The aim of this survey is to present a type of concrete that is more cost effectual when compared to other concretes, yet is still compliant with the BS8110 criterions of mechanical features for design and building of structural concrete. This paper presents portion of the trial consequences of an on-going survey in an effort to utilize the low cost solid waste material ‘almond shell ‘ ( AS ) , as a harsh sum in the production of structural lightweight concrete. Test consequences in this paper determine assorted structural and physical belongingss, which are elastic modulus, compressive strength, and the bond strength between the concrete and sum. There is besides an probe into the flexural behavior of the AS concrete. Based on these experimental consequences, it was determined that although AS concrete has a lower modulus of snap than other trial samples, middle-scale beam trials revealed that warps under expected design service tonss are within acceptable bounds. The BS8110 criterions stipulate acceptable bounds for the span-deflection ratios of lightweight structural concrete, and this survey shows that AS concrete complies with this, with values of warp between 252 and 263. Lab probes showed satisfactory public presentation of the AS concrete within the remit of the BS8110 codification, and it can be concluded that for lightweight concrete as a structural stuff, Prunus dulcis shell shows great as a harsh sum. This consequence particularly has significance for low-priced applications such as in lodging building and for usage in temblor prone countries.
The issue of resource decrease has become more outstanding in recent old ages, and planetary pollution has resulted in a challenge for applied scientists to seek and develop new stuffs based on resources that are renewable. To accomplish this, research workers are analyzing the usage of waste stuffs, recycled points, and byproducts from the building industry. These waste stuffs are already normally included as aggregative stuffs in the production of lightweight structural concrete. There has already been important sums of survey into the physical belongingss and structural application of lightweight concrete produced with the inclusion of aggregative stuffs, which has been focused on look intoing sums that are manufactured, of course happening, and besides waste stuffs from industry.
Stone fruit belongs to the same household of fruit as the Prunus persica, which is known as the Rosaceae household. It is native to the Middle East, and it thrives merely in a dry, hot environment. Almonds are the individual seed from a type of rock fruit, and they are grown throughout California in the USA, in the full Mediterranean Region, and besides in Australia, Africa, Turkey and Iran. The Almond, as a rock fruit, is non easy grown in a wet environment, intending these are premier locations for its cultivation. Currently, research attempts have been directed towards the potency for utilizing Prunus dulcis shell ( AS ) as a harsh sum in the production of structural lightweight concrete. In Iran, there is over 70 metric tons of Almond shell waste produced at each cropping, intending it is a premier location for doing usage of this waste stuff. Recycling AS leads to many benefits, such as maximization of the usage of Prunus dulcis shell, saving of natural resources and care of ecological balance. In add-on, the current economic and societal clime means that in many states across the universe there is a higher recent shortage in low-cost, low-cost lodging, intending that AS has possible as a cheaper option to the conventional sums in carry throughing this demand.
In structural concrete, aggregates that have a denseness of 1200Kg/m3 ( dry unit weight ) are normally used, and are classified as lightweight sums ( Owens, 1993 ) . AS sum has a unit weight of 600-700 kg/m3, which is about 55 % igniter in comparing with traditional sum stuffs, such as crushed rock. As a consequence of utilizing lighter aggregative stuff, the structural concrete produced will hold a lower weight. This AS aggregative lightweight concrete has been really late developed and employed as a structural stuff in the building industry, intending that its structural public presentation still requires probe. This survey attempts to find some of import features of AS aggregative concrete, to ensue in wider credence of AS as a lightweight aggregative stuff option in bring forthing concrete that can be used as a structural, lightweight concrete for usage in the building industry, in peculiar for the application of low-priced residential homes. To accomplish this, this probe will try to find the elastic modulus, compressive strength, and the bond strength between the concrete and sum. There is besides a survey into the flexural behavior of the AS concrete samples
MIX DESIGN OF AS CONCRETE
The constituents of the AS concrete in this survey included ordinary Portland cement ( ASTM Type 1 ) , with crushed sand as a all right sum, Prunus dulcis shell ( AS ) as a harsh sum, and a superplasticiser to cut down the H2O content. In this survey, a Sodium Naphthalene Sulphonate Formaldehyde Condensate was used, of Type F ( Collepardi et al. 1993 ) . The chemical construction of the SNF based superplasticiser is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Chemical construction of naphthalene sulphonate methanals based superplasticiser.
The Prunus dulcis shell sums for this survey were acquired from local Prunus dulcis shell Millss. AS is normally available in atoms of assorted forms, which as shown in Figure 2 are by and large extremely irregular. To fix the AS atoms as sums, they were sieved with the undermentioned government: the atoms were foremost passed through the No.1/2 screen, with the atoms that were retained being discarded. The staying AS was so passed through the No.4 screen, with the atoms retained from this 2nd sieving being used for the experiment. The atom size distribution of the AS sum is shown in Figure 3, and the belongingss of the crushed sand and AS are shown in Table 1.
Figure 2. Assorted forms of AS sum.
Figure 3. Atom size distribution of AS sum.
Table 1. Properties of crushed river sand and AS
Almond shell ( AS )
Maximum grain size, millimeter
AS atom thickness, millimeter
( Average=2.0mm )
Bulk unit weight, kg/m3
Los Angeles scratch value, %
Aggregate impact value, %
Aggregate oppressing value, %
24-h H2O soaking up, %
Based on the belongingss of the all right and harsh sum available for this survey, the necessary proportions of stuffs in the concrete mix were estimated, and later these test mixes were altered and modified to accomplish a practical and satisfactory consequence. The acceptable mix comprised 450 kg/m3 cement, 810 kg/m3 sand, and 440 kg/m3 AS, with a free H2O to cement ratio of 0.35. The cement content used in production of concrete in this research was acceptable for lightweight structural content, based on bounds determined by Mindess et Al. ( 2003 ) . Superplasticiser sum used was based on values suggested by the maker, and were set at 1.5 % by cement weight ( 6.75 kg/m3. This value was fixed for the continuance of the experiment. The AS sum used was assorted when it satisfied the status of ‘saturated surface prohibitionist ‘ , or ‘SSD ‘ . This is where the atom surfaces are saturated, but the interiors are dry. This was achieved by submersing the sum in drinkable H2O for 24 hours.
The aim of this probe was to find if the structural and physical belongingss of AS concrete that were specified in the old subdivision are within acceptable bounds for structural application. To this terminal, assorted research lab trials were carried out. Compression strength trials were carried out to conform to the criterion BS 1881: Part 116, on concrete samples that were regular hexahedrons of dimension 100mm. The initial modulus of snap was determined based on the ASTM C 469-87a criterion, on concrete cylinder samples of 150A-300 millimeter. The strength of the aggregate-cement bond in the AS concrete was calculated on concrete cylinder samples of 100x200mm, by manner of disengagement trials. The flexural belongingss of the AS concrete were studied by manner of trials on all-out theoretical accounts of concrete beams. For each trial, three samples were studied, and the consequences obtained were an norm for these three values. For the flexural trials, there was one beam studied, but with three tenseness supports.
The concrete samples were produced by blending the component stuffs in a rotating membranophone, which was compliant with the relevant criterion for sums that are SSD, which is subdivision 6.3 of BS 1881: Part 125. In order to restrict the vaporization of wet from the concrete, which would ensue in subsequent shrinking, one time the molds were cast, a fictile sheet was used to cover the samples. This was left unmoved for 24 A± 3 hours in the research lab at ambient conditions of 24-28 A°C and comparative humidness of 85 % – 95 % . After this, the regular hexahedron and cylindrical specimens were transferred into a 25-30 A°C H2O armored combat vehicle until proving begun. The samples for flexural testing, the all-out paradigm beams, were moist-cured over an extra six yearss. They were so stored until proving in the research lab in ambient conditions. The bond between the support and AS concrete was investigated by application of the bond-slip computation. To this terminal, the disengagement trial was used. The samples were distorted concrete bars with diameters of 10mm, 23mm and 13mm. The trials were performed at assorted phases of aging, get downing at 3 yearss, so at 7 yearss, and later at 28 yearss, 56 yearss, 90 yearss and eventually at 180 yearss. The expression ( 1 ) was so applied to find the strength of the bond.
( 1 )
I„ = Stress in the bond, MPa
F = Load applied to the bond, N
vitamin D = Diameter of the saloon, nominal, millimeter
cubic decimeter = embedment length ( millimeter )
Three separate reinforced sample beams were produced and studied. These trial beams were all of the same dimensions, which were 150mmA-230mmx3200mm, and they clearly have a rectangular cross subdivision. Once in the trial setup, the effectual length under survey was reduced to 3000 millimeter. These dimensions for the samples were chosen to be sufficient in magnitude in order to accurately stand for an existent structural constituent. The tenseness support for the three beam samples were 2O10, 2O12, and 2O13. To mount the experiment, two steel hanger bars were used, of 8mm in diameter. In order to forestall shear manner failure, and in order to merely look into the belongingss specified, shear links were employed. The samples were subjected to the lading profile known as the four point flexing trial, and the resulting warps in the pure flexing zone were measured by manner of additive electromotive force supplanting transducers, or LVDTs. These were selected to read up to a supplanting of 100mm, and three were used. The experiment and beam specifications are shown in Figure 4.
Radio beam 1
Radio beam 2
Radio beam 3
Figure 4. Beam proving apparatus and inside informations.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The fresh concrete denseness during this survey ranged from 1863 to 1897 kg/m3, and the air content in the specimens was in the scope of 4.2 % to 4.9 % , which is big when compared to other lightweight concrete types. It is suggested that this is a consequences of the diverse and non-uniform topography of the person AS atoms, which prevented their full compression with each other ; nevertheless, this air content value for the AS concrete samples is still within the acceptable values of 4 % to 8 % specified in the ACI 213R-87 samples. The slump trial consequences for the AS fresh concrete workability rating was performed, which determined that AS concrete was in the scope of 6 to 8 centimeter. Analysis of these trial consequences revealed that the AS concrete had a medium grade of workability, which was within the acceptable scope of a feasible concrete. The belongingss after 28 yearss of the hardened AS aggregative concrete are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Physical belongingss of AS concrete.
Air-dry denseness, kg/m3
Compressive strength, MPa
Modulus of snap, GPa
Pullout bond strength, MPa
Concretes that have a denseness of less than 1900 kg/m3 are classified as lightweight concretes, and from Table 2 it can be seen the denseness of AS concrete is within this scope, intending it can be termed as a lightweight concrete. Compared to normal concretes, which have a denseness of around 2400 kg/m3, AS concrete is about 25.5 % igniter. This shows that usage of AS concrete would extinguish 25.5 % of dead burden when used in building, whilst still keeping satisfactory physical belongingss. Another benefit of this decreased weight is that the detrimental consequence on concrete constructions exposed to black, structural weight-dependent temblor forces and inertia forces can be lessened.
In order to measure compressive bearing capacity of AS concrete, compressive strength trials were performed on 10 centimeter regular hexahedron at an age of 28 yearss. The consequences determine an mean compressive strength of 32.5 MPa, which is about 90 % higher than the lower limit needed compressive strength provided by the ASTM C330 criterion, which for lightweight structural concrete is set at 17 MPa. Although AS is of organic beginning, it was shown that there was negative impact on the consequences from biological decay, as the regular hexahedron retained acceptable strengths even after 180 yearss. This has been showed in figure 5.
Figure 5. Compressive strength development of AS concrete.
Different harm and failure mechanisms were observed at different sample ages. At the earlier phases of proving between 3 yearss and 28 yearss, the failure in the concrete samples under compaction burden was chiefly due to failure in the interface between the cement paste and the AS sum, where the cleft follows a way around the sum ( Figure 6a ) . At ulterior phases, from 42 to 180 yearss, this mortar-aggregate interface bond is stronger, and therefore the cleft grows through the sum as illustrated in Figure 6b.
Crack way about AS sums
Crack way through
( a )
( B )
Figure 6. Waies of the clefts at ( a ) preliminary and ( B ) late phases.
The bond strength development of AS concrete is illustrated in Figure 7. Based on the disengagement trial performed, the bond strength of AS concrete was found to be approximately 2.7 to 3.5 times higher than is required by the BS 8110 criterion. The failure in the trial specimens was all by the same mechanism, which resulted in the concrete sample screen being split. This failure manner was ruinous and really sudden. Longitudinal snap in the part was observed to attach to the failure, which spread over the full beam length prior to failure. The ground for this is that radial clefts were formed from the burden that was transferred from the steel hanger bars to the concrete. The splitting failure so occurs as the clefts that form consequence in bond forces being projected outwards from this point, and the restricting concrete screen is later cracked. The bond strength of the AS concrete was about 26 % to 29 % of the compressive strength. This is within similar values for Aerocrete ( Chitharanjan et al. , 1988 ) , sintered pulverized fuel ash concrete ( Orangun, 1967 ) , and other similar lightweight structural concretes presently normally employed in building.
Figure 7. Chemical bond strength development of AS concrete.
The finding of elastic modulus is important, and it is a critical parametric quantity when planing concrete constructions due to the fact that it is necessary for measuring warps and finding possible snap and failure. Figure 8 shows a stress-strain curve for the AS concrete. The strain value matching to the maximal emphasis is about 0.005 micro-strains. One peculiar concern for the AS concrete is that it has a low modulus of snap compared to other similar concretes. This was studied by paradigm beam testing.
Figure 8. Stress-strain curve for AS concrete.
All of the tried beam samples exhibited flexural failure as expected typically for lightweight structural concrete. The failure was slow and gradual, and due to the fact that all the beams were under-reinforced, it resulted in the first failure manner being in the tensile support. This was before the concrete screen was crushed due to lading in the bending zone. To find a predicted value for the beams ‘ ultimate minutes, a rectangular emphasis block analysis was used as recommended by the BS 8110 criterion. Once the experiment was complete, the existent trial beams ‘ ultimate minutes were approximately 22 % to 31 % greater when compared to the predicted minutes for normal weight concrete. These trials demonstrate that the BS 8110 criterion is utile for supplying a conservative anticipation for finding ultimate minutes in singly reinforced AS concrete beams. The warp ensuing from lading is a critical parametric quantity in design of a structural member. When using the expected service burden to the samples, which includes the dead burden and unrecorded burden, the mid span warp obtained was 11.43mm, 11.62mm, and 11.87mm for the three trial beams. Despite the lower elastic modulus for AS concrete compared with other lightweight concretes, the design service burden warps observed were compliant with the BS 8110 criterion. The experimental warps were in the part of 252 – 263 millimeter. The moment/deflection graphs for the three beams are shown in figure 9.
Figure 9. Moment-deflection curves for the trial beams.
From the consequences of this survey, it has been determined that Prunus dulcis shell is compliant with needed criterions for usage as an sum for inclusion in production of lightweight structural concrete. It particularly has potency for usage in applications where a low to medium strength is required, and low cost is necessary, such as in low-cost lodging. By incorporating this waste stuff into concrete mixtures, non merely can a decrease in concrete weight and production costs be achieved, but there is the added benefit that the ecological cyclic system can be preserved. Based on this research survey, the undermentioned decisions can be drawn:
The rating of the workability of fresh AS concrete by the slack trial was 6 to 8 centimeter, which showed that the AS concrete had a medium grade of workability. It could hence be defined as feasible concrete.
The air content per centum in the concrete, which was 4.2 – 4.9 % , could be reduced by optimizing the step curve. However, the air content in the AS concrete is within the allowable scope of 4-8 % recommended by ACI 213R-87.
The compressive strength of the AS concrete after 28 yearss was 32.5 MPa, which satisfies the demand for structural lightweight concrete.
Despite the changing forms of AS sum atoms, the bonding belongingss of AS concrete are up to the criterion as shown by other normally used lightweight structural concretes. It should be noted that this bond and its mechanical belongingss were obtained by utilizing a cement content of 450 kg/m3.
Although AS concrete has a low modulus of snap of 6.73 GPa, full graduated table beam trials showed that the warp under the expected design service tons was acceptable. The ratios of the effectual span length to maximum mid span warp ranged from 252 to 263. This is compliant with the acceptable scopes specified in BS 8110.
From the experiment, it has been shown that the existent experimental values of ultimate minutes for the trial beams were 22 % to 31 % higher than those predicted by the BS 8110 criterion. The criterion can hence be used to give a conservative estimation.
ACI 213R-87, Guide for Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, American Concrete Institute.
ASTM C330, Standard Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards ASTM C 469-87a, Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson ‘s Ratio of Concrete in Compression, Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
BS 1881, Part 116, Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes, British Standards Institution, London.
BS 1881, Part 125, Methods for Mixing and Sampling Fresh Concrete Samples in the Laboratory, British Standards Institution, London.
BS 8110, Structural usage of Concrete Part 1, Code of Practice for Design and Construction, British Standards Institution, London, 1985.
Chitharanjan N. , Sundararajan R. and Manoharan P.D. , Development of Aerocrete: A New Lightweight High Strength Material ” , The International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete, 10, 27-38, 1988.
Collepardi M. , Coppola L. , Cerulli T. , Ferrari G. , Pistolesi C. , Zaffaroni P. , and Quek F. , A«Zero Slump Loss Superplasticized ConcreteA» , Proceedings of the Congress “ Our World in Concrete and Structures ” , Singapore, pp 73-80, 1993.
Mannan M.A. and Ganapathy C. , Behavior of Lightweight Concrete in Marine Environments ” , Proceedings of the International Conference on Ocean Engineering, Chennai, India, 409-413, 2001.
Mindess S. , Young J.F. and Darwin D. , Concrete, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, USA, 2003. Orangun C.O. , The Bond Resistance between Steel and Lightweight-Aggregate ( Lytag ) Concrete ” , Building Science, 2, 21-28, 1967.
Owens P.L. , Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete, Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, edited by J.L. Clarke, Blackie Academic & A ; Professional, London, 1993.