Introducing IS in organizations

Introduction

In this write-up, we shall be discoursing the development of information system ( IS ) in an organisation through the concern aims and the sort of IS attack that will be suited in a defined organisation when developing an information system. Issues we shall be turn toing are the doctrines and methodological analysiss of IS development and the ways of using analytical accomplishments in turn toing Information system development in an organisational by utilizing a instance survey.

Based on the analysis findings, we shall analyze the systems development doctrines by looking at Engineering and Socio-technical doctrines, their differences and the deductions on the procedure of Information systems development ( ISD ) . From our attack pickings, we will so see the methodological analysis to utilize because of the different options in footings of organisational aims, design characteristic, users satisfaction and system usage ( Hirschheim & A ; Klein 1989 ) which will take us in cognizing the philosophical root, its suitableness and virtues and demerits of certain methodological analysis.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Introducing IS in organizations
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Before developing an IS, we need to analyze the demand of the system in footings of what problem/opportunity to work out which will be towards the company objectives ( Law & A ; Longworth 1987 ) . By problems/opportunity, we shall so analyse the current system and its problem/opportunity, and so urge ways of turn toing such problem/opportunity through the usage of an appropriate modeling technique.

Doctrines Of An Information System

Information Technology ( IT ) plays an of import function in an organisational development which has an impact on the people and organisations non because of the present of engineering but the information. Walsham ( 1989 ) sees engineering as a tool which is socially impersonal ( back uping IT resources both technically and administrative wise ) as viewed by discrete-entity theoretical account which assumed to be a consensus of formal aims but could non explicate the world of information systems in an organisation because it takes no history of the societal context ( societal dealingss between the interior decorators, the directors and the users of the information system ) . However, Information system takes history of the information produced by the information engineering in pass oning and determination support intents within and outside the organisation. Laudon and Laudon ( 2007:14 ) defined information system as “ a set of inter-related constituents that collect, procedure, shop and distribute information to back up determination devising and control in an organization” .

Suppliers Environment Customers

The term information system ( IS ) can be shown in figure 1 above has different writers view as IS that does non hold precise definition but seen as channel for informations flow in accomplishing an effectual and accurate information which is accepted and handle by the people in the assorted phases in an organisation ( Avgerou & A ; Cornford 1998 ) . In accomplishing effectual and accurate Information, one needs to develop systems that will execute this undertaking harmonizing to design that will run into the organisational demands. Since human existences are involved in the usage, design and execution of these systems, 1s attack is how, who and for what quality people desire, this will so find the sort of methodological analysis that would be suited but in some instances people might be biased in their pick ( ibid ) . Avison & A ; Fitzgerald ( 2003:20 ) defined Information systems development methodological analysis ( ISDM ) as:

“a aggregation of processs, technique, tools, and certification AIDSs which help the system developer in implementing a new information system while a methodology consist of stages and bomber stages, which will steer the systems developers in their pick of technique, that would be appropriate at each phase of the undertaking and besides aid in planning, managing, commanding, and measuring an information systems projects” .

Engineering And Socio-Technical Doctrines

Some methodological analysiss depend the usage of homo ( Social ) while some scientific ( Technical ) and some both attacks ( Socio-technical ) in developing an information system which is based on some philosophical position ( Avison & A ; Fitzgerald 2003 ; Heeks 1999 ; Laudon and Laudon 2007 ) . We shall hold a expression at the assorted attacks of developing an IS by comparing and contrast fundamentally proficient ( Engineering ) and socio-technical ( intercrossed ) doctrines as follows:

  • Engineering doctrines are largely of direction scientific discipline that tends to turn to IS jobs by harder attack while the socio-technical doctrines are largely mediate societal scientific discipline and direction scientific discipline which tends to turn to IS issues by both softer and harder attack which is called intercrossed attack ( Heeks 1999 ; Heeks 2006 ; Mumford 2000 ) .
  • Engineering doctrines tends to turn to issues by accomplishing organisational aims while socio-technical tends to look at the behavioral issues and the impact of the system on the organisation but both thrusts towards accomplishing successful information system ( Laudon and Laudon 2007 ; Avgerou and Cornford 1998 ) .
  • Using a checklist called ITPOSMO ( Information, Technology, Processes, Objectives and value, Staffing and accomplishments, Management and construction and Other resources ) , one can state Engineering doctrines are formal ; mechanical ; straightforward ; nonsubjective ; rational being ; structural in direction and clip and money as accomplishing organisational ends while Socio-technical doctrines are a small proficient and societal in nature when compared and differentiated from technology doctrines ( Heeks ( 1999 ) .
  • Engineering doctrines drive towards efficiency and mistake free system while Socio-technical doctrines drive towards uniting efficiency with democracy ( Mumford 2000 ; Avgerou and Cornford 1998 ) .
  • Engineering doctrines goes in-line with discrete-entity theoretical accounts which focus on engineering while socio-technical doctrines reject discrete-entity theoretical accounts because of its chief focal point on engineering merely but uses portion of discrete-entity theoretical account and portion of societal doctrine ( Walsham 1989 ) .
  • Engineering doctrines are compatible with autocratic direction while Socio-technical doctrines are non compatible with bureaucratic construction and autocratic direction but has some assorted thoughts from both autocratic and bureaucratic stsructure ( ibid ) .

There are deductions of the Engineering and Socio-technical doctrines in an ISDs are discussed as follows:

Organization end: The primary end of the proficient position is to guarantee that the proficient designs are in line with the organisation end, but any skip may do a different organisational deduction while socio-technical suggest that the system should be mutualist ( societal and proficient ) subsystem design without any precedence of action ( Livari & A ; Hirschheim 1996 ; Avgerou and Cornford 1998 ; Mumford 2000 ) .

Development: Technical position sees execution job as an property caused by hapless proficient quality/ homo opposition which may be seen as a rational/irrational motivation from user ‘s position while socio-technical sees the misfit between proficient and organisation subsystem ( Livari & A ; Hirschheim 1996 ; Avgerou and Cornford 1998 ) .

System Schemes: Technical position relies on traditional analysis and design attack, whereas socio-technical accent on design attack which includes design and meeting of societal and proficient option. As consequence of this, the function of the developer is characterised as applied scientist ( scientist ) and facilitator ( instructor ) ( Livari & A ; Hirschheim 1996 ) .

Engagement: Socio-technical allows engagement of people in sharing valuable beginning of information for successful system development and enriching the people with full cognition of the system and its milieus which will do execution easier to accomplish and less threatened by alteration activities but on the other manner round its seen as a signifier of surety pickings and use of system instead than sharing of information for development procedure of information system while proficient position sees engagement of users frequently leads to confusion of duty, clip consuming and expensive procedure. As issues of determination devising lies in the power of direction and non users, this makes developer feels that the system develop is technically hapless in nature ( Avgerou and Cornford 1998 ) .

Soft System Methodology

The history of today ‘s methodological analysiss started right back from 1960s during epoch of mass produced 3rd coevals computing machines. As engineering began to turn, jobs arose as a consequence of deficiency of satisfaction in the proficient kingdom which led to development of new attacks that will supply better quality and appropriate ways of transporting out work ( ibid ) . Checkland came up with Soft system methodological analysis ( SSM ) in 1970 ‘s at the University of Lancaster as a manner of work outing normal system development issues in which people have their universe perceptual experience ( Checkland and Scholes ( 1999 ) . ( Avison & A ; Fitzgerald 2003 ; Walsham 1989 ) see SSM as a manner of acquiring better apprehension of these jobs state of affairss that are likely to come up through the usage of rich image diagram, root definitions and other analysis preceding.

Checkland and Scholes ( 1999 ) described SSM as shown in figure 2, as the seven phase procedure that aims at bettering the societal concern of the people by leting active engagement in the acquisition rhythm that akes note of the occurrences in the existent universe issues through system constructs. This system concept utilizations Weltanschauung ( World position ) extracted from job state of affairs as the footing for depicting the system demands which would be taking to another phase of methodological analysis ( Avison & A ; Fitzgerald 2003 ) . This theoretical model that allows possible start from any point in the phases at the same time by looking at the set ends and patterning purpose utilizing human activity systems as a manner of accomplishing the ends. SSM is an emerging acquisition system because of the concern in job state of affairs which led to new cognition and penetration of the job state of affairs.

Checkland ( 2000 )

The seven phases of checkland ‘s methodological analysis relies much less on techniques and tools because it provides the rule histrions job state of affairs of the system. SSM does non hold preconceived impressions of a solution but it gives better apprehension of the job state of affairs which makes it easy to learn ( Checkland 2000 ) .

Suitability of SSM in ISD procedure is by utilizing it as a front terminal procedure before nearing the difficult facet of the system development. SSM is concern about analysis but topographic point less emphasizes on design, development and execution. The logic-drive position examines the human activities when comparison with the universe position and the cultural position which has three characteristics of job state of affairs: the intercession, the state of affairs as a societal system and political system. These positions are seen as uninterrupted and synergistic in nature ( Avison & A ; Fitzgerald 2003 ) . Holwell ( 1997 cited in checkland 2000 ) found that SSM regulations are excessively loose and non extended plenty in nature because of rich image drawn by people claiming they are utilizing SSM and the silence in some basic premises.

Problems ( chances ) .

In order to hold an effectual system, since information systems are dynamic which changes with clip as an organisation grows, 1s demands to hold some alterations in the organisational system in order to hold competitory advantage in the environment it operate ( 21 ) . For one ground or the other, Organization asks for a new information system either to replace the go outing one after acknowledging its jobs or to run into the chances in the planetary market. In instance of Problems/opportunities, one needs to see the cause of the jobs and what chance will the new system bring to the organisation or there are times when job might be but a alteration in the organisation information system is needed to better or run into their demands more efficaciously ( Avison & A ; Fitzgerald 2003 ) .

In constructing the rich image, the principle lies in the complex human personal businesss because of multiple interaction relationship which the rich image portrays. The active theoretical accounts used in SSM are device for structuring job state of affairs being address to obtain consequence which can be used in bettering the existent universe public presentation.

Truex, D. , Baskerville, R. & A ; Travis, J. ( 2000 ) ‘Amethodical Systems Development: deferred significance of Systems development methods ‘ , Accounting, Management & A ; Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. pp. 53-79.

Law, D. & A ; Longworth, G. ( 1987 ) Systems Development: Schemes and Techniques, NCC Publications, Manchester, England.

Hirschheim, R. & A ; Klein, K. H. ( 1989 ) ‘Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development ‘ , Communication of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1199-1216.

Avgerou, C. and Cornforgd, T ( 1998 ) Developing information systems: Concepts, Issues and Practice, 2nd edn, Macmillan imperativeness, London.

Walsham, G. ( 1989 ) ‘The application of IT in organisations: some tendencies and issues ‘ , Information Technology for Development, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 627-644.

Laudon, K. & A ; Laudon, P. ( 2007 ) Management Information System: Pull offing the digital house, 10th edn, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Avison, D. & A ; Fitzgerald G. ( 2003 ) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools, 3rd edn, Mcgraw-Hill, London.

Heeks, R. ( explosive detection systems ) ( 1999 ) Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International pattern in IT-enable public sector reform, Routledge, London.

Heeks, R. ( 2006 ) Implementing and Managing eGovernment, Sage, London.

Mumford, E. ( 2000 ) ‘A socio-technical attack to systems design ‘ , Requirements Engineering, Vol. 5, pp125-133.

Livari, J. & A ; Hirschheim, R. ( 1996 ) ‘Analyzing Information Systems Development: A comparing and analysis of eight IS development attacks ‘ , Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 551-576.

Checkland, P. & A ; Scholes, J. ( 1999 ) Soft Systems Methodology in Action: a 30-years retrospective, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.

Ceckland, P. ( 2000 ) ‘Reseach paper on Soft Systems Methodology in Action: a 30-years retrospective ‘ , Systems Reseach and Behavioral Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 511-558.

Holwell, S. E. ( 1997 ) Soft systems methodological analysis and its function in information systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Lancaster University, England.

×

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out