Poverty in Australia

Poverty in Australia


When a figure of people are non able to populate a life carry throughing their basic demands of day-to-day everyday so there is considered to be presence of Poverty. Australia is a province that is well-known in the international universe and offers many oversees privileges specifically scholarships to destitute people as good. But there are many people in a province like Australia that unrecorded under poorness line. Poverty line is fundamentally a standard for look intoing that if the individual or province prevarications in the class of the rich or the fighting or hapless 1s.

Poverty lines are fundamentally in other words, salary ranks that have been fixed for many classs of wage in several units to avoid any confusion. This is a cheque as mentioned above and if the income of the gaining units is less than the fixed poorness line related to it so the constituent or unit is said to be hapless ( Davidson, 2012 ) .


After universe war II there was observed low or disappearing poorness in Australia but by the terminal of 1960s there was once more seen the opportunities of the rise of poorness in the province. This was because many Australians failed to give a big portion in the economic advancement after universe war II besides this was taken into consideration that many retired seniors and widows were populating a life of poorness in 1960 ( Mendes, 2008 ) .

Again in 1963 an estimation of approximately 5 % of the population of Australia were to be populating in the province of poorness for a long period of clip. This estimation was calculated by a lector Ray Brown. After 3 old ages of this epoch another estimation was given in a magazine under publication of John Stubb that considered half a million of the Australians to be populating below poorness line.

Much research work was carried out in order to gauge that how many people are deprived of the basic necessities of life in Australia. There were taken many stairss by several societal establishments in order to eliminate poorness and the people were granted certain benefits for this intent. Hence in 1973 there was seen a positive consequence diminishing the figure of hapless people from 20.8 % to 11 % ( utilizing national poorness line ) and from 24.3 % to 19.3 % utilizing standard/international poorness line ( Beckerman,1979 ) .

The standard of poorness line was agreed at 56.5 % of the usual income for a regular household. Numbers more than 50 % of Aborigines were populating a life below poorness line and less than 20 % of Aborigines were populating above the poorness line harmonizing to the estimation of Henderson Commission of Inquiry. The survey on the natives in the past i.e. 1973-77 besides revealed their infant decease rates that was 63/1000 unrecorded births in the north part of Australia ( Beckerman,1979 ) .

Thesis statement:

Poverty is that issue of Australia which if non removed will might ensue into societal perturbation within the province but it besides leaves one thing common among them that is the battle to accomplish a better and unafraid criterion of life in future.


Australia is the province that one if hears approximately do non believe of people populating there themselves fighting for the necessities of life but unhappily the world is different. Although the strength of poorness in Australia is on the lower side but still there are people seen below poorness line. The analysis will be done after analyzing certain studies and graphs. Furthermore nexus of poorness to the different sectors of society as in refugees, individual parents and Aborigines will besides be discussed below.


The term Poverty when caput might sound the same every clip and everyplace but fundamentally the significance and strength is different for everyone at different places. The ground for poorness is different for everybody as the poorness might be a consequence of hapless or deprived household background, or belongingness to a shelter place, some might be hapless because of some mental or physical disablement or else one might hold a sound and strong physical, mental or societal background but could hold met any accident in life that ended up to a fighting life for him in front. One thing that is common in all hapless people is they seek for a better, respected and unafraid criterion of life.

Poverty is a large issue but it is non merely the issue of province but besides the issue of society. Poverty in Australia is non the job of the governments of Australia but besides the issue of the society as hapless pushes the adult male towards complexness in life and affects the modus operandi and professional concern of life.

Belong to the group of people that are hapless is a greater issue of the society. Harmonizing to Victor George poorness fundamentally a battle of what U have and what you don’t have or in order words the war of ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ . The sense of something non holding leads to complex issues and this can be helped by looking frontward to the system of province that is doing up the group of hapless people. Basically the Australian authorities and the high governments have to pay title and attending towards the system and assist eliminate the poorness of Australia ( Barca, 2002 ) .

Statistical account:

In order to look into the poorness degree of Australia there are normally used three poorness lines that are ;

  1. 50 per cent of average equivalent disposable family income
  2. 60 per cent of average equivalent disposable household income, ( which is the international or standard poorness lines )
  3. Henderson Poverty Line

Henderson Poverty line was established in 1970 for the National poorness enquiry and was subsequently by the Melbourne Institute ( Saunders, Hill & A ; Bradbury, 2008 ) .

39 % people in Australia that are non married harmonizing to the first poorness line cheque are hapless and harmonizing to 2nd poorness line look into 60 % of the same class Li in the hapless class nevertheless harmonizing to the national poorness line cheque of Australia around 39 % people are hapless. Looking frontward to individual female parent life in Australia around 11.4 % are hapless harmonizing to 50 per centum of average poorness line and 32.1 % of same class harmonizing to 60 per centum of average poorness line whereas harmonizing to the Henderson/ standard poorness line 20.1 % individual parenting female parents are fighting from poorness ( Ross & A ; Whiteford, 1992 ) .

The first measure to cipher the rate of income poorness for Aboriginal people was taken in 1970s by Henderson/ standard poorness enquiry. Harmonizing to it 12.5 % of the entire population of Aboriginals of Australia in 1970s were considered to be hapless and were therefore poverty line. An estimation was made in 1986 that about 43 % of all Aboriginal Families with kids had net incomes below standard poorness line ( Choo, 1990 ) .

2001 nose count estimated 2.7 million Australians to be hapless that is about 13.0 % of the whole population which at that clip was 18972350 and the per centum of individual female parents populating in poorness was about 7 % .

Other communities that has been the targeted by poorness are refugees. Refugees are the people that migrated to Australia from other developing provinces. After come ining here they seek for gaining money but they have to fight for this because these are considered a load on the state’s wealth. They are non encouraged and whole heartedly welcomed by the Australians and confront different economic issues.

Poverty in Australia is non a job that can be separated as the job of a certain group of society. Poverty in one part of the province affects the other portion of the province somehow hence the circle of poorness is connected to other facets of the society excessively and follows functionalism theory. For illustration a hapless adult male might hold many advantages but deficiency of chance could hold been the ground of his poorness, so in this instance his advantages when are non used and invested in the personal businesss and concern of the society the province indirectly will be losing in the terminal.


Main measure taken in response to the state of affairs in Australia by the high governments is income security system. This system involves the aggregation of revenue enhancement gross by the citizens on general things and so administering them to the people which are considered to be meriting for that fund. The system besides delivers fund to the rational and qualified ( alumnuss and post-graduate ) pupil by Austudy. These stairss by Australian Government are a progressive measure to eliminate or lower the poorness in Australia.


Barca, T. ( 2002 ) .poorness in Australia. University of Adelaide.

Choo, C. ( 1990 ) .Aboriginal Child Poverty, Child Poverty Policy Review 2,Brotherhood of St Laurence, Melbourne.

Beckerman, W. ( 1979 ) . “ Introduction“ . Poverty and the Impact of Income Maintenance Programmes.Concept Printing Company. pp. 1–5.

Davidson, P. ( 2012 ) .poorness in Australia. Australia: Australian Council of Social Service. ISBN 978-0-85871-082-5.

Ross, R. and Whiteford, P. ( 1992 ) , ‘Poverty in 1986: Aboriginal households with kids ‘ , inAustralian Journal of Social Issues, Vol.27, No.2, May pp.92-111.

McDonald, C. ( 2013 ) Poverty in Australia and the Social Work Response,Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 23:1, 3-11, DOI: 10.1080/02185385.2012.760233

Mendes, P. ( 2008 ) .Australia ‘s Welfare Wars: the Players, the Politicss and the Ideologies.University of New South Wales Press. ISBN 978-0-86840-991-7.

Saunders, P. , Hill, T. , & A ; Bradbury, H. ( 2008 ) .Poverty in Australia sensitiveness analysis and recent tendencies.Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre. ISBN 978-0-733426162


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out