Killer Angels Book Review Sample Essay

The novel I chose for the historical book reappraisal is called The Killer Angels. by Michael Shaara. This novel is about the Battle of Gettysburg during the Civil War. and it is written from the position of the people contending while sharing their ideas and feelings about the conflict as it goes on. Although it is historical fiction. The Killer Angels centres around the Battle of Gettysburg. which. of class. truly took topographic point. While the scheme of the conflict is factual. the duologue is fabricated. The book starts with a Foreword that gives inside informations of the ground forcess and people involved. Four chief chronological subdivisions cover the yearss of Monday. June 29. 1863. through Friday. July 3. 1863. while exchanging between point of views Union and Confederate participants. An Afterword tells the reader what happens to several of the cardinal characters. Even though a chapter is written from one commander’s position. the writer still allows you to see what some of the other characters in those scenes are believing. Without this manner of composing the novel. the reader wouldn’t genuinely be able to understand ideas and sentiments of the soldiers. so some of the picks wouldn’t have made as much sense. Shaara included the statements between characters about how to travel about the onslaught. which gives the reader much more inside informations about how complicated the few yearss of the conflict were.

Since 355 pages are used to cover merely four yearss of history. Shaara’s narrative of the Battle of Gettysburg is highly in deepness. Sing this. it’s hard to state how accurate the historical content of the novel is. Yes. it’s accurate that the Union ground forces won the conflict. and yes. it’s accurate that the conflict took topographic point in 1863. but what about the little inside informations Shaara writes about. that we can’t know for certain are true? What I found is that Michael Shaara did extended research about the Battle of Gettysburg by reading the letters and memoirs of the soldiers and officers involved in the conflict. and even taking several trips with his boy Jeff to the battleground. He studied the personalities of the characters. and how they might hold acted. Even though the duologue is fabricated. one can conceive of that the conversations and little inside informations in the book were likely really similar to the conversations and minor events that took topographic point throughout the existent conflict. Shaara describes how the geographics of the battleground played a major function in the Union’s triumph. With grounds he could likely see with his trip to the battleground. Shaara describes how the Confederates marched many stat mis to Gettysburg to seek to get the better of the North on their “home sod. ”

We will write a custom essay sample on
Killer Angels Book Review Sample Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

He explains how the Union ground forces secured a point called “Little Round Top” which gave them the ability to contend from a high point. while the enemy had to slog acclivitous to them. When reading “The Americans” text edition. this piece of information about the conflict can be seen. warranting its truth. Robert E. Lee. as a 57 twelvemonth old Virginian. has less than a decennary to populate. He is holding bosom problem. which finally kills him. Some historiographers speculate that Lee may hold suffered a mild bosom onslaught during the Battle of Gettysburg. and Shaara plants from that thought. In the chapter about the first twenty-four hours of the conflict. Shaara describes how when Lee wakes up in the forenoon. he’s holding bosom problems and wants to take it easy throughout the twenty-four hours. His physical wellness that twenty-four hours affects the manner he interacts with General Longstreet. and his conflict scheme. This is merely one illustration of Shaara’s research. Lee’s bosom jobs in this instance. which he used to determine his narrative.

The manner Shaara describes Lee’s status for illustration can’t be proven true. but it would be incorrect to state it’s all “made up. ” Overall. The Killer Angels is really historically accurate. but because of the duologue and minor inside informations like Robert E. Lee’s bosom jobs. the novel is still considered historical fiction. When I foremost started reading the book. we had merely begun speaking about the civil war in category. My anterior cognition of the civil war. particularly the Battle of Gettysburg was limited. What I did cognize was how complex the civil war was. and how the war wasn’t something anyone could to the full understand without tonss of research. I realized that all the colonies like the Compromise of 1850 couldn’t abate the two region’s choler forever. and that a war was inevitable. I expected the choler on both sides to be strong. as the North saw bondage as immoral and the South needed it for their economic system. Without this cognition I would hold been astounded by the figure of soldiers contending and the many deceases that occurred in merely one twenty-four hours. Shaara used graphic imagination in the novels such as. “Union guns firing. work forces traveling among the guns. hunched. a bloody Equus caballus running spookily by. three-legged. atrocious sight. running toward the route. Another Equus caballus down with no caput. like a broken plaything. ” ( Pg. 310 )

I was taken back by quotation marks like this. but I had a feeling coming into reading how hideous the conflict was. I knew how strongly both sides would contend for their cause. and this proved true in the novel. Although I didn’t know of all the military figures. I knew that Robert E. Lee led the Confederate Army. and that he was a extremely skilled and experient general. Before this twelvemonth. I had the feeling from in-between school that “The North was good. the South was bad. and the war started because the South didn’t like the inkinesss. ” I rapidly learned there was much more to it than that. Because of the manner Mrs. Stark stressed the complexnesss of the war. I was prepared to read a really in deepness. and complicated novel. Possibly the most of import cognition I had traveling into the book. was the apprehension that things that could be seen as immoral or merely kick brainsick today. were normal back so. For illustration. I think the ground many people assumed the South was the “Bad guy” is because they didn’t understand how of import bondage was to the South. It had been a manner of life for the Southerners for so many old ages. and one can’t fault them for non giving up bondage without a battle.

If I didn’t understand why the South felt the manner they did. I’m certain that as I read. I would hold had much less sympathy or understanding for Lee. and the Confederate Army. After reading the novel. I had an vastly greater apprehension of what went on throughout the few yearss of the conflict. Shaara told the narrative from the position of activists from both ground forcess. so the reader could see the elaborate perceptual experiences of the events. through the eyes of Generals like Robert E. Lee or Joshua Chamberlain. Throughout the novel. the emotions of the soldiers of the ground forcess change as we see the events that take topographic point. We can see the tenseness physique between Robert E. Lee and Commander James Longstreet as the conflict continues on. With the north sending in a steady flow of supports. the two disagree on how to travel about contending. Longstreet suggests that the Confederates take a defensive place. while Lee wants an ambuscade on John Buford’s military personnels. Not merely did I learn the rudimentss of the conflict. like who or how many people were contending. but I got to larn all the unhappiness. choler. and exhilaration that came along with combat.

For illustration. Lee knew the motion on the last twenty-four hours would be many lives. but still ordered it on. He blames himself for doing the error: “No incrimination can be attached to the ground forces for its failure to carry through what was projected by me… I entirely am to fault. in possibly anticipating excessively much of its art and valor… could I have foreseen that the onslaught on the last twenty-four hours would neglect. I should surely hold tried some other course… but I do non cognize what better class I could hold pursued. ” ( Pg. 349 ) Passages like this shows how the generals were existent people. with a heavy emotional load to transport. cognizing the determinations they make can be 1000s of soldier’s lives. I genuinely connected with General Robert E. Lee because of quotation marks like these. I could truly experience for Lee as he lived his life purely by devotedness to the self-denying virtuousnesss of responsibility and faith. He wasn’t a barbarous adult male merely because he believed in bondage. and Shaara does a enormous occupation of altering the feelings associated with Lee from history text editions or 8th grade history instructors.

Because of Shaara’s composing manner. we can experience the guilt in Lee’s bosom after the loss. and the emotional toll the war took on him. After Confederate Commander Richard Ewell failed to transport out an of import order that would perchance alter the result of the war. Robert E. Lee says. “Jackson is gone – non wholly gone ; Jackson was there today observation. and Ewell sees his eyes – but you can non fault him for non being Jackson. You must do make with the tools God has given for the occupation. ” Lee was likely really defeated with Ewell. wishing he had his General “Stonewall” Jackson. but he refuses to fault anyone but himself. Although I have a gained regard for many of the activists depicted in the novel. I truly appreciate the award and regard Robert E. Lee had.

Throughout The Killer Angels. one can see all facets of the Battle of Gettysburg through the eyes of the Army leaders themselves. The reader can acquire an in depth expression at the manner people felt during the yearss of conflict. physically and really much so emotionally. Reading this book gave me an astonishing chance to larn about one of the most of import conflicts in history- a conflict that some historiographers believed won the whole war for the North. I extremely recommend this book for anyone over the age of 14. For the people who don’t know or the people who think they know about the Battle of Gettysburg. this novel will give anyone a much deeper apprehension of how much went on in merely four yearss of history. I hope to read this novel once more some clip in my life. and I suggest that people read this book for larning. and for exhilaration.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out