Taxonomic distribution of mitochondrial noncoding DNAs
Mitochondrial noncoding DNAs are nomadic familial elements capable of independent extension in the their host ‘s cells [ 1–3 ] . They encode homing endonuclease and maturase ( Group I introns ) or rearward RNA polymerase ( Group II noncoding DNAs ) domains that catalyse their mobility [ 4,5 ] . Mitochondrial noncoding DNAs are rare in Metazoa. They have been found in Placozoa ( Group I and II ) , Cnidaria, Porifera ( Group I merely ) and Annelida ( Group II merely ) . Within these phyla, they were periodically encountered in unrelated households [ 6–15 ] .
As for Metazoa in general, mitochondrial noncoding DNAs in sponges, all belonging to Group I, are considered rare. This has been based on their find incox1fragments of merely two households from different sponge categories [ 12–14,16 ] , every bit good as the low proportion of complete sponge mitochondrial genomes possessing such noncoding DNAs ( 3 out of 51 GenBank records, release 201.0, accessed June 8Thursday2014 ) . Their sparseness in sponges served as one of the lines of grounds back uping their horizontal cistron transportation ( HGT ) . Other groundss included the phyletic incongruence between the noncoding DNAs and their sponge hosts and the phyletic relationship of the noncoding DNAs ‘ ORFs to those of fungi noncoding DNAs [ 12,14 ] . However, these groundss were non ever perceived as cogent evidence of HGT [ 13 ] , chiefly due to an evident correlativity in the evolutionary rates of the noncoding DNA andcox1sequences.
Two of the mitochondrial noncoding DNA signifiers found in sponges are inserted in places that are located within the contrary Folmer fragment primer part. In a few instances, it is possible to state with assurance that the presence of an noncoding DNA prevented the successful elaboration of the standard Folmer fragment. Rot et Al. [ 12 ] identified the first sponge noncoding DNA, inCinachyrella levantinensis( Tetilla sp.sensuIlan [ 17 ] ) , utilizing an alternate contrary primer, after neglecting to magnify the Folmer fragment. In another instance, Cardenas et Al. [ 18 ] have reported to hold failed in magnifying the Folmer fragment inCinachyrella alloclada,utilizing a specimen in which the presence of an noncoding DNA was confirmed subsequently [ 14 ] . However, the entire figure of such failures is non accounted for since they are rarely reported. As a consequence, we can non gauge the proportion of recognized sponge species that have nocox1barcode representation due to the presence of a mitochondrial noncoding DNA, as we are in fact ignorant of the true prevalence of Group I introns in sponges.
Features of sponge Group I introns
Three different signifiers of Group I noncoding DNAs have been found in sponges, within the spirophorid household Tetillidae [ 14 ] and the homosclerophorid household Plakinidae [ 13 ] . The sponge noncoding DNAs comprise three distinguishable signifiers denoted by the sequence place in which they are inserted. The Numberss of the places in thecox1sequence ofAmphimedon queenslandica( 714, 723 and 870 ),which are homologous to intron interpolation sites in other species, were used to call the different noncoding DNA signifiers ( i.e. , noncoding DNA 714, noncoding DNA 723 and intron 870 ) , for the interest of uniformity.A.queenslandicawas adopted as mention, being the lone species with a complete sequencedcox1ORF at the clip, although itscox1sequence does non possess an noncoding DNA [ 14 ] . Intron forms sharing an interpolation site, have been found to portion ORFs and secondary constructions as good. However, these two characteristics vary well among intron signifiers [ 14 ] . The systematic distribution of the three noncoding DNA signifiers does non match the the sponges ‘ phyletic relationships [ 14,19 ] . Introns 714 and 723 were found in Tetillidae, every bit good as in Plakinidae. Intron 870 was found so far merely in Tetillidae [ 13,14 ] . However, some more late identified plakinid noncoding DNAs, which were non yet characterized [ 16 ] , are campaigners to belong to this noncoding DNA signifier.
In this survey we have surveyed the representation of noncoding DNA interpolation sites, vacant and occupied, in the availablecox1sequence informations, in order to gauge the impact of mitochondrial noncoding DNAs on the systematic representation of sponges in the planetarycox1sequence barcode dataset. Our findings show that some sponge orders are under-represented, perchance because of unsuccessful efforts to magnify theircox1cistron, due to the presence of an noncoding DNA. We present new sequence informations that confirms the presence of noncoding DNAs in at least to orders in which they were non antecedently encountered. These two orders are so under-represented by thecox1barcode sequence. This suggests that noncoding DNAs are more abundant the we have originally assumed and that perpendicular heritage may hold played a bigger function in their systematic distribution than we have antecedently concluded.
Material and methods
samples and molecular uses
1. Burt A, Koufopanou V ( 2004 ) Homing endonuclease cistrons: the rise and autumn and rise once more of a selfish component. Current Opinion in Genetics & A ; Development 14: 609–615. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2004.09.010.
2. Chevalier BS, Stoddard BL ( 2001 ) Homing endonucleases: structural and functional penetration into the accelerators of intron/intein mobility. Nucl Acids Res 29: 3757–3774. doi:10.1093/nar/29.18.3757.
3. Haugen P, Simon DM, Bhattacharya D ( 2005 ) The natural history of group I introns. Tendencies in Geneticss 21: 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2004.12.007.
4. Belfort M ( 2003 ) Two for the monetary value of one: a bifunctional intron-encoded DNA endonuclease-RNA maturase. Genes Dev 17: 2860–2863. doi:10.1101/gad.1162503.
5. Lambowitz AM, Belfort M ( 1993 ) Introns as Mobile Genetic Elements. Annual Review of Biochemistry 62: 587–622. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.003103.
6. Dellaporta SL, Xu A, Sagasser S, Jakob W, Moreno MA, et Al. ( 2006 ) Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerens supports Placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum. PNAS 103: 8751–8756. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602076103.
7. Valles Y, Halanych KM, Boore JL ( 2008 ) Group II Introns Break New Boundaries: Presence in a Bilaterian’s Genome. PLoS ONE 3: e1488. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001488.
8. Beagley CT, Okada NA, Wolstenholme DR ( 1996 ) Two mitochondrial group I introns in a metazoan, the sea windflower Metridium senile: one noncoding DNA contains cistrons for fractional monetary units 1 and 3 of NADH dehydrogenase. PNAS 93: 5619–5623.
9. Fukami H, Chen CA, Chiou C-Y, Knowlton N ( 2007 ) Novel Group I Introns Encoding a Putative Homing Endonuclease in the Mitochondrial cox1 Gene of Scleractinian Corals. J Mol Evol 64: 591–600. doi:10.1007/s00239-006-0279-4.
10. Goddard MR, Leigh J, Roger AJ, Pemberton AJ ( 2006 ) Invasion and Persistence of a Selfish Gene in the Cnidaria. PLoS ONE 1: e3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000003.
11. Medina M, Collins AG, Takaoka TL, Kuehl JV, Boore JL ( 2006 ) Naked corals: Skeleton loss in Scleractinia. PNAS 103: 9096–9100. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602444103.
12. Rot C, Goldfarb I, Ilan M, Huchon D ( 2006 ) Putative cross-kingdom horizontal cistron transportation in sponge ( Porifera ) chondriosome. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 71. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-71.
13. Wang X, Lavrov DV ( 2008 ) Seventeen New Complete mtDNA Sequences Reveal Extensive Mitochondrial Genome Evolution within the Demospongiae. PLoS ONE 3: e2723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002723.
14. Szitenberg A, Rot C, Ilan M, Huchon D ( 2010 ) Diverseness of sponge mitochondrial noncoding DNAs revealed by cyclooxygenase 1 sequences of Tetillidae. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 288. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-288.
15. Brugler MR, France SC ( 2007 ) The complete mitochondrial genome of the black coral Chrysopathes Taiwan ( Cnidaria: Actinozoa: Antipatharia ) supports categorization of antipatharians within the subclass Hexacorallia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 776–788. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.016.
16. Gazave E, Lapebie P, Renard E, Vacelet J, Rocher C, et Al. ( 2010 ) Molecular Phylogeny Restores the Supra-Generic Subdivision of Homoscleromorph Sponges ( Porifera, Homoscleromorpha ) . PLoS ONE 5: e14290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014290.
17. Meroz-Fine Tocopherol, Shefer S, Ilan M ( 2005 ) Changes in morphology and physiology of an East Mediterranean sponge in different home grounds. Marine Biology 147: 243–250. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1532-2.
18. Cardenas P, Menegola C, Rapp HT, Diaz MC ( 2009 ) Morphological description and DNA barcodes of shallow-water Tetractinellida ( Porifera: Demospongiae ) from Bocas del Toro, Panama, with description of a new species. Zootaxa 2276: 1–39.
19. Szitenberg A, Becking LE, Vargas S, Fernandez JCC, Santodomingo N, et Al. ( 2013 ) Phylogeny of Tetillidae ( Porifera, Demospongiae, Spirophorida ) based on three molecular markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67: 509–519. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.018.