The potency for destruction wastes to be used in the production of new concrete merchandises has been exhaustively studied in academic scenes and successfully demonstrated in the field via trial instances. In quickly turning metropolitan countries that host a robust combination of destruction activities and new building undertakings, symbiotic relationships can be between bust uping companies and stuffs manufacturers with proper coordination and substructure. Merchandises runing from pavings to structural beams have been made with concrete incorporating recycled sums ( RA ) . In add-on to economic benefits, the usage of RA in all capacities lightens the load of destruction waste managing on municipalities that operate landfills.
Despite research that indicates promising economic, waste direction, and technology potency, existent usage of RA in concrete applications in Mecklenburg County, NC is comparatively nonexistent. Some grounds for the minimum use of RA in concrete applications may be related to physical public presentation issues. Others are linked to regulative or industry hurdlings that could be cleared by decision-makers. The aim of UNC Charlotte research workers look intoing the usage of recycled sums in Mecklenburg County was to place the feasibleness of developing a significant supply of concrete-grade RA every bit good as placing a scope of possible concrete merchandises that could potentially integrate the RA. This probe, sponsored by the United States Department of Energy, was accomplished in several stairss, including:
Literature reappraisal – Background information about the usage of RA in Portland cement concrete was gleaned from diaries, manuals and specifications
Case study – A destruction undertaking was observed in Mecklenburg County and demolished constructing stuff was collected for farther survey
Aggregate word picture – The instance survey sums, created by individually oppressing concrete slab and brick masonry debris were characterized in the UNC Charlotte research labs
Concrete readying – Specimens of concrete were prepared utilizing recycled brick sum and recycled concrete sum
Industry interviews – Industry representatives from destruction contractors, aggregative manufacturers, and concrete manufacturers were interviewed sing their policies, experience and attitudes towards recycled aggregative production and usage
Background
Recycled sums are composed of the debris from the destruction of edifices roads, and other beginnings such as returned concrete. Although unaccredited landfills are known to be one finish for the destruction waste, the balance arrives at either municipal or private installations that have the capacity to oppress the stuff into either graded or dirt stuff ( Elias-Ozkan 2001 ) . In some venues, such as parts of Europe, the scarceness of both landfill infinite and quarry infinite create an drift for the debris to be reused for assorted building intents ( Oikonomou 2005 ) . Builders purchase the majority of the debris for low-grade utilizations such as fill and come uping stuff for impermanent roads. However, there is some case in point for usage as sums in Portland cement concrete ( PCC ) that could supply economic benefits to material manufacturers ( Tam 2008 ) . In add-on to destruction waste beginnings, RA can besides be composed of extra concrete stuffs returned to the works. This stuff is frequently referred to specifically as returned concrete sum ( RCA ) .
The suitableness of RA for concrete applications has been investigated by many. In general, concrete incorporating some proportion of RA has been found to hold somewhat diminished mechanical belongingss in comparing to material integrating strictly virgin sums. Tupcu and Sengel ( 2004 ) created concrete specimens with mark strengths of 16 MPa and 20 MPa and so replaced virgin sums with recycled sums at the rate of 30, 50, 70 and 100 % . It was found that the compressive strength decreased at a rate proportional to the add-on of recycled sums. Tu et Al. ( 2006 ) explored the usage of recycled sums in high public presentation concrete ( HPC ) . The research group tested concretes in strength scopes suited for structural applications ( 20-40 MPa ) that had been created with either recycled coarse or recycled coarse and all right sums. It was determined that a strength decrease of 20-30 % could be expected due to aggregate replacing. Overall, the effect of replacing virgin sums with RA has resulted in 10-30 % decreases in compressive strength, with the least impact being found in mixes that merely include recycled coarse sums ( Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz 2002 ; Chen et al. 2003 ; Topcu and Guncan 1995 ; Topcu and Sengel 2004 ; Tu et Al. 2006 ; Xiao et Al. 2005 ) .
Work completed by Xaio and Zhang ( 2005 ) determined that RA concrete elastic belongingss are significantly impacted by the proportion of recycled stuff included in the mix. As RA was added in increases from 0 % to 100 % of the harsh sum, the elastic modulus decreased by 40 % at the upper replacing degrees. At the same replacing increases, the peak strain increased by 20 % during uniaxial compaction testing of concrete cylinders.
Using recycled mulct sums has been shown to hold extra deductions refering to the proportioning and control of concrete mixes. Evangelista and de Brito ( 2007 ) added crushed all right sum to concrete mixtures and found worsening public presentation in footings of elastic modulus, tensile strength and scratch opposition. Compressive strength was non significantly impacted and the writers speculated that the mulcts contribute both hydrated and unhydrated cement to the mix and thereby improved compressive strength. A survey performed by the Texas Transportation Institute ( Lim et al. 2001 ) confirmed the negative impact of recycled concrete mulcts on the workability and H2O demand of concrete mixes incorporating them. However, the same study identified applications for the recycled mulcts that take advantage of their residuary cementitous action to heighten the public presentation of virgin sum stuffs. Such applications included subbase and bondbreaking classs.
Research on scaly structural elements prepared with RA has confirmed the suitableness of the recycled stuff to map in supporting applications. Etxeberria et Al. ( 2007 ) manufactured strengthened concrete beams with changing per centums of RA. The research workers found negligible impacts on beam public presentation when up to 25 % of the virgin sums were replaced. In beam designs with less-than-required transverse support, the shear capacity of concrete made with 50 % and 100 % recycled sums was significantly reduced compared to likewise reinforced beams holding merely virgin sums. However, when the measure of steel required by EuroCode was included, the beams with all measures of RA achieved their code-predicted ultimate shear strength.
Guidance Sing the Use of Recycled Aggregates in Concrete
The challenges to keeping rigorous mechanical public presentation criterions while utilizing RA in concrete mixes have been overcome by accommodating either the batching procedure or cut downing the proportion of recycled stuff. Tam et Al. ( 2005 ) have adapted the blending procedure into two stages- the first to surface the sum in a rich cement slurry, and the 2nd to finish the add-on of blending H2O. The writers found that this technique filled microcracks along the interfacial passage zone and besides allowed fresh paste to make the surface of the mineral sum. The American Concrete Pavement Association reports that the job of high H2O soaking up capacity in RA has been addressed by simple techniques such as presoaking sums prior to batching ( American Concrete Pavement Association 2009 ) .
State sections of transit every bit good as national degree bureaus, such as the National Cooperative Highway Research Program ( NCHRP ) , National Ready Mix Concrete Association ( NRMCA ) , the American Concrete Pavement Association ( ACPA ) and the Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) have produced counsel on the execution of undertakings that permit or promote recycled concrete sums in new PCC applications.
Control of concrete quality when RA is used is achieved via several schemes that are given in province section of transit stuffs specifications or in the counsel published by the antecedently listed bureaus. These schemes include the undermentioned major subjects:
Restriction of the measure of RA in the concrete
Preparation and handling guidelines
Limits to the beginning of acceptable stuffs
Restrictions on the type of elements permitted to incorporate RA
Word picture demands
Table 1 provides a sampling of the specifications and recommendations given by assorted groups. Possibly the most conservative hazard decrease technique for stipulating RA concrete merchandises is to restrict the type or allowable proportion of recycled stuff in the mix design. For case, TXDOT permits a upper limit of 20 % recycled all right sum in certain non-structural concrete elements ( Texas Department of Transportation 2004 ) . A scheme introduced in Europe encourages the segregation of incoming stuff by beginning or quality so as to keep reserves of rubble holding known beginnings and quality. The MDOT specification merely permits RA that was collected from MDOT destruction undertakings. In this manner, the beginning stuff is known to hold met Michigan quality criterions when it was originally created ( Michigan Department of Transportation 2003 ) . The NRMCA has proposed similar recommendations for returned concrete aggregates- proposing that they be divided by the original class of concrete in the returning truck ( Obla et al. 2007 ) .
Table 1. Assorted guidelines for usage of RA
Subject
MDOT
TXDOT
FHWA
NRMCA
ACPA
Document Type
Specification
Specification
Guideline
Guideline
Guideline
Restriction of the measure of RA in the concrete
None given
Recycled all right sum limited to 20 %
Recycled all right sum limited to 10-20 %
10 % for general beginning RA, 30 % for returned stuff & gt ; than 21 MPa
10 % -20 % bound on recycled all right sum
Preparation and handling guidelines
Must keep separate reserves to avoid non MDOT beginning stuff
None given
Sprinkle reserves to maintain sums saturated ; store individually from other stuffs
Separate entrance stuff harmonizing to quality ; maintain SSD conditions with sprinklers
None given
Restriction to the beginning of acceptable stuffs
MDOT concrete
None given
None proposed
Higher-quality returned stuff
None given
Restrictions on the type of elements permitted to incorporate RA
Curb and trough, vale trough, pavements, barriers, private roads, impermanent pavings, inclines with commercial ADT 250, shoulders
Inlets, manholes, troughs, kerbs, idiots, pavements, private roads, backup walls, ground tackles, riprap, little marks, pavings ( all of these applications require & lt ; 21 MPa concrete )
Recommendations merely relate to pavings
Structural elements should incorporate less than 10 % , non-structural applications up to 30 %
Recommendations merely relate to pavings
Word picture demands
Undertaking by project freeze-thaw word picture
None given
Check for hurtful stuffs such as chloride, sulphate
Weekly confirmation of soaking up and specific gravitation
Perform freeze-thaw rating on stuffs exhibiting D-cracking or incorporating fly ash
( American Concrete Pavement Association 2009 ; Federal Highway Administration 2008 ; Michigan Department of Transportation 2003 ; Obla et Al. 2007 ; Texas Department of Transportation 2004 )
Aggregate Recycling in Mecklenburg County
Prior to the economic downswing, concrete and other hardscape rubble comprised 8 % of the building and destruction waste produced in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. In 2005, this equaled more than 28,000 metric tons ( Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services Agency 2006 ) . Interviews with local municipal solid waste forces have indicated that the down-turn in destruction undertakings within the county have reduced the consumption of rubble stuffs at the landfill to degrees that are non sufficient to run into onsite demand. Operational demands for these stuffs include low-grade utilizations such as impermanent roads for earthmoving equipment and trucks that require entree to unpaved countries of the landfill.
An attempt to analyze the aggregation and usage of RA in Mecklenburg County, NC for concrete applications included three constituents 1 ) a instance survey of a destruction undertaking in which beginning separation and analysis of debris for usage as sum was performed, 2 ) an interview with a destruction company that operates an aggregative production pace, and 3 ) interviews with concrete manufacturers sing the possible to include greater measures of RA, including RA produced from building and destruction waste, in bing concrete merchandises.
Case Study – Idlewild Elementary School, Charlotte, North Carolina
UNC Charlotte research workers observed the destruction of an simple school installation in order to analyze the physical procedures included in the tear-down every bit good as the determination devising procedure for the disposal or the recycling methods applied to the dismantled stuffs. The building of the school was typical for a broad scope of commercial and institutional edifices at the clip. Therefore, the information presented here sing the destruction procedure should be relevant to many of the edifices in the local stock list. Walls were reinforced and unreinforced masonry, the roof was a combination of prestressed concrete double-tees and steel framing, and the floor system was a concrete slab-on-grade. The destruction procedure was found to be really orderly and included many techniques that simplified the separation of stuffs such that taint of the debris destined for the crusher was minimized. General stairss followed in the destruction ( in consecutive order ) were:
Removal of risky stuffs such as asbestos
Removal of valuable metals such as Cu and non-critical steel constructions ( such as sunshades )
Destruction of non-masonry divider walls, bead ceilings, and fenestration
Collection and disposal of stuffs listed in # 3
Destruction and remotion of roof framing, adorning and covering
Destruction and remotion of masonry divider walls
Destruction and remotion of the concrete slab
The destruction scheme used in the instance of the simple school is referred to as “ top-down. ” The non-rubble bring forthing stuffs such as gypsum wall board, wood coatings, fixtures, and the similar are removed foremost. Second, the masonry stuffs that constitute the walls are crushed and removed individually. Third, the concrete floor slab is crushed and hauled off-site. While the top-down procedure may non be used for smaller undertakings in which separation of wastes is non economical, it is a practical technique for mid to big scale destruction work and besides lends itself to beginning separation. The concrete slab was used as a sorting tablet for dismantled stuffs before they were hauled to the crusher, landfill, steel recycling installation or other location. In add-on to supplying a surface for the loading equipment thrust on, the concrete slab could be cleared between stages to forestall the debut of foreign stuffs such as cellulose, plastics and metals into the debris for RA. UNC Charlotte research workers found that segregating the rubble stuffs before they were crushed helped better the quality and predictability of the RA.
Prior to the beginning of destruction, 6.4 centimeter diameter nucleus specimens were removed from the subdivision of slab that would be crushed to bring forth sum. A portable coring drill was used to obtain the samples. A sum of seven nucleus samples were removed from three locations in the slab. Of these, due to the comparatively shallow thickness of the slab-on-grade, five nucleus samples were found to be suited for compaction testing. The terminals of the cylinders were trimmed with a wet diamond proverb and the specimens were tested to failure in a cosmopolitan testing machine. The consequences of these compaction trials are given in Table 2. Due to the location of the reinforcing mesh and the slab thickness, the length to diameter ratios of the cut cylinders were typically less than two. The compressive strength was discounted as recommended by ASTM C42 ( ASTM 2004 ) . The mean adjusted compressive strength was found to be 47 MPa. This indicates that the sums should be suited for concrete merchandises in the scope of 34-48 MPa.
Table 2. Compressive strength of nucleuss removed from the slab
Specimens
L/D
Reduction Factor
[ MPa ]
Adjusted
[ MPa ]
1
1.1
0.90
51.1
46.0
2
1.3
0.94
44.1
41.6
3
1.2
0.92
58.8
53.9
4
1.2
0.93
54.7
50.8
5
2.0
1.00
44.6
44.5
In add-on to roll uping compressive strength information from nucleus specimens, Schmidt Hammer readings were taken from the slab in propinquity to the location of the nucleus specimens. The process is outlined in ASTM C805 ( ASTM 2008 ) . No clear correlativity was found between the recoil hardness measured in situ and the compressive strength of the nucleus specimens determined in the lab.
Whole clay brick and clay tile were besides obtained from the destruction debris in order to find belongingss in conformity with ASTM C67 ( ASTM 2009 ) . Trials to find the compressive strength, modulus of rupture, soaking up, and initial suction of the stuffs were performed. Extra testing that is planned but non completed to day of the month is freeze-thaw lastingness proving on the whole clay brick and clay tile specimens. The mean compressive strength of the clay brick was found to be 67.2 MPa, and the mean compressive strength of the clay tile was found to be 81.4 MPa.
Concrete slab-on-grade and brick masonry rubble stuffs from the destruction instance survey were separated on-site, transported, and so crushed at the destruction contractor ‘s aggregative production installation. Two types of recycled sums were produced from the stuff generated at the instance survey site: recycled concrete sum and recycled brick masonry sum. Once crushed, these sums were taken to UNC Charlotte for survey. The crushed sum was characterized in footings of step, bulk denseness and soaking up capacity. Sieve analyses of the two types of recycled sums is presented in Table 3. Table 4 summarizes other features of the recycled sums.
Table 3. Gradation of RA and Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregates Produced from Idlewild Elementary School Demolition Rubble
% Finer
A Sieve Opening [ millimeter ]
Recycled Concrete AggregateA
Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregate
19
100
100
13
100
99.8
9.5
85.0
85.1
4.75
14.0
19.5
2.36
3.0
0.8
Pan
0.0
0.0
Table 4: Features of RA and Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregates Produced from Idlewild Elementary School Demolition Rubble
Characteristic
Recycled Concrete Aggregate
Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregate
Bulk Density ( kg/m3 )
1,281
975.5 ( ASTM C29 shoveling process )
Absorption ( % )
7.6
12.2
Abrasion Resistance ( % lost )
TBD
43.1
The majority denseness of the recycled concrete sums was found to be 1281 kg/m3, which is lower than typical granite sums used in the part. The bulk denseness of the recycled brick masonry sum was found to be 975.5 kg/m3, which is somewhat higher than regionally available manufactured lightweight sums. Absorption of both the RA and recycled brick masonry sum are well higher than locally available granite sum.
The recycled brick masonry sum contained clay brick, clay tile, and masonry howitzer. The proportion of the stuff, by weight and volume, is shown in Table 5. A little ( but potentially important ) sum of other stuff was present in the sum. Future surveies sing the usage of dismantled brick masonry as recycled sum will necessitate to turn to the influence of howitzer and unwanted stuff contained in the sum.
Table 5: Composition of Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregate
Material
% by weight
% by volume
Clay brick
64.5
63.9
Clay tile
2.1
1.9
Mortar
30.1
31.6
Other ( stone, porcelain, lightweight dust )
3.3
2.6
To day of the month testing has chiefly been performed to obtain mechanical belongingss. Concrete mixes were created that incorporated the RA and recycled brick masonry sum as harsh sum. Preliminary consequences from these mixes have indicated that structural compressive strength can be developed in concretes integrating up to 100 % RA utilizing standard commixture patterns and economical mix designs. Careful beginning separation of sensible quality stuffs and proper scaling of the sums simplified the mix design procedure by keeping the consistence of the input stuffs. Future proving includes lastingness proving for a figure of the concrete mixtures developed. Test consequences and other findings for both the recycled sum features and concrete integrating these sums will be published in the undertaking study and potentially in other documents.
Interviews With Industry Representatives from Demolition Contractors, Aggregate Producers, and Concrete Producers
UNC Charlotte research workers conducted interviews with works directors and executives of companies involved in production and usage of recycled sums in the Charlotte country. Specifically, the sum and concrete manufacturers were asked to place the hindrances to utilize of recycled sums in concrete, every bit good as inducements that might assist increase their usage in the Mecklenburg County, North Carolina country.
Particularly insightful information was obtained from the North Carolina-based DH Griffin Companies, including DH Griffin Wrecking Company, which was responsible for destruction at the case-study site. The company is alone because it operates its ain sum suppression and rating unit, DH Griffin Grading & A ; Crushing. This provides a direct recreation of rubble stuffs from the landfill, every bit good as a secondary income watercourse from the sale of the recycled sums. The recycled aggregative production operation was late inspected and certified as an sum beginning for North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT ) work. Despite the success in puting up this aggregative production operation, there are non commissariats for recycled sums in PCC pavings or structural elements in the NCDOT stuffs specifications. Additionally, there are several hindrances to market entry as indicated by company executives. A sum-up of penetration and sentiments from this destruction contractor every bit good as other industry representatives interviewed as portion of this survey is summarized below.
Hindrances to Use of RA and Other Types of Recycled Sums
Aggregate Manufacturers
Being of on-site and low-grade utilizations for RA
In urban destruction undertakings that include Reconstruction on the same site, the sums can frequently be more expeditiously used as fill stuff. The cost benefit to maintaining the sum on the site includes turning away of tipping fees, haling costs and the cost of imported fill when required.
Potential for unsteady supply of beginning stuff
The supply of recycled sum is dependent on the volume of activity in the building and destruction sector. Currently, destruction activities in the Mecklenburg County, North Carolina country are reduced. Therefore, it has been hard for recycled sum makers to guarantee supply for larger occupations.
No illustrations of big graduated table usage
Owners and contractors who might be interested in utilizing concrete that incorporates recycled sums do non hold illustrations of the stuff in service that demonstrate the acceptableness of its visual aspect and lastingness.
Conflict with other cost centres within a company
In recent old ages, companies involved in the concrete industry ( including sum manufacturers, cement makers, and ready-mix and precast concrete providers ) have tended to consolidate into larger concern entities. Use of recycled aggregative stuff in the concrete production operations may non be seen as an option, merely due to possible in-house struggles of involvement with the virgin sum production operations.
Equipment costs
The cost to get down a decently equipped suppression operation is about $ 850,000 for the burden, scaling, rinsing and trial equipment. This big initial cost is a barrier to market entry for many companies that could potentially organize and make a better distributed web of recycled sum manufacturers.
Awareness of oppressing as a disposal option
Smaller trucking companies are non cognizant of the location of sum manufacturers that will accept destruction rubble. They are likely to utilize regulated or unregulated dumping countries in order to dispose of their destruction waste instead than haling it to a recycling installation.
Handiness of illicit shit sites
Although recycled sum manufacturers offer haulers a low-priced or no-cost finish for destruction debris, there are a sufficient figure of unpermitted and unregulated sites available for dumping waste. These sites are particularly desirable if the draw distance from the destruction site is shorter than the distance to the recycling installation.
Preies have a political advantage in big undertakings
Owners of preies that produce virgin sums have political sway and can act upon the stuff criterions for province undertakings.
Concrete Manufacturers
Ready Supply of Virgin Aggregates
Aggregate recycling is more common in some coastal and alluvial countries where there may be a deficit of virgin sums. Mecklenburg County, North Carolina is underlain by several stone formations, and there is no deficit of beginning stuffs for aggregative production.
Preference for returned stuff
Concrete manufacturers that intend to include recycled stuffs prefer to utilize returned concrete with a known composing instead than that of unknown destruction debris.
Storage infinite and handling demands
Recycled sum stuffs must be individually stockpiled in most instances, and many manufacturers do non hold infinite in their installations to hive away equal measures. Significant cost may be incurred to upfit an bing concrete production installations with storage silos, gears such as scattering systems, and conveying systems.
Lack of experience with recycled sums
Harmonizing to NRMCA forces, there is presently merely one ready-mix provider in North Carolina utilizing returned concrete RA on a regular footing. Broader usage may necessitate preparation and counsel from NRMCA and other trade organisations.
Incentives and Tacticss to Promote the Use of Recycled Sums
Aggregate Manufacturers
Waive tipping fees for higher quality debris at oppressing operations
Reduced or waived tipping fees will countervail the disbursal of haling. The ensuing addition in rubble delivered to the suppression operations could relieve the jobs of steady stuff supply at the crusher.
Provide income revenue enhancement credits
Tax credits for the purchase of oppressing equipment that will be used to bring forth recycled sums was identified by those interviewed as potentially the biggest inducement to aggregate manufacturers interested in fabricating recycled sum.
Create demand from undertaking proprietors
Tax credits or other inducements for the usage of recycled sums would promote undertaking proprietors to choose recycled sums over virgin stuffs at their undertaking site.
Create more stationary/permanent crushers
While many companies have invested in nomadic crushers, the stationary units can be better tuned to bring forth systematically graded stuff that would be preferred for production of concrete.
Concrete Manufacturers
Explore possible merchandises
Concrete manufacturers may experience most comfy with everyday usage of recycled sums if mixtures were designed for specific lower strength utilizations such as termss. Manufacturers interviewed expressed comfort with mixes incorporating up to 50 % replacing of virgin sums with RA every bit long as stuff finer than 9.5 millimeter is removed.
Consolidate operations
Due to greater industry consolidation, some sum manufacturers besides operate concrete batching workss. If a individual installation could have and oppress destruction waste, quarry virgin sums, and batch concrete, it would be possible to orient mix stuffs that contain appropriate measures of recycled sums.
Engineers submit their ain quality control program
In order for recycled sums to be used in concrete on niche undertakings, it may be necessary for applied scientists to supply more specific specifications sing beginning stuff and handling, prequalification trials for mixes, and extra testing demands.
Decisions
General apprehensiveness to the usage of destruction waste sourced sums from a proficient position has frequently focused on the potency for taint and inconsistent physical belongingss. As portion of this instance survey, bing source-separation techniques routinely utilized by local destruction contractors have been shown to supply comparatively “ clean ” and unvarying beginnings of recycled sums with satisfactory features for PCC applications. However, a deficit of field experience with, specifications for, and presentation of recycled aggregative concrete in North Carolina has delayed credence and involvement in the stuff by applied scientists, contractors and providers. Since much of the research and counsel has been centered on RA arising from returned concrete, farther research should be conducted to verify the similar public presentation of destruction waste sourced sums.
Although recycled sums produced from building and destruction debris can successfully be used in concrete mixtures that exhibit acceptable research lab public presentation, hindrances to widespread use are still readily evident from a market position. Due to the ample supply of virgin sums in North Carolina, the watercourse of available recycled sums is overpoweringly directed to lower class, non-concrete applications. Concrete that includes recycled sums has been shown to supply cost nest eggs to manufacturers. If the supply and consistence of destruction debris additions, there should be improved market involvement in RA. The staying hindrances will include equipment and operational cost barriers to market entry, and other economic issues such as tipping fees, haling costs, and increased merchandise development disbursals.
Recognitions:
This stuff is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FG26-08NTO1982.
Particular thanks to DH Griffin Wrecking Company and DH Griffin Grading & A ; Oppressing for their sort aid with our destruction instance survey every bit good as for supplying information on the production of recycled sums.
Thankss besides to Argos, USA, Vulcan Materials, Concrete Supply Company and NRMCA.
Disclaimer: This study was prepared as an history of work sponsored by an bureau of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any bureau thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any guarantee, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or duty for the truth, completeness, or utility of any information, setup, merchandise, or procedure disclosed, or represents that its usage would non conflict in private owned rights. Mention herein to any specific commercial merchandise, procedure, or service by trade name, hallmark, maker or otherwise does non needfully represent or connote its indorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any bureau thereof. The positions and sentiments of the writers expressed herein do non needfully province or reflect those of the United States Government or any bureau thereof.
Beginnings
Ajdukiewicz, A. , and Kliszczewicz, A. ( 2002 ) . “ Influence of recycled sums on mechanical belongingss of HS/HPC. ” Cement and Concrete Composites, 24 ( 2 ) , 269-279.
American Concrete Pavement Association. ( 2009 ) . “ Recycling Concrete Pavements. ”
ASTM. ( 2004 ) . “ C42-04 Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete “ , ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. ( 2008 ) . “ C805-08 Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete. ” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. ( 2009 ) . “ C67 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile. ” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Chen, H.-J. , Yen, T. , and Chen, K.-H. ( 2003 ) . “ Use of edifice debriss as recycled sums. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 33 ( 1 ) , 125-132.
Elias-Ozkan, S. T. ( 2001 ) . “ Recycling rubble into sums: a theoretical account for local authoritiess. ” Habitat International, 25 ( 4 ) , 493-502.
Etxeberria, M. , Mari , A. , and Vazquez, E. ( 2007 ) . “ Recycled sum concrete as structural stuff. ” Materials and Structures, 40 ( 5 ) , 529-541.
Evangelista, L. , and de Brito, J. ( 2007 ) . “ Mechanical behavior of concrete made with all right recycled concrete sums. ” Cement and Concrete Composites, 29 ( 5 ) , 397-401.
Federal Highway Administration. ( 2008 ) . “ User Guidelines for Byproducts and Secondary Use Materials in Pavement Construction. ”
Lim, S. , Destner, D. , Zollinger, D. , and Fowler, D. ( 2001 ) . “ Characterization of Crushed Concrete Materials for Paving and Non-Paving Applications. ” Texas Transporation Institute and Center for Transportation Research, Austin, TX.
Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services Agency. ( 2006 ) . “ Mecklenburg County Solid Waste Management Plan, 2006-2016. ” Mecklenburg County, NC.
Michigan Department of Transportation. ( 2003 ) . “ MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction. ” 692-703.
Obla, K. , Kim, H. , and Lobo, C. ( 2007 ) . “ Crushed Returned Concrete as Aggregates for New Concrete. ” National Ready Mix Concrete Association.
Oikonomou, N. D. ( 2005 ) . “ Recycled concrete sums. ” Cement and Concrete Composites, 27 ( 2 ) , 315-318.
Tam, V. W. Y. ( 2008 ) . “ Economic comparing of concrete recycling: A instance survey attack. ” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52 ( 5 ) , 821-828.
Tam, V. W. Y. , Gao, X. F. , and Tam, C. M. ( 2005 ) . “ Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregative concrete produced from two-stage blending attack. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 35 ( 6 ) , 1195-1203.
Texas Department of Transportation. ( 2004 ) . “ Texas Department of Transportation Materials Requirements. ”
Topcu, I. B. , and Guncan, N. F. ( 1995 ) . “ Using waste concrete as sum. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 25 ( 7 ) , 1385-1390.
Topcu, I. B. , and Sengel, S. ( 2004 ) . “ Properties of concretes produced with waste concrete sum. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 34 ( 8 ) , 1307-1312.
Tu, T.-Y. , Chen, Y.-Y. , and Hwang, C.-L. ( 2006 ) . “ Properties of HPC with recycled sums. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 36 ( 5 ) , 943-950.
Xiao, J. , Li, J. , and Zhang, C. ( 2005 ) . “ Mechanical belongingss of recycled aggregative concrete under uniaxial burden. ” Cement and Concrete Research, 35 ( 6 ) , 1187-1194.
