Morality As Anti-Nature Essay

Friedrich Nietzsche. a outstanding German philosopher in the nineteenth century is one of the most well-read philosophers of the past two-centuries. His thoughts sing morality and nature continue to be discussed and debated to this twenty-four hours among bookmans of all beliefs.

All living things are given desires by nature. These desires exist as portion of who we are. They define us in a manner ; they can help us and they can besides make us great injury. The central wickedness of Pride. for case. can be a good thing. to hold pride in yourself and your abilities. and be able to boast about them may be what stands between you and another individual using for the same occupation. But harmonizing to the Bible. it is a wickedness. So the other individual might hold the moral high land. but you will stop up with the occupation. Which is better? Merely you can make up one’s mind that for yourself.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Morality As Anti-Nature Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Another manner to look at it is this. You have a great passion for reading. but morality says that reading is evil. So you deny yourself the pleasance of a good book. magazine article or even a street mark in order to follow what person else has deemed to be a moral codification. You are denying your true ego. for no other intent. but to be accepted in society. In your bosom. and in your head. you know that reading is no more evil that take a breathing. but because society has told you otherwise. you ignore world.

To Nietzsche. denying your ain passions is like denying world. If your passions were a tiger. a strong adult male would catch the tiger and tame it. A weak adult male would at least run off. But it is merely a sap who pretends that the tiger doesn’t exist. The greatest of moralities are those that accomodate nature… the weakest of moralities are those that deny it.

Even though many people at the clip genuinely believed that the church provided them a great way in life. Nietzsche strongly disagreed. Nietzsche believed that following a faith is to disregard the really nature of humanity. He believed that adult male is born of course good. suggesting that the church should non be followed in order for worlds to let their passions be presented in themselves as they desire. Throughout his Hagiographas. Nietzsche aims to inform his readers that we as worlds can merely make our possible by following our passions and disregarding the blemished ideals of the church. Under the philosophy of the church’s morality. unconditioned passions of its followings must be abolished in order to go proper Christians. By destructing the interior passions of its followings. the church is making a great disfavour by utilizing morality to govern out nature from their lives.

When person begins to follow the ideals of the church. they are introduced with the philosophy of the thought of free will. Basically. this construct claims that even if God is an all righteous and all powerful being. merely “his” followings have the ultimate duty for their actions. As human existences. we have a certain failing to do great errors. This is where Nietzsche claimed that there is a instance of cause and consequence. At the clip of his authorship. Friedrich Nietzsche saw that when events were non proven scientifically. followings of the church were really naive to recognition an act of God instead than seeking for the replies otherwise.

Christian religion had become the enemy of life and nature and the church has stifled its followings by turning them into closed minded and weak worlds. Nietzsche finally believed that faith creates a construct of anti-natural morality which amendss our development as worlds rather badly. finally stoping our position and rights as persons once the church gets involved.

Nietzsche believed that the church is at war with the passionate and the intelligent in favour of the hapless and spirited. He believed that the 1s who began the mental and religious beheadings of others are genuinely the 1s who were unable to command their passions and were really sick willed. The people of the church who imposed morality as anti-nature were the 1s who were unable to enforce moderateness in their lives. He believed that an immoralist is an ideal human being. because they are the 1s who genuinely understand the rights and wrongs in life by using passions and a chosen life style that best coincides with their lives.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out