Impact On The Credibility Of Auditors Work Accounting Essay

Ethical motives, are Moral beliefs and regulations about right and incorrect. As defined in Merriam Webster Dictionary, moralss are the rules linked with what is good and bad and with moral responsibility and duties rules of behavior regulating an person. Ethical motives refers to a subject in which affairs of right and incorrect, good and evil, virtuousness and frailty, are consistently examine ( Brinkmann, 2002 ) . Ethical motives encourage a sensed of societal ; duty in the professional member ( Tucker et al, 1999 ) , while at the same time supplying justification of professional opportunism ( Fisher et al, 2001 ) .

3.1.1 Impact on the credibleness of hearers ‘ work

The credibleness of hearers ‘ work remainders on hearers being perceived as independent, competent, and adhering to ethical behavior. Flint ( 1988 ) provides an reply when he states:

‘Public trust and assurance in hearers are dependent on a go oning belief in their unqualified unity, objectiveness, and, in appropriate fortunes, credence of responsibility to the public involvement, with a eventful subordination of self-interest. Creating and retaining trust and assurance, hence, requires hearers to demo certain features which are those normally associated with employments which are recognized and sanctioned by society as professions ”

Therefore, in order to retain the populace ‘s assurance in the credibleness of their work, hearers must adhere to criterions of ethical behavior: criterions of behavior that embody and demonstrate unity, objectiveness, and concern for the populace ( instead than self- ) involvement.

Harmonizing to Dobson and Armstrong, 1995 ; Libby and Thorne, ( 2007 ) ethical behavior supports the sweetening of the audit independency and has important to the hearer ‘s function to play hearers ‘ primary responsibility to protect the public involvement and the necessity to utilize judgement in carry throughing his responsibility such that the hearers ‘ work is believable and dependable.

In Mauritius, the Financial Reporting Council ensures that any registered houses set up policies and processs designed to supply it with sensible confidence that the house and its forces comply with relevant ethical demands in carry oning their work.

3.2 Regulation of hearer independency

The Mauritius Financial Reporting Act 2004 provinces: “ independency ” means independency of head and independency in visual aspect. An hearer shall transport out his maps in full independency and shall non move in any mode contrary to the Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics ; or prosecute in any activity which is likely to impair his independency as an hearer.

Mauritius establishes a local professional accounting organic structure which meets IFAC Statements of Membership Obligations, and a local regulative organic structure for the accounting profession. Mauritius adopts all current IFRS and ISA. The Mauritius model, nevertheless, acknowledge that the hearer can non to the full keep this independency of head and in visual aspect as in one manner or the other circumstance emerges whereby such professional behaviour is hard to keep. Along with this line, the ICAEW Review of Guidance on Auditor Independence ( ICAEW, 2000 ) high spots that: ‘As long as audit assignments and fees are determined by the stockholders of the company being audited, the hearer can ne’er be economically independent of the client ‘ .

Mauritius has undertaken a reappraisal ( ROSC A & A ; A ) , most late in June 201, to find what reforms should be undertaken to further beef up the accounting institutional model that is critical in lending to the state ‘s economic growing. This reappraisal brings out new issues on the strengths and failings in institutional model that underpin accounting and scrutinizing patterns that influence the quality of fiscal coverage. The failings are studied and executions are made to better Mauritius ‘ concern environment, thereby heightening assurance of investors in the work of the hearer. The passage of the Financial Reporting Act 2004, establishes the Financial Reporting Council to modulate the accounting and scrutinizing profession by guaranting conformity with accounting and auditing criterions.

Mauritius ordinance ensures that houses and its forces maintain independency where required by the IFAC Code and national ethical demands so that it identifies and evaluates fortunes and relationships that create menaces to independence, and to take appropriate action to extinguish those menaces or cut down them to an acceptable degree by using precautions, or, if considered appropriate, to retreat the hearer from the audit assignment. Firms in Mauritius which are approved by the Financial Reporting Council is obliged to supply independency preparation to all steadfast forces on an one-year footing, so as to regularly communicates updates to or elucidation of independency policies. It sets the ordinance for houses to hold a good managed internal processs and controls over the work. It besides specified to hold rotary motion as a agency of precaution for hearer independency. Mauritius model Acts of the Apostless as a shield to non-independent by through instruction, preparation and experience demands for entry, professional criterions, monitoring and disciplinary procedures, external reappraisal of quality control system, and holding statute law regulating independency demands and countenance for licencing hearer who fails to conform with the needed professional and ethical behaviors required as an hearer.

3.3 The extent to which Mauritius model every bit good as establishments provides the best possible preparation to fit people with the needed professional and ethical behaviors required as an hearer ; independency

In Mauritius, the Mauritius Institute of Professional Accountants ( MIPA ) supervises and regulates the accounting profession and promotes the highest criterions of professional and concern behavior of, and enhances the quality of services offered by professional comptrollers. Equally far as the professional and ethical behavior is concerned, the MIPA proctors its members utilizing the IFAC Code of Ethics For Professional Accountants by set uping, publication and reexamining the Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics for professional comptrollers, which is consistent with and contains all the rules of IFAC ‘s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. It promotes the highest professional criterions among, and improves the quality of professional services offered by its members. The MIPA does non administrate any professional instruction and scrutinies since there is no local ( Mauritius ) professional accounting making. In Mauritius, professional accounting makings are provided by ACCA, ICAEW and CIMA. There is close direct coaction between third establishments and specific professional accounting organic structure as exemplified by the cooperation between the University of Mauritius and ACCA. Tertiary establishments and professional accounting organic structures include IFRS and ISA in their course of study and universities offer ethic preparation faculties. Some universities have faculties in public sector and moralss preparation.

Mauritius establishments are pulling, retaining and developing the right people for the accounting profession. The Council develops issues and keeps up-to-date auditing criterions, and ensures consistence between the criterions issued and the auditing criterions and dictums of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. The audit profession is in a premier place to drive fiscal unity in the involvement of the society. The Institute, in bend, continually challenge the different civilizations within the profession. Innovate and go on to put clip and attempt in continuing capital market assurance through continually bettering the quality of external auditing and transfusing the needed professional and ethical behaviors required as an hearer. Therefore in Mauritius regulative model prevents hearers who are insufficiently independent and competent in this manner of instruction and preparation to procure the independency of hearers.

In Mauritius non merely members of the profession are educated but besides regulators, direction, boards of managers and audit commissions on the outlooks of hearers with regard to independency is done through the followers:

Execution counsel, including illustrations of appropriate and inappropriate precautions to independence menaces.

Guidance with regard to public-interest entities and the moralss constructs that apply to such entities.

Increased lucidity sing the application of the Code with regard to revenue enhancement services.

Consideration of encompassing ethical conformity within a quality control model.

Mauritius is doing its best to beef up professional instruction and preparation and development of practical-oriented guidelines on executions of criterions for the whole market to run into the challenges and demanding aims set by the acceptance of IAS/IFRS and ISA within a short timeframe. So the Mauritius Framework provides the necessary preparation which encourages unity and objectiveness, so as hearers have sufficient respect for their callings and reputes to be encouraged towards objectiveness and usage of precautions and avoid judicial proceeding. Seen in this manner, Mauritius can be said to supply the best possible preparation to fit people with the needed professional and ethical behaviors required as an hearer.

Part 2

4.0 Audit Hazard

4.1 Definition of audit hazard

Identifying and measuring audit hazard is a cardinal portion of the audit procedure. Harmonizing to ISA 400 ( SAS 300 ) “ Accounting and internal control system and audit hazard appraisals ” , audit hazard is defined as ‘the hazard that the hearer expresses an inappropriate audit sentiment when the fiscal statements are materially misstated. Audit hazard is a map of material misstatement and sensing hazard. Harmonizing to Dan Swanson ( Articles on Internal Control: Business hazard V. Audit hazard ) , “ audit hazard relates chiefly to the internal and external audit attempts to accomplish its aims ; that is, provide effectual, seasonably, and efficient confidence and confer withing support to direction and the board ” .

There are four chief audit criterions which hearers consider when covering with audit hazard:

ISA 200, Overall Aims of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in conformity with International Standards on Auditing

ISA 315, Understanding the Entity and its Surrounding Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

ISA 330, The Auditor ‘s Procedures in responses to Assessed Hazard

ISA 500, Audit Evidence

4.2 Business hazard vs. audit hazard attack

The effectivity of the audit hazard attack has been questioned. Lemon et Al. ( 2000 ) place that some big houses are following what is called a concern hazard attack. Business hazard ” refers to the hazard that “ the hearer is exposed to loss or hurt to his professional pattern from judicial proceeding, inauspicious promotion, or other events originating in connexion with fiscal statements that he has examined and reported on ” ( AICPA 1983 ) . Harmonizing to Jeppeson ( 1998 ) concern hazard brings house more closely aligned to the aims of the concern and of direction than those of fiscal statement audit so as to add value to scrutinize. By utilizing this attack, the hearer acquires a better cognition and apprehension of the concern.

In Mauritius, the National Audit Office ( NAO ) adopted the Risk-Based Audit Approach in 2010, and the execution needs to be strengthened. It is by and large accepted that for most entities of size, the risk-based audit attack minimises the possibility of audit aims non being met. Consequently ISA 315, “ Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and its Environment ” , compels hearers to follow a risk-based attack to audits.

4.3 Auditor independency and audit hazard relationship

The Sarbane and Oxley Act ( SOX ) act enhanced hearers independency as it prevents audit houses from supplying extra services to public companies they audit. SOX act was invented in the US when there was fraud and no transparence in public companies that investors lost a batch of money and were in a demoralized province for new investings. Therefore, SOX came to re-assure everyone and to get down newly. SOM act contributes a batch to hearers ‘ independency, and consequences in an automatic positive impact on audit hazards. This is because when the independency of hearers is threatened that audit hazards arises more. So, here there is no concern for independency, hence audit hazard will be significantly decreased. This act has considered all the drawbacks and possible countries and fortunes in which mistakes and fraud may happen in an organisation before implementing their regulations and ordinances. It decidedly enhances independency of hearers and avoids hazard factors. So there is a tie relationship between hearer independency and audit hazard. As suggested by Fearnley, S. and Beattie, V. and Brandt, R. ( 2005 ) , “ In reconsidering the relationship between independency in fact and audit hazard we are able to place more clearly where the cardinal audit hazards and menaces to independence truly lie. ”

Therefore both independency model and audit hazard theoretical account is required if hearers ‘ independency is to be protected. Vivien Beattie, Stella Fearnley and Richard Brandt ( 2005 ) argue that audit is a holistic activity, in which issues of competency, independency in fact and audit hazard are inextricably linked. Achieving the end of a high-quality audit really much depends on hearers exerting appropriate and sound professional judgement throughout the battle. If the right hearer is topographic point to transport out the battle, so audit hazard can be reduced. As stated by ISA 200: The Objective and General Principle Regulating an Audited account of Financial Statement ‘ , aˆ•The hearer is non expected to, and can non, cut down audit hazard to zero and can non therefore obtain absolute confidence that the fiscal statements are free from material misstatement due to fraud or mistake. But the latter must demo that appropriate stairss have been taken to make an indifferent sentiment. Findingss documented by Mitra et Al ( 2007 ) , Goddard and Master ( 2000 ) , O’Sullivan ( 1999 ) , Collier and Gregory ( 1999 ) and Simunic ( 1984 ) study that there is as important positive relationship between audit hazard and factors endangering hearer independency ( illustration in footings fees paid to the external hearer ) . Increasing hearer independency reduces audit hazard as better professional behavior better the measure and quality of audit grounds upon which audit sentiments are formed. Compromise audit independency associated with addition in entire fees paid to auditor, finally increase audit hazard.

5.0 Auditor independency and audit hazard theoretical account moving as the chief constituents of audit work to guarantee public assurance

5.1 Audit Procedure

5.1.1 Definition of the audit procedure

Harmonizing to ISA 200 “ Aims of Auditing Financial Statement ” , hearers should show an sentiment on whether their client ‘s fiscal statement provides a true and just position of their fiscal place. In order to organize this sentiment, hearers must garner and measure sufficient appropriate grounds ( ISA 500: “ Audit Evidence ” ) . This grounds is collected through the audit procedure. The audit procedure comprises a series of logical chiseled stairss and is performed utilizing appropriate audit processs to make by an audit sentiment. There are fundamentally 10 stairss of the audit procedure which have been summarized in the tabular array below ( Brenda Porter, Joe Simon, David Hatherly, 2002, “ Principles of External Hearers ” , 2nd edition ) :

Audit Step


Appointment of hearer at one-year general meeting of stockholders

Letter of battle sent to client

To document the audit agreements and to clear up affairs that may be misunderstood

Gain apprehension of the client, its activities and its fortunes

To understand events, minutess and patterns that may hold a important impact on the fiscal statements

Overall analytical reappraisal

To measure audit hazard and set materiality degree

Gain apprehension of the accounting system and measure the internal controls

To understand how the accounting system ‘works ‘ and to place strengths and failings of internal controls

Test internal control strengths through conformity testing

To determine whether controls on which audit trust is planned is working good

Test minutess an history balances ( substantial testing )

To measure the completeness, truth and cogency of informations produced by the accounting system

Completion and reappraisal

To guarantee sufficient appropriate grounds has been collected on which to establish an sentiment

Report to:

Stockholders and other parties external to the entity

Those charged with administration of the entity

To inform stockholders and other interested parties of the sentiment signifiers about the truth and equity of the fiscal statements.

To inform those charged with administration about the nature, range and findings of the audit. To inform direction of failings found in the accounting system and any to offer affairs of concern. To offer advice on how the accounting system and its internal controls can be improved.

( Re ) at the company ‘s general meeting

5.1.1 The “ unobservable ” property of the audit procedure

There are a battalion of issues and jobs hearers encounter during scrutinizing that must be addressed separately. Some issues emerge out of the blue and unobtrusive. Common jobs that hearers experience solutions are at that place, but ill-defined issues which arise can non be references instantly. Although the audit procedure is really similar in all audits, audit clients differ markedly in size, nature and complexness. Harmonizing to Richard A. Vincins, a Certified Quality Auditor and regulative personal businesss adviser, there are different scrutinizing manners, from Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) inspectors to third-party hearers for International Organization for Standardization ( ISO ) enfranchisements. There are many jobs which arise during audit procedure, and many of which may be unknown. Audit procedure is considered to be unobservable as no hearer will meet the same issue. Many hearers struggle with jobs they encounter during the audit procedure without understanding how to cover with them.

The audit procedure is really complex and barely discernible by 3rd parties and the audit study ( the consequence of an audit ) is so standardized in its content and format that it offers a lone few possibilities for distinction. Audit failures are frequently merely known when there are published by imperativeness ( Wooten, 2003 ) . So, it is hard to cognize the figure of audit failures non published by the imperativeness. The audit procedure in itself is unobservable because in the first topographic point issues like independent of head is hard to turn out and can merely usually be established by circumstantial grounds. As the audit procedure is unobservable, the lone juncture when grounds of independency in fact ( or deficiency of it ) becomes by and large known is as a consequence of a disciplinary enquiry as stated by SEC. The quality of audit is non unvarying and particularly non straight evident. Audit quality and professional agnosticism are unobservable in the audit procedure. All these issues themselves make the audit procedure ill-defined. In fact, because of the troubles in detecting the audit procedure, the bulk of normative and experimental research focuses on an appraisal of audit quality through “ the quality of the hearer ” as an person or group of persons.

Audit procedure is “ unobservable ” because unless appropriate legal, regulative or ethical inducements are present, there may be small ground for any 3rd parties to collaborate in the audit procedure or to recognize their portion in back uping the truth and equity of fiscal statements in the procedure. There is a danger that information which is of importance in measuring the truth and equity of fiscal statements may non be available to either the board or the hearers. The work of third-party advisors can hold a major influence on fiscal statements. But there are attendant dangers that the effects of their work are non crystalline or may non be to the full taken into history in the audit procedure.

5.1.2 Ingredients necessary to guarantee assurance in the audit procedure

The fiscal audit is the anchor for continuing assurance in the capital markets. It is a must to protect investor assurance in the audit procedure. Hearers have traffics with a broad scope of employees and directors and it is of import for them to hold assurance in the audit procedure. As the fiscal markets become progressively complex and planetary, a relevant and dependable audit procedure is progressively indispensable to investor assurance and to the on-going verve of the capital markets.A Harmonizing to Howard Pratt FCA ( July 2012, Group audits article ) good quality information, effectual communications and proper planning are all indispensable ingredients for accomplishing a successful audit procedure where benefits accrue to all parties. As the audit procedure is unobservable, public assurance in the value of audit depends on both the visual aspect of audit quality and the fact of audit quality while audit hazard besides is cardinal to the audit procedure as hearers can non and make non try to look into all minutess. Enhancing assurance in independent audit by bettering audit transparence and back uping stockholder engagement in the audit procedure are ingredient.

Quality auditing is built-in to the effectual operation of the capital markets. It is an indispensable service necessitating specializer accomplishments and cognition. That is the hearers themselves are a critical ingredient in the audit procedure. Hearers must be seen to be independency of fact and of head. Hearers must demo that the aims of ethical criterions are achieved, supplying assurance in the unity, objectiveness and independency of the hearer, and that sufficient audit grounds is non unsuitably constrained by fiscal force per unit areas. The European Commission believes that advancing independency and guaranting that hearers are moving in conformity with the professional and ethical behavior is a cardinal to reconstructing trust in the audit procedure, which plays a polar function in concern by advancing the causes of transparence, answerability and sound fiscal direction.

Effective communicating is cardinal to the audit procedure and a quality audit. Research information indicates that accomplishments and competences traditionally regarded as ‘soft ‘ , such as communicating, are truly the true drivers of audit quality. Communication is at the very bosom of scrutinizing. Communication within audit squads gives rise to shared wisdom and enhances or encourages professional agnosticism. That communicating is besides how audit findings are best assessed and developed to give the right audit results.

The use of the audit hazard theoretical account is besides a cardinal portion in audit procedure so as to measure audit hazard and set the materiality degree, and find the type of proving to be used ( substantial or command trial ) . This theoretical account enables the hearer to find the range of audit proving for mistake or misstatement in each client company by measuring the hazard of mistake or misstatement arising in that company. By measuring the degree of hazard associated with the concern and its environment, hearers will cognize about the effectivity of the internal control system. In this instance the audit procedure will be carried put expeditiously as appropriate testing is made and ‘good ‘ hearer sentiment is reached.

Consideration or finding whether an action is necessary or appropriate in the public involvement to see whether the action will advance efficiency, competition, and capital formation is besides an ingredient in the audit procedure. This will increase investor assurance in the unity of the audit procedure and in the audited fiscal information that they use day-to-day to do investing and vote determinations. This increased sense of assurance should advance market efficiency and capital formation.

Despite the strong unfavorable judgment in the UK of the exterritorial facet of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the major commissariats of the act are widely seen here as being the right and proper steps. Many would see greater transparence by companies and hearers as the concluding ingredient necessary to guarantee assurance in the audit procedure ( Peter Wyman, April 2004, Is Auditor Independence Really The Solution? ) . Certain houses like PWC and E & A ; Y suggest that transparence by company additions usefulness and informational value of audit study in the audit procedure. Ernst & A ; Young ( November 2012 ) believe a better and more meaningful attack would be to beef up the audit commission oversight treat and do it crystalline to stockholders, to supply stockholders with a clearer image of how the audit commission really carries out its of import duty to guarantee that the hearer is both independent and effectual.

A ‘robust independent audit procedure ‘ is, cardinal to the unity of fiscal coverage which is, in bend, cardinal to confidence in the capital market ( APB, 1994 )

5.2 Audit quality

5.2.1 Definition of audit quality

Audit quality is defined as the chance that an hearer will both discover and truthfully describe material mistakes, deceit, or skips in the client ‘s material fiscal statement ( Deangelo, 1981 ) . Audit quality includes ( 1 ) the chance that an hearer will both discover and truthfully describe material mistakes, deceit, or skips in material fiscal statement ( Deangelo, 1981 ) , ( 2 ) chance that an hearer will non publish an unqualified study for statements incorporating material mistakes ( downwind et al. , 1999 ) , ( 3 ) the truth of hearer ‘s information coverage ( Davidson and Neu, 1993 ) , and ( 4 ) step of the audit ‘s ability to cut down noise and prejudice and better punctilious in accounting informations ( Wallace, 1980 ) . Quality has been defined as the entireness of characteristics and features of a system, procedure, and merchandise or service that bear the ability to fulfill given demands ( Mills, 1989, p. 1-4 ) . The quality of the houses ‘ disclosed information is enhanced by the audit quality, which in bend lowers the information dissymmetry along with the sensing and turning away of accounting mistakes and misstatements ( F. Hakim, Omri & A ; I. Hakim, 2010, p. 152 ) . The audit quality is usually related to the ability of the hearers to place material misstatements in the fiscal statements and their willingness to publish an appropriate and indifferent audit study based on the audit consequences ( Turley & A ; Willekens, 2008, p. 3 ) .

5.2.2 The demand for quality control in keeping high quality audit

International Standard on Auditing ( ISA ) 220, “ Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements ” trades with the specific duties of the hearer sing quality control procedures for an audit of fiscal statements to guarantee that high quality audits are performed. Quality control is of paramount importance to the independent audit map. ISA 220 explains:

“ In order to transport out an audit in a mode that meets the sensible outlook of users of audited fiscal statements, it is indispensable that audit work is carried out with due respect for audit quality. Firm ne’er compromises the demand of audit quality in order to accomplish fiscal success. In developing quality control policy and procedures, and in order to continue audit quality, direction constructions within houses are designed ” .

It is indispensable that hearers perform high quality audits so that they fulfill accurately their map in society. In order to guarantee that high quality audits are performed, or if the populace is to hold assurance in hearers ; work, quality controls are needed to guarantee that their work is systematically of high quality. Flint ( 1988 ) conveys compactly the importance of quality control for auditing:

“ Hearers have both a legal responsibility and a professional duty to work to the highest criterions which can moderately be expected to dispatch the duty that is placed on them. . . . in a profession whose authorization is dependent among other things on public assurance. . . a incontrovertible concern, separately and jointly on the portion of the members of the profession, to command and keep the highest quality in its work, is a affair of basic rule. The footing of go oning public assurance and trust in professional competency is a belief that that the criterions of the members of the profession will be maintained and can be relied on. ( pp. 159, 161 ) ”

Okolie ( 2007 ) maintains that high quality audits enhance the dependability of the fiscal coverage procedure and facilitate optimum allotment of capital by investors and other users of the fiscal statements.

Conformity with the ISA 220, “ Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements ” helps minimising the chance of audit failure.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out