There are a batch of intents of an accounting conceptual model. The chief intent of fiscal describing under this accounting conceptual model is non to assist direction to do determinations, or calculate nonexempt income and etc. ( Alexander & A ; Nobes, 2007 ) However, the intent of accounting conceptual model is act as a model for puting accounting criterions. It act as a guideline to the Board in developing accounting criterions, yet is besides as a usher to deciding accounting issues which is non stated straight in an International Accounting Standard or International Financial Reporting Standard or Interpretation. Besides, harmonizing to Arnold & A ; Hope the intent of conceptual model is to assist to cut down the influence of personal prejudices and political force per unit areas on accounting judgements. Other than that, the intent is to cut down cost of analysis and aid to decide accounting differences. Other than that, it identifies the qualitative feature that make information in fiscal statement useful and it provides constructs of capital care therefore it aid to increase the user assurance will fix and show the fiscal study which all information needed had clarify clearly. So, an accounting conceptual model chief intent is to steer the criterion compositors when they are composing or revising accounting criterion. ( Alexander & A ; Nobes, 2007 )
( B )
One of the feature is relevancy, the information in the IASB model must be relevant to it aim so that the information would be utile to the user. This is because ; the information in the model is to assist the users to do better economic determinations. By supplying relevancy information in the balance sheet and income statement, the users could measure the base on balls and nowadays or future events of corroborating or rectifying their base on balls rating based on the future net hard currency influxs. For illustration, the information would be out of day of the month due to it printing one time a twelvemonth, therefore the dependability of the information would be slow down and it would impact the users or investor determination.
Other so relevancy, dependability is besides need in the IASB Framework. In order for the information to be utile the information must be dependable and must be possible for user to depend on it to do better determination. It must be free from mistake and prejudice and must be faithful representation of the real- universe economic phenomena. This is because to avoid the users of fiscal statement being misled by the contents of the statement, such as dealing, assets and liabilities should be shown in such manner as to stand for every bit good as possible what underlies them. For illustration, a balance sheet should non demo an point under the header of liability unless it meets the definition of a liability. So, in order to be faithful representation it requires completeness, non subordinating substance to organize, and neutrality.
Besides, a faithful representation of a dealing is merely possible if the minutess and other events are accounted for a presented in harmonizing with their substance and economic world non simply their legal signifier. ( BPP, 2008 ) In other words, it means that if one party sells of the assets to another party, the gross revenues papers may enter that legal ownership has been transferred. However, if the understanding exist the party sold off the plus and go oning basking the future economic benefit from the plus so the substance over signifier has non taken topographic point. For an illustration, if an entity sold of the machine to the other party, and instantly leaseback for use for most of it life. Neutrality needs to be taken topographic point in order for the information to be dependable. The information must liberate from prejudice if non it will act upon the user to do a judgements or determination for future use.
On the other manus, comprehensibility is besides one of the qualitative features of fiscal information that presently included in IASB model. The information in the fiscal statement should be easy apprehensible for the internal users and the external user. The users of fiscal statements are assumed to hold some concern, economic and accounting cognition and able to analyze the information decently. Harmonizing to BPP, complex affairs should non be left out of fiscal statement merely due to its trouble if is relevant information. Therefore, relevant information should non be excluded due to it is excessively complex or to hard for users to understand and the model should include the givens on the capablenesss of fiscal statements users and besides the capableness of fiscal statement preparers and hearers. ( IASB.ORG, 2005 )
Last, comparison is besides one of the qualitative feature of fiscal information. This is because, users use the informations in fiscal statement to do determination therefore it is of import that whether the information is comparable or non. It needs to enables the users to place the similarity and differences between economic phenomena. Besides that matching information for old period should be shown in order to compare over the clip. For illustration, for the usage of internal users they could take last twelvemonth net income and comparison with this twelvemonth net income to do future determination investing for following twelvemonth.
Question 1 ( C )
It is better for accounting profession holding agreed accounting criterions as a footing for fixing fiscal statements. This is because concern are traveling toward a planetary economic system it will be easier for internal users and the external user to do a better determination by holding a standard accounting manner of fiscal statement. By holding an in agreement accounting criterion it will be a common manner of coverage and fixing fiscal statements in different states. If there is no in agreement accounting criterion there will be a batch type of manner to fix the fiscal statement in different county and this may confound the external user. Therefore through standardisation by holding agreed accounting criterion it guarantee every bit for as possible that different entities apply similar accounting interventions to similar minutess.
Besides, it will be easier for the companies or organisation to roll up their fiscal statements. There will be a guide line for the company to roll up the fiscal statements and they would able to cognize what information should be revelation and what information should n’t. By holding an in agreement accounting criterion for fixing fiscal statement the investors or external user could at least a guideline to compare the organisation fiscal criterions and made better determination for future investing use. Other than that, by holding an in agreement accounting criterion it would be easier for the organisation to compare their fiscal statement with their rivals from different states. This is because, everybody would able to understand the fiscal statement and easier to be comparison.
Therefore by holding agreed accounting criterion to prepared fiscal statement it will cut down clip and cost involved for users to fix their fiscal statement this is because at least it act as a bottom line or a guideline for comptroller to follow to fix a fiscal statement which is standardising in worldwide and being accepted by worldwide yet it easy to be understand. Users could salvage clip and no demand to blow money to seting them to a common format and accounting intervention before fixing or set abouting comparative analysis.
Question 1 ( D )
It is acceptable to go from accounting criterion but there is certain demand and for certain states. There is merely some states ‘ company are allowed to go from accounting criterion if making so will be better. Besides that, in some states accounting criterion is merely apply to single company fiscal statement non for amalgamate company fiscal statement. Harmonizing to Zeff & A ; Stephen A, US is the lone state in which authorities bureaus do non let companies under their legal power to go from standard accounting pattern
However, it is acceptable to go from accounting criterion if the direction entity thinks that if harmonizing to the accounting criterion the fiscal statement will non stand for a to the full true and just of statement. Harmonizing to HRB Opperman, SF Booysen, C. S. Binnekade, JGI Oberholster, it will be depart signifier accounting standard if it provide the relevant regulative model which is required, if non the depart is non allow to make so.
There are certain stairss and information to taken to be depart signifier accounting criterion. The direction entity needs to reason that the fiscal statement is reasonably stand foring the fiscal place, public presentation and hard currency flows of the organisation in order to go from the accounting criterion. Besides, in order to go from accounting criterion, applicable accounting statements and readings have to be following with so that the fiscal statement will accomplish a true and just statement as depart from the accounting criterion. Other than that, the entity should disclosure the rubric of the statement or reading which the entity does non follow, and including the ground why conformity with the statement or reading will be deceptive.
Therefore, it is acceptable to go from an accounting criterion, if the entity follow the full measure and supply information which is required.
There are many issues that are raised during the procedure of harmonisation of accounting criterion. During the harmonisation procedure several issues arise like different in civilization, political relations, economic system and sociological behaviour, deficiency of strong accounting and etc.
One of the issues had risen is there is different intent of fiscal coverage for different state. In some states the fiscal intent is for revenue enhancement appraisal while in other states their intent is for investor decision-making. Therefore when harmonising the accounting criterion this issue risen. For illustration, largely states like Malaysia their fiscal intent is for investor decision-making therefore it did non impact these states much but it affected other states which their fiscal intent is for revenue enhancement appraisal. At the same clip, during the procedure of harmonisation the patriotism issues originate. Some states are unwilling to accept other ‘s state system and replace their ain accounting ordinance while some states are wary of yielding control of their accounting ordinance to foreigners. Besides, the other issues arise is there is different demands and deficiency of strong accounting organic structures in developing states. ( BPP, 2008 ) State like Malaysia is during the underdeveloped phase evidently is behind the standard scene procedure and deficiency of strong independent accounting could press for better criterion of harmonisation. At the same clip, another issue is the different demands of the big multinationals and smaller concern entities in devolving state prevent the procedure of harmonisation arise excessively. There is other issues originate every bit good as there is different user groups could hold different demands in different states. Different states have different thoughts about their several importance. For illustration, in USA the investors and creditor groups are more importance to them while in Europe they enjoy a higher net income. ( BBP, 2008 ) . Furthermore, due to there is different civilization in different state therefore the other issue arises which the aim for accounting system go different differing from one state to another state.
In my point of position I agree with merely one accounting criterion for all states. This is because is will be easier for comptrollers to fix the fiscal statement as there is merely one manner of readying for fiscal study. Besides, it will be easier for the comparison of international fiscal information, as the internal users could compare their net income with their rival from different state and could do better investing determination. Besides, it besides will cut down the audit costs this is because the comptroller could salvage cost as they do n’t necessitate to change over in to the common fiscal coverage when is required to follow with different states ‘ fiscal study. Yet, they did non necessitate to include account for peculiar figure had been calculated because there is merely one footing applied therefore it will salvage clip and the user could easy understand it. By holding one accounting system will easier for comptroller for making the revenue enhancement governments. It will be easier for the comptroller to cipher the revenue enhancement of the investor who receives income from oversea.
As decision, harmonisation of accounting standard brings a batch of benefit to most of the states. As it make the companies ‘ history more crystalline and comparable and this will assist internal users and the external user to do better investing determination.