Ngos Go Collaboration In Haiti Economics Essay

The Non Governmental Organizations, chief development spouses of the international community in Haiti, are openly and vehemently criticized by the national and international Medias. They have n’t brought the expected alteration to the destitute island.

However, the Haitian authorities should besides be blamed for its passiveness ; it has n’t responded strategically vis-a-vis the preponderance of NGOs in the state. There is weak interaction between both histrions which has led to an uneffective usage of the assistance money.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Ngos Go Collaboration In Haiti Economics Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Consequently, a shared committedness to interrupt the regulation of isolation may lend to the accomplishment of societal and economic alteration in the state. The province should be the chief instigator of the collaborative administration by set uping right legal and institutional models. It can be inspired by Uganda, Ghana and Nepal instances ; these states have developed appropriate national policy for NGOs- GO partnership.

“ The emasculation of the province is no accident aˆ¦ it is partially the effect of the neoliberal government implanted in the state by the major international fiscal establishments. By recommending the backdown of the province from its societal and regulating duties, and by advancing the domination of the market, this government has contributed to an economic, political and societal catastrophe. ”[ 1 ]( Haitian Professor Robert Fatton, 2012 )

“ NGOs community has infantilized Haiti. ”[ 2 ]( Jean Max Bellerive, Former Haitian Prime Minister )

“ Civil society [ … ] should non make the work of the authorities ” ( Buss and Gardner, 2008 )

The above commendations are samples of unfavorable judgments that the Non Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) have been digesting before and after the temblor of January 2010. They are considered portion of the bad luck of the state which seems trapped into poorness despite the immense sum of assistance it has been having through NGOs, cardinal development spouses of the international community.

However, the passiveness of the Haitian authorities, that, some refer to as the “ Phantom province ” is besides to be condemned. The authorities is holding a “ individualistic attack ” counterpart the NGOs which does n’t harmonize with this new development aid epoch where the NGOs are supposed to be the suppliers and the authorities, the policymaker.

Consequently, sing the comparative advantages of both histrions and the complementarities of their functions, the coaction between the Haitian authorities and the NGO community appears to be the best ingredient to make the common end: effectual assistance bringing.

Research inquiries

Collaboration between authorities and NGOs sounds to be an of import and really ambitious policy. Consequently, for an in-depth analysis, the survey is designed around the undermentioned inquiries:

How of import NGOs are for the state?

What is the political economic system of NGOs- GO coaction?

How to heighten NGOs-GO coaction?

Rationale of the survey

The turning unfavorable judgments of the legion Non Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) that operate in Haiti, peculiarly in the wake of the 2010, actuate this research paper. Hence, its purposes placing the factors that can assist each stakeholder complementing its strengths and to deduce some utile tips for effectual NGOs- GO collaborative model in Haiti.


The reappraisal will see articles, working documents, books and thesiss that have addressed the issue of coaction and specifically surveies that have proposed some model for meaningful confederations. Consequently, we will garner information from different surveies irrespective of the sector.

Besides, the paper will i ) highlight the comparative advantages of both histrions, two ) province the economic system of collaborative administration, three ) place the necessary factors for healthy coaction, four ) derive appropriate recommendations for effectual NGOs-GO coaction in Haiti.


This subdivision is of import because it helps capturing how complex and challenging is this environment. Besides, it helps infering the context of intercessions of the Non Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) in the state.

Since its independency from France in 1804, Haiti has being enduring from several catastrophes that have impoverished it. Indeed, this little island located in the Caribbean Sea is transporting a long history of political instability, incapable and self-interest motivated leaders, dependent economic system, and frequent natural catastrophes that explain its position as the poorest states in the Western Hemisphere.

Political environment

Haiti, from 1804 to show has known 56 presidents and 23 of them were evicted from power by putsch d’etat and long periods of internal struggles. As a affair of fact, six UN peace maintaining mission have intervened in the state. The most recent one “ UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti ( MINUSTHA ) ” has been in the state since 2004 ( UN office of the particular minister plenipotentiary 2010 ) .

Another index of the problem political environment of Haiti is corruptness. For some old ages, Transparency International has listed Haiti among the 10 most corrupt states in the universe. For case, it ranks it 175 out of 182 states in 2011. A fact that erodes the legitimacy of the province, and that weakens the belief in its establishments and capacity.

Social environment

The societal environment of the state is besides really critical. The Human Development Index statistics attest the hapless quality of life of the Haitians ; it ranks it 154 out of 178 in 2011. Indeed, health care, instruction, balanced nutrition, clean H2O etc. are epicurean goods for the bulk of the population who live with less than $ 2 a twenty-four hours. Besides, the state suffers from societal inequality. Another bad characteristic of the state is its exposure to natural catastrophes such as inundations, hurricanes. The most unprecedented catastrophe that the state has ne’er known is the 2010 temblor followed by the cholera epidemic that has worsened its societal conditions. Today, the capital, Port-au-Prince becomes a shanty town chiefly decorated with fictile collapsible shelters and transitional shelters.

Economic environment

Economically, Haiti is besides in a unstable state of affairs. Although, it claims to be basically agricultural state, it exports chiefly nutrients from abroad. With a low national production, the state has a long yesteryear of trade shortage. For case, in 2011, it imported 3,352 billion dollars against 721.3 million dollars of exports ( CIA, the World Fact book ) . Besides, the state suffers from low investings due to miss of substructure and security. The high rate of unemployment ( 40.6 % ) and the high rate of budget support ( approximately 50 % ) are besides collateral grounds of the unhealthy Haitian economic system. A weak economic system, that strongly leans on foreign assistance money.

In amount, we should understand that this Haiti ‘s landscape is non recent. The state has been confronting the challenge of poorness for decennaries ; today, it becomes more pressing to get by with it. How to do it more effectual is the inquiry.


Context of outgrowth

The intercession ‘s context of Non Governmental Organizations in Haiti is non different from other developing states unable to run into the basic demands of their citizens, to guarantee a better resource allotment, to cut down inequality and to relieve poorness.

Harmonizing to some research workers, the NGOs have been runing in the state since 1950s[ 3 ]. However, in the early old ages, their chief function was to back up the marginalized provincials in the distant country of the state and to advance the adult females ‘s rights. They have started playing a greater function in the state in footings of aid and service bringing in the late 1980 ‘s and early 1990s due to the volatility of the political system and rampant corruptness. In 1987, President and Dictator Jean Claude Duvalier went in expatriate. In 1991, Jean Bertrand Aristide, foremost democratically elected President left the power further to a military putsch[ 4 ]. During those periods of political instability, NGOs were the chief suppliers of societal service. World Bank besides reports in its survey, during the unwilling absence of Aristide, the assistance bureaus channeled through the NGOs an estimated sum of $ 100 million as foreign assistance. In 1994, President Aristide came back, but non the money.

Indeed, the effectual function played by the Non Governmental Organizations during these four old ages and the inability of the series of former Haitian authoritiess to utilize efficaciously the giver monies made the international assistance bureaus “ IMF and World Bank changed their programs for Haiti ‘s development. ”[ 5 ]( 45 ) They have chosen NGOs to present service in rural and urban countries in the state. In 1999, the international community agreed openly to short-circuit the province. In her academic journal Blares of assistance ( 2010 ) Zanotti states the ground of contested presidential election ( 758 ) . A policy, that is still prevailing, and that some consider as the chief account to the proliferation of NGOs in the state[ 6 ]. For case, after the temblor the Medias reported that the NGOs have received 85 % of the money assistance disbursed for long-run alleviation, and 99 % of the human-centered assistance ( CDG Policy Paper 004, 2012 ) .

Proliferation of NGOs in the state

Proliferation, mushrooming, burgeoning and roar are the specific words used to measure up the turning figure of NGOs runing in the state. In 1996, research workers estimated the figure of NGOs working in Haiti between 165 and 500 ( World Bank study, 1998 ) . In 2010, the estimation figure varied from 462 to 20.000[ 7 ]. The smaller figures represent the figure of registered NGOs at the Ministry of Planning. With a population of 10 million, Haiti has the “ universe ‘s biggest concentration of NGOs per capita ” ( Jay and Barry- Shaw, 2012 ) .

Sectors of engagement

With respect of their importance in the state in footings of service proviso, many people have called the NGOs “ a parallel province ” . Indeed, their prominence is in every sector of activity ( wellness, instruction, environment, community development etc. ) . For case, Jay and Barry-Shaw estimation that NGOs provide approximately 80 % of Haiti ‘s basic services. The undermentioned chart presents the NGOs per intercessions sector.

Figure1. NGOs grouping per sector[ 8 ]

Beginning: Where the money has gone? 2010


The shared and on-going vision is that coaction is the cardinal component to heighten one-sided attempts. Hence, this literature reappraisal aims to show a wide position of coaction in order to understand why it is of import to prosecute this end in the assistance industry.

Comparative advantages of both histrions

NGOs, defined as non-profit-making organisations, play a cardinal function in development sectors. Their functions and influence are going progressively of import. They are involved in about all sectors: wellness, protagonism, environment, instruction, etc. In some development states, they even assume more seeable functions than authorities establishments. Some bookmans argue that there is a alteration in the power dealingss between both histrions.

Indeed, the NGOs have progressively become, the favourite channel of the development aid in the recent decennaries.For illustration, The volume of resources funnels through NGOs for development undertakings rose from $ 0.9 billion to $ 6.3 billion in 1993 ( Riddell and Robinson, 1995 ) . With the immense rises in bilateral and many-sided assistance passed through the worldwide NGOs, the giver entrust them to convey effectual alteration in the development and transitional economic systems ( Fowler, 1999 ) .

The account for such a policy resides in the chronic ” inability of consecutive authoritiess to stem the impairment of the economic system saddled with a heavy societal public assistance load and a low economic growing, and attendant addition in unemployment, low incomes, poorness and the marginalisation of whole parts in the state. ”[ 9 ]

Donors consider NGOs to be the cardinal development agents and best operational option for bettering the criterion of life of the hapless due to their comparative advantages. They have virtues to be less corrupt, more cost effectual, more close to the marginalized people, more competent and less bureaucratic.

However, this new attack of assistance does non mean that authoritiess have no function to play. They have besides some comparative advantages against the NGO community. The chief one is its capacity to come up with policy reforms aimed to relieve poorness. For case, it is a authorities ‘s responsibility to construct large- graduated table substructures and to put up the state ‘s development scheme and guarantee that NGOs regard it. In a fancy term, the authorities should guarantee an enabling environment that Analysts define as a set of conditions to back up societal and economic alteration, in other words to ease the development procedure.

However, the fact is the functions of the authorities and the NGO community is non reciprocally sole. They aim both to societal alteration and have strengths and failings. Consequently, moving independently does non vouch success. For illustration, Levitsky ( 2000 ) , reports that Bangladesh is one of the poorest states in the universe despite the three decennaries of NGOs intercessions. One declared ground is the low range of their enterprises, their “ pocket of development ”[ 10 ]because of the non -involvement of the authorities histrions, and the absence of working collaborative model.

Some research workers even argue both the authorities and the NGOs are loath to work together, but for different grounds. The NGOs are afraid to lose their liberty and their advocacy function vis- a-vis the authorities. Government itself does non desire to lose its power of monitoring, commanding the non for net income organisations and implementing their answerability.

In the following subdivisions, we will see that coaction has more advantages than disadvantages. Besides, extenuating actions do be to cut down the possible hazards built-in to the collaborative administration.

Importance of NGOs-GO coaction

Many bookmans have besides praised the values of coaction in the assistance industry. The coaction between both histrions is worthwhile because of their complementary and auxiliary advantages ( Farrington & A ; Bebbington, 1993 ) . Salker and Parker ( 2005 ) assume that collaborative administration is utile to get by with common development challenges. Mc Donald and Chrisp ( 2005 ) believe that this relationship can be fruitful because each organisation despite its strengths can non make everything by itself.

Collaboration in the NGO community is besides valuable. It can avoid duplicate, waste and activities which are non in line with the province ‘s precedences ( John Clark, 1994 ) . In his paper NGO webs: strength in Numberss? ( 2003 ) Adam Abelson besides affirms that NGO webs helps to cut down duplicate of attempts, purchases of financess and plans. In their survey The Dynamics of NGO coaction, Dutting and Sogge besides report the possible benefits of NGOs coaction ; for case, plans implemented in squads have more direct impact than those implemented separately. ( 3 )

For some others research workers, coaction between authorities and NGOs can heighten common capacity edifice through cognition, accomplishments sharing and synergistic and constructive communicating ; Collaboration can even advance new development attacks ( Arya, 1999 ) .

Conditionss for effectual coaction

“ With the right conditions in topographic point, coaction can so pay off. ”[ 11 ]Some argue that the State -NGOs coaction needs some schemes and policies. Governments should commit the coaction through good processs. They should besides beef up it through regular duologue, regard and common answerability ( Workshops on NGOs- Government coaction, organized by APMAS[ 12 ]) . Structured webs are profitable. Aurobindo Behera, in his survey “ Government – NGO coaction for catastrophe decrease in India ” ( 2002 ) , advocates that appropriate institutional and regulatory models are necessary conditions for effectual joint actions.

Zafa Ullah et Al. ( 2004 ) show some basic regulations for effectual coaction. Governments should originate policies and schemes development to ease engagement of NGOs in service proviso. NGOs should heighten capacity edifice of the authorities and the community. Besides, the development histrions must hold shared values. At last, the best coaction theoretical account for public service proviso should be crystalline and sustainable.

Harmonizing to Ansell and Gash, good inducements are besides a cardinal factor for successful coaction. The inducements to join forces are stronger, when the histrions are mutualist, when their aims can non be reached one-sidedly and when, they do non hold other options to accomplish their aims. They can besides be given by the province through ordinance ( 553 ) . Conflicts can be a shutter release of strong inducements for partnership administration when the histrions are strongly dependent to each other ( Gash & A ; Ansell, 2008 ) .

However the chief and important factor to heighten collaborative administration is leading. As Gash & A ; Ansell said leading becomes all more of import, where inducements to take part are weak and where power and resources distribution are uneven ( 555 ) . Indeed, coaction requires leaders who are capable to ease the linkage procedure ( Larson et al. , 1994 ) ; facilitation through what Emerson et Al. ( 2011 ) name “ collaborative actions ” ( 7 ) . Ansell & A ; Gash ( 2012 ) , province that a collaborative leader may play different functions depending on state of affairss and aims. He can be steward, go-between or the accelerator ; go-between to intercede and pull off struggles between spouses ; steward to keep and heighten the unity among stakeholders ; accelerator to assist taking advantages of the best chances.

Furthermore, Emerson et Al. ( 2011 ) asserts that durable collaborative administration requires proper processs and establishments. Their chief aim is to put up over clip regulations and protocols to pull off the web and avoid misbehaviour by repairing the range of intercessions and duties of the parties. The construction should be defined at intra-organizational and inter-organizational degrees and collectively for broader actions and to heighten ownership.

Summarized findings from surveies

“ Mvula Trust “ is a nongovernmental establishment that has successfully implemented H2O and sanitation undertakings in South Africa. Harmonizing to Ilse Wilson et Al. this plan was successful because Trust works closely with the authorities, exactly the Department of Water and Forestry. The District office involved it in policy development, and jurisprudence reforms in the sector. In fact, this has been possible thank to the political committedness and the existent leading of the Department. They besides report in the article the sanitation & A ; H2O sector did non work good in the past because of the non concerted mode in policies and attacks.

Ahmed ( 2011 ) carried out a study among 50 territory functionaries and NGOs employees on the factors act uponing the success of GO-NGOs coaction in Bangladesh at the territory degree. He found out that there were active interactions between the District office and the NGOs during undertakings execution. However, the partnership was non sustainable. His statement is the NGOs- GO cooperation is informal ; there are no defined regulations.

We have seen that strong linkages between the authorities and the NGOs have powerful virtues. However, what we should understand is this collaborative relationship is non easy to accomplish. It has menaces and failings that deserve to be controlled.

Threats & A ; failings of coaction

The collaborative relationship might be counterproductive or unhealthy if the political will to poverty decrease is weak and if the authorities has no positive development docket ( John Clark, 1994 ) . He besides recognizes that NGOs webs development is non easy ; it can be impeded by green-eyed monster and competition between NGOs. Zaffar Ullah et Al. ( 2006 ) , besides mention the involuntariness of NGOs to work with authorities and deficiency of common trust as possible menaces to healthy coaction. Tough regulations and ordinances are besides possible obstructions ( World Bank, 1990 ) . The fright of long bureaucratic procedures can besides endanger coaction ( Cecchini et al. 2000 ) .

Summary & A ; Lessons learned

Different surveies have analyzed coaction between authorities and Non Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) and have a common decision: coaction is advantageous. It ensures a better assistance direction by expeditiously meet attempts toward shared ends in agreement with the state ‘s precedences.

However, collaborative administration is non instantaneous. It comes from the histrions willingness. Besides, successful coaction requires appropriate policy and institutional models and facilitative leader capable to garner the different histrions and warrant a healthy coaction by puting proper processs and establishments.

Consequently, the lessons learned, from the literature reappraisals are the conditions for effectual coaction are indistinguishable in every sector. The chief 1s are willingness and right policies.

In the following subdivision, this theoretical model will be utile to come up with appropriate recommendations to render coaction effectual between the development histrions. The restriction of the survey is the demand appraisal is chiefly from unfavorable judgments and, from the call for new partnership by the Haitian authorities in September 2012.


Over clip, Collaboration has become the new strategic mean to accomplish stated ends efficaciously. In the public disposal literature, the construct “ collaborative administration ” qualifies the new signifier of direction that condemns adversarial attack and centralised decision-making. The prevailing thought that feeds this new signifier of administration is that web, confederation, partnership or coaction is a constructive mode of garnering different histrions, to seek solutions to jobs that can non be solved in isolation, specifically, that require a shared vision and different expertness.

In the assistance industry, the rule of coaction for important consequences has become besides a leitmotif. The on-going demand for partnership between the development histrions comes from the inability to assist the hapless states traveling out of poorness. The Non Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) led development attack applied, by the givers in the so- called “ failed ”[ 13 ]and “ weak ” provinces have n’t succeeded to relieve poorness.

The competitory and leery relationships that have defined both the authorities and the NGOs and that have prevented them to work together for effectual assistance bringing explain the failure ; a relationship compared to cats and sneak relationships.

Legal and institutional model

We analyze the relationship between the Haitian authorities and NGOs by mentioning to the policy environment that regulates the dealingss between both histrions.

Aside of the fundamental law, the edict of September 1989 is the lone existing legal model on NGOs operations in the state. It gives a restrictive and debatable definition of NGOs: they are, “ all establishments, or private entities, unpolitical, non for net income pursuing development aims at national, departmental and community degrees with resources to transport out their missions ” ( article 1 ) . What we can infer from this definition is the NGOs are free to transport out their missions. Should they be in line with the authorities plans? The statute law is ill-defined.

Furthermore, the decree sets UCAONG, a unit of the Ministry of Planning responsible of the enrollment, monitoring and coordination of the NGOs activities at the national degree ( art.13 ) . However, there is no operational entity at the departmental degree. It impacts negatively on the followups of undertakings that NGOs implement at the community degree and the realization of the list of NGOs step ining per section every bit good as their activities.

Most of the demands are non fulfilled For case, article 28-6 stipules “ should be sent to the Ministry of Planning and External cooperation, between May 15 and August 31, the plan and investing budget for the following exercising financial ” . In a study prepared by UCAONG in December 2008, 97 NGOs out of 428 have submitted their activities study. For 2010-2011, 36 out of 546 registered and active submitted theirs.

At the exclusion of the Ministry of Health and Population, any of the other sectoral ministries have complete information on the different NGOs working on their sector.

Hence, in the wake of the temblor many newspapers point out the deficiency of coordination and partnerships between both histrions.

Consequently, the aforesaid facts give some penetration on the deficiency of interaction between the NGOs and the authorities. Indeed, in the months following the temblor, the national and international Medias have strongly criticized the deficiency of partnership and coordination. Largely, the NGOs work outside of the authorities system.

Rationale for NGO-GO coaction in Haiti

We have seen that collaborative administration, or coaction can lend to greater results, better public service commissariats. Consequently, effectual coaction between NGOs and the Haitian province appears necessary. Why?

Lack of institutional capacity of the province worsen by the temblor and the phenomenon of encephalon drain ( For case, UCAONG is in charge of NGOs enrollment and the coordination of their activities across the state and it has approximately a forces of 100 )

Chronic poorness despite the significant sum of assistance that it has been having for decennaries ( World Bank 1998 )

Misalignment of the NGOs plans with the authorities precedences[ 14 ]

The immense measures of undertakings implemented at one time at national and community degree ( see figure below )

Centralization of the NGOs coordination

Undertakings map of Haiti

hypertext transfer protocol: //*U5zqdIvjaxFJzTJ5ZJ05t3Rlfij90A8eya7RgB*apS/HaitiAidMap.jpg

Beginning: hypertext transfer protocol: //

SWOT analysis of the NGOs-GOH coaction

Strengths ( expected )




Coverage of public services addition

Alliance with the state plan precedences increased

authorities competency through proficient aid improved

Cost effectivity


Better engagement / service proviso

High figure of NGOs

Low direction accomplishments and capacity of the authorities

Lack of common trust Limited resources

Absence of legal model

Centralization of coordination

Turning political willingness

for coaction

Support from the international community

High degree forum /aid effectivity advancing coaction amidst histrions

Resistance from both parties

Co-option by the authorities

Political instability

Lack of advancement in sector reforms to make enabling environment

N.B: We made this SWOT analysis harmonizing to different unfavorable judgments of the assistance direction in Haiti in different intercessions sectors in the wake of the temblor.


We have learned from the literature reappraisal that NGOs intercessions may hold greater impact with engagement of authoritiess, in other words if they work together. Sing the prominence of NGOs in Haiti and the weak capacity of the authorities, heightening the partnership between histrions will take to better service commissariats and greater coverage. How to make it?

Sing the above-named failings of the coaction system in the state, the wise option would be to reexamine the legal and institutional model jointly with NGO community. This new policy will assist standardise and prolong the coaction theoretical account across line ministries at the state and community degree.

For illustration, the authorities would hold to amend the edict of 1982 that has a narrow definition of NGOs. This definition is non in line with the World Bank definition which is broader ; accordingly, it leaves out most of the NGOs. The jurisprudence should stipulate besides the duties of NGOs and each sectoral ministry.

Besides, the jurisprudence should besides qualify the decentalisation of control and monitoring functions of UCAONG by set uping an NGO unit in each line ministry and local authorities bureaus to ease the follow up of undertakings from the designation to rating stairss.

Because of limited capacity of the state in footings of homo and fiscal resources, it would be worthwhile if the authorities provide inducements such as revenue enhancement freedoms to the NGO community to reorganize themselves into association ; this would hold the advantage to cut down the atomization of the assistance attempts and besides the holds in covering with each individual NGO.

However, we should acknowledge that this aspiration will non be possible without a steadfast political will, franc duologue between histrions and the support of the international community.

In drumhead, coaction appears to be the necessary tool to hold things done expeditiously and efficaciously. The literature is full of narratives that stress on the importance of coaction in assorted spheres. The stronger is the linkages the better is the results.

In the context, of assistance and development, coaction implies that the development histrions work together to accomplish the MDGs ends which the most pressing is poverty relief. It seems to be the slug thaumaturgy because it encourages common audience, duologue, common answerability and shared rules. Hence, this battle and committedness avoid misdirection of assistance by avoiding atomization and duplicate of attempts.

Haiti is one of the development states where the non-cooperation between NGOs and authorities are a concern. The moral force of NGOs lead and the authorities follows has n’t contributed to the state ‘s societal and economic alteration.

As a affair of fact, sing their comparative advantages, the NGOs and the Haitian authorities should accommodate themselves to the new development aid epoch. The collaborative administration is the solution and the authorities should be the collaborative leader to ease, promote and protect the procedure to carry through the expected results by holding relevant establishments and ordinances. All this, should be done in a advisory mode, in other words through changeless audience, communicating with the NGO community.

Although the paper is concentrating merely on the coaction between authoritiess and NGOs, the part of the civil society as a whole and the private sector is besides necessary. The engagement of all histrions is worthwhile for complete collaborative administration.

Besides, we believe that givers will maintain encouraging partnership, coaction to accomplish the end of assistance effectivity. For case, the 4th High degree Forum on Aid effectivity in Busan ( 2011 ) agreement besides greater importance to coaction between developments histrions

However, The political economic system of coaction is chiefly theoretical, so future research is necessary to prove through empirical observation the correlativity between collaborative administration and assistance effectivity.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out