The Influence of Neighborhood on Fear of Crime on Streets Essay



Street is the most critical public topographic point of a metropolis. The character of street preponderantly influence by its vicinity, which spontaneously influence the Sense of safety of its user. One facet of sense of safety is fear of offense, which differ harmonizing to the individual’ dismay of sense of safety to being, or being portion of a offense. Peoples accidentally scan their immediate context for possible danger, by reading their next contexts’ marks for topographic points for wrongdoers and offense. A overplus of literatures have discussed the consequence of immediate context features of fright of offense with particular focal point on two positions ; either as environmental or societal. But many literatures on urban design, planning and architecture province that environmental and societal variables of a context doesn’t act individually. Both these variables influence strongly to add a sense to a topographic point. Therefore to analyze fright of offense, it is indispensable to analyze both of these variables. The survey found that some constabulary offense hot musca volitanss do non overlapped with the fright of offense musca volitanss identified by the populace, which lead the survey to analyze both of these constabularies offense hot musca volitanss and public identified fright of offense musca volitanss to understand this difference. A theoretical model with selected societal and environmental variables from past literatures on fright of offense and sense of safety used for the survey.

We will write a custom essay sample on
The Influence of Neighborhood on Fear of Crime on Streets Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Keywords:street, vicinity, sense of safety, fright of offense, environmental variables, societal variables



Chapter ONE: Introduction

A Fewer attending has paid to understand the consequence of vicinity context on fright of offense as sense of safety, in our context as south Asians. The street has become a topographic point in which most of the offense attempts and offenses are go oning. Fear of offense may born in many ways. A fright to go a victim of a offense or the human psychological science of hazard comes with the fright of offense can exemplify as different manners of fright of offense ( Fisher B. , Nasar J. L. , 1995 ) . The psychological barrier comes with the fright of offense bounds the single behaviour ( Kristina, S. , Ulf, E. , Naomi, K. , Lars, S. , Henrik, O. , Daniel, A. , 2015 ) in a infinite, their independency and pick, mobility, defeat with public infinites and vicinity and general life ( Abraham & A ; Maury, 1998 ) . And this besides impacts on individuals’ wellness and wellbeing ( Aneshensel. C.S. , Sucoff. C.A.. , 2015 ) ( Latkin. C.A. , Curry. A.D. , 2015 ) .

1.1. Aim

The purpose of this survey is to research the environmental and societal variables of vicinity in making a fright of offense on the street user. The degree of fright of a offense is different in our context comparison to other European context, where a overplus of literature have written sing the topic. Therefore this survey, examine the influence of vicinity context on fright of offense of public with a particular focal point on our metropolis vicinity and streets.

A overplus of literatures were studied and used as the theoretical footing to develop the survey. As an initial effort in our context to analyze the influence of vicinity context on ‘fear of crime’ on streets, it is expected that this novel survey will go an interesting topic to acquire more attending in front to elate the street character of our urban context.

1.2. Undertaking Justification

Since it affect the comfort and safety of people and society, Fear of offense is a critical topic to be studied. Therefore, many bookmans have stated the importance of foregrounding what fright of offense meant for people and society, yet all the literatures have written on concentrating on western context. As an Asiatic state with a different urban scene and a different societal context it is indispensable to extent these literatures and theories to our context ( Ratnayake, 2013 ) . Therefore this survey is done as a novel survey focused on placing vicinity variables of metropolis vicinity which influence fright of offense in our context.

1.3. Restrictions

Sense of safety on streets may include physical amendss and menaces from vehicle accidents, hurts by uneven paving edges/ ditches on the tract and etc… early bookmans have reference that these events do non see to the offense sector ( Garafalo, 1981 ; Nasar, Fisher, & A ; Grannis, 1993 ) . Therefore, this paper besides does non see them as offenses.

Peoples experience sense of safety in relation to fear of offense at many degrees due to many variables in a context, vary from macro graduated table to the micro graduated table ( Fisher B. , Nasar J. L. , 1995 ) . This thesis chiefly focused on micro flat characteristics on immediate metropolis vicinity context around streets.

Harmonizing to the literature study, it was identified that the past constructs, theories of fright of offense have done in relation to two chief theoretical positions: as theories related to environmental design or theories related to socio-cultural variables. But most of these theories haven’t emphasized the importance of holding both of these positions. Most of them have drastically focused on a individual position. But Wilson & A ; Kelling ( 1982 ) and ( Jacobs J. , 1961 ) indirectly discuss the impact of both physical and socio-cultural facets of vicinity for sense of safety. Therefore in this survey certain selected cues/ variables quoted from these past literatures, were individually listed under environmental and societal classs for the survey.

Though there are a overplus of literatures have done, this is study lineations few selected past literatures done on fright of offense. A theoretical model created by sketching the wide theoretical attacks done on different degrees of fright of offense since the 1950s.

Yet all these literatures have written concentrating on Western vicinity contexts, which’s features and facets are different from our Asiatic context. Therefore the list of variables selected carefully for the survey to acquire a positive consequence.

In many literatures, streets found to be as a important fragment of unfastened public infinite and see as the most important symbol of the civic kingdom ( Jacobs J. , 1961 ) , ( Kostof, 1992 ) , ( Alexander, 1977 ) , ( Tuan, 1977 ) . Peoples use streets for many grounds ; societal, functional, recreational and other activities. Therefore streets has become the topographic point where people largely expose, yet most safe and most insecure among many other public kingdoms. Neighborhood is a cardinal term used in every literature on public infinites, or urban kingdoms, in this survey Kotahena with a “mixed – usage neighborhood” selected as the location for the survey.

The often selected participants ( 20 to 35 samples for each topographic point ) were the street users found from the instance survey country. Who were interviewed utilizing direct interviews with close-end and open-end inquirers about their fright of victimization of offense in relation to their context and selected fear musca volitanss.

All The participants selected are above 15 old ages age, children’s’ remark has non been used for the study. Their manner of seen things is rather interesting but different from the mature grownups ( Tuan, 1977 ) , particularly the manner they response to vicinity variables, particularly relate to fear of offense is different ( Mehta V. , 2013 ) .

1.4. Sequence of the Study

Second chapter discuss about street and metropolis vicinity by foregrounding the influence of societal and environmental variables of the vicinity towards the experiential perceptual experience of the user.

Third chapter focal point on literatures on sense of safety and fright of offense, which discussed under societal and environmental variables.

Fourth chapter presents the location of survey, the theoretical model and the methods of analysis. A list of Myriad methods including Walk-by observations, Direct observations, Pedestrian counts, field notes and Surveys utilizing Photography, Short picture, Sketches, head maps and drawings, Face-to-face interviews with occupants, workers, Sellerss, clients and visitants of the streets used for informations aggregation.

Inquirers were done for two phases during the procedure. First phase of inquirers was given with a layout of the country, in which the participants marked the fear musca volitanss under four classs as, safe, relatively safe, spot insecure, and highly insecure. Then a set of images including closed terminal and unfastened terminal inquirers given to place their degree of fright of offense. Second phase of questionnaire included both unfastened terminal and closed terminal inquirers, which used to place the consequence of selected variables on each topographic point.

Fourth chapter presents the informations under three phases. First it identified six blocks for the survey utilizing two layouts shows offense hot musca volitanss ( harmonizing to constabulary offense records of Kotahena, 2014 ) and fright of offense related safe – insecure musca volitanss identified by persons through the first phase of the questionnaire. The 2nd phase of the analysis identified the societal and environmental variables in each block. The information of each variable nowadayss as graphical presentations, shows peoples’ activity behaviour ( remaining, sitting, garnering ) with the clip, denseness gender, and age fluctuations and topographic points, and street elements along the street ( trees, street furniture, seating, stairss, pavement cafe , light stations, H2O pat, unfastened evidences, signage, fencings and walls, graffito, parking ) , And Graphical informations ( studies, subdivisions, lifts ) present constructing quality and types ( ill maintained, glass frontages, clean walls, retails, commercial, residential, office ) and the H: W ratio between perpendicular deepness of volumes and street breadths ( constructing tallness, and unfastened land ) . During the 3rd phase, the inquirers participants analyzed harmonizing to the replies they provided during the inquirer. Purpose of this phase is to give a deepness to the analysis by detecting the experiential perceptual experience of the user.


Alexander, C. ( 1977 ) .A Pattern Language: Towns: Buildings: Construction.New York: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C. ( 1979 ) .The Timeless Way of Building.New York: Oxford University Press.

Aneshensel, C.S. , Sucoff, C.A. ( 1996, December ) .The vicinity context of adolescent mental wellness. PubMed.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Aneshensel. C.S. , Sucoff. C.A.. ( 2015, 02 01 ) .The vicinity context of adolescent mental wellness.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Appleton, J. ( 1975 ) .The experience of landscape.New York: New york: John Wiley.

Appleyard, D. ( 1981 ) .Livable Streets. .Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Bonnes† , M. , Mannetti† , L. , Gianfranco, S. , Giancarlo, T. ( 1990 ) . The metropolis as a multi-place system: An analysis of people—urban.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37-65.

Brohier. , L. ( 2000 ) .Kolompura Ourawurthaya.Boralesgamuwa: Visidunu Publishers.

Canter, D. ( 1977 ) .The Psychology of Place.New York: St. Martin ‘s Press.

Cesar, S. , Laura, V. , Anabel, V. ( 2000 ) . Self-protective behavior against offense in urban scenes: An empirical attack to exposure and victimization theoretical accounts. Spain: University of the Basque Country.

Farrall S. , Gray E. , Jackson J. ( 2007 ) .Speculating the Fear of Crime: The Cultural and Social Significance of Insecurities about Crime.England: Institute of Law, Politics and Justice, Keele University Press, Staffordshire, England.

Fisher B. , Nasar J. L. ( 1995, May 1 ) . Fear Spots in Relation to Microlevel Physical Cues: Researching the Overlooked.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 214-239.

Foster, S. , Giles-Corti, B. , Knuiman, M. ( 2015, January 20 ) . from Neighbourhood design and fright of offense: A social-ecological scrutiny of the correlatives of residents’ fright in intelligence uburb an lodging developments: S. Fosteretal./Health & A ; Place16 ( 2010 ) 1156–1165

Gehl, J. ( 1987 ) .Life Between Buildings.New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

Gemzoe, L. ( 2008 ) .Public Spaces for Public Life: Seattle 2008.Seattle: GEHL Architects ApS.

Hall, E. T. ( 1996 ) .The Hidden Dimension.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Helle L. S. , Sia K. , Prof Nancy R. , Todd V. ( 2010 ) .Vicinities.Kobenhavn: Gehl Architects.

Jacobs, A. ( 1993 ) .Great Streets.Cambridge, MA: : The MIT Press.

Jacobs, J. ( 1961 ) .The Death and Life of Great American Cities.Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.

Jacobs, J. ( 1984 ) .The Death and Life of Great American Cities.New York: Richard Clay ( S.E.Aia ) Pte Ltd.

Jorgensen, L. J. , Ellis, G. D. , Ruddell E. ( 2012, May 20 ) .Fear Percepts in Public Parks: Interactions of Environmental Concealment, the presence of people Recreating, and Gender.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Kostof, S. ( 1992 ) .The City Assembled: The Elementss of Urban Form through History.Boston: Brown & A ; Co.

Kristina, S. , Ulf, E. , Naomi, K. , Lars, S. , Henrik, O. , Daniel, A. ( 2015, January 30 ) .Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behaviour: The Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity ( SNAP ) survey.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Kristina, S. , Ulf, E. , Naomi, K. , Lars, Skogc. , Henrik, O. , Daniel, . ( 2011, March 4 ) .Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behaviour: The.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Langer, S. K. ( 1958 ) .Doctrine in a New Key.New York: Mentor Books.

Latkin, C.A. , Curry, A.D. ( 2003, March ) .Nerve-racking vicinities and depression: a prospective survey of the impact of vicinity upset.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Latkin. C.A. , Curry. A.D. ( 2015, 01 30 ) .Nerve-racking vicinities and depression: a prospective survey of the impact of vicinity upset.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Lynch, K. ( 1960 ) .The Image of the City.Ma: MIT Press.

Lynch, K. ( 1984 ) .Good City Form.Ma: MIT Press.

Madanipour, A. ( 1996 ) .Design of Urban Space.New York: Wiley.

Maslow, A. ( 1954 ) .Motivation and Personality.New York: Harper and Row.


Mehta, V. ( 2013 ) .The Street ; A Quintessential Social Public infinite.New York: Routledge.

Moudon, A. V. ( 1987 ) .Public Street for Public Use.New York: Columbia University Press.

Mumford, L. ( 1964 ) .he Highway And The City.London: Secker & A ; Warbug.

Nasar, J. L. , Jones, K. M. ( 1997 ) . Landscapes of fright and emphasis.Environment and Behavior, 291-323.

Permentier. ( 2015, 01 30 ) .Neighbourhood Reputation.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Permentier, M. ( 2012, May 24 ) . Neighbourhood Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, 85-89.

Rapoport, A. ( 1977 ) .Human Aspects of Urban Form.Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Ratnayake, R. ( 2013 ) . Environmental characteristics and sense of safety.The Sustainable City, 377-388.

Ratnayake, R. ( 2013 ) .Fear of Crime inn the Built Environment.

Ratnayake, R. W. ( 2012 ) .Sense of Safety and Planning and Design Policies.Australia: La Trobe University Press.

Ricoeur, P. ( 1967 ) .Fallible Man: Doctrine of the Will.Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.

Ross CE, M. J. ( 2015, 02 01 ) .Neighborhood disadvantage, upset, and wellness.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Ross, C. E. , Mirowsky, J. ( 2015, 02 01 ) .Neighborhood disadvantage, upset, and wellness.Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // hypertext transfer protocol: //

Rudofsky, B. ( 1969 ) .Streets for Peoples.New York: Doubleday.

Rudofsky, B. ( 1969 ) .Streets for Peoples.New York: Doubleday.

Soholt, H. ( 2014 ) . Life, Space and Buildings- turning the traditional planning procedure upside down.Walk21-V Cities for Peoples, The Fifth International Conference on Walking.Kobenhavn.

Somarathna G. , P. V. ( 1883 ) .Kotahena Riot.

Thomas, M. ( 1991 ) .The death of public infinite.

Tuan, P. ( 1977 ) .Space and Place, The position of experience.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Warr, M. ( 1990 ) . Dangerous state of affairss: Social context and fright of victimization.Social Forces, 891-702.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out