Towards an Integrated Management Accounting Approach Essay

Towards an Integrated Management Accounting Approach


We will write a custom essay sample on
Towards an Integrated Management Accounting Approach Essay
or any similar topic only for you
Order now

Accounting informations are the most of import beginning in doing of import executive determinations, advanced direction accounting techniques depend on edifice concern theoretical accounts that have feedback cringles to measure the impact of direction determinations on internal and external stakeholders, this cringle requires cooperation between clients, stockholders and employees.

Companies in the US and the UK have been slow in following the new concern theoretical accounts which depends on authorising employees by giving them more duty and wages, the ground for the hold is the use in the fiscal information that undermined the mechanism for honoring employees, Ezzamel, M, Lilley, S, Wilmott, H and Green, C ( 1995 )

2.Main Text:

2.1-The power of Peoples:

Employees are considered the most of import plus in the company. Rivals can copy the company’s engineerings, merchandises and direction manner. But No 1, nevertheless, can fit the extremely loyal, reliable and motivated employees who care. Peoples are the house ‘s stock of cognition and they are cardinal to any company ‘s competitory scheme and competitory advantage, employees if empowered is more of import that machines, investors and providers.

Corporations do non speak and make non make occupations, Well educated, empowered, and extremely motivated people are critical to the development and executing of the corporate schemes, particularly in today ‘s faster-paced and competitory universe, where senior direction entirely can no longer guarantee your house ‘s fight.

2.2-Why Employee Empowerment?

Peoples are the house ‘s most underutilized resource ; corporations use the cognition and the experience of their employees. In the new cognition economic system, independent entrepreneurship and enterprise is needed in order to last the current competitory markets. In today ‘s corporate competitory environment a director must work difficult towards prosecuting the organization’s employees towards accomplishing the aims of the organisation. Hierarchical organisational constructions and extremely skilled work force are determining new knowledge-based corporations. Directors are expected to execute more leading and coaching undertakings and work hard in order to supply employees with the necessary resources and working environment that they need to carry through the ends they ‘ve assigned to. In brief, directors work for their staff, and non the antonym.

Authorization is the oil that runs the procedure of larning. Talented and empowered rational capital is going the premier ingredient of organisational success. A critical characteristic of successful squads, particularly in knowledge-based corporations, is that they are invested with a important grade of authorization, or decision-making authorization.

Equally of import, employee authorization allow the company to derive the co-operation and the conformity of its employees, Hales, C ( 2000 ) authorization changes the directors ‘ precedences and leaves them with more clip to prosecute in more strategic determinations, visioning, and invention. This intelligent and productive division of responsibilities between airy leaders, concentrating on emerging chances, and empowered employees, running the concern unit twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours ( with inadvertence on the leader ‘s portion ) provides for a well-managed endeavor with strong growing potency.

The authorization theory is non new, it is really old, and many economic experts have talked about authorising employees as a manner of bettering the degree of end product and the profitableness of the company.

Empowering employees makes them experience that they are of import to the company, it helps develop a positive attitude to employees and cut down staff turnover and increase productiveness.

Empowering employees is the lone manner in which capitalist economy could last the crisis of go oning struggle between direction and employees, it is the lone manner to make people’s capitalist economy, Saunders, P & A ; Harris, C ( 1994 ) .

2.3Empowerment and doctrine:

The roots of the authorization had come from doctrine, philosophers ever dreamed about accomplishing justness, democracy and societal equality.

For a long clip, people lived and they are still populating in a society that does non administer wealth and power equally among its members.

Authorization is seeking to reply the inquiries that have been arisen from the political doctrine.

“Human existences ever questioned the nature of power, the function of the citizen in the polis, and the accomplishment of justness in civic life. From this vantage point, authorization is a continuance of this theoretical hunt for elusive, but critical, replies to timeless human questions” , Spreitzer, G & A ; Doneson, D ( 2005 ) .

Many research workers consider empowerment the natural completion of democracy ; empowerment most if non all the employees should be seen as the lone manner to democratizing corporations.

Authorization is non about whether or non to democratize corporations, authorization is about taking the barriers that prevent employees from engagement by altering organisational policies and processs.

Employees should develop a sense of duty and committedness while managers should listen and give existent powers to employees.

Employees should exert their power non because directors have agreed to give it to them but because they are portion of the society that give them right to descent criterion of life by bearing their duties.

2.4-How to authorising employees and accomplish justness:

Empowering employees includes sharing power and wealth in the organisation.

  1. Sharing net income: sharing net income is one of the most of import tools that direction of corporations normally uses in making inducements to employees to work harder and be a existent portion of the corporation, sharing net income takes the forms of “profit sharing schemes” , “stock options” , “Employee stock ownership” , “pensions” and “staff inducement schemes” , Sesil, J, Kruse, D, and Blasi, J ( 2001 ) .

Net income sharing depends normally in its computations on accounting values, accounting has been capable to broad uses in the last few old ages, this has created a crisis of assurance between the direction and the employees, employees do non swear their directors when it comes to ciphering their net income portion.

Employees and trade brotherhoods are likely to hold done their portion prior to subjecting a net income sharing demand. The inquiry is ever ‘how much can the company would wish to pay? ‘ replying this inquiry will depend on the company’s balance sheet and net income and loss statement. It is assumed that the larger the net incomes, the more the company can afford to pay? Therefore, company managers instruct their comptrollers to describe lower instead than higher net incomes in order to understate the outlooks of the employees and their trade brotherhoods, Simon, J ( 1998 ) .

  1. Sharing power: harmonizing to the economic literature, employees used to acquire rewards or wages because they do non take the hazard that the capitalist or the enterpriser normally takes, but things have changed because sharing net income should take to sharing power, employees should take more duty should they desire to acquire some of the net income, employees are assigned more than their traditional functions, employees are assigned more undertakings that the center and the low-level directors used to make, employees see themselves making more than earlier and acquire paid little, this state of affairs has been created by the dependance on accounting information in ciphering net income portions for employees..

Employees should portion in taking determinations and should be incentivised by sharing in the net income

2.5 What is the impact of accounting use on employee authorization?

Directors are straight responsible for the undermining of assurance between the employees and the directors.

Directors who consider their corporations a profit-making machine that should work everything even their employees are sabotaging the chances of their companies in the long-run by take downing the degree of committedness and the productiveness of the employees to their organisation.

Empowering employees depends on promoting employees to take on more duty and authorization in order to be more productive and acquire higher wage.

When employees feel that the net income of the company has been underestimated in order to pay less rewards or net income portions to employees, that will make confusion in the corporation, employees will experience that they have been cheated and they have worked for nil, employees will shortly seek to draw out of the duties that they have been seeking to set about.

When this happens, alteration plans will be disrupted, employee’s committedness will be undermined and the resources of the company that have been invested to develop the employees will be wasted because the employees of the company will seek non to work every bit difficult as before and seek to be less productive.

When senior directors realise that their employees are seeking to draw out, they will seek to coerce their employees to make what they were non required to make under their contractual committednesss. This will do senior directors depend on junior directors to oversee the work of the employees.

Directors will get down directing confounding messages to blend the internal committednesss of the employees with their external committednesss of the employees, Argyris, C ( 1998 ) .

Internal committednesss originate from the motive that the net income sharing outputs ; internal committedness bases for authorization while external committedness arise from the contractual conformity Argyris, C ( 1998 ) .

Change programmes will neglect because managers will be given to cut down the employee liberty and enforce command-type direction on them.

Senior and in-between directors intercession will make an uncertainness in the significance of authorization.

Colin Hales found that senior and in-between directors will be unsure about what to authorise, how to authorise and when to authorise,

Empowering usually will be emptied from its existent significance and it will be turned to redistributing the authorization between senior and middle-level directors.

Empowering normally leads to give junior directors more powers and give employees more duties.

Junior and middle-level directors have an intrinsic involvement in hindering authorization because it will call off their occupations, those directors will seek to curtail the freedom of their employees and hinder their enterprise.

Junior and middle-level directors ever misunderstand the policies and the processs of making good authorization atmosphere in the organisation.

Not merely that but besides, in-between direction attempts to rewrite the policies and the processs in a manner that suits its involvements and maintain its powers.

2.6How Empowerment plants in pattern?

In instance the company was doing immense net incomes, managers will be tempted to undervalue the net incomes and give the employees less than what they really deserve.

In instance the company was doing less than expected net incomes or losingss, managers will set some of the incrimination on employees and inquire them to work harder therefore making more for nil.

In that sense, authorization will take to more undertakings and less power to employees.

In any instance, the senior direction is seeking to increase the outlooks of the employees in order to increase their part to net incomes prior to their net income sharing demands ( fiscal consequences ) while seeking to diminish the outlooks of the employees after doing net incomes ( fiscal consequences ) . This displacement in policy prior and post net income is doing harm to the productiveness of labor in the long-run and detaining alteration in organisations that would profit all stakeholders.

This displacement in policy is attributable to the nature of authorization, as we explained earlier ; empowerment depends on motive and internal committedness. Motivation and internal committedness could non be specified by contractual relationship between the direction and the employees, that is why some CEOs attempt to work the good connotations of their employees.

In several surveies, research workers showed that authorization had failed in heightening employee liberty, Harley, B ( 1999 ) , the uncertainness ( policy displacement ) , that the senior and in-between directors, have created unbroken employees unable and unwilling to exert their new powers.

2.7What is the impact of authorization on trade brotherhoods?

Employee net income engagement strategies should be designed to weaken trade brotherhoods and construct a more co-operative attack between the direction and the employees.

We have to retrieve that the corporation and the employee ( participants ) prefer to play a competitory game if each one of them prefers to minimise the addition of the other while the corporation and its employees ( participants ) prefer to play a co-operative game when they could both maximize their additions Rapoport, A ( 1966 ) .

In many European states, trade brotherhoods have opposed profit-sharing strategy because it individualise the relationship between the employee and the direction and it weakens solidarity and Bolshevism, D’Art, D & A ; Turner, T ( 2002 ) .

Empirical research showed that authorization has led to the weakening of trade brotherhoods in Norse states when power and wealth were distributed in a merely manner among employees.

In the ideal instance of no use and perfect justness, employee authorization should take to the riddance of trade brotherhoods and maximizing the additions of each side, it is true that trade brotherhoods disturb production and seek to minimise the additions of the direction in order to acquire more additions to the employees.

Manipulating fiscal informations is a beginning of beef uping trade brotherhoods and doing struggle between the direction and the employees.

2.8 Why depending on accounting information fails authorization:

Depending on accounting information is non plenty ; accounting expressions to the employees as an disbursal.

We have explained above that employees are now considered portion of the assets that the company possesses.

Assetss are normally investings that yield income beyond one accounting period.

Stockholders that have financed the buying of the long-run assets are rewarded with a larger portion of net incomes and they are rewarded for more than one accounting period.

If direction would wish to acquire the full co-operation of the employees, it should honor its employees with significant net income portions in order to demo grasp for all the attempt that its employee have put in the organisation, Leonard, B ( 1994 ) .

Authorization will do employees work on undertakings that would pay off beyond the current accounting period.

When these undertakings pay off, employees may non be rewarded for them because the direction would non cognize that employees have contributed positively to this net income that has been made.

The direction should look for more merely step of employee part, accounting in its current form and repute is non the best manner to honor employees.


The struggle between direction and employees is non over yet ; it has been renewed after the accounting fiscal dirts, which happened in the wake of Enron prostration.

Directors are still seeking to maximize the short-run net income of their organisations by working authorization and doing employees make more work for nil.

Employee engagement in internal auditing of the organisation, which includes the accounting side and the non-accounting side, will better the assurance between the two sides.

Employees and their trade brotherhoods should get down seting force per unit area on the direction in order to mensurate the parts of labor that wage off beyond one accounting period and seek to happen ways of compensating that labor.

Increasing the assurance in the accounting informations will sideline the center and junior direction, which is seeking to set troubles in the face of authorization, and open the door unfastened in the face of more democratic and just corporations.

Our findings coincide with Hardy C. ; Leiba-O’Sullivan S ( 1998 ) findings, extinguishing the misinterpretation between the employees and the direction will do the authorization procedure win.


  1. Colin Hales ( 2000 ) : Management and Empowerment Programme ‘s. In “ Work, Employment & A ; Society ” vol. 14 no. 3, pp. 501-519.
  2. D’Art, D & A ; Turner, T ( 2002 ) : A comparative Analysis of net income sharing, public presentation and unionization in selected European states, Katholieke Universitate, Brussels.
  3. Ezzamel, M, Lilley, S, Wilmott, H and Green, C ( 1995 ) : Changing Directors and Managing Change, CIMA publication ( I have looked in the diary of direction surveies and have non found the article that you indicated because you have non given me a rubric and the deadline is tight, so I should non be apt for that, I have used this one alternatively ) .
  4. Harley, B ( 1999 ) : the myth of authorization: work administration, hierarchy and employee liberty in modern-day Australian workplaces. Work, Employment and Society, 13, 1999, pp. 41-66.
  5. Hardy C. ; Leiba-O’Sullivan Second: The power behind authorization: deductions for research and pattern, Human Relations, page 451-483, 1998.
  6. Leonard, B ( 1994 ) : Large return for award bucks-rewarding employees with hard currency, HR Magazine.
  7. Sesil, J, Kruse, D, and Blasi, J ( 2001 ) : Sharing Ownership Via Employee Stock ownership, Discussions Paper No. 2001/25, United Nations University.
  8. Simon, J ( 1998 ) : Why do companies utilize originative accounting? ,
  9. Argyris, C ( 1998 ) : Authorization: The Emperor ‘s New Clothes, Harvard Business Review, May-June 1998 pp. 98-105.
  10. Rapoport, A ( 1996 ) : Two Person Game theory, Dover Publications.
  11. Saunders, P & A ; Harris, C ( 1994 ) : Denationalization and Popular Capitalism, Buckingham Philadelphia: unfastened University imperativeness.
  12. Spreitzer, G & A ; Doneson, D ( 2005 ) : Contemplations on the past and hereafter of employee authorization, the enchiridion of organisational development, Thousands Oaks: Sage.

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out