can be seen when O’Brien tries to convert Winston about Big Brother by seeking to do him recognize that the party owns being now and there is nil he can make but follow. He wanted Winston to utilize the ‘If you can’t crush them so fall in them’ sort of doctrine. “Reality merely exists in the human head and nowhere else. Not in single ; merely in the head of the party. which is corporate and immortal” ( Orwell 261 )
Even Beatty attempts to alter Montag’s affinity for books and he tries to convert him that they destroy books because it ever offends person and they want to halt that. “The new society as he explains let all people rich or hapless. stupid. smart. to acquire a sense of gesture without moving” ( Bradbury 56 ) .
Brainwashing of heads was one of the chief aims of both authoritiess in the novels and all of these were merely in an effort one time once more to maintain power. Due to the incontestible control of the authorities. and it’s subjugation to its citizens. the safety of all opposed to the authorities are in danger. In 1984. the audience can associate to this due to the comparable agony both Julia and Winston went through in the drama. And due to the rough interventions. they were forced to bewray each other.
“I betrayed you. ” she said baldly.
“I betrayed you. ” he said.
She gave him another speedy expression of disfavor.
“Sometimes. ” she said. “they endanger you with something—something you can’t stand up to. can’t even think about. And so you say. ‘Don’t do it to me. make it to person else. make it to so-and-so. ’ And possibly you might feign. afterwards. that it was merely a fast one and that you merely said it to do them halt and didn’t truly intend it. But that isn’t true. At the clip when it happens you do intend it. You think there’s no other manner of salvaging yourself and you’re rather ready to salvage yourself that manner. You want it to go on to the other individual. You don’t give a darn what they suffer. All you care about is yourself. ”
“All you care about is yourself. ” he echoed.
“And after that. you don’t experience the same toward the other individual any longer. ”
“No. ” he said. “you don’t feel the same. ” ( Orwell 292 )
In Fahrenheit 451. it is really apparent as there were so many times they wanted to kill Guy Montag the supporter after they could non alter him. They oppressed him a batch and an illustration of where that can be seen is when Beatty forces him to fire his house and so Beatty places him under apprehension. When Beatty continues to call on the carpet Montag. Montag turns the flamethrower on his superior and returns to fire him to ashes. Montag knocks the other firemen unconscious and runs. The Mechanical Hound. a monstrous machine that Beatty has set to assail Montag. pounces and injects Montag’s leg with a big dosage of anesthetic. Montag manages to destruct it with his flamethrower ; so he walks off the numbness in his leg and flights with some books that were hidden in his backyard.
Both the freedom from ignorance of the supporters finally changes their behavior from jurisprudence staying to jurisprudence interrupting citizens and it besides led to their new apprehension of what constituted life. Montag is a fireman and in the novel. the firemans are a disciplinary force in society that really starts fires alternatively of halting them. As in the instance of Winston. ab initio Montag is non suspected of perfidy since he is a ‘model citizen’ who enjoys his occupation of destructing books. which society has deemed as troublesome and saddening. Being portion of the group that burns books would look to those around him as a hapless campaigner for interrupting the jurisprudence and reading them.
Finally. nevertheless. there is a alteration in Montag. and he starts to want for the cognition. consciousness and chance that he thinks books can supply. He considers this thirst as an impulse described as “poison working up his carpuss and into his cubituss and his shoulders. and so the jumpover from shoulder blade to shoulder blade like a flicker jumping a gap” ( Bradbury 41 ) . Montag returns to interrupt the jurisprudence by reading as many books as he can. Winston in 1984 is besides a familiar character that Fahrenheit 451 produced ; the supporter breaks the jurisprudence by perpetrating idea offense which is the worst type of offense to perpetrate. He commits this idea offense when he started composing his journal on page 8. “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER over and over once more filling half a page. ” ( Orwell 18 )
Their discourtesy is what begins their battle with the authorities and as such lead to the government’s ‘harsh’ action towards them and at the terminal. they both had dry terminations as Winston eventually conforms and agree with the authorities while Guy Montag continues his battle by fall ining new friends to travel on to seek for subsisters and rebuild civilisation.
An of import or possibly the most of import subject that occurs in the essay is that of devastation of human values. In both novels. a human value seems to hold been diminished to the lowest degree. In 1984. there are about no human values left in most of the people of the society and that is how Large Brother likes it. Even the ‘proles’ enjoy watching the executing of their equals. “It was a good hanging said Syme reminiscently. I think it spoils it when they tie their pess together. ( Orwell 49 ) . Syme believes that it is all right for people to be hanged and it is non fun when their legs are tied. This is merely to demo you the extent to which human values are no longer revered. It is besides the same for Fahrenheit 451 when even adolescents kill each other for merriment whether or non on aim it doesn’t affair. “I’m afraid of kids my ain age. They kill each other. Did he ever use to be that manner? ( Bradbury 30 ) The control of the authorities over its citizens is all so high here that about all if non all have been vanquished and both authorities sees nil incorrect with it. On the contrary. they like it.
Orwell’s 1984 and Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 are both originative visions of what the writers felt society should be concerned about turning into. The novels offer different inside informations on interesting scenarios. but they portion similarities in their leaders. the control over their people and the devastation of human values. The protagonists’ opposition to conform to the norms of their dystopian society led to their terrible penalties and treachery every bit good their alteration from jurisprudence staying to jurisprudence interrupting citizens. Even though these narratives were written around 1950. they are still rather applicable to the universe today. The popularity of these books does govern out the possibility of such a society coming into being in the hereafter. nevertheless. the dangers of a controlled authorities and how seeable it is in both novels should publish a wake-up call to society on how unsafe controlled authoritiess and how about impossible it is to acquire rid of them.
