The Measurement Of The Amount Of Impairment Of Many Types Of Assets Accounting Essay

The purpose of this essay is to discourse, the measuring of the sum of damage of many types of assets in companies describing. This essay is structured as follows. In the first subdivision, this essay will try to analyze methodological analysis of an damage in conformity with IAS 36. An plus is described as impaired and IAS 36 requires it to be recorded as an impairment loss when the plus ‘s carrying sum exceeds its recoverable sum.

In the 2nd portion, this essay will try to convey to illume on the jobs and restrictions of the impairment proving peculiarly it will demo some subjective points of the IAS36 and how they can be manipulated. Finally, the last subdivision will sum up the chief subjects discussed in the chief organic structure.

We will write a custom essay sample on
The Measurement Of The Amount Of Impairment Of Many Types Of Assets Accounting Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

The chief thing in any information – its significance.

Hemorrhoids of Numberss, if they do non take to solutions –

unpointed outgo of energy and resources.

( Y. V. Sokolov )

Main Body

IAS 36 defines the processs that the company uses to account for its assets at a value non transcending their recoverable sum. Asset is carried at a value in surplus of its recoverable history if its carrying sum exceeds the measure that will be recovered through usage or sale of this plus. In this instance the plus is considered impaired and the sum of the damage requires acknowledgment of the loss.

Standard applies to the integrating of the undermentioned assets:

land, edifices, machinery and equipment ;

investing belongings, which is estimated to cost ;

intangible assets ;

good will ;

investings in subordinates, associates and jointly controlled companies

valued at historical cost ;

Assetss that are recorded at revalued sums under ( IAS 16 ) and ( IAS 38 ) .

Standard does non use to the history of the undermentioned assets:

militias ( IAS 2 ) ;

assets originating from building contracts ( IAS 11 ) ;

deferred revenue enhancement assets ( IAS 12 ) ;

assets originating from employee benefits ( IAS 19 ) ;

fiscal assets ( IAS 39 ) ;

investing belongings, which is measured at just value ( IAS 40 ) ;

assets related to agricultural activity measured at just

value ( IAS 41 ) ;

Assetss that arose out of insurance contracts ( IAS 4 ) ;

assets held for sale ( IAS 5 ) .

Identifying an plus that may be impaired

At each balance sheet day of the month, all assets are tested for damage ( book value

plus may be higher than the merchandising monetary value or value of the plus ) . ( IAS ) 36

contains a list of external and internal marks of damage. If there are

damage is necessary to find the recoverable sum of an plus.

In regard of the undermentioned types of intangible assets recoverable sum is determined yearly, irrespective of damage:

intangible assets with indefinite utile lives ;

intangible assets that are non available for usage ;

Goodwill originating on acquisition of companies.

In mensurating whether there is any mark that an assets may be impaired an entity should see, as a lower limit, the undermentioned indicants:

External grounds of damage

diminution in market value ;

inauspicious alterations in the technological, market, economic and legal conditions ;

addition in market involvement rates ;

monetary value portions below net plus value of the company.

The internal grounds of damage

moral or physical obsolescence ;

plus involved in the restructuring procedure, whether capable to retirement ;

economic indexs for the coverage period, worse than expected

This list is non thorough. Further marks of damage may bespeak that it should revise the utile life of the plus method of depreciation or resale value.

Measuring the recoverable sum

IAS 36 defines recoverable sum as the highest value of the “ just value less cost to sell gross revenues “ and “ operational value ” of an plus or cash-generating unit.

If the plus ‘s just value less costs to sell or the value of its usage exceeds the transporting value of the plus, the recoverable sum plus is non calculated. Asset is non impaired. However if the plus ‘s just value less costs to sell can non be defined, so the plus ‘s recoverable sum is the value of its usage. For assets capable to disposal, the recoverable sum is the just value less costs to sell.

The just value less costs to sell

If there is understanding on the sale of an plus, company should utilize the monetary value specified in the understanding less costs of disposal. Current and operating expense costs are non included in the cost of disposal of an plus. If there is an active market for the plus, company should utilize a market value of the plus less disposal costs. Under the market monetary value understand the current command monetary value, if available, otherwise company must use the most recent dealing monetary value. If an active market for the plus is losing, organisation should utilize the most optimum monetary value of an plus ( best estimation ) , less costs of disposal.

Value in Use

The computation of the value of the plus shall include the undermentioned elements:

appraisal of future hard currency flows, which the organisation expects to have from plus ;

outlooks sing possible alterations in the sum and timing of these hard currency flows ;

clip value of money provided by the current market riskless rate per cent ;

allowance for the uncertainness inherent in the plus ;

Other factors such as illiquidity, reflected market participants

set uping the value of future hard currency flows, which the organisation

expects to have from the plus.

Cash flow planning should be based on sensible and justified premises, the latest budgets and prognosiss, and extrapolated for periods that do non mention to the period of the budget. IAS36 admits that the budgets and prognosiss non compiled for a period transcending 5 old ages. To cipher hard currency flows for the period more than 5 old ages, projections and estimations are extrapolated from earlier budgets and prognosiss. Guide must measure the rationality of these premises, look intoing grounds for the differences between past projected hard currency flows and existent hard currency flows.

Discount rate

Main points of price reduction rate are that it should be pre-tax rate that replicates bing market appraisals of the clip value of money and hazard particular to the plus. It should non mirror hazard to which prospect hard currency flows estimations have been adjusted.

Recognition of an impairment loss.

An impairment loss should be recognized merely if the recoverable plus value is less than its book value. Loss on damage of assets is recorded as an disbursal in the net income and loss history ( if the plus is carried at a revaluated sum, which reflects alterations straight in equity ) . Recognition of an impairment loss is an accommodation of future depreciation tax write-offs.


Read phonetically

Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary

The recoverable sum should be determined for each single plus, if possible. If it is impossible to find the recoverable sum for each single plus, so

find the recoverable sum of the cash-generating unit. Cash Generating Unit – is the smallest identifiable group of assets that cause hard currency flow and it is mostly independent from the hard currency influxs from other assets or groups of assets. CGU should foremost considered intangible assets such as good will, than touchable assets such as corporate assets.

Goodwill is positive difference of cost of acquisition and just value of net touchable assets. Harmonizing to IFRS 3 it must utilize accusal method in every combination. Cash Generating unit to which good will has been allocated shall be tested for damage at least one time a twelvemonth by comparing the transporting value of cash-generating unit including good will with its recoverable sum: If the recoverable sum of cash-generating unit exceeds the book value, so bring forthing unit and the good will related to this 1, do non deprecate. However if the transporting value of cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable sum, the company should acknowledge an impairment loss.

Subjectivity of the measuring of the sum of damage of many types of assets. Listen

Read phonetically

Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary


Read phonetically

Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary


Read phonetically


Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary

Refering the subjectiveness of the procedure and the variables used in the rating procedure, no dependable steps can be derived from the trial ( Schultze, 2005: 279 ) .

Important subjectiveness of the Impairment testing is that different attacks are used to find just value of an plus such as available market monetary value, monetary value of similar assets, present value techniques and other rating methods. Therefore users of fiscal information should believe that market values are non ever clear. As the consequence just value appraisals are founded on subjective determination.

As it was discussed supra, the trial for damage of long-run assets is based on

IAS 36. At the first phase of impairment testing, the largest of the estimations is determined for each object of long-run assets 1 ) Value in usage, defined as the present value of future hard currency flows generated by the plus for its intended usage, or 2 ) cyberspace gross revenues monetary value, defined as the difference between the possible sale monetary value and the estimated costs to sell. Obviously, the good will does non bring forth independent from other assets hard currency flow, so the value of its usage ca n’t be determined. Besides, good will can non be sold because of its inseparable from the group. Therefore, good will ‘s impairment testing is in the country of subjective determinations and appraisals.

Goodwill ‘s impairment trial requires complete accepting of methodological analysis for valuing assets and liabilities. A quoted market monetary value, that is available merely in the active market, should be used for the measuring as the best cogent evidence of just value. Bens ( 2006 ) declares that just values are non readily accessible for many of the describing units to which good will was assigned ; directors use a confident sum of discretion when using the impairment trial. Using the theoretical account of just value for assets and liabilities, which are non actively traded, make accounting studies more subjective. If quoted market monetary values are non available, appraisals of just value should be supported by the best available information, taking into history monetary values for similar assets and liabilities and utilizing suited rating techniques, such as the present value, matrix pricing, option adjusted spread theoretical account, option-pricing theoretical accounts and cardinal analysis ( Lander and Reinstein, 2003: 228 ) . Directors utilizing IAS36 accounting impairment trial make a momentous sum of subjective determinations when they prepare accounting information to stockholders. The deficiency of market-based appraisals is likely to increase uncertainness and this reduces the efficiency of information ( Dunse et al. , 2004: 241 ) Besides the appraisal of just value involves the organisation to doing a figure of guesss and appraisals, such as future net incomes, hereafter grosss and chance of results this state of affairs may take to possible net incomes uses. ( Sevin and Schroeder 2005: 48 )

The measuring of the sum of damage of many types of assets abounds in subjective determinations. The manner on gauging just values for assets and liabilities to boot better the possibility of originative accounting. In malice of the fact that some research workers argue that the chief consequence of application of the IAS36 is to supply users of fiscal statements with better information, the stated jobs refering Impairment testing should be taken into consideration. One of major ground why the new criterion was applied was to better the information content refering the good will write-downs. At this point it is deserving to believe does IAS36 truly provide with better information about good will or is a new chance of originative accounting.


Read phonetically

Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary


Read phonetically

Dictionary – Position detailed dictionary



IAS 36 Impairment of Assets “ is applied to a big figure of assets recognized in the balance sheet. The chief aim of this criterion is to supply a realistic appraisal of the assets in the fiscal statements through acknowledgment of impairment losingss. This criterion was made to do fiscal studies of organisations more transparent for stockholders. However the measuring of the sum of damage of many types of assets has a batch of subjectiveness. The assignment wholly supportive with Sevin and Schroeder that those restrictions of the IAS36 are non able to forestall possible net incomes use by the director. Uncertainty of this criterion can cut down the efficiency of the fiscal studies. New IAS 36 is non perfect and there are many chances for originative accounting. Therefore, in the development of IAS it seems to be appropriate to alter non merely the International Financial Reporting Standards, but besides the really rules of readying of fiscal statements.


Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out