Public private partnership is an understanding affecting authorities and the private sector for the intent of rehabilitating the populace services and substructure. It helps both sectors to utilize the resources reciprocally for the interest of societal development with the administrative accomplishments of the private sector, ( Rosenau, 2000 ) to unburden the authorities from potentially heavy outgo of both human and capital resources, and to minimising and spliting the hazard of cost overproductions to both of the sectors. ( Walker and Johannes, 2003 ) Unlikely to denationalization in which the public assets wholly transferred to the populace sector, both authorities and public sector work together for the improvement of the public services. ( McMillan, 2005 ) .
Degree centigrades: UsersYa Ali MadadDesktop
ew progresss assignmentsources\_wsb_486x268_Chart_Insert.jpg
Particularly in United Kingdom PPPs are extensively used by The British Government to finance different public undertakings like ( Deakin, 2002 ) the building of schools & A ; infirmaries, military and defence contracts, and precise investing undertakings such as betterments to the London Underground, the National Air Traffic Services and the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Inspite of high dependence upon the system it ‘s besides good criticized for working the differences of both of the sector, some of the draw dorsums frequently highlighted by the critics that this system lacks the answerability with respect to capital allotment, hazard factor, and public presentation.
Why do Governments utilize Public Private Partnerships?
Some of the advantages that Public private partnership provides over the conventional methods attract authoritiess to utilize it for the proviso of public services. These include quicker bringing of the services, more invention, betterment in overall procedure, possible value for money and transportation of hazard. The authorities sector covering with public services is besides responsible to analyse the factor of value for money that whether it is executable to utilize PPP for efficient bringing of services over any other conventional method. ( Goldenkoff, 2001 ) Some authoritiess besides use PPP for its political benefits to reassign the duty of being accountable for a service quality. Public private partnership lies someplace in the center of denationalization and nationalisation as a impersonal temperament. It proved as a 3rd manner or option for the authorities to present the populace services.
Types of Public Private Partnership:
Public private partnerships can change in:
aˆ? The apprehension and nature of hazard involved in the partnership
aˆ?The presence of dialogue accomplishments in each of the spouse to tag the contract
aˆ? The history of the spouses in old contracts and influence of ratepayers
One of the major factors that consequence on different facets of partnership understandings is the distribution of hazard among the spouses. ( Grimsey and Lewis 2004 ) Aspects such as sharing of duties, entire sum invested by each of the spouse and proviso of wagess and result of the undertaking following disscusion provides comprehensive analysis of different signifiers of palatopharyngoplasty in pattern.
( BOT )
It is the most preferable and widely used signifier of public private partnership in which the private sector takes the premier duty for figure of different constituents of the undertaking. Private sector is accountable for planing the lineation of the undertaking and taking attention of entire finance and overall operations necessary for the achievement of the undertaking. Depending on the clip frame of the undertaking and the period of the grant which is usually 15-25 old ages. After gaining the designated capital and net income from the undertaking the private spouse transfer the rights of ownership and control to the public spouse
2. Build-own-operate ( BOO )
An understanding in which private sector remains in control and ownership without specifying any specific period this signifier of PPP is being used in the bulk of public substructure services and installations, including Local council disposals, sewage system undertakings, recycling waste systems, substructure care, public parking installations, recreational developments, Parkss, street directions etc.
Most usual signifier of PPP in which the fiscal hazard involved in the undertaking is transferred to the private spouse. The borough undertakes the operation of edifice and planing a installation and after the completion it lease outs to the private sector or adhering it into the contract. Afterwards private sector is entirely responsible for operating, keeping and developing the installation. It can better the efficiency of buildings and provides the room for inventions.
4. Joint ventures ( JV )
A successful signifier being used largely by the Nipponese authorities for the local economic development in which both the populace and private sector pool their finance jointly and sharing the result to already defined ratio. It besides helps the populace sector to unburden itself from heavy capital investing and high degree of hazard involved in the undertaking.
5. Management contract or
Normally used for pull offing operation or infrastructure-related services in which private sector plays a partial function and involved in the undertaking merely for supplying expertness based on past undertakings and experiences. This partnership remains till the period ascertain in the contract. This signifier of PPP can be further customizable harmonizing to the demands of the undertakings. Some of the other sub-types of these signifiers are operate and maintain ( OM ) . Design, physique, finance operate ( DBFO ) and run, maintain and manage ( OMM ) . Management contracts normally ranges from 5 to 15 old ages in length.
6. Concerted agreements or
The populace sector ensures the private sector to supply excess financial inducements and it tries to pull private sector to convey more finance. It ‘s all about making chances for the private sector to put and to prosecute it in some physical or infrastructural development and support the several countries.
Common Misconceptions about Public Private Partnerships
The best manner to understand a construct is to cognize “ what it is non ” due to the hardship of the construct and figure of different signifiers by different school of ideas makes it more complex and confounding. Sometimes none handiness or deficiency of information sing the existent theory consequences in misconception the most common of these misconceptions are:
aˆ? Blending PPP with denationalization:
Public private partnerships are frequently related to denationalization. In construct and application they are non even near to each other. The lone signifier of PPP that comes near to the denationalization is known as Build-Own-Operate ( BOO ) and remainder of the other signifiers involved a changeless partnership between the populace and genitalias sector. Even the signifier which comes near to denationalization Build-Own-Operate requires an on-going partnership in which certain ordinances and conditions imposed on the private sector. The basic ground for the application of public private partnership in this context is to develop a competition for supplying public services which is non possible in denationalization. As in full denationalization the monopoly of public sector is wholly transformed into the monopoly of private sector.
aˆ? By come ining into a public private partnership, local authorities
loses control over the proviso of services
Before prosecuting into public private partnership the populace sector fears that it will lose control and bid over the proviso of services. Actually after come ining into the partnership the public authorization does non abdicate its control over the execution of its policies and ordinances histories for the proviso of services. Public authorization is on a stronger place to set up its land regulations and has the power and capableness to orient the contract to reflect its ain involvements
aˆ? Public private partnerships apply merely to substructure undertakings
A public private partnership is so far successful manner to ease the authoritiess to supply public services in a really effectual and advanced manner. In instance of heavy substructure undertakings it tends to pull the most public attending ; public private partnership is besides a suited option for presenting the undertakings that do non affect any sort of capital services. Example includes route care services, aggregation services and informations services.
aˆ? The chief ground for local authoritiess come ining into public
private partnerships is to avoid debt
Most of the clip the major ground for a public sector to come in into the public private partnership is to better its capableness to cover with different thing such as increasing the competition by join forcesing with the more efficient private sector that consequence in diverseness, invention, non monopolistic attack, reduced execution timing and that finally provides better value. In different instances the premier motivation of public sector to prosecute into PPP could be to “ off book ” itself from the load of heavy debt but that is non and should be non the usual instance. The public sector and the ultimate users of the services are still accountable about the debt in any manner. While the chief focal point of both of the sector should be on the advanced, originative and efficient ways of presenting services non on the debt or accounting
aˆ? The quality of service will worsen under public private
Whether the services are delivered through public private partnerships or in a conventional mode it does non impact on the Quality of services. It depends on the ability of both of the sectors that how much willing they are to better the quality. It besides depends what is agreed in the contract what quality control methods will be used to guarantee and implement the quality of services. What we have learned from the past and present figures about the public private partnership that it non merely kept up quality but really enhanced it. It is ever favourable for private spouse to put in the services, which addition effectivity, improves the quality of the services that will finally pull more clients and will go a win-win state of affairs for both of them.
aˆ? Local authorities staff will lose under public private
The public sector staff sometimes fears that they will be dominated by the private sector and they will lose their occupations or possible decrease in their wages and rewards if they will work under public private partnership. But in most of the states like UK the labour Torahs does non allow this besides if any of the Public private partnership consequences in plundering staff or decrease in rewards so it ‘s a clear misdemeanor of the labour contract. Harmonizing to the the labour Torahs of UK the private spouse ensures a public staff and warrant occupation security and competitory degree of salary. Unnecessary layoffs should be avoided because by increasing the investing in employees ensures high degree of end product and effectual accomplishment smoothing.
aˆ? The cost of service will increase to pay for the private spouse ‘s
Cost is the major concern for the populace sector to see the partnership because it ‘s a common belief of public sector that the services provided through public private partnership will be more dearly-won and expensive. While from the position of private sector it should be profitable and it has to gain net income while keeping the bing or lower cost of the services, in that instance the public authorization would merely see public private partnership if the cost of services remain lower than if provided merely by the authorities itself or if the superior quality of services provided by the private sector in the same monetary value. The private sector is merely being profitable if they provide increased productiveness or assortment of services by maintaining the monetary values low.
aˆ? Local authorities can finance the cost of services at a lower cost
than the private sector
It is in the capableness of the populace sector to borrow finance from Municipal Finance Authority and to put to death the undertaking at comparatively low monetary value so outsourcing it to private sector. But that ‘s ever non the instance the overall advantages of the public private partnership is far more so the populace merely undertakings, so the chief focal point of the public sector should on the overall premiums of the public private partnership.
aˆ? There are merely two spouses in a public private partnership
If we analyze the nature of public private partnership from the narrow point of view, so it clears merely two parties involved in the contract. In world, figure of different parties can be engage in the contract to accomplish the mark more expeditiously and efficaciously. These parties could include the employees that are working for support and the most of import Customer of the services who will be the terminal users. To do the partnership more successful and better commissariats of services require an ideal four-way combination among these four spouses.
When Should Public Private Partnerships be
Before sing public private partnership for outsourcing a undertaking both of the sectors should voyage the advantages and efficiencies that will be achieved. Besides it is really of import to look for other possible options. A public private partnership may or may non be the best option for suiting a undertaking or public service. All of the relevant factors should be take attention of before originating any determination. Different signifiers are available based on the division of hazard and duty. Choosing the best signifier of PPP is the key to prosecuting into a successful partnership.
These signifiers are besides based on the grade of expertness and complexness needed for settling a successful contract. PPPs should non be considered as an easy reply to every hard state of affairs or public service issues faced by the populace sector. Maximizing the hazard transportation besides increase the outlooks for inducements by the private sector that will ensue in the increasing demand for a high grade of proficiency. Based on the treatment following are some of the advantages and disadvantages related with public private partnerships.
What are the Potential Benefits of Public Private Partnerships?
Public private partnerships may non be suited as a solution for presenting every public service. Without analyzing whether the execution of PPP is appropriate for the specific nature of Public service it can all travel incorrect and end can non be achieved as it supposed to be. So before continuing with PPP both parties should critically look into the possible hazards and benefits of Public private partnership. When it is used consequently so following are the possible benefits that can be achieved while utilizing Public private partnership as a manner of presenting public services.
Potential benefits include:
aˆ? Cost nest eggs
One of the major benefit that Public private partnership provide to both authorities and private sector is that both of sectors are able to use each other ‘s fiscal resources so they do n’t necessitate to borrow anything from any fiscal establishment. In that manner both will be able to salvage the cost of debt which otherwise have to bear on adoptions ( loan ) . With public private partnership, both of the sectors enjoys cost nest eggs at different phases it varies with the nature of the public services like building of substructure, direction of operations and service care. Cost economy in building can frequently be achieved by uniting the procedure of planing and building in the same contract. When both interior decorators and builders interact with each other in the same environment and on same land degrees so the result green goods by the squad will be less dearly-won and more advanced. The efficiency of the procedure will increase the building clip will diminish ensuing in salvaging the labour cost and that will assist in seting the installation in usage rapidly. The cost for the direction and keeping activities by the professionals will be reduced overall while cut downing the hazard of undertaking overproductions. The private sector can cut down cost by implementing the construct of economic systems of graduated table where goods are produces high in figure to diminish per unit cost, the construct of merely in clip can besides be implemented to salvage clip and storage costs. More research and invention can besides assist to cut down the operating expense cost.
aˆ? Hazard sharing
With public private partnership, both authorities and private spouse portion the hazard. Hazards such as high capital costs, hazard of deficient grosss, hazard of less expertness and deficiency of cognition in certain public services, inability to present some public services in a certain clip frame, hazard of overall inability to put to death a undertaking on the bases of available resources, or a hazard of non following with the regulations and ordinance or environmental related issues.
aˆ? Improved degrees of service or keeping bing degrees of service
If two organisations join together conveying their ain civilization together consequences variegation and increased invention to try the proviso of services. It besides helps in implementing new engineerings and to come up to a solution with common apprehension helps in bettering the quality of services or keeping the degree with minimising the cost factor.
aˆ? Enhancement of grosss
The new and more enhanced ways of bring forthing grosss can be identified in Public private partnerships. Both sectors jointly set fees for the users of the services that non merely cover the cost of the service but besides generate fringy net income. Public private partnerships besides helps in implementing more effectual methods of bring forthing grosss that otherwise non be possible if utilizing conventional process of presenting public services
aˆ? More efficient execution
Activities such as determination devising, managing, building, planing and procurance can be combined together to accomplish efficiency. This non merely helps quicker bringing of services but besides cut down the overall cost which finally consequences in smoother procedure in really effectual and efficient mode.
aˆ? Economic benefits
Government sector is more powerful sector when it increases its engagement in public private partnership so it creates chances for the private sector to excite its concern and farther strive to hike its economic growing and make employment. After acquiring experient and going expert in public private partnership the private house can besides supply their expertness and can gain some supernumerary.
What are the Potential Risks of Public Private Partnerships?
There are some hazards and benefits associated to see the execution public private partnership merely like any other conventional method of presenting public services. These hazards and drawbacks can be reduced or eliminated if these are tackled with proper scheme and understanding its nature. ( Bennett et al. , 2004 ) Involving the stakeholders in determination devising can hike the assurance in covering with the hazards and besides in the involvement of both of the parties.
Potential hazards include:
aˆ? Loss of control by local authorities
As discussed earlier that it ‘s a common misconception that in every Public private partnership the authorities or the public sector loses its control over the determination devising and execution of its involvement. But sometimes it truly can go on. Due to its nature of affecting the hazard sharing factor and distribution of determination doing power the private spouse would wish to take a little border. It can be debatable concern among the spouses that who will command the monetary value criterions and the bringing of the services. This issue can be sort out while subscribing the contract where both of the parties come to a point and specify each other ‘s place in commanding and keeping the services harmonizing to the bets invested. The authorities has to guarantee the protection of public involvements and has a duty and authorization to maintain the service criterions in cheque.
aˆ? Increased costs
While doing the monetary value or fees policies for the bringing of service non every authorities or the public house considers the existent costs of doing these services accessible to public. For illustration, the monetary value of single services is calculated without including the costs of depreciation and other overhead costs like disposal. Some clip the authorities has to subsidies the monetary values for the certain services. But in instance of public private partnership each and every cost has to be included in the pricing policy which increases the monetary value which the terminal user has to bear. Making more complex policy for the interest of increasing the fees makes public private partnership insignificant for certain type of services.
aˆ? Political hazards
We have a plentifulness of illustrations where authoritiess in UK have an extended engagement in public private partnerships. Lack of cognition and experience of the stakeholders and authorities about the public private partnership can increase the political hazards and do it more vulnerable in political environment. Government is capable of cut downing such hazards by utilizing different options such as understanding the nature of public private partnerships while prosecuting in to a less complex and simpler signifier of public private partnership.
aˆ? Unacceptable degrees of answerability
Normally the services that are provided by the authorities are more sensitive than others because they are more seeable to the populace and it needs more crystalline attack to answerability. So in instance of public private partnership, ( Broadbent and Laughlin, 1999 ) the answerability factor for the services that are being provided are non clear and accessible to the normal public if compared to the conventional system. This drawback of the partnership may ensue in unfavorable judgment by the populace on the private spouse to non taking public into history. Government can counter this unfavorable judgment by decently reacting the populace about their demands.
aˆ? Unreliable service
In some state of affairss the private spouses can confront some uncertainnesss or some unexpected jobs like fiscal shortage and labour differences that may forestall them to run into the mark or committedness in the clip frame. In such instances where opportunities of uncertainnesss are high the partnership contract should be design in manner that it can back up both of the parties in hard scenarios.
aˆ? Inability to profit from competition
One of the grounds that authoritiess take PPP is that it can make a healthy Competition in the market and every private spouse can acquire equal opportunity to win a contract so it can take advantages of decreasing costs, accomplishing efficiency and convey invention out of this competition. Incase if the figure of private houses viing for the contract are less so alternatively of making competition it will make monopoly and power of dialogue will reassign to the private spouse. The authorities needs to be stronger if non so it can non take any benefit from the competition.
aˆ? Reduced quality or efficiency of service
Again it depends on how good the paper work is executed in world and how properly public private partnership contract is structured. If the possible hazards are underestimated and non much attempt is put up in recognizing the importance of different maps of the contract so much worse should be expected. The consequence could be fall in the quality of the service, deficiency in service care, increasing costs and inefficient proviso of the services.
aˆ? Labour issues
In public private partnership arrangement the labour sector might experience uneasy in working with the new foremans and new concatenation of bid. They might necessitate clip to set themselves for working under new direction and hierarchy. The labour brotherhoods might respond adversely and oppose the agreement which they can make under the labour jurisprudence for public private partnership.
Public private partnership in u.k
As our focal point is more exactly on the usage public private partnership In United Kingdom so farther treatment will be on the function of PPP in public undertakings in UK ‘s economic system, the chief signifier of PPP being used in UK is the Private Finance Initiative ( PFI ) .
Public finance enterprise
Introduction & A ; characteristics
The private sector in utilised in different states around the universe to supply the services like planing, building, funding, runing and pull offing the public substructure. For this intent we have figure of different theoretical accounts available such as PFI ( private finance enterprise ) , BOOT ( build-own-operate-transfer ) , and DBFO ( design-build-finance-operate ) . With the little differences all autumn under the header of PPP ( public private partnership ) . Particularly in UK the chief theoretical account being used is PFI and for the other broad scope of complex partnerships between public and private sector the term that is used is PPP.
Following are some of the characteristics that make PFI suitable for the economic system like UK.
Contractor responsible for capital investing.
It is expected from the contractor to put to a great extent in substructure related services like Roads, edifices or IT-systems. The contractor normally obtains such heavy investing by utilizing the private resources that includes issue of debt securities and equity.
All operational undertakings in one bundle.
Unlike other conventional methods in which each operational undertaking is outsourced individually like cleansing, care, warming, PFI combines the figure of different operational undertakings all together in a one bundle to outsource it in one long-run contract. That helps in cut downing the costs and enables the contractor to look for more inventions.
Payment after public presentation analysis.
In PFI contracts the payment made is non based on the input and end product it really based on the public presentation and the quality of service provided by the contractor. It helps to maintain cheque on the public presentation on regular footing and besides implement the quality control factor more efficaciously.
History of Pfi ‘s in uk
It all started in the epoch of conservative authorities in 1992 which was considered as a period of worsening investing in the sector of public substructure. ( Heafey and King, 2007 ) . The conservativists recognize the potency in PFI and announced that it will utilize this method extensively while bettering the proviso of public services this scheme of the conservative was opposed by the labor party which was sitting in resistance at that clip. When labour party came into power in 1997 its attitude towards sing PFI as a major manner of presenting the populace services turned into positive.
The figures suggested an addition in PFI based undertakings for Example, the entire figure of PFI based undertakings from 1997 to 2003 were 563 and the entire fiscal value of these undertakings were ?35.5 billion and about 90 per centum of entire undertakings was contracted after 1997 ( Her Majesty ‘s Treasury ( HMT ) 2003 ) . The one-year PFI undertakings increased from nine undertakings valuing ?667 million to 65 undertakings valued at ?7.6 billion ( HMT 2003 ) , while harmonizing to the current figures the entire figure of PFI undertakings by 2010 is increased to 200 valued at ?26 billion ( HMT 2010 ) . PFI is re-branded by the labour party under the umbrella of Public-Private Partnerships to do it more compatible and friendlier and to take some political hazards from it.
Degree centigrades: UsersYa Ali MadadDesktopUntitled.png
( HM exchequer 2009 )
Provision of Value for Money by PPP in UK
Harmonizing to the facts and figures available on the HM exchequer web site and rating of public services that are provisioned by utilizing public private partnerships PPPs are turning to be the most ideal method available to cover with the public services. These really proved to be value maximising in Britain ‘s public services. With the better direction of capital and minimising the cost factor the authorities is more in place to function the populace more expeditiously, efficaciously rapidly and with the higher criterions.
Public private partnership ‘s advantages can be seen in about every sector of public services. For illustration:
Health sector: After the authorities reformatted the construction of national wellness services ( NHS ) with the Private Finance Initiative, multiple figure of new major undertakings have been signed ab initio the entire value of these undertakings were over ?3 billion dwelling of entire 35 major infirmaries.
Education sector: Lapp in the instruction sector, the authorities of UK is presently working on different grouped and single undertakings covering 520 schools and a figure of them are still in grapevine. Some advanced undertakings in context to the authorities ‘s new reform of the instruction sector including the catering services to Lewisham ‘s 90 schools and execution of new IT related substructure for Dudley ‘s 104 schools are close competition. Many of such undertakings are in completion procedure more rapidly if compared them to the conventional methods. A figure of major undertakings are merely made possible by PPP which could hold remained on paper for ever.
Even on smaller graduated table PPP proved to be extremely utile for illustration undertakings like direction of sewage services in kinnegar, northern Ireland and the upgrading the old street visible radiations in Brent, north London.
Rosenau, P. ( 2000 ) , Public-Private Policy Partnerships, Massachusetts MIT, Cambridge, MA.
( The ) Scotsman ( 2002 ) , ‘1bn to convey schools into twenty-first century ‘ , The Scotsman, 26 June.
Walker, D.H.T. and Johannes, D.S. ( 2003 ) , ‘Preparing for organizational acquisition by HK
Infrastructure Project joint ventures organisations ‘ , The Learning Organization:
An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 106-77
Bennett, N.A. , Harvey, J.A. and Anderson, L. ( 2004 ) , ‘Autonomy and partnership in local
Education ‘ , Educational Management Administration & A ; Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 2,
McMillan, A ( 2005 ) . The concise Oxford lexicon of political relations. 3rd erectile dysfunction. United States: Oxford university imperativeness. P441-442.
Deakin, N 2002, ‘Public-Private Partnerships: A UK instance survey ‘ , Public Management Review, 4, 2, pp. 133-147, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost [ online ] available at hypertext transfer protocol: //0-web.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ehost/detail? hid=12 & A ; sid=9cc3f574-fd38-41fc-97f2-634b7824a319 % 40sessionmgr10 & A ; vid=9 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=buh & A ; AN=6895186 ( Accessed on 24 February 2011 )
Jones, R, & A ; Noble, G 2008, ‘Managing the Execution of Public-Private Partnerships ‘ , Public Money & A ; Management, 28, 2, pp. 109-114, E-Journals, EBSCOhost [ online ] available at hypertext transfer protocol: //0-web.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ehost/detail? hid=12 & A ; sid=9cc3f574-fd38-41fc-97f2-634b7824a319 % 40sessionmgr10 & A ; vid=11 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=eoah & A ; AN=18862333 ( Accessed on 24 February 2011 )
GRIMSEY, D & A ; LEWIS, MK, 2004. Public private partnerships: the worldwide revolution
in substructure proviso and undertaking finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Goldenkoff, RN 2001, ‘Opportunities and Challenges of Public/Private Partnerships ‘ , Public Manager, 30, 3, p. 31, Academic Search Elite, EBSCOhost [ online ] available at hypertext transfer protocol: //0-web.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ehost/detail? hid=12 & A ; sid=8700d19b-8135-4c01-854e-53c04c1d4ad8 % 40sessionmgr13 & A ; vid=1 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=afh & A ; AN=5568921 ( Accessed on 24 February 2011 )
Broadbent, J, & A ; Laughlin, R 1999, ‘The Private Finance Initiative: Clarification of a Future Research Agenda ‘ , Financial Accountability & A ; Management, 15, 2, pp. 95-114, E-Journals, EBSCOhost [ online ] available hypertext transfer protocol: //0-web.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ehost/detail? hid=12 & A ; sid=04ecdfcb-902b-47a0-bd16-008ba721bae8 % 40sessionmgr4 & A ; vid=1 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=eoah & A ; AN=4681905 ( Accessed on 24 February 2011 )
Ball, R, Heafey, M, & A ; King, D 2007, ‘The Private Finance Initiative in the UK ‘ , Public Management Review, 9, 2, pp. 289-310, E-Journals, EBSCOhost [ online ] available at hypertext transfer protocol: //0-web.ebscohost.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ehost/detail? hid=12 & A ; sid=8700d19b-8135-4c01-854e-53c04c1d4ad8 % 40sessionmgr13 & A ; vid=1 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=afh & A ; AN=5568921 ( Accessed on 24 February 2011 )