Organizational Structures Used by UK Supermarkets Essay

Organizational construction can be defined as the formal and informal model of policies and regulations in order to keep the alliance of the company ‘s communicating, the length and breadth of authorization, rights and responsibilities of the maps of the resources that is allotted in a extremely ordered mode.

In this, I would wish to present two among the most good successful nutrient concatenation companies in the UK viz. J Sainsbury Plc and Tesco Plc.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Organizational Structures Used by UK Supermarkets Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

J Sainsbury Plc

Sainsbury ‘s was founded by John James and Mary Ann Sainsbury in the twelvemonth 1869 with their first store in one of the London ‘s poorest countries called Drury Lane. Their success in supplying high quality merchandises in low monetary value make them to the success to make their today ‘s base with more than 800 stores. The company is now longest functioning 18.5 clients a hebdomad and with market portion of about 16 per centum. The company besides has a recognition of the longest major nutrient retailing concatenation in the UK.

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: // pageid=12 [ April 1, 2010 ]

Tesco Plc

Tesco was founded by Jack Cohen in 1919 by his first gross revenues on excess food markets from a stall with a net income of & A ; lb ; 1 with gross revenues of & A ; lb ; 4. The company ‘s trade name ain merchandise was sold as Tesco tea before the company is called by the name. The name Tesco came from the company ‘s spouse and tea provider name TE Stockwell and the first two letters of doodly-squat ‘s family name. Tesco ‘s today ‘s plus planted in several states like Japan, Turkey, China, Malaysia, India, United States and more.

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Types of Organization

There are different types of organisations with regard to the manner they are working.

Formal Organization

This type of organisation contains fixed regulations that may or may non follow a certain figure of regulations and patterns that bother the organisation. This depends on the manner the organisation considers it. Some of them are really purely followed. Some of the cardinal features of formal organisations are

good attributed regulations and ordinances

good determined policies and aims

bounds given to activities of single with in the organisation

purely maintained coordinated observation

they are non dynamic in nature

hierarchal in nature

Informal Organization

This type of organisation cane be defined as integrating of behaviors, interactions, personal or professional connexions through which the work is being done by meshing of societal connexions. Development of this type of organisation is of course created societal networking site such as facebook, chirrup are good known for its interaction in assorted degrees. These types of networking are really much flexible and executable in developing interpersonal relationships every bit good as organisational interaction. They are more informal both in professional and personal positions. These are more effectual for brainstorming and can follow new inventions and societal constituents.

Some of the cardinal features of the informal organisation involve

really antiphonal and dynamic in nature

extremely motivated and excellence in public presentation

really flexible

Disadvantages of informal organisation

There are many extremely possible disadvantages of informal organisation. Some of them are

Resistance towards change

Role struggle


With all these disadvantages, the informal organisations are still really popular in the current fast changing universe. Their natural efficiency and effectual attack towards new thoughts and suggestions make them to maintain alive and more communicative with first-class channels through out the Earth.

Flat organisation

This type of organisation normally in a little sector or might be a unit of large organisation. In this there will few degrees or no degrees at all in construction. This type of organisation operates in different degrees of concern for some specific intent. This type of organisation is a decentralised 1. That is there will be no point of concentration of power.

The chief advantages of this type of organisation are

minimum bureaucratism

more effectual in altering environment

resource committedness is minimum

Tall organisation

This type of organisation is non normally used separately in any organisation as the forte of holding excessively many parallel degrees that make them hard to make determinations.

Matrix Organization

Matrix organisations are those organisation which they pool the work of people holding the same degree of accomplishment. This type of construction is used in organisations which has high dependences between different sections with in the organisation.

Courtesy: hypertext transfer protocol: //

The above figure shows how the interaction between the directors and their functions in their authorization and sections and the organisation as a whole. In this the directors of different sections are in the same degrees and they interact between them for the overall quality and public presentation of the organisation.

The matrix organisations can be loosely divided into weak, strong and balanced one harmonizing to the degree of control and entree of the authorization towards their employees.

Weak matrix

In this type of organisation the chief job is the trueness between the undertaking directors and the squad as there is less function for them towards the public assistance of the employees. This is because the functional directors who decide the public assistance and development of the employees. This create a less affinity for the employees. The chief drawback of this is employees ‘ public presentation is measured harmonizing to the work they do for their functional directors non for their ain undertaking or for the undertaking director. This creates job in making their work on clip and in proper. This will take to a struggle between different degrees of the organisation like functional directors and undertaking directors.

Strong matrix

In this type of matrix the undertaking directors have more power than the map director. So the exclusive authorization goes to the undertaking director and the map directors have authorization over the undertaking director. They do n’t hold direct control over the squad. But the squad has staff directors which besides has control over them other than project map. The strong influence on the function of undertaking directors towards the employees gives the name strong matrix.

Balanced matrix

This is a balanced matrix to avoid abuse of power given to appellation. For illustration the exclusive authorization given in a strong matrix organisational construction can make over power of undertaking directors towards its employees which affect single public presentation. So extremely executing people may acquire neglected due to the personal involvement of undertaking directors. On the other side we should besides avoid weak matrix in an organisation. The employees should acquire clip for their ain undertaking work and it should non be a show out for the functional director. So both of the matrix must be balanced for the effectual working of an organisation with high productiveness and public assistance of the employees.

Variation of organisation harmonizing to the size and type of concern

Organizational Structure of J Sainsbury Plc.

Sainsbury Plc is a really big organisation that applies a mix of different types of organisational construction in order to keep the stableness and demand of the organisation. Sainsbury uses a mix of tall, level, matrix and hierarchal construction. The combination helps Sainsbury to work efficaciously harmonizing to the state of affairss

For illustration, when we take a expression of the organisational construction of Sainsbury as a whole we will see merely a hierarchal construction. But when we start to detail the different sections and divisions of Sainsbury we will understand that it uses level organisational construction within a functional degree or a production degree. When we look at the interaction between the sections we will understand that they are utilizing matrix organisation and the along with the level and tall organisation construction is mixed up to do more efficient and coordinated working of sections for the overall public presentation of Sainsbury.

Sainsbury besides do a flexible organisational construction harmonizing to the demand of demand of new merchandises. So they can spread out their sections harmonizing to the Sainsbury ‘s production and market demands.

Beginning: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Organizational Structure of Tesco Plc.

Tesco Plc is one of the taking concatenation company in the universe. They are chiefly supplying nutrient merchandises every bit good as fuel, telecom and other kinds of services. Both Tesco and Sainsbury Plc has much similar attitudes in their working schemes. But Tesco Plc gives importance to revenue enhancement turning away scheme programs which brings out a big figure of allegations towards the company. They are seeking to be more concentrated on their fiscal benefits along with their merchandise quality.

Organizational construction, allotment of managerial duties and Accountability

The construction of an organisation is really much influenced to the managerial duties and answerability. The organisation construction makes the employees to work harmonizing to the work flow and work environment that make the employees satisfied and motivated. The public presentation assessments and wagess processs and the direction approaches towards the employees give a good feedback from them through high public presentation, security and suggestions from the employees. A good direction of an organisation is a mirror image of the public presentation of the organisation.

Sainsbury provide appropriate centralized every bit good as decentralized attacks to get by up the demand of the concern system. The flexibleness of Sainsbury brings appropriate lastingness to the work environment and suitableness to the altering universe.

Organizational Leadership

This is an of import portion for keeping the stableness and the overall duty of the organisation. The leaders bring their vision and mission to transport on with the organisation ‘s significance of being. When a company nonsubjective gets changed harmonizing to the demand of the market and the suitableness of the result they are supplying inside and outside of it. So a good leading can direct the organisation to a proper flow will effectual vision and missions. They provide schemes and besides do the employees to trip proper manner of executing of the schemes through brainstorming and appropriate use of communicating channels along with effectual use of human resources.

The flow of power is the major portion of organisational leading. The manner the direction executes is in different ways in different organisation harmonizing to the suitableness and dependability of the organisation.

Management Manners

Organizations adopt different ways of direction manners harmonizing to the manner it is proper in organisational point of position. There are different types of direction manners normally adopted by different organisations.

Autocratic Leadership

This type of leading has a superior power who sends bid for their subsidiaries. The higher-up does n’t trouble oneself about inquiring suggestions from the subsidiaries. Commanding and do them to make what is to be done.

The feature of bossy leading are

Decisions are made from a individual individual

Subordinates have high dependence towards the leader

Can take for de-motivation and disaffection of staff.

Good for organisation which need determinations to be executed rapidly and resolutely

This type of organisation is non common in modern universe as they are non effectual in large organisation as single public presentation leads to the entire public presentation of the organisation.

6.2 Democratic Leadership

This type of organisation is common in these yearss. Larger organisations are giving more importance to the executing of their aim with single public presentation. In determination devising, directors give importance to the employees. When a determination is given to the employees a bulk of the determination is accepted and is being executed.

The features of democratic leading are

encourages determination doing from different positions

determination is being discussed

leader consults with others to corroborate about the rightness of the determination

employees will be extremely motivated

employees feel ownership of the house as they are besides a portion of the determination devising

brainstorming makes more efficient and effectual determination devising

experience gives more ideal suggestions for determination devising

The chief drawback of democratic organisation is the hold in taking the concluding determination by the engagement of excessively many people.

Laissez Faire

This type of direction is seldom used in common. In this the staff has their ain manner of taking determination and the leader does n’t hold much function on this. This type of leading is peculiarly used in originative thoughts. This omits the importance of leader in the organisation and the it can sometime impact the company with a negative image.

Some of the feature of this type of organisation are

leading duties are every bit shared

utile for organisation which has importance to creative thoughts

employees will be extremely motivated as the have full control over their work life

can acquire good squad work

can hold good interpersonal relationship

The chief disadvantages of this type of organisation are the deficiency of coordination and clip consuming in taking determinations.

Paternalistic Leadership

This type of organisation is similar to an bossy organisation in the sense that the direction is traveling downwards merely. But the organisation ever takes attention of the employees ‘ societal demand and ever encourages them for their feedback. This motivates the employees and helps the direction to take attention of their employees ‘ demands. This decreases the staff turnover and every bit good as the work is done like a absolutism.

Some of the chief features of paternalistic organisation are

leader is like a male parent to the company

workers wholly depend upon the leader

leader is the supreme power, but consults with the employees

have precedence to back up the organisation ‘s employee

8. Corporate Culture

Corporate civilization can be explained as the sum to the usage, traditions, values and the significance of it that makes the organisation unique. Corporate civilization is usual said as the feature of an organisation as it points towards the laminitis ‘s vision of the organisation. This depends upon the attitudes of the company towards its aims and the employees which are nearing that to accomplish it. This makes corporate organisation as a broader construct than organisation civilization.

9. Organizational Culture

Organizational civilization is the inherent aptitude of an organisation. The organisation performs harmonizing to the civilization they are carried out in an organisation. Organizational civilization differs from one organisation to another and every bit good as the geographic location. The organisational civilization is more depended and concentrated on a group or a subdivision in an organisation which differentiate this from the corporate civilization.

10, Strategic alteration

Strategic alteration can be defined as the alteration in the constituents of scheme of an organisation on its range, nonsubjective, resource use, competitory advantage etc. Change is an inevitable kernel of life. So the organisations have to alter itself harmonizing to the demand and for the being of the organisation. Organizations ever review their consequence of their scheme on the company public presentation and do necessary alterations to get by up with the fortunes. Small alterations ne’er disturb much with the everyday executing of the organisation. But inevitable drastic alterations bring out immense impact on the organisations, particularly when the alteration is so drastic and the current system is non prepared to accept the alteration.

There are many factors that has to be taken into consideration on the strategic alteration. One of the cardinal factors is the rigidness of organisation in




policies and regulations

workplace civilization

Before originating a strategic alteration, the organisation has to see all the facets including the demand and benefits due to this to the organisation. Organization has to believe about how rapidly it has to be deployed and what all factors need to be changed to implement it. Necessary readyings before execution can avoid a certain sum of impact by the alteration. A good flexible organisation is ever prepared for a alteration. The usual ways a strategic alteration is implemented in three alterations.

Unfreeze: – In this phase the direction gives the employees the demand of the alteration and that helps them to understand the demand of the alteration and how helpful for the endurance of the organisation. This helps the employees be more confident and acquire prepared for the credence of new scheme

Change: – In this phase scheme is being implemented and worked out the effects on the existent environment and appropriate care is carried out for the flexibleness of the organisation.

Refreeze: – Once the alteration is implemented, the organisation makes the alteration permanent so it can be a modus operandi for the organisation.

All the above phases need to understand a really deep cognition of the impact of the new scheme being implemented on the current system. There must be a clear vision of the consequence and benefits to the organisation than the current scheme. It has to be explained how the implementing scheme adopts a better way to make the organisation aim.

The organisational alteration is formulated in these phases utilizing assorted phases.

Originating alteration

This includes making a sense of urgency, making a alteration squad, developing alteration scheme.

Implementing alteration

This phase is the execution phase where the initiated alteration is being put on to the current system. This measure comprises of pass oning the alteration vision, do the employees to put to death harmonizing to the alteration and get short-run wins.

Making the alteration permanent

This phase is the refreezing phase where the alterations are working decently and maintain it lasting as the everyday work. This phase includes support to the alteration attempt, consolidating and observing the additions acquired by the alteration and adding the alteration to the organisational civilization.

11. Resistance to alter

Resistance to any alteration is normal in any organisation. There are many grounds for the opposition of alteration. Some of them are

Rigidity of the organisation

Employee attitudes towards the alteration.

Skilled workers ‘ fright of losing precedence

Fear of the unknown

Stability of the construction


Employees attitude towards the instigator

11. Symptoms of hapless civilization

An organisation ever has to supervise the degree of criterion of its organisational civilization. The organisational civilization displays the image of the organisation and its public presentation. The chief symptoms of organisational civilization are

high employee turnover

bad communicating of the direction with the employees

hapless public presentation of employees

irregular manner of organisation processs and policies

hapless struggle direction

debasement in organisation ‘s efficiency

demotivated and dissatisfied employees

hapless human resource schemes

The organisation which is non acknowledging the symptoms can set themselves into hazard of the organisation ‘s being and its hereafter.

To name the hapless public presentation organisation has to take attention of the public presentation of the organisation in some order in a peculiar clip slots.

12. Methods to better quality of leading

The quality of leading is an indispensable factor for the leading of an organisation. There are different methods to better the quality of leading. Before that we should understand strength and failing and the outlooks the employees expect from their leader. Some of the stairss to better the quality of leading are

Focus the failing of to ourselves as a leader

Bettering the failing to strength is the major portion as a leader. As a leader it is non a good attitude to be excessively good in some accomplishments and excessively bad in some other accomplishments. Bettering the accomplishments makes use more effectual leaders.

Listen and understand

Listen to the employee about their suggestions and feedback. Make them comfy at the work topographic point. If the employees feel that they are valued and listened, they will work harder for the company and will non travel for unneeded leave from work.

Constructing up good relationships

This is another feature of a leader that should be really much valued. Constructing good relationship with the employees and clients make them to swear as a leader. This is sometimes a clip devouring one. But one time this is done people will be ready to follow the thoughts and positions as a leader.

Never discriminate anyone

Treating everyone every bit is really of import. Everyone has their ain strengths and failings. Never give anyone as favourite in the squad. This will assist them to experience free to near the leader.


Leader should be ever self motivated and ever actuate the employees to acquire things done. A leader who is motivated even in nerve-racking and hard state of affairs will do the staff to be motivated.

Offering aid on to get by up with work loads

Offering aid to the staff alternatively of inquiring for it will ask for more respect towards the leader. Helps the employee while they are fighting inside or outside the work topographic point works a batch.

Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: // leadership-skills

13. Decision

From the observations and analysis done on the organisation we can understand that and first-class leading with the presence of good organisational civilization with appropriate organisational construction will transport frontward the sustainability and hereafter of an organisation towards a more stable or advanced phase. The survey leads me to finalise that flexibleness and appropriate use and executing of the company resources and monitoring of the criterion of the corporate civilization will set up high degree of throughput to the organisational ends. All these are to the full depended on the nature and size of the organisation. So the organisation needs to be to the full understand the environment which they are transporting out


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out