Performance Appraisal Essay

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Appraisal Year: _________________ EMPLOYEE DETAILS Name Position Title Group Location Date of Joining Reporting To: (Name/ Position) Qualification For The Period: ______________________ Band / Grade: ___ SECTION I: GOALS / OBJECTIVES FOR THE YEAR – Previous Year No. 1 2 3 4 5 Goals Set By Self Goals Evaluated by Appraiser Final Goals / Objectives SECTION II: DELIVERABLES ASSESSMENT I. A. Deliverable and Performance for the year 2006– 2007 (Rating Scale = 0 5) Key Deliverables – Rating Scale 0 5 No Key Deliverables W 3m 6m 9m Appraiser Rating Only

Yearly Rating Self Appr. Total Score Self Appr. 1 No DEVELOPMENTAL DELIVERABLES W XYZ 20 3m 6m 9m Appraiser Rating Only 2 3. 5 3 Yearly Rating Self Appr. 3. 5 3 Total Score Self Appr. 70 60 20 TOTAL YEARLY SELF SCORE (KEY + DEV) Maximum Score: 20 X 4 = 80 Maximum Score: 20 X 4 = 80 70 Score Obtained: 70 Score Obtained: 60 60 %: 87. 5 YEARLY APPRAISER SCORE (KEY + DEV) %: 75 II A. PERFORMANCE SHORTFALLS WITH REASONS: Sr. No. Deliverables Reasons Appraiser’s Comments II B. Significant Achievements that were not part of planned goals or Responsibilities? If yes, please elaborate.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Performance Appraisal Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Self Comments Appraiser’s Comments 2 II C. DISCUSS KEY STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS Employee Appraiser Employee WEAKNESSES Appraiser SECTION III – COMPETENCIES ASSESSMENT (Rating Scale 1 Self Rating Weight (A) Managerial Competencies 5 Self Ratings (B) 4 Total Score (A x B) 20 5) Appraiser’s Rating Desired (C) 5 Observed (D) 3 Total Score (D x A) 15 GAPS (C–D) 2 Behavioral Competencies 4 4 16 5 3 12 2 Functional / Competencies Technical 11 4 44 5 3 33 2 TOTAL 20 80 60 Performance Competencies Score (SELF) Maximum Score: (20*5) = 100 Score Obtained: (AXB) = 80 %age: 80

Performance Competencies Score Maximum Score: Score Obtained: %age: 60 (APPRAISER) (20*5) = 100 (DXA) = 60 Evaluation of Deliverables and Competencies A. For Senior Consultants & Above: Weightage (80:20) The total score = (Deliverable %Score x 0. 80) + (Performance Competency Score x 0. 20) The total score = (75 x 0. 80) + (60x 0. 20) = 60 + 12 = (72%) B. For other employees: Weightage (60:40) The total score = (Deliverable %age x 0. 60) + (Performance Competency Score x 0. 40) Self 86% TOTAL OF COMPETENCY SCORES Appraiser 72% 3 Section III A. Overall Evaluation of the Appraisee’s performance (Total

Score = Deliverables score + Performance Competencies score) To be filled in by Appraisers & Reviewers Outstanding (5) (91 – 100 % goals achieved) Excellent (4) (81 – 90 % goals achieved) Good (3) (61 – 80 % goals achieved) = 72% Average (2) (51 – 60 % goals achieved) Poor (1) (; 50% goals achieved) SECTION IV: TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS SECTION IV: TRAININGS RECEIVED in Previous Year (Rating 1 Trainings Received EXP / IDEAL Managerial Skills & Competencies Time Management 4 OBS DES 5) GAP (D – O) 1 Appraisers Comments 2 3 Not Satisfactory Behavioral Skills & Competencies Communication Skills 4 3 3. 5 . 5 Satisfactory Functional/Technical Skills & Competencies (Based on Deliverables Shortfalls) MIS Reporting 4 3 4 1 No exposure till now Automated Accounting 4 2 4 2 No exposure till now SECTION IV A: TRAININGS REQUIRED IN NEXT YEAR Trainings Required Priority Objective Training Effectiveness (Expected Improvements) 1 5 with comments of Appraiser Hold Initiate Hold Initiate Managerial Time Management Behavioral Communication Skills Functional / Technical MIS Reporting Automated Accounting 3 2 3 1 Punctuality, Deadlines Client Management Accuracy & Timeliness Independent Use of Tally without guidance

SECTION V: Areas of Development & Disagreement (if any with reasons) List down discussion points exchanged during the appraisal meeting. DISAGREEMENTS Appraisee’s Comments Appraiser’s Comments Final Remarks 4 DEVELOPMENTAL DISCUSSION POINTS Appraisee’s Comments Appraiser’s Comments Final Remarks SECTION VI: GOALS / OBJECTIVES FOR THE YEAR – Next Year No. 1 2 3 4 5 Goals Set By Self Goals Evaluated by Appraiser Final Goals / Objectives Appraisee’s Signature & Date: Appraiser’s Signature & Date: M. D. ’ s Signature & Date: Reviewer’s Signature & Date: SECTION VII.

FINAL RECOMMENDATION & APPROVAL Increment Promotion Promotion with Increment No Increment Others: (Please specify)_______________________________ SECTION VII A. REVIEW AND APPROVAL Comments: Managing Director Signature: _____________ Date: ___________ Comments: Reviewer Signature: _____________ Date: __________ 5 Benchmark for Effective Performance Management System Bell-curve Technique Suggested Best Ratio of Quality of Manpower required based on their Performance Ratings Poor Performances = 5 % Average Performers = 15 % Good Performers = 40 % Excellent Performers = 25 % Outstanding Performers = 15 % 6

×

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out