Researching Plays: Methodology Essay


Qualitative research methods shall be used to garner primary information for this survey. Specifically, it will utilize interviews and questionnaires supplemented by the secondary beginnings gathered for the literature reappraisal. Peat ( 2002 ) states the strengths of a qualitative survey as being able to obtain information straight from the position of the participants. This can increase how worlds understand a construct or phenomenon. In this instance, question shall be conducted with the facilitators, histrions and spect-actors of a dramatic forum theater for immature people aged 13-25 with mental wellness troubles. At the same clip, questionnaires shall be distributed to the audience of the drama to happen out what the play’s impact was on them. Questions shall refer to how drama enhances affectional development in the participants.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Researching Plays: Methodology Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now


Semi-structured interviews shall be conducted for this survey. These usage predetermined inquiries where the order can be modified or adapted as necessary ( Robson, 2002 ) . It will enable participants to discourse their readings of a construct or procedure as they portion their sentiments with the interviewer ( Cohen et al. , 2000 ) . The interview method involves oppugning or a treatment of issues with one or more people. It is utile to roll up informations which may non be accessible through observation or questionnaires ( Blaxter et al, 2006 ) .

Interviews are flexible and adaptable research tools because there are more opportunities to follow up on interesting responses when face-to-face inquiring is done instead than go forthing the inquiries to be answered on print ( Robson, 2002 ) . Hence, response rate is higher in interviews than in questionnaires because participants are more involved ( Oppenheim, 1992 ) . The interviewer should be skilled plenty to inquire the right inquiries in order for respondents to reply them exhaustively ( Frey and Mertens-Oishi, 1995 ) . Robson ( 2002 ) mentions the fact that the whole interview procedure can be clip devouring because it entails the undermentioned: doing agreements sing permission and agenda ; the existent interview itself ; the composing up of notes ; written text of the interview ; cryptography of subjects that surface, etc.

A major disadvantage in any interview state of affairs is the possibility of prejudice. ( Grinnell & A ; Unrau, 2008 ) The interviewer may inadvertently unwrap their ain sentiment or outlooks by their tone of voice, or in the manner inquiries are asked. Even when entering the interview it is of import to stay cognizant of prejudice holding an consequence on how replies are understood and canned. However, these methods are a speedy manner to measure participant’s cognition of the subject involved. Although participants may non ever react truthfully, honestness will necessitate to be emphasized.

Each interview shall be recorded, with the permission of the interviewee, and so transcribed in verbatim for analysis. The following are the proposed interview inquiries for three sets of interviewees in the Speakeasy Project. The first set of inquiries shall be directed to theworkshop facilitators:

  1. How important are emotions in moving and how do you utilize emotions to heighten the playing of the actors/ spect-actors?
  2. What guides you in actuating the histrions?
  3. How make you steer the histrions to place with the functions they are playing?
  4. What is the ideal scene to ease realistic moving with emotions?
  5. What are your schemes to maintain the histrions engaged in their playing? How about schemes to link with the audience?
  6. Can you place some hinderances in accomplishing your ends in the drama?

The following set of inquiries are directed to thehistrionsof the drama:

  1. What is your motive to move?
  2. How make you internalise your function?
  1. How make you sympathise and sympathize with the character you are playing?
  1. How much of the character comes out in your playing and how much of your ain

personality is expressed?

  1. How do you believe your emotional intelligence develops in moving?
  1. Do you believe utilizing your emotions in your playing helps or distracts your focal point in

your playing?

Finally, the last set of inquiries is directed to thespect-actors:

  1. What was the play’s impact on your emotions?
  2. Did this help/distract you from effectual engagement in the drama?
  3. While you were executing onstage, how did you show your sympathy/empathy for the character or state of affairs you were given?
  4. Did your engagement aid you appreciate the drama more or did it do you more self-aware and lose your focal point on the drama?
  5. How do you believe the histrions motivated you to take part?
  6. How do you believe you could be more prepared the following clip you participate in a drama like this?


To complement the interviews, questionnaires were besides utilized to garner more informations from the audience. The questionnaire measures the impact of the drama on the audience based on their grade of understanding to the statements provided. These statements are appraising of the proficient theatrical constituents every bit good as the content and bringing of the drama itself.

Questionnaires are really “…a really various data-gathering method ; they are inexpensive, easy to administrate, whether it be to three people or 300, and can be used to garner a great assortment of informations of both quantitative and qualitative nature.” ( Campbell et al. , 2004, p. 146 ) . The convenience it provides research workers allows for the efficient usage of clip on the portion of both the research worker and interviewee because a important sum of information may be gathered in merely one effort ( Cohen et al. , 2000 ) . Another positive characteristic of questionnaires is the namelessness it gives the respondent particularly if the research subject is sensitive in nature. It is likely that participants are more honest without the menace of designation so they are more willing to portion their penetrations in the questionnaire instead than with a face-to-face brush ( Gillham, 2000 ) .

Below is a transcript of the questionnaires to be distributed to the audience right after the drama.

Name: _________________________________________________Age: ___________

Gender: _________________________Occupation: ____________________________

Instruction manuals:

Please answer the questionnaire candidly by look intoing on the most appropriate reply for you. Please besides take clip to make full out the infinite for remarks to lucubrate on your replies at the terminal of each subdivision.


SD- Strongly Disagree

D- Disagree

NS- Not Certain

  1. Agree

SA- Strongly Agree


South dakota





Phase Set and Technical Design:

  1. The set design and props used are appropriate to the scenes and complement the plot line.
  1. The lighting, sound effects and music reflect the story’s temper and atmosphere.



  1. I found the narrative of the drama interesting and captivating.
  1. There were parts in the drama that evoked strong emotional responses from me.
  1. The book was clear and challenging.
  1. I can personally associate to the narrative.



  1. The histrions were effectual in stating the narrative of the drama.
  1. I found the moving effectual in arousing strong emotional responses from me.
  1. The histrions were effectual in actuating spect-actors to take part in the drama.
  1. I found myself being participative either by replying their inquiries aloud or merely to myself.


How did the drama affect you?

What are your penetrations about the experience of watching the drama and take parting in forum theater?

Thank you for your cooperation. It is much appreciated.

Analysis of the Datas:

Verbatim transcripts of the interviews shall be analyzed qualitatively. Bowen’s ( 2005 ) analysis of interview transcripts identified forms in the information by agencies of thematic codifications. This means there will be subjects in the interview informations that may come up. Patton ( 1980 ) explains “Inductive analysis means that the forms, subjects, and classs of analysis come from the informations ; they emerge out of the informations instead than being imposed on them prior to data aggregation and analysis” ( p. 306 ) . Bowen’s analysis of informations entailed analyzing the forms that emerge, doing logical associations with the interview inquiries and mention to the reappraisal of literature. She inside informations the procedure of deducing her research findings as therefore:

“At consecutive phases, subjects moved from a low degree of abstraction to go major, overarching subjects rooted in the concrete grounds provided by the informations. These emerging subjects together with a substantive-formal theory of ‘development-focused collaboration’ became the major findings of the study” ( Bowen, 2005, p. 216 ) .

The cogency of the information gathered would come from the unity of the participants’ responses and its close correspondence to the research literature. Guaranting qualitative cogency is rather different from quantitative surveies. In quantitative research, the hypotheses presented at the beginning of the survey guides the research worker in finding the concept cogency of the informations derived from the research procedure every bit good as the appropriate methodological analysis to be used ( Wainer and Braun,1988 ) . The concept cogency is expected to interplay with the informations as applied from the trial or research procedure pull stringsing the identified variables. The informations derived may back up or reject It besides depends on how tightly they integrate their issues and concerns to the research subject ( Butt,1992 ) . The participants’ perspectives provide a graphic image to the research worker because the participants are considered experts on their ain life experiences.

With respect to the questionnaires, frequence counts of participant responses for each inquiry shall be done and charted in graphs for analysis. These descriptive statistics shall be compared and contrasted. Responses will be computed as to how it contributes to the per centums derived per inquiry. Then, these consequences will be represented in pie graphs to see outright the distribution of responses.

Triangulation of Datas

Using assorted data-collection methods is one manner to add trustiness to the derived informations. Such a scheme is known as triangulation, a construct borrowed from appraising and pilotage. Creswell and Miller ( 2000 ) defined triangulation as “a cogency process where research workers search for convergence among multiple and different beginnings of information to organize subjects or classs in a study” ( p. 126 ) . It is non merely seting together a assortment of informations, but its significance lies in happening the relationships of the informations to each other in order to antagonize possible menaces to cogency ( Berg, 1995 ) . Denzin ( 1994 ) suggested the incorporation of multiple sorts of informations beginnings and multiple theoretical positions alternatively of merely utilizing multiple data-collection methods in order to beef up the cogency of the findings. Integrating multiple informations beginnings and theoretical positions improves the cogency and dependability of the research ( Golafshani, 2003 ) . For this survey, the information beginnings are the interviews with the workshop facilitators, the histrions and spect-actors and the questionnaires to be completed by the audience of the drama. Trianglulation will be achieved when these informations beginnings are compared and contrasted, and analyzed with the background of the reappraisal of literature. Mathison ( 1988 ) elaborated, “Triangulation has risen as an of import methodological issue in realistic and qualitative attacks to evaluation [ in order to ] control prejudice and [ for ] set uping valid propositions because traditional scientific techniques are incompatible with this surrogate epistemology” ( p. 13 ) .

Restrictions of the Study

Since this survey will merely utilize a little figure of participants, the findings may non be conclusive to the general population of participants in forum theater. However, the informations may be implicative of what other participants may see when they engage themselves in forum theater.

Ethical Considerations

Kvale and Brinkmann ( 2009 ) argue that ethical determinations must be made throughout the research procedure. They point out four ethical regulations for research on worlds: the informed consent, confidentiality, effects and the research worker ‘s function ( Kvale & A ; Brinkmann 2009 ) . Informed consent shall be sought from the prospective participants themselves. Confidentiality shall be ensured to them, as some of the information they may portion may be excessively sensitive that uncovering their individualities may be hazardous. Consequences of the interview procedure have besides been studied. The safety and security of the participants shall be ensured at all times during the interview procedure. The researcher’s function is to clearly carry on the interviews every bit best as one can with extreme earnestness, honestness and kindness. This survey shall follow with ethical criterions and considerations in carry oning research with human participants.

During the informations aggregation phase, confidentiality of participants must be respected at all times. ( Frey and Mertens-Oishi, 1995 ) . They shall besides be informed that they are free to retreat from their engagement any clip they feel uncomfortable or their safety and security are threatened with the information they portion.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out