Renaissance was one of the important minutes in the past centuries stand foring art. Leonardo district attorney Vinci was the archetypical Renaissance representative for humanistic values whereas Michelangelo Buonarroti was a cardinal figure for typifying the classical construct of flawlessness. With Leonardo ‘s love for nature and Michelangelo ‘s love for masculine beauty, the two accidentally created a manner in art that the universe now embrace. They were both trained in Florence and both best known as a painter although Michel ever believed himself to be more of a sculpturer. They both studied human anatomy but the similarities end at that place. Leonardo used the cognition to laud adult male whereas Michelangelo used it to idolize God. The techniques used in their pictures and other artistic accomplishments are similar in manner, but different in given.

The environment Leonardo grew up was surrounded by trees, rivers and mountains. It was a learned environment for Leonardo to analyze constellation, which lead to constructing his accomplishments in detecting what is merely above the surface. “ … the painter ‘s oculus sees but the surface of things it must in rendering the surface discern and construe the organic construction that lies beneath” quoted from a subdivision in Leonardo ‘s notebook ( 1998 ) . Later it was besides the landscape that encouraged him to paint. His developed ability of observation and accomplishment as an illustrator enabled him to detect and animate the effects he saw in nature that besides added a particular energy to his portrayals. The celebrated portrayal of the Mona Lisa has a dramatic landscape background which made it seem like the universe was in a province of instability ( Andrews, 2009 ) . Leonardo used intense and diaphanous colorss in the distance and so aglow colorss to conjunct with the foreground. The lineation of the adult female is emulated with the moving ridges of the landscape and steady curves of the river and hills behind her, making a harmoniousness. It was known that Leonardo kept diaries to enter thoughts and observations because he had a tough clip seeking to explicate what he could see that others could n’t. His relationship with nature and personal wonder allowed him to research and experiment assorted topics, including the human organic structure. He combines logic and analytical observation into art. An illustration of this is The Homo – Vitruvianus, which is “a survey of proportions with the human figure inscribed in a circle and a square ( Keaton, 2005 ) .” It was used to demo the rule of gesture that a figure makes “in itself” without altering place and with the inexplicit suggestion of coiling procedure.

Michelangelo ‘s art, on the other manus, mirror his love for male beauty. During the Renaissance, maleness was idealized. However Michelangelo ‘s topics in his pictures will be either given a feminine side or a contemplation that shows his animal response to them. This factor bothered Michelangelo and it shows in his sculptures and drawings as he struggled between proper thoughts and animal desire. Michelangelo ‘s personal journal mentioned his contemplation on his first two sculptures, “Already at 16, my head was a battleground: my love of heathen beauty, the male nude, at war with my spiritual religion. A mutual opposition of subjects and signifiers… one spiritual, the other earthly, I ‘ve kept these carvings on the walls of my studio to this really twenty-four hours ( Ruehring, 2006 ) .” Michel is a really disturbed adult male. He had internal struggles, publishing coiled and crude behavior. His pictures and sculpture, nevertheless, have natural scenes of female parent and kid love.
“ … What Michelangelo lacked in grace and breeding he compensated for in artistic force and magnificence ( Ruehring, 2006 ) .” He has strong feelings for his ain beliefs on what flawlessness is and attempts to implement those beliefs into his art work. The image Michelangelo created of St. Bartholomew in The Last Judgement was tragic and tormented. The ground for this is because he had his ain face hanged horridly like melted clay from one of the saint ‘s manus, making a metaphor for the creative person ‘s anguished psyche. He was a singular creative person, but he left many of his plants unfinished as if he was defeated by his ain aspiration.

Leonardo was more than merely an creative person. His background varies from an uranologist, to mathematician and discoverer. This was resulted by his feature of wonder doing him desire to experiment with anything he can acquire his custodies on. He surveies how the universe he lives map in scientifically footings and is n’t afraid to seek different attacks. As a scientist, he has knowledge in the Fieldss of anatomy and it shows in his achievements through inside informations. He was the first creative person who dissected the human organic structure to let him to understand the workings of musculuss and other internal variety meats. He besides holds involvement in physiognomy leting him to register face look and placing that emotion onto paper. These qualities are shown through his celebrated pictures such as the Mona Lisa. The position of Mona Lisa, “…Everything about it speaks reserve and silence” . The celebrated smiling, for case, had viewing audiences bring forthing their ain theories as to what the smiling of Mona Lisa signifies to. The effectivity of the smiling is strengthened when looking at her eyes. The whole portrayal is made to center on her face. “By environing the facing with the darkened surfaces of her frock, hair and head covering, Leonardo utilized the natural lighting encompassing her chest and custodies to concentrate attending on the face ( Andrews, 2009 ) .”

Michelangelo grew up hearing about Leonardo ‘s established repute in success. However he was more dedicated to artwork than Leonardo. He focused chiefly on pictures and sculpture. He one time wrote that “ … a true and pure work of sculpture — by definition, one that is cut, non cast or modeled — should retain so much of the original signifier of the rock block and should so avoid projections and separation of parts that it would turn over downhill of its ain weight.” These words reflect Michelangelo ‘s love of quarried marble and his regard for the really rock that lies at the bosom of his chosen art signifier of sculpture. Michelangelo installs his topics with “a sense of moral cause of action ( EDinformatics, 1999 ) .” One of Michel ‘s celebrated successes was his sculpturer of David, posed before the battle contemplating the conflict yet to come with no armor… “The David is the ultimate projection of heroic pick and epic action ( Sandstead, 2009 ) .” Michel has his ain construct of beauty and flawlessness. He tries to implement his constructs through graphics. The “Pieta” involves with Mary keeping a dead Jesus in her weaponries. Mary ‘s face appears to be peaceable but it is her left manus turned upward in incapacitated surrender that betrays the true deepness of emotion, which relates to the strength of her heartache. In the face of Christ, it reveals little hints of enduring being endured. The look is composed to peacefulness, without lingering torment. Both faces were polished to flawlessness and ideal beauty during the Renaissance. Youth was a key.

Leonardo ‘s notebooks became celebrated after his decease. It concluded a batch of facts that he discovered during the yearss he still walked on Earth. In his notebooks, it shows his wonder and involvement in the construction of adult male. All parts of adult male, whether interior or exterior, has been analyze carefully by him. “If you open your legs so much as to diminish your tallness by 1/14 and spread and raise your weaponries so that your in-between fingers are on a degree with the top of your caput, you must cognize that the umbilicus will be the Centre of a circle of which the outspread limbs touch the perimeter ; and the infinite between the legs will organize an equilateral triangle” Quoted from Leonardo ‘s notebook ( 1998 ) . The Vitruvian Man created by Leonardo is a drawing of a male figure in two overlying places with his weaponries and legs apart and at the same time inscribed in a circle and square. This work is Leonardo ‘s effort to associate adult male to nature. He believed each limb, each organ was designed and accommodate to execute is map. For illustration, the musculus of the lingua was made to bring forth sound within the oral cavity to enable adult male to articulate many linguistic communications. The Last Supper features great sleight and command of the human signifier. By puting all the spacial lines and position points within the model of the picture to pull the spectator to the centre of the tabular array, Christ is at the cardinal focal point no affair the angle.

Religion was one of the factors animating Michelangelo. He felt obliged to uncover the religious beauty of God although he struggled between his ain theories and the susurration of “false” theories environing him created by scientific discipline and political relations. Michel has a background with the Christian Church and did many sculptures and painting for the church. Commission from Pope Julius II himself, Michel was requested to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in Rome. His work told an challenging scriptural narrative of Genesis “ … get downing with God dividing light and dark, come oning to the narrative of Adam and Eve, and reasoning with the narrative of Noah ( Ruehring, 2006 ) .” His Last Judgment in the Sistine Chapel was described as an reverberation of utmost crisis. It portrayed the 2nd approach of Christ and the Apocalypse. “ … The psyche of humanity rise and descend to their destinies as judged by Christ and his angelic cortege ( Penn, 2008 ) .” The manner being used was different from his other creative activities. His figures were perceptibly broader and more menacing. The piece shouted nakedness, ensuing in ailments of indecency. “ … construct of the event shows figures equalized in their nakedness, stripped bare of rank ( Ruehring, 2006 ) .” The construction of the picture showed the division between approval and the damned as the saved rise on the left and the blasted descending on the right. The frescoes ceiling is dominated by the tones of flesh and sky. The scattered usage of orange, green, xanthous and blue added to the complex scene. Christ appears to be surrounded by the aura of “divine light” . Across his pubess, a mantle is the lone fabric used to cover him giving the reverberations of his Resurrection.

In Leonardo da Vinci ‘s and Michelangelo Buonarroti ‘s art paintings they frequently exhibit the use of elaborate imagination, graphic colourss and an unconventional manner of making deepness and volume in their plants. Leonardo was a soft, self assured and extremely esteemed creative person His mastermind laid in the Fieldss of anatomy, scientific discipline and engineering while Michelangelo ‘s mastermind ballad in his ability to sculpt. Michelangelo was an unpredictable, reserved, conflicting creative person yet was recognized as a lifting star. Leonardo worked difficult for his ain satisfaction, Michelangelo worked difficult at his committees. Inspired by nature or faith and their personal construct of ideal beauty, the two bring the universe of art an influence in which defines Renaissance today.


Andrews, Colin “ Analysis of the Mona Lisa Painting. ” Analysis of the Mona Lisa Painting. 14 Nov. 2007. 19 Oct 2009 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // ? Analysis-of-the-Mona-Lisa-Painting & A ; id=832462 & gt ; .

Esaak, Shelley. “Art History 101 – The High Renaissance.” April. 2003. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; .

Irma, A. “ The Notebooks of Leonardo district attorney Vinci. ” Encarta, 1998. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // refid=1741576336 & gt ; .

Jones, Tina L. “Great Minds, Great Thinkers.” EDinformatics, 1999. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; .

Keaton, John “ Leonardo Da Vinci – A Bequest of Immortal Genius. ” Leonardo Da Vinci – A Bequest of Immortal Genius. 18 Apr. 2007. 19 Oct 2009 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // ? Leonardo-Da-Vinci — -A-Legacy-of-Immortal-Genius & A ; id=532285 & gt ; .

King, Ross. “Michelangelo Renaissance Artist.” LuidCafe, 18 Aug. 2009. Web. 14 Oct. 2009. hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Mojave, Miz. “Michelangelo Vs. Da Vinci. 9 Sept. 2008.” Web. 14 Oct. 2009. hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Penn, Leah “ Michelangelo ‘s Masterpiece – The Sistine Chapel in Rome. ” Michelangelo ‘s Masterpiece – The Sistine Chapel in Rome. 1 Jul. 2008. 19 Oct 2009 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // ? Michelangelos-Masterpiece — -The-Sistine-Chapel-in-Rome & A ; id=1290724 & gt ; .

Ruehring, Lauren Mitchelle. “ Michelangelo Biography. ”, 2002. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; .

Ruehring, Lauren Mitchelle. “ Michelangelo ‘s Last Judgment. ”, 2002. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; .

Winslow, Lance. “Leonardo ‘s Life.” LairWeb, Mar. 2003. Web. 14 Oct. 2009. Hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out