Leadership has become very much on every manager’s mind Essay

1.0 Introduction
Employees ne’er work along in the organisations, there must be some sort of teamwork involve in the on the job procedure, both formal and informal. Leadership Acts of the Apostless as an of import factor that strongly influences employee ‘s public presentation, motive and attitude. It has been argued that differences between success and failure, whether in concern, war or football, leading is mostly attributable to success.

1.1 Definition Of Literature Review
A literature reappraisal is defined as mark to demo of import facts sing attacks on a subject in the methodological method. It besides means they are non primary beginnings because it is non original or new work.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Leadership has become very much on every manager’s mind Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

1.2 Definition Of Leadership
Leadership is become really much on every director ‘s head today in organisations. Origins are fighting due to the progressively dynamic environment. As the challenges of taking and pull offing addition, leaders of organisations need to understand procedure, accomplishments and cognition to execute leader maps efficaciously.

1.3 Definition Of Motivation
Motivation is “ the willingness to exercise high degrees of attempt to make organisational ends, conditioned by the attempt ‘s ability to fulfill some single demand ” ( Belasen & A ; Frank, 2008 ) . Motivating employees are one of the continual challenges of managerial behavior, that are besides directors ‘ cardinal grounds for prosecuting in assorted activities and work.

1.4 Introduction Of KFC
Kentucky Fried Chicken ( KFC ) , as we all know – is one of the popular fast nutrient mercantile establishments worldwide with the subject “ It ‘s finger lickin ‘ good ” . The first KFC mercantile establishment in Malaysia was opened on 1st January 1973 at Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur. Today there are more than 390 KFC mercantile establishments countrywide and are still numbering. Great savoring poulet has become synonymous with KFC and has been enjoyed by Malaysians of all time since. The KFC we will be speaking about is in Nilai, Negeri Sembilan.

2.0 Literature Review
2.1 Specifying Leadership
Leadership can be defined as “ the procedure whereby one single influence other group members towards achieving defined group or organisational ends ” ( Orlando, 2008 ) . More of import, successful organisations need effectual leading, who are capable of increasing an organisation ‘s employee motive ; in bend improve the overall public presentation and organisational productiveness ( Richard, 2007 ) .

In add-on, Drucker in his “ The Leader of the Future ” sums up leading as “ The lone definition of a leader is person who has followings. ” It is said that many of the universe ‘s best leaders do non hold the unity every bit good as certain values which wo n’t be discussed in the modern yearss.

In my sentiment, leading is different from direction. Directors have subsidiaries which are below them while leaders have people who follow them. Directors will usually use their place of power in order to make things. In the procedure of work, directors orders his or her employees while they will follow because of the wages given which is the lower limit of their wage. Looking at the other manner unit of ammunition, leaders gives up their autocratic control, due to their followings which follows them in a voluntary manner.
2.2 Leadership Theories
Terry ( 2000 ) has highlighted that “ leading is an influence relationship between leaders and followings who intend existent alterations and results that reflect their shared intents. ” Block ( 2002 ) has noted that as a procedure, leading is, ideally the usage of non-coercive influence to determine the group ‘s or organisation ‘s ends, motivate behavior towards the accomplishment of those ends and assist specify group or organisational civilization.

Effective Leadership
Russell, ( 2000 ) defined effectual leader as those leaders who are able to better organisation productivenesss, in bend develop typical competitory advantages for organisations. In other words, effectual leaders normally have an inspiring vision ; they will seek to organize a group of people to work as a squad, doing them into a powerful squad which utilizes as a competitory advantage. Effective leaders know how to do people function harmonizing to what they are good at, and how to actuate them to stand out their public presentation. Leaderships need to understand the balance technique in any single squad member ‘s quest with the aim of making synergism. Leaderships need his or her members in their squad to predate the end for the single best coherent with the attempt of the whole squad.

2.3 Leadership Style
Autocratic vs. Democratic vs. Laissez-faire leading manner
Taggart ( 1989 ) defined that, wide categorization of leading manner consists of autocratic ( or bossy ) manner, democratic manner and laissez-faire ( echt ) manner. The definition of bossy manner is:

It is where the focal point of power is with the director, and all interactions within the group move towards the director. The director entirely exercises decision-making and authorization for finding policy, processs for accomplishing ends. Work undertakings and relationships, control of wagess or penalties.

Kotter ( 1990 ) expressed Democratic leading manner takes wants and suggestions of employees into consideration. It is more a human dealingss attack, in which all members of the group are seen as equal, and they are all of import subscribers to the concluding determination.

Individualistic leading manner involves limited control or influence of leaders over his or her group members. A member is given a end and largely left entirely to make up one’s mind how to accomplish it. The leaders function as one of the group member, and he merely supply way and suggestions when necessary.

Task Orientation and People Oriented Leader Behavior
Another manner of looking at different leading manners is in footings of dimension of leader behaviour. Equally early as 1950s, a big organic structure of research at University of Michigan and Ohio State University suggested that leaders differ greatly along the dimensions ; at the high terminal of two dimensions is task orientation versus people orientation.

Task Orientation leader behaviour is more concern about the production and chiefly concentrate on acquiring the occupation done. Whereas the People Orientation leader behaviour reflects how much a leader is concerned for the people around him, supplying support and encouragement for them. There is no 100 per centum right or incorrect in utilizing which leader behaviour, it depends on the state of affairs and organisation ‘s nature concern.

2.4 Situational Factors
Path-goal Theory
Different organisation has different concern environment, we must take the situational factors into the consideration to analyse and measure the effectivity of the leading. Bartram & A ; Casimir ( 2007 ) cited in House ‘s path-goal theory argued that the primary map of a leader ‘s occupation is to train and steer workers to take the best way for making their ends, in the average clip to do valued wagess available in the work topographic point. In short, the leader should clearly cognize the waies to accomplish ends.

As showed in the path-goal model, the path-goal theory contends that employees tend to listen to leaders who are play an assisting function in their plants, in other words, effectual leaders clear uping what employees need to make to acquire to where they should be, and they help the employees to make so. Furthermore, Stone & A ; Russell ( 2004 ) argued that the theory suggests occupation satisfaction, motive, and existent public presentation are enhanced.

In add-on, path-goal theory besides states four types of leading behaviours to assist their employees carry throughing undertakings. ( 1 ) Directive leading, which is an attack focused on supplying specific usher and on be aftering work regulations and agendas. ( 2 ) The supportive leading chiefly focuses on physique good dealingss with employees and fulfills their demands and wants. ( 3 ) The participative leading, whereby the leader let employees to acquire involved in the determination devising procedure. ( 4 ) The accomplishment oriented leading is speaking about the company leader who sets challenges and expects employees better public presentations.

Furthermore, the environmental features include three factors like undertaking construction, authorization system and work group. Directing leading manner does non fit with high undertaking construction. It is non needfully for leaders to repeatedly state employees the demand of some everyday plants. The authorization system is another of import feature that will impact the leading manners. The higher grade of formality the less effectual of employees ‘ public presentations will demo.

Employees ‘ personal features

Perceived ability

Locus of control

Leadership behaviors




Accomplishment oriented

Environment feature

Undertaking construction

Authority system

Work group

Employees ‘ motive to execute
Figure 1: The Path-goal FrameworkSource: House, R.J. & A ; Mitchell, T.R. 1994, ‘Path-goal theory of leading ‘ , Journal of Contemporary Business, vol. 3, pp. 21-36.

3.0 Conclusion and Recommendation
In amount, developing an effectual leading in organisations is the most indispensable, yet the most hard undertakings for organisation direction. Great leading is the combinations of single traits, taking accomplishments and of class the situational contexts. As we have discussed above, effectual leading is require both intrapersonal and interpersonal accomplishments. The intrapersonal accomplishments are of paramount of import, as it is logical and obvious that success or great leader all start from within. Merely with personal interior strong desire to stand out, passion, enthusiasm, finding, committedness, religion and effectual personal values can a individual go a true leader for others.

A great leader among the people ever starts as a great leader of his ain. Then, interpersonal accomplishments come into topographic point, where the ability and accomplishments to web, communicate and interact with the other people come into topographic point. The effectual leaders can steer companies through many different channels. Because of this, it is of import to cognize which leading qualities motivate employees the best. Throughout the analysis and rating, there have been many leading manner theories identified. As we have found that, the bossy leading manner has gone out of manner in recent old ages, though certain state of affairss, such as exigencies state of affairss.

Therefore, effectual leaders must set the leading manner to assorted state of affairss. In that sense, there is no 1 leading manner is appropriate for every juncture or state of affairs. The most effectual manner to utilize depends upon the state of affairs and whether the group members are willing and able to take on the duty. To be effectual as a leader, it ‘s of import to cognize your group in footings of cognition, ability, desire and willingness, and be ready to accommodate your manner to accommodate the dynamic environment. An of import undertaking in the coming old ages will be the preparation and testing of future leaders.

Further more, organisations have to hold a bigger image of long term success, that is beef uping leading competences will better organisational effectivity. When subsidiaries trusted their leaders ‘ leading, and they deem it is just for them to obtain satisfactory wagess and results when they made the greatest attempts. Therefore, effectual leading lead to a positive motive and motivated employees will fulfill the clients of the organisations. In a long-run, it will assist organisation making or keeping a sustainable organisational competitory advantage.

Svensson, G & A ; Wood, G. ( 2007 ) . Sustainable leading moralss: a uninterrupted and iterative procedure.

Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220280304.html

Belasen, A & A ; Frank, N. ( 2008 ) . Competing values leading: quadrant functions and personality traits. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220290202.html

Hay, A & A ; Hodgkinson, M. ( 2006 ) . Rethinking leading: a manner forward for learning leading? Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220270205.html

Orlando J. ( 2008 ) . The preparation of a leading development practice: linking purposes to results. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220290604.html

Bartram, T & A ; Casimir, G. ( 2007 ) . The relationship between leading and follower in-role public presentation and satisfaction with the leader. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220280101.html

Richard K. ( 2007 ) . A strategic attack for incorporating theory to pattern in leading development. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220280503.html

Leskiw, S.L & A ; Singh, P. ( 2007 ) . Leadership development: acquisition from best patterns. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220280504.html

Terry, L. ( 2000 ) . Explaining ethical failures of leading. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220210401.html

Block, L. ( 2002 ) . The leadership-culture connexion: an explorative probe. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220240602.html

Russell, R. F. ( 2000 ) . The function of values in servant leading. Retrieved on March 10, 2010, from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet? contentType=Article & A ; Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0220220204.html

Taggart, J. 1989, Motivation and Leadership: For Executive Members, Managers, Committee Chairs, Factsheet: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, No.89-178.

Kotter, J 1990, A force for Change: How leading differs from direction, Free Press, New York.

House, R.J. & A ; Mitchell, T.R. 1994, ‘Path-goal theory of leading ‘ , Journal of Contemporary Business, vol. 3, pp. 21-36.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out