The jobs and force caused by the usage of illicit drugs. and the deficiency of efficient steps by the authorities to cut down the usage of these substances has affected both society and concerns. In recent old ages. many politicians have debated the pros and cons of legalizing marihuana. even the population voted to make up one’s mind whether to legalise or non is the best option. Throughout this essay. it will be analyze both sides of the issue and confirm if legalisation of marihuana is the best option for U. S. and how this affect Mexico in the legal. society and concern facets. Harmonizing to an article posted by William Booth in The Washington Post. he said that “Mexico spends one million millions of dollars each twelvemonth facing violent trafficking organisations that threaten the security of the state but whose chief market is the United States. the largest consumer of drugs in the universe. ” As we can see. the job of drugs in U. S. straight affects Mexico. because the authorities has to cover with the trusts that take 1000s of inexperienced person lives twelvemonth by twelvemonth.
This is why the determination made by either one of the two states will hold serious reverberations on the other. as they will hold to do drastic alterations to suit and work together in the best manner. Marijuana legalisation is an issue where citizens are involved in. and we have to cognize and see that any determination made about this is job injuries without restrictions or boundary lines. First of all. to speak about a job we have to cognize about it. Harmonizing to the Medicine Net marihuana is “A common street and recreational drug that comes from the marihuana works: the hemp works hemp sativa [ … ] is used to rise perceptual experience. affect temper. and relax. [ … ] Signs of marihuana usage include ruddy eyes. lassitude. and uncoordinated organic structure motions.
The long-run effects may include lessening in motive and harmful effects on the encephalon. bosom. lungs. and generative system. Peoples who smoke marihuanas are besides at increased hazard of developing malignant neoplastic disease of the caput and cervix. ” Analyzing the above. this drug causes perturbations in the human organic structure. act uponing short and long term wellness of people ; this is why authoritiess try to protect the society by forbiding its usage. Despite this. it is of import to see that the ingestion of intoxicant and baccy coffin nails is even more harmful to wellness than marihuana. For better apprehension and analysis of the job. this essay is chiefly divided by three parts: legal. societal and concern deductions for both states.
Harmonizing to Cross & A ; Miller. “dozen provinces. including California. have adopted medical marihuana Torahs that legalize marihuanas for medical intents. Marijuana ownership. nevertheless. is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act ( CSA ) . ” As it is mentioned by these writers. at the present clip some limitations exist with the ownership and nonmedical usage of Cannabis. The legal deductions will be that politicians would hold to do reforms and alterations to province and federal Torahs for the legalisation had valid throughout the state.
In add-on to the above mentioned alterations. Mexico would hold deductions excessively. Harmonizing to The Washington Post “the determination by electors in Colorado and Washington State to legalise the recreational usage of marihuana has left Mexican President-elect Enrique Pena Nieto and his squad scrambling to redevelop their anti-drug schemes in visible radiation of what one senior adjutant said was a referendum that “changes the regulations of the game. ” As we can see the job is for both states and the legal deductions excessively. because Mexico and U. S will hold to harmonise their Torahs every bit much as possible sing this issue. to forestall the outgrowth of bad political reactions in front. None of them can move one-sidedly.
Recent surveies show that legalising the marihuana additions use by adolescents. These are chiefly based on the experience in Germany where many adolescent start devouring this soft drug. Harmonizing to the American Academy of Pediatrics. “legalization of marihuana could diminish adolescents’ perceptual experiences of the hazard of usage and increase their exposure to this drug. Furthermore. informations refering adolescents’ usage of the 2 drugs that are legal for grownups ( intoxicant and baccy ) suggest strongly that legalisation of marihuana would hold a negative consequence on young person. ” The aforesaid job straight affects the society. because if striplings think that by decriminalisation marihuana means that the drug is non harmful. the job of ingestion will tremendously increase. Because of this. there may be new societal jobs. for illustration. adolescents would hold wellness jobs at a younger age. concern for parents could be invariably turning and the rate of auto accidents or offense could increase.
On the other manus. whether marihuana is legalized or non. a individual who wants to devour this drug will happen the manner to make it. regardless of age. In my sentiment. there are possible solutions that will decidedly profit the instruction of society but will assist adolescent to take right determinations. Harmonizing to Roger A. Roffman a “well-funded many-sided marijuana instruction plan that is based on scientific discipline instead than political orientation. Far excessively few Americans are sufficiently informed about marijuana’s effects on wellness and behaviour. both the positive and the negative. A cardinal to good decision-making is possessing accurate information” . These steps ( applied both in Mexico and the United States ) will surely assist society to avoid devouring Cannabis. and if we add wellness centres that provide interventions for current users. I think that the job may significantly diminish.
Harmonizing to Kelly Phillips in her article in Forbes. she said that “States that have moved to legalise marihuana for medical grounds have done so for rather logical grounds: legalising the drug ( like nicotine and intoxicant ) means that it can be regulated. Regulations mean control. And control is straight linked to the all-powerful dollar. ” As we can see if the authorities has control of marihuana by legalizing it. the merchandise will go nonexempt and they will roll up amounts of money from each sale. In add-on. looking and trailing drug traders or drug trusts and maintain them in gaols are bing a batch of money to the authorities and taxpayers.
This is a job that decidedly affects the economic system of both states. Furthermore Mike Moffat analyzed that “entrepreneurs detecting the great net incomes to be made in the marihuana market would get down their ain grow operations. increasing the supply of marihuana on the street. which would do the street monetary value of the drug to fall to a degree much closer to the cost of production. ” By taking this point of position in consideration. the net incomes made by marketing marihuana will get down diminishing with the base on balls of clip. Businesss in these states particularly in Mexico have been affected severely due to the offenses and delinquency that exists because of traffic drugs. including marihuana. It is of import to see that this drug is the most trafficked illegal substance in our state. which is besides the most used illegal drug in the universe.
Other issue to see with this job is that corruptness is increasing. because drug trusts are excessively strong and they “buy” or threaten the constabulary and ground forces to market marijuana more easy. In my sentiment the illegal drug trade has been arisen as a consequence of drug prohibition Torahs that both states established.
Roger A. Roffman stated. “we can make better. By modulating and taxing marihuanas based on a set of strong public wellness rules. I believe our cultural norms refering marihuana will switch and the injuries we’ve witnessed will greatly cut down. ”
As decision. I think that the best option for both authoritiess is to legalise the usage of marihuana. Why? Because the Torahs that prohibit it are non working good. there is a batch of money invested in halting this job with no success. the industry is a moneymaking market. and both authoritiess will hold control of it and it will taxable. If we go back in history. there was a similar job when the intoxicant was prohibited and since they decriminalized it. the offenses and force began to worsen.
Besides I think that with the legalisation. educational plans and wellness centres should come with it. in order to assist society to be cognizant of the harm caused by the usage of this drug and besides the amendss caused of legal substances ( such as intoxicant. baccy ) . Politicians should besides ordain Torahs that wholly control the sale. ownership and usage of marihuana. Finally. the communicating between Mexico and U. S. is critical for the proper operation of the legalisation and common assistance will better the quality of life of both states.
Global Post. ( 20011 ) . Mexico: President OK on legalising pot? . Retrieved on November 29. 2012 from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. globalpost. com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/mexico/110922/mexico-president-calderon-legalize-pot-marijuana-drug-war Ingersoll. J. E. ( 1972 ) . The Effect Of Legalizing Marihuana & A ; Heroin. Vital Speeches Of The Day. 39 ( 1 ) . 24.
Joffe. A. ( 2004 ) . Legalization of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth. Pediatrics. 113 ( 6 ) . e632. Kelly Phillips ( 2012 ) . Stiring the Pot: Could Legalizing Marijuana Save the Economy? Retrieved on November 29. 2012 from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. forbes. com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2012/04/20/stirring-the-pot-could-legalizing-marijuana-save-the-economy/ MedicineNet ( 2012 ) . Definition of Marijuana. Retrieved on November 28. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. medterms. com/script/main/art. asp? articlekey=12124
Merle D. Kellerhals Jr. News Blaze ( 2008 ) . Initiative will assist conflict drug trafficking. Retrieved
on November 30. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //newsblaze. com/story/20080701063119tsop. nb/topstory. hypertext markup language Mike Moffat ( 2012 ) . Should Governments Legalize and Tax Marijuana? Retrieved on November 30. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //economics. about. com/od/incometaxestaxcuts/a/marijuana. htm Nadelman. E. A. ( 2004 ) . AN End TO Marijuana Prohibition. ( cover narrative ) . National Review. 56 ( 13 ) . 28.
Roger A. Roffman ( 2012 ) . The terminal of the war on marihuana. Retrieved on November 27. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. cnn. com/2012/11/08/opinion/roffman-pot-legalization/index. hypertext markup language
Roig-Franzia. M. ( 2008 ) . Mexico program adds constabulary to take on drug trusts on. Retrieved
November 30. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. washingtonpost. com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2008/07/10/AR2008071002800. hypertext markup language Villagran. L. ( 2010 ) . Marijuana legalisation in Mexico deriving support.