Moving To A Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax Accounting Essay

The Australian Conservation Foundation ( ACF ) is a non-profit national environmental organisation established in 1960s for a exalted nonsubjective refering on environment preservation. For over 40 old ages, ACF has been systematically working with communities, concerns and the authorities to protect restore and prolong the vulnerable environment through carry oning researches, offering audience and instruction plans. The topics ACF covers feature a broad scope, including clime alteration and energy, sustainable agribusiness and land direction, atomic issues, sustainable ingestion, corporate environmental duty, environmental jurisprudence reform, etc.

Carbon Taxes or Carbon Trading for Emission Reduction

This entry addresses the treatment whether a C revenue enhancement is needed to heighten C emanation decrease as the new unit of ammunition emanation trading strategy ( ETS ) is withdrawn late. Both are the two chief instruments for nursery emanation decrease. The ETS is a “ cap and trade ” system which works as: the authorities sets a end of the entire emanation volume in progress, and issues licenses to houses which gives off nursery gases. This cap decreases twelvemonth after twelvemonth to accomplish a decrease ( Climate Action Newcastle 2007 ) . By contrast, a C revenue enhancement is to straight enforce a revenue enhancement on nursery gases release harmonizing to the volumes discharged and the nursery potency. So far, increasing researches indicates the inefficiency of ETS in emanation decrease. The simple revenue enhancement attack is advocated by many outstanding professors and bookmans as an effectual option. For interest of all human existences, it is pressing for the authorities to fall back to the latter yet more effectual step to cut down emanation.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Moving To A Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax Accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

The Timetable for Carbon Emission Reduction Issue

Scientific surveies on nursery effects resulted from the monolithic emanation of H2O vapour, C dioxide, etc. really dated back a century ago when Fourier ( 1824 ) published his Remarques Generales Sur Les Temperatures Du Globe Terrestre Et Des Espaces Planetaires. However, the issue has non received sufficient attending until the lifting temperature globally forces human society to reexamine its behaviours during the past 100s of old ages. In 1997, Kyoto Protocol was endorsed as a milepost in homo ‘s attempt to turn to the nursery gas emanation issue. For the first clip, statutory attack was deployed to command and cut down GHG. In this papers, the right to dispatch C is seen as a “ practical goods ” for trade in hope of utilizing market mechanism to work out the decrease issues. Based on this understanding, Emission Trade Scheme ( in Australia, it turns up as Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme ) comes out. Meanwhile, some European states such as Sweden, Finland, Norway became precursors to impose C revenue enhancements in 1990s to add a “ monetary value ” to let go of GHG.

The Severe Greenhouse Gases Problems

The universe is seemingly warming up, taking to a rapid clime alterations around the Earth. Australia who is driest inhabited continent and is sensitive to conditionss bears the full brunt of the impact. Apart from being a victim enduring the inauspicious effects, Australia is besides a major perpetrator in this “ offense ” . At present, Australia is the universe ‘s biggest coal exporter and a universe taking nursery gas ( GHG ) defiler. The domestic and exported “ one-year per capita GHG pollution ” by Australia is 54 dozenss CO2-equivalent per individual per twelvemonth! The figure is twice that of the US, 10 times that of China, 25 times that of India and 60 times that of Bangladesh ( Lighter Footprints 2009 ) . If things continue like this, fewer than 1 billion people are estimated to be able to last planetary heating by the terminal of this century ( Murray 2009 ) .

The Current Measures and the Proposed Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

The lifting consciousness on GHG issues urges the authorities to move responsively. Main steps in consequence include compulsory ordinances and subsidies to promote green enterprises. However, authorities intervene is ne’er lasting solution which stimulus enterprises to cut down C release. Besides, fiscal stimulation generates extra populace disbursals to transport out the plans.

For more effectual attacks, CPRS, the Australian version ETS, is put on the docket, though it seems to be temporarily put off at present. This is one of two major options for cut down C emanation. Nevertheless, increasing groundss turn out its ineffectualness and unfeasibility. The C trading mechanism is basically a policy instrument. Similar to the ordinance and subsidy attack, it besides undermines the effectivity of voluntary attempts and imply excess disbursement to get down the strategy ( the rejected program purportedly cost A $ 12 billion ) . The emanation up bound is normally received as an ultimate end that asks emitters non to transcend the cap, alternatively of pressing them invariably to cut down the volume with new techniques ( Brook & A ; Kelly 2009 ) . What is more, this trading mechanism allows companies to purchase extra pollution credits from those who will non utilize up their credits ( Lohmann 2006 ) . As a consequence, largest emitters in Australia will be able to go on dispatch immense sum of GHG through purchasing licenses from developing states, giving small part to ablactate these emitters off fossil fuels ( Pearse 2009 ) .

The Benefits of a Revenue-neutral Carbon Tax

A revenue-neutral C revenue enhancement is merely the other chief instrument for GHG emanation decrease. It works every bit straight imposing revenue enhancement on GHG emanation and uses the gross collected to cut down other revenue enhancements or set up a fund to present emitters who mostly cut down their emanation on a year-on-year base. Compared with trading mechanism, this is simpler, cheaper and more efficient, more crystalline ( Humphreys 2007 ) .

The centrepiece of trading and revenue enhancement is the pricing. Tax is obviously simpler to increase the cost of let go ofing. There is no complex computation on C monetary values which involves plentifulness of human and material resource to complete the undertaking. No periods are needed to manus out legion licenses to defilers or apportion subsidies to legalize organisations and persons, which saves considerable clip to rush up stairss towards a more “ green ” economic system. In fact, about intermediate links can be eliminated if the revenue enhancement mechanism is deployed. All needed is to work out the revenue enhancement rate and sporadically regenerate the rate if needed to fit the economic and societal development. Meanwhile, simpleness ever leads to betterment in transparence.

Unlike subsidies and ETS ( EPRS ) , an extra revenue enhancement tends to bring forth small or no economic cost. As is stated above, backbreaking work can be eliminated in the C revenue enhancement system, so assorted disbursement lifting in these attempts can be save, in footings of both touchable stuffs and intangible clip. Beside, the revenue enhancement attack besides helps to avoid possible fiscal hazard which may increase economic cost. Under the revenue enhancement system, the monetary value added to carbon release is fixed and therefore equal to anyone who gives off the destructive gases. Consequently, concerns that volatile monetary values for the licenses will give rise to guess and new fiscal derived functions on fiscal markets disappear instantly. Given the autonomous debt crisis in Europe which may trip another international fiscal crisis, the fixed monetary value by merely imposing revenue enhancement, instead than presenting a new potentially hazardous flexible monetary values, is more contributing to keep a stable fiscal market.

A carbon-based revenue enhancement is collected against the volume and the nursery potencies. In other words, the more terrible effects it generates, the more charges emitters will pay. No bound, no cap. The largest defilers in the excavation and power industries must fall back to less-carbon-intensive fuels and engineerings to forestall operation cost from lifting enormously under the C revenue enhancement system. Subsequently, in order to beef up the fight in market contending, defilers are forced to continuously cut down emanations and besiege the C revenue enhancement to command overall cost. As a consequence, the revenue enhancement together with market competition constitutes an effectual permanent mechanism to advance changeless lessening. More significantly, the effectivity and efficiency of revenue enhancement instrument in promote emanation are evidenced in message delivered – emitters must truly cut down their emanation, alternatively of reassigning the pollution elsewhere outside Australia through purchasing licenses. The C revenue enhancement prevents defilers from spread outing coal export and increasing making C escape for more net income. In this manner, the entire planetary emanation is able to diminish. The atmospheric bed is seamless unity and the GHG emanation is a planetary issue. Small consequence can be achieved with a decrease in entire emanation volume. Therefore, it is a pathetic fraud to claim a decrease in emanation while dispatching this portion elsewhere. The lone meaningful tool is to increase cost straight and unfalteringly by imposing a revenue enhancement.

Some controversialists commend that a C revenue enhancement gives authoritiess less control over emanations and denies Australian entree to a moneymaking planetary emanations merchandising market. This is a flimsy statement. For one thing, authorities control is simply a agencies, non the ultimate end. Equally long as emanation is cut down, it matters litter whether the authorities control involves is strong or weak ; for the other, emission decrease is adult male ‘s duty to the full human society every bit good as the whole planet. It is by no mean a new manner of trailing net incomes!


The accomplishment gained by Sweden in emanation decrease through revenue enhancement so far serves as obliging grounds on the effectivity of Carbon Tax ( Fouche 2008 ) . Plus the theoretical analysis on these benefits, the Tax mechanism deserves the acclamations and is extremely recommended to be introduced in Australia countrywide soonest possible. Any hold in action will take to severer effects!


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out